دانشگاه مازندران

 آمار

تعداد نشریات30
تعداد شماره‌ها467
تعداد مقالات4,519
تعداد مشاهده مقاله7,144,849
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله5,334,662
زروکی, شهریار, اولیایی نسب, مرضیه. (1396). بررسی عوامل موثر بر رشد گردشگری با تاکید بر رقابت پذیری مقصد کاربردی از روش داده های تابلویی پویا و تخمین زن GMM-Sys. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 6(23), 77-104. doi: 10.22080/jtpd.2018.1765
شهریار زروکی; مرضیه اولیایی نسب. "بررسی عوامل موثر بر رشد گردشگری با تاکید بر رقابت پذیری مقصد کاربردی از روش داده های تابلویی پویا و تخمین زن GMM-Sys". پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 6, 23, 1396, 77-104. doi: 10.22080/jtpd.2018.1765
زروکی, شهریار, اولیایی نسب, مرضیه. (1396). 'بررسی عوامل موثر بر رشد گردشگری با تاکید بر رقابت پذیری مقصد کاربردی از روش داده های تابلویی پویا و تخمین زن GMM-Sys', پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 6(23), pp. 77-104. doi: 10.22080/jtpd.2018.1765
زروکی, شهریار, اولیایی نسب, مرضیه. بررسی عوامل موثر بر رشد گردشگری با تاکید بر رقابت پذیری مقصد کاربردی از روش داده های تابلویی پویا و تخمین زن GMM-Sys. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 1396; 6(23): 77-104. doi: 10.22080/jtpd.2018.1765

بررسی عوامل موثر بر رشد گردشگری با تاکید بر رقابت پذیری مقصد کاربردی از روش داده های تابلویی پویا و تخمین زن GMM-Sys

برنامه ریزی و توسعه گردشگری
مقاله 4، دوره 6، شماره 23، اسفند 1396، صفحه 77-104    اصل مقاله (731.41 K)
نوع مقاله: علمی-پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/jtpd.2018.1765
نویسندگان
شهریار زروکی* 1؛ مرضیه اولیایی نسب2
1استادیار گروه اقتصاد، دانشگاه مازندران
2دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه مازندران
تاریخ دریافت: 16 دی 1396،  تاریخ بازنگری: 10 اسفند 1396،  تاریخ پذیرش: 21 اسفند 1396 
چکیده
رقابت‌پذیری از مهم‌ترین مسائل در اقتصاد کشورهاست. در حوزه‌ی گردشگری نیز افزایش توان رقابتی می‌تواند با حفظ و افزایش سهم بازار منجر به افزایش رشد این بخش و به تبع آن رفاه ملی شود. پژوهش حاضر با هدف تحلیل عوامل موثر بر رشد بخش گردشگری با تاکید بر رقابت‌پذیری مقصد برای 63 کشور منتخب، طی دوره زمانی 2016-2007 انجام شده است. روش در برآورد مبتنی بر داده‌های تابلویی پویا و تخمین‌زن گشتاورهای تعمیم‌یافته سیستمی می‌باشد. نتایج حاکی از آن است که در مجموع اثر رقابت‌پذیری مقصد بر رشد ارزش افزوده حقیقی بخش گردشگری، اثری مثبت می‌باشد. البته نوع و اندازه‌ی آن در گروه‌های مختلف کشوری متفاوت است. بدین شرح که در تفکیک کشورها براساس ویژگی‌هایی نظیر صادرکننده‌گی سوخت؛ سطح درآمد؛ قرار داشتن در سطح ده کشور برتر از حیث تعداد گردشگران و میزان مخارج صورت گرفته در بخش گردشگری؛ و سطح توسعه‌یافتگی تفاوت معناداری در علامت و اندازه‌ی اثرگذاری رقابت‌پذیری مقصد بر رشد گردشگری مشاهده می‌شود. همچنین اثرپذیری رشد بخش گردشگری از سهم گردشگری در تولید ناخالص داخلی، جمعیت و نرخ ارز حقیقی مثبت است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
رشد گردشگری؛ رقابت‌پذیری مقصد؛ داده‌های تابلویی پویا
عنوان مقاله [English]
An Investigation of Effective Factors in the Growth of the Tourism with an Emphasis on Destination Competitiveness (Application of DPDM and GMM-Sys Estimator)
نویسندگان [English]
shahryar zaroki1؛ Marziyeh Owliaaynasab2
1Assistant Professor in Economics, University of Mazandaran
2M.A. in Economics, University of Mazandaran
چکیده [English]
Abstract:
Competitiveness is one of the most important issues in the economy of countries. In the field of tourism, the increase in competitive ability can lead to an increase in the growth of this sector and, consequently, on national welfare by maintaining and increasing market share. The purpose of this study was to analyze the factors influencing the growth of tourism sector with an emphasis on destination competitiveness for 63 selected countries during the period 2016-2007. The method was based on dynamic panel data and system generalized method of moment (GMM-Sys) estimator. The results indicated that destination competitiveness has a positive effect on the growth of the real value added of the tourism sector. Of course, its type and size vary from country to country. Thus, in the differentiation of countries based on features such as fuel exports, income levels; being in the top ten countries in terms of the number of tourists and the amount of expenditure in the tourism sector; and the level of development, there is a significant difference in the sign and size of the impact of destination competitiveness on tourism growth. Also, the growth of the tourism sector is positively related to the share of tourism in GDP, population and real exchange rate.
 
