پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 30 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 467 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,522 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,145,291 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,334,968 |
طراحی یک مدل رشد سازمانی در صنعت قطعه سازی خودرو با استفاده از رویکرد پویایی سیستم | ||
| پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 7، شماره 13، خرداد 1394، صفحه 6-6 اصل مقاله (337.75 K) | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| غفار تاری1؛ ناصر فقهی فرهمند* 2؛ هوشنگ تقی زاده3؛ علیرضا بافنده زنده4 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکترای گروه مدیریت، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران | ||
| 2نویسنده مسئول- دانشیار گروه مدیریت، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران | ||
| 3دانشیار گروه مدیریت، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران | ||
| 4استادیار گروه مدیریت، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 25 بهمن 1393، تاریخ بازنگری: 25 شهریور 1394، تاریخ پذیرش: 25 شهریور 1394 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| طراحی یک مدل رشد سازمانی در صنعت قطعه سازی خودرو با استفاده از رویکرد پویایی سیستم هدف این تحقیق طراحی یک مدل رشد سازمانی در صنعت قطعه سازی خودرو با استفاده از رویکرد پویایی سیستم می باشد. بدین منظور با مطالعات نظری و بررسی پیشینه تحقیق، مهمترین عوامل موثر در رشد شرکتها استخراج شده و از طریق یک پرسشنامه مهمترین آنها مشخص شده است. جامعه آماری تحقیق کلیه شرکتهای قطعه‌سازی عضو انجمن قطعه‌سازان استان آذربایجان شرقی شامل 186 شرکت می‌باشند که تعداد 126 شرکت بصورت تصادفی به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شده اند. برای جمع آوری اطلاعات جهت تعیین روابط بین متغیرها از مصاحبه های عمیق با خبرگان صنعت و دانشگاه استفاده شده و نمودار حلقه های علی ایجاد شده است و پس از بررسی اعتبار ساختار و رفتار مدل، سناریوهای حذف یارانه و تغییرات نرخ بهره بانکی شبیه سازی شده و اثرات آنها بر رفتار مدل مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| رشد شرکتها؛ مدل پویا؛ نمودار علت و معلولی؛ نمودار انباشت و جریان؛ ارزیابی سناریو | ||
| موضوعات | ||
| مرزهای نوظهور دانش در مدیریت اجرایی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| A model of organizational growth in automobile parts industry using the system dynamics approach | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| ghafar tari1؛ naser feghhi farahmand2؛ hoshang taghi zadeh3؛ alireza bafande zende4 | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Growth and profitability are of the main goals and strategic priorities for most companies which show the importance of corporate growth for senior managers. But despite the importance of firms’ growth in the business, it is very little known about the nature and manner of companies' growth. The aim of this study is to develop a model of organizational growth in automobile parts industry using the system dynamics approach. The research method is descriptive- analytical method. The research statistical population is all the members of auto parts producing association in East Azarbaijan province, Iran, including 186 firms of which 126 companies were randomly selected. A questionnaire with Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.897 is used to collect information to determine the most important variables in organizational development (system boundary). Then the relationships between variables have been identified with the use of experts view points (dynamic Hypothesis) and an organizational growth model is simulated using causal loop and flow diagrams. To test the validity of the model, the data of Charkheshgar Company are used and after model validation, two scenarios of subsidies elimination and changes of bank interest rate are simulated and their effects on the model behavior have been studied. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| firms’ growth, dynamic model, cause and effect diagram, stock and flow diagram, scenario evaluation | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
- Alfarano, S. and Milaković, M. (2008), Does classical competition explain the statistical features of firm growth?, Economics Letters, 101, 272–274.
- Barlas, Y. and Carpenter, S. (1990), Philosophical Roots of Model Validation: Two Paradigms, System Dynamics Review, 6(2), 148-166.
- Barlas, Y. (1989), Multiple Tests for Validation of System Dynamics Type of Simulation Models, European Journal of Operational Research, 42(1), 59-87.
- Barlas, Y. (1996), Formal Aspects of Model Validity and Validation in System Dynamics, System Dynamics Review, 12(3), 183- 210.
- Bianchi, C. (2013), Managing Small Business Sustainable Growth: a System Dynamics approach, http://www.academia.edu/1398257
- Bottazzi, G., Cefis, E., Dosi, G. (2002), Corporate growth and industrial structures: some evidence from the Italian manufacturing industries, Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 705–723.
- Cassia, L., Colombelli, A. and Paleari, S. (2009), Firms’ growth: Does the innovation system matter?, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 20, 211–220.
- Cefis, E., Cirrarelli, M., Orsenigo, L. (2001), The Growth of Firms: From Gibrat’s Legacy to Gibrat’s Fallacy, EPRIS Working Paper.
- Chowdhury, S. (2011), The moderating effects of customer driven complexity on the structure and growth relationship in young firms, Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 306-320.
