دانشگاه مازندران

 Statistics

Number of Journals32
Number of Issues591
Number of Articles5,779
Article View8,660,891
PDF Download6,342,772
Tayyebi, A., Zekavat, K. (2018). The Effect of the Host Society on the Tourists’ Image of Urban Public Open Space: A Qualitative Study in an Iranian Context. Journal of Executive Management, 7(26), 8-27. doi: 10.22080/jtpd.2018.2039
Amir Tayyebi; Kamran Zekavat. "The Effect of the Host Society on the Tourists’ Image of Urban Public Open Space: A Qualitative Study in an Iranian Context". Journal of Executive Management, 7, 26, 2018, 8-27. doi: 10.22080/jtpd.2018.2039
Tayyebi, A., Zekavat, K. (2018). 'The Effect of the Host Society on the Tourists’ Image of Urban Public Open Space: A Qualitative Study in an Iranian Context', Journal of Executive Management, 7(26), pp. 8-27. doi: 10.22080/jtpd.2018.2039
Tayyebi, A., Zekavat, K. The Effect of the Host Society on the Tourists’ Image of Urban Public Open Space: A Qualitative Study in an Iranian Context. Journal of Executive Management, 2018; 7(26): 8-27. doi: 10.22080/jtpd.2018.2039

The Effect of the Host Society on the Tourists’ Image of Urban Public Open Space: A Qualitative Study in an Iranian Context

برنامه ریزی و توسعه گردشگری
Article 1, Volume 7, Issue 26, December 2018, Pages 8-27    PDF (499.01 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.22080/jtpd.2018.2039
Authors
Amir Tayyebi* 1; Kamran Zekavat2
1PhD Urban Design, Assistant Professor, Architecture and Planning Department, Jandishapoor Industrial University, Dezful
2Associate Professor, Architecture and Planning Department, Shahid Beheshti University
Receive Date: 01 January 1970,  Accept Date: 01 January 1970 
Abstract
Extended Abstract
Understanding interactions between the host society and tourists is an important factor in tourism cognition and management. Part of this matter is the effect that the host society has on the mental image of the guest (traveler) of destination. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of host society on the mental image of tourists about the urban public open spaces. This qualitative study has been conducted using content analysis approach. The participants were 24 domestic tourists in the city of Isfahan who had experience of visiting this city and its spaces. Data collection was done by semi-structured interviews and continued until theoretical saturation. The five main categories of data analysis were: 1) vitality, 2) host emphases on space, 3) self-introduction of host, 4) tourists’ sense about the host and 5) food. The results of this study will help the experts, tourism managers and urban designers and managers to better understand the tourists’ image of urban spaces and accordingly provide the context to improve the level of urban tourism.
 
Introduction
Tourism is a social phenomenon involved interactions and relationships between individuals, organizations and various interested groups especially between tourists and local residents (McGehee & Andereck, 2009; Sharpley, 2014). Interactions and relationships between local residents and tourists can affect their attitudes, expectations, beliefs and lifestyles (Sharpley, 2008). One of the most important issues influenced by the interactions between the host society (local residents) and tourists is the tourist's image destination.
Few studies have examined the effect of host society on the tourists’ image of urban public open spaces qualitatively. To meet this particular lack of literature on the subject matter, this qualitative study examines the impact of host society on tourists’ image of urban public open spaces.  
 
Methods
A qualitative study with content analysis approach has been used to examine the effect of host society on the tourists’ image of urban public open spaces. Content analysis is a systematic approach to code and categorize that can be used to verify a large amount of textual information and determine the processes and patterns in the data (Gbrich, 2007). In order to ensure the accuracy of the data the long-term engagement with the data was considered by the researchers by which the depth and familiarity needed to extract the main themes would be provided. To ensure that codes are consistent with the experiences and mental images of the participants, the member- check was used. Interviews, initial codes, and themes were also judged by peer-check and expert- check.
 
Discussion and Results
The purpose of this study was to understand the effect of host society on the tourists’ image of urban public open spaces. In this study, by analyzing the statements of tourists in public open spaces, 5 categories were extracted as the dimensions of the effectiveness of the host society on the tourists’ image of urban public open spaces. These five categories include: vitality, host emphases on space, self-introduction of host, tourists’ sense about the host and food. This research was one of the first qualitative studies that examined the effect of host society on the tourists’ image of urban public open spaces in Iran. 
 
Conclusions
In this study, concepts related to the effect of host society on the tourists’ image of urban public open spaces were identified. These concepts included 5 categories and 11 subcategories. Since urban public open spaces (such as streets and squares) are among the most important destinations for urban tourism, understanding the effect of the host society on tourists’ image of these spaces is advantageous for groups involved in the management of urban spaces (such as urban designers) and in tourism management. 
This research is one of the first qualitative studies to examine the effect of host society on the tourists’ image of urban public open spaces in Iran. However, because the data have been collected from limited sample and based on purposeful sampling, generalization to other tourists and dissimilar places (environmentally, culturally, and psychologically) is not possible. This study provided valuable information about tourists’ image of urban public open spaces. Given the fact that other dimensions affecting the tourists’ image of urban public open spaces are still not well known, the grounded theory approach is recommended for further research.
 