 
Introduction:
Today, the tourism industry is considered as one of the most important industries in the world and its increasing importance has led to the recognition of not only as an industry but also as a productive industry, with many potential in growth, development and positive economic effects. Accordingly, attention to the growth of the tourism sector and the factors that improve it are important. Competition is one of the issues that can affect this industry. The competitive environment created in the international tourism industry has revealed the need for attention to the competitive ability of tourism destinations. The competitiveness of a destination is attributed to its ability to compete effectively and profitable in the tourism market and refers to the amount of attraction of tourists in order to increase the prosperity of the destination. In other words, destination competitiveness is an economic concept that influences the sustainable development of the tourism industry. Regarding the importance of tourism and the growing competition between the countries of destination, the present study first seeks to answer the question of what factors affect the growth of the tourism sector in a select group of countries that are composed of different groups? Among the various factors, the main focus is on the destination competitiveness. On the other hand, different groups of the countries, due to their specific characteristics, can be different in type and size of the impact of destination competitiveness on tourism growth; and have a different role in attracting tourists. Therefore, the other goal of the present research is to answer the second question, which is essentially whether differences between different groups of countries have a significant difference in the type and size of the impact of destination competitiveness? In other words, if the differences such as the degree of development, the level of income, export of fuel, and the ranking of countries in the top (among the ten first countries in terms of tourism or the number of tourists entering or expenditure (investment) for the tourism sector) creates a kind of relationship between destination competitiveness and the growth of the tourism sector?
 
Materials and Methods:
In this study, according to previous studies and especially according to Webster and Ivanov (2014), the research model is as follows:
                                                    (1)
The relation (1) corresponds to the beta conditional convergence equation in which ΔLnTGDP as a dependent variable represents the change in the logarithm of the real value added of the tourism sector.  Represents the logarithm of first lag in the real value added of the tourism sector. The TTCI represents the destination competitiveness. TTCI have been extracted from reports published by the World Economic Forum (WEF). Tour Share is the share of tourism in GDP. POP is population size and RExR is the real exchange rate.
Index of  represents the time period of the research, covering the period from 2007 to 2016.  also represents 63 countries, including China, Germany, Japan, the USA, France, India, Italy, Spain, Mexico, Brazil, Australia, Canada, Turkey, Thailand, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Philippines, Switzerland, Indonesia, Hong Kong, Argentina, Sweden, UAE, Malaysia, Netherlands, Greece, Portugal, Norway, New Zealand, Iran, Singapore, South Africa, Belgium, Chile, Denmark, Poland, Finland, Nigeria, Peru, Egypt, Pakistan, Morocco, Venezuela, Vietnam, Ireland, Colombia, Qatar, Czech Republic, Hungary, Botswana, Croatia, Dominican Republic, Albania, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Romania, Panama, Kazakhstan Jordan, Costa Rica, Kuwait and Kenya. In order to answer the questions in the introduction section, the relationship (1) as the main model of research was redefined in six scenarios.
 
Conclusions
The results indicate that the share of tourism in GDP, population and real exchange rate have a positive effect on the growth of the tourism sector. In addition, the effect of the destination competitiveness on the growth of the value added of the tourism sector is positive. Of course, the type and size of the effect of this variable is different in the groups of the country. The growth of tourism in the fuel exporting countries has a different impact (both in size and in terms of sign) of the target competitiveness indicator. In fuel exporting countries, unlike other countries, destination competitiveness has a negative impact on tourism growth. In the high income countries, the impact of destination competitiveness on the growth is positive, while in the middle income countries, the effect is negative. Also in the countries which are among the first ten countries, both in terms of the number of tourists and in terms of expenditures (for the tourism sector), the impact of destination competitiveness on the growth of tourism is different from the other countries. So that, in this group of countries, the destination competitiveness influences the growth of the tourism sector more intensively. The level of development has also been effective in terms of size and sign of influence. As in developed countries and economies in transition, destination competitiveness has led to a decline in the growth of the tourism sector, while in developing countries; this has been accompanied by an increase in the growth of the tourism.
 