- Coad, A. and Rao, R. (2008), Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors: A quantile regression approach, Research Policy, 37, 633–648.
- Coad A., Roa R. and Tamagni, F. (2011), Growth processes of Italian manufacturing firms, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 22(1), 54-70.
- Coad, A. and Teruel, M. (2013), Inter-firm rivalry and firm growth: Is there any evidence of direct competition between firms?, Industrial and Corporate Change, 22)2(, 397-425.
- Cochran, A.B. (1981), Small Business Mortality Rates, A Review of the literature, Journal of Small Business Management, 19(4),50-59.
- Comin, D. and Mulani, S. (2009), A theory of growth and volatility at the aggregate and firm level, Journal of Monetary Economics, 56, 1023–1042.
- Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., and Gartner, W. (2003), Arriving at the high-growth firm, Journal of Business Venturing, 18,189–216.
- European Commission, http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/enterprise_policy/sme_definition/index_en.htm
- Feeser, H.R., Willard, G.E. (1990), Founding strategy and performance: a comparison of high and low growth high tech firms, Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 87–98.
- Gil, P.M. (2010), Stylized facts and other empirical evidence on firm dynamics, business cycle and growth, Research in Economics, 64, 73-80.
- Goddard J., Tavakoli M. and Wilson J. (2009), Sources of variation in firm profitability and growth, Journal of Business Research, 62, 495–508.
- Hamidi Zadeh, M.R. (2000), System Dynamics, Tehran, Shahid Beheshti University Pub.
- Huynh, K.P., and Petrunia, R.J. (2010), Age effects, leverage and firm growth, Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 34, 1003–1013.
- Inderst, R., and Mueller, H.M. (2009), Early-stage financing and firm growth in new industries, Journal of Financial Economics, 93, 276–291.
- Jang, S. (2011), Growth-focused or profit-focused firms: Transitions toward profitable growth, Tourism Management, 32, 667- 674.
- Langberg, N. (2008), Optimal financing for growth firms, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 17, 379–406.
- Lee, Chang-Yang (2010), A theory of firm growth: Learning capability, knowledge threshold, and patterns of growth, Research Policy, 39, 278- 289.
- Lumpkin, J. R. and Ireland, R. D. (1988), Screening practices of new business incubators: The evaluation or critical success factors, American Journal of Small Business, 12(4), 59-81.
- Luttmer, E.G.J. (2010), On the Mechanics of Firm Growth, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Research Department Staff Report 440.
- Madhushi, M. and Tari, Gh. (2007), The effect of initial capital on survival of small and medium sized manufacturing firms in Iran, Knowledge and Development, 20, 147-166.
- Madhushi, M. and Nasiri A. (2011), The effects of industry specifications on survival of new firms, Journal of Executive Management, 38, 127-148.
- Mancke, R.B. (1974), Causes of interfirm profitability differences: a new interpretation of the evidence, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 88(2), 181–193.
- Marris, R. (1979), The Theory and Future of the Corporate Economy and Society, North-Holland Pub. Co./American Elsevier Pub. Co., New York: Sole Distributors for the USA and Canada/Amsterdam, New York.
- Marris, R., Mueller, D.C. (1980), The Corporation, competition, and the invisible hand, Journal of Economic Literature, 18(1), 32–63.
- Mudambi R. and Swift T. (2011), Proactive R&D management and firm growth: A punctuated equilibrium model, Research Policy, 40(3), 429-440.
- Nichter, S. and Goldmark, L. (2009), Small Firm Growth in Developing Countries, World Development, 37(9), 1453–1464.
- Park K. and Jang S. (2010), Firm growth patterns: Examining the associations with firm size and internationalization, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29, 368- 377.
- Park, K., and Jang, S. (2011), Mergers and acquisitions and firm growth: Investigating restaurant firms, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30, 141–149.
- Rahaman, M.M. (2011), Access to financing and firm growth, Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(3), 709-723.
- Shi, T., Gill, R. (2005), Developing effective policies for the sustainable development of ecological agriculture in China: the case study of Jinshan County with a systems dynamics model, Ecological Economics, 53(2), 223-246.
- Sterman JD. (2000), Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world, New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Tari, Gh. (2007), The effects of firm specifications on survival of SMEs in Iran, M.A. dissertation, Mazandaran University, Iran.
- Titus VK, et al. (2011), Aligning strategic processes in pursuit of firm growth, Journal of Business Research, 64(5), 446-453.
- WIPO, How can patent office’s encourage inventive and innovative activities? http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/innovation/en/wipo_ifia_bue_00/wipo_ifia_bue_00_11.doc
- Wöhrl, R., Hüsig, S., and Dowling, M. (2009), The interaction of R&D intensity and firm age: Empirical evidence from technology-based growth companies in the German “Neuer Markt”, Journal of High Technology Management Research, 20, 19–30. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,859 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,418 |
||