Keywords: tourist destination image, urban public open space, host society, content analysis, qualitative study.
 
References:

1.    Grbich, C. (2007). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. Sage.
Griffin, T., & Hayllar, B. (2009). Urban tourism precincts and the experience of place. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 18(2-3): 127-153.
Hayllar, B., & Griffin, T. (2005). The precinct experience: a phenomenological approach, Tourism Management, 26(4): 517-528.
McGehee, N. G., & Andereck, K. (2009). Volunteer tourism and the “voluntoured”: the case of Tijuana, Mexico. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 17(1): 39-51.
Sharpley, R. (2008). Tourism, Tourists and Society, Routledge.
Sharpley, R. (2014). Host perceptions of tourism: A review of the research. Tourism Management, 42: 37-49.

 
Keywords
tourist destination image; urban public open space; host society; content analysis; qualitative study
References

 

  1. Aletta, F., Lepore, F., Kostara-Konstantinou, E., Kang, J., & Astolfi, A. (2016). An experimental study on the influence of soundscapes on people’s behaviour in an open public space. Applied Sciences, 6(10): 276.
  2. Anastasopoulos, P. G. (1992). Tourism and attitude change: Greek tourists visiting Turkey. Annals of tourism research, 19(4): 629-642.
  3. Assaker, G., Hallak, R., Assaf, A. G., & Assad, T. (2015). Validating a structural model of destination image, satisfaction, and loyalty across gender and age: Multigroup analysis with PLS-SEM. Tourism Analysis, 20(6): 577-591.
  4. Baloglu, S., & Brinberg, D. (1997). Affective images of tourism destinations. Journal of travel research, 35(4): 11-15.
  5. Baloglu, S., & McCleary, K. W. (1999). A model of destination image formation. Annals of tourism research, 26(4): 868-897.
  6. Beerli, A., & Martin, J. D. (2004). Factors influencing destination image. Annals of tourism research, 31(3): 657-681.
  7. Bentley, I. (Ed.). (1985). Responsive environments: A manual for designers. Routledge.
  8. Bojanic, D. C. (1991). The use of advertising in managing destination image. Tourism management, 12(4): 352-355.
  9. Bowen, D., & Schouten, A. F. (2008). Tourist satisfaction and beyond: tourist migrants in Mallorca. International Journal of Tourism Research, 10(2): 141-153.
  10. Carr, S., Francis, M., Rivlin, L.G. and stone, A.M. (1992). Public Space, Cambridge University press, Cambridge.
  11. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks.
  12. Crompton, J. L. (1979). An assessment of the image of Mexico as a vacation destination and the influence of geographical location upon that image. Journal of Travel Research, 17(4): 18-23.
  13. Crouch, D. P. (1981). The historical development of urban open space. Urban Open Spaces. New York, NY: Rizzoli: 7-8.
  14. Dahles, H. (2002). The politics of tour guiding: Image management in Indonesia. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(3): 783-800.
  15. De Kadt, E. (1979). Tourism: Passport toDevelopment. Perspectives on thesocial andcultural effects of tourism in developing countries. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  16. Del Bosque, I. R., & San Martín, H. (2008). Tourist satisfaction a cognitive-affective model. Annals of Tourism Research, 35(2): 551-573.
  17. Dolnicar, S., & Grün, B. (2013). Validly measuring destination image in survey studies. Journal of Travel Research, 52(1): 3-14.
  18. Echtner, C. M., & Ritchie, J. B. (1991). The meaning and measurement of destination image. Journal of Tourism Studies, 2(2): 2-12.
  19. Espelt, N. G., & Benito, J. A. D. (2005). The social construction of the image of Girona: a methodological approach. Tourism Management, 26(5): 777-785.
  20. Ford, L. R. (2000). The Spaces between Buildings. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  21. Gallarza, M. G., Saura, I. G., & Garcı́a, H. C. (2002). Destination image: Towards a conceptual framework. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(1): 56-78.
  22. Gartner, W. C. (1994). Image formation process. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 2(2-3): 191-216.
  23. Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968). The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Nursing Research, 17(4): 364.
  24. Goheen, P. G. (1998). Public space and the geography of the modern city. Progress in Human Geography, 22(4): 479-496.
  25. Goodey, B. (1993). Two Gentleman in Verona: the Qualities of Urban Design. STREETWISE-BRIGHTON-, 4: 3-3.
  26. Grbich