Keywords: Growth of the tTourism Sector, Destination Competitiveness, Dynamic Panel Data.
 

References:

Shaiki Tash, M., Mahmodpour, K. and Mohseni, H. (2016). A survey of affecting factors on the countries competitiveness with emphasis on Iran economy. Quarterly Journal of Fiscal and Economic Policies, 3(11): 155-188.
Farzin, M.R. and Nadalipour, Z. (2011). Identification of factors contributing to the competitive advantage of tourism destinations of Iran (Case study: Chabahar). Tourism Management Studies, 5(14): 40-67.
Balan, D., Balaure, V. and Veghes, C. (2009). Travel and tourism competitiveness of the world's top tourism destination: An exploratory assessment. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 11(2): 979-987.
Li, K., Jin, M. and Shi, W. (2017). Tourism as an important impetus to promoting economic growth: A critical review. Tourism Management Perspectives, In Press, Corrected Proof.
Pessoa, A. (2017). Tourism and regional competitiveness: The case of the Portuguese Douro valley. Estudos Regions, 18: 55-75.
Webster, C. and Ivanov, S. (2014). Transforming competitiveness into economic benefits: Does tourism stimulate economic growth in more competitive destinations? Tourism Management, 40: 137-140.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Growth of the tTourism Sector, Destination Competitiveness, Dynamic Panel Data
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. پناهی، حسین؛ معصوم‌زاده، سارا و رزاقی، سمیه (1396). بررسی اثر نرخ ارز بر تراز پرداخت گردشگری ایران. فصلنامه نظریه های کاربردی اقتصاد، شماره‌ی 2: 142-127.
  2. تقوی، مهدی و قلی پورسلیمانی، علی (1388). عوامل موثر بر رشد صنعت گردشگری ایران. پژوهشنامه اقتصادی، شماره‌ی 3: 172-157.
  3. جعفرتاش، برزین و پویان­زاده، نسرین (1394). ارزیابی و اولویت­بندی شاخص­های رقابت­پذیری صنعت گردشگری ایران. فرایند مدیریت توسعه، شماره­ی 3: 105-85.
  4. خوشنویس یزدی، سهیلا و غمامی، مریم (1395). برآورد تابع تقاضای گردشگری ایران. پژوهشنامه اقتصاد و کسب و کار، شماره‌ی 12، 12-1.
  5. خیرخواهان، جعفر. (1391). معرفی شاخص رقابت‌پذیری گردشگری. خبرگزاری دانشجویان ایران ایسنا، فروردین 1391.
  6. شهیکی تاش، محمد نبی؛ محمودپور، کامران و محسنی، حدیثه (1394). بررسی عوامل تاثیرگذار بر شاخص رقابت‌پذیری کشورها با تاکید بر اقتصاد ایران. فصلنامه‌ی سیاست‌های مالی و اقتصادی، شماره‌ی 11: 188-155.
  7. شاطریان، محسن؛ غلامی، یوسف و میرمحمدی، محمد (1396). نشریه‌ی تحقیقات کاربردی علوم جغرافیایی، شماره‌ی 46: 214-195.
  8. فرزین، محمدرضا و نادعلی پور، زهرا (1390). عوامل موثر بر مزیت رقابتی مقصدهای گردشگری در ایران (مورد مطالعه: منطقه ی چابهار). فصلنامه‌ی مطالعات گردشگری، شماره‌ی 14: 67-41.
  9. محمدی، تیمور؛ کریمی، مجتبی؛ نجارزاده، نگین و شاه کرم اوغلی، معصومه (1389). عوامل موثر بر تقاضای گردشگری در ایران. فصلنامه علوم اقتصادی، شماره‌ی 10: 51-27.
  10. نظری، محسن؛ اسفیدانی، محمد رحیم و طباطبایی، سید مهدی (1396). ارزیابی عوامل موثر بر جذب گردشگران بین‌المللی با استفاده از مدل جاذبه، تحقیقات اقتصادی، دوره‌ی 52، شماره‌ی 1: 243-215.
  11. Algieri, B. (2006). An econometric estimation of the demand for tourism: the Case of Russia. Tourism Economics, 12(1): 5-20.
  12. Arellano, M. and Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, No. 58: 277 – 297.
  13. Balli, F., Balli, H.O. and Louis, R.J. (2016). The impacts of immigrants and institutions on bilateral tourism flows. Tourism Management, 52: 221-229.
  14. Blundell, R.W. and Bond, S.R. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, No. 87: 115–143.
  15. Brida, J.G. and Risso, W.A. (2009). Tourism as a factor of long-run economic growth: An empirical analysis for Chile. European Journal of Tourism Research, 2(2): 178-185.
  16. Botti, L., Peypoch, N., Robinot, E. and Solonadrasana, B. (2009). Tourism destination competitiveness: The French regions case. European Journal of Tourism Research, 2(1): 5-24.
  17. Balan, D., Balaure, V. and Veghes, C. (2009). Travel and tourism competitiveness of the world's top tourism destination: An exploratory assessment. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 11(2): 979-987.
  18. Caselli, F., Esquivel, G. and Lefort, F. (1996). Reopening the convergence debate: A new look at cross-country growth empirics. Journal of Economic Growth, No. 1: 363-389.
  19. Diamond, J. (1977). Tourism's role in economic development: The case reexamined. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 25(3): 553-559.
  20. Dwyer, L. and Kim, C. (2003). Destination competitiveness: Determinants and indicators. Current Issues of Tourism, 6(5): 369-414.
  21. Ekin, Y. and Akbulut, O. (2015). Tourism destination competitiveness: The case of Dalyan–Turkey. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 3: 60-66.
  22. Fernándeza, J. and Díaz, B.R. (2016). Reinterpreting the world economic forum's global tourism competitiveness index. Tourism Management Perspectives, 20: 131-140.
  23. Gomezelj, D.O. and Mihalič, T. (2008). Destination competitiveness-applying different models, the case of Slovenia. Tourism Management, 29(2): 294-307.
  24. Hanly, P. and Wade, G. (2007). Modelling tourism demand and econometric analysis of North American tourist expenditure in Ireland, 1985-2004. Journal of Tourism Economic, 13(2): 319-327.
  25. Huang, C.H., Tsaur, J.R. and Yang, C.H. (2012). Does World Heritage list really induce more tourists? Evidence from Macau. Tourism Management, 33(6): 1450–1457.
  26. Ivanov, S. (2005b). Problems in the measurement of tourism impact on the leakage of national income, Yearbook of International University College, 2: 176-182.
  27. Kumar, R.R., Loganathan, N., Patel, A. and Kumar, R.D. (2014), Nexus between tourism earnings and economic growth: A study of Malaysia. Quality and Quantity, 49(3): 1101-1120.
  28. Kum, H., Aslan, A. and Gungor, M. (2015). Tourism and economic growth: The case of Next-11 Countries, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(4): 1075-1081.
  29. Li, K., Jin, M. and Shi, W. (2017). Tourism as an important impetus to promoting economic growth: A critical review. Tourism Management Perspectives, In Press, Corrected Proof.
  30. Mountinho, L., Huarng, K.H. and Tiffany, H.K. (2008). Modeling and forecasting tourism demand: The case study of flows from mainland China to Taiwan. Journal of Service Business, 2.
  31. Pessoa, A. and Silva, M.R. (2007). Environment based innovation: Policy questions. Finisterra, 44(88): 53-78.
  32. Pessoa, A. (2017). Tourism and regional competitiveness: The case of the Portuguese Douro valley. Estudos Regions, 18: 55-75.
  33. Ritchie, J.R.B. and Crouch, G.I. (2005). The competitive destination: A sustainable tourism perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  34. Suresh, J. and Senthilnathan, S. (2014). Relationship between Tourism and Economic Growth in Sri Lanka, Published as the 7th Chapter of a Book Entitled, Economic Issues in Sri Lanka. 115-132.
  35. Su, Y.W. and Lin, H.L. (2014). Analysis of international tourist arrivals worldwide: The role of World Heritage sites. Tourism Management, 40: 46-58.
  36. World Bank (2015). Strategic Environmental, Social and Cultural Heritage Assessment; Executive Summary.
  37. Tang, C.F. and Tan, E.C. (2013). How stable is the tourism-led growth hypothesis in Malaysia? Evidence from disaggregated tourism markets. Tourism Management, 37: 52-57.
  38. Webster, C. and Ivanov, S. (2014). Transforming competitiveness into economic benefits: Does tourism stimulate economic growth in more competitive destinations?. Tourism Management, 40: 137-140.
  39. Yang, C.H., Lin, H.L. and Han, C.C. (2010). Analysis of international tourist arrivals in China: The role of World Heritage Sites. Tourism Management, 31(6): 827-837.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,788
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,776


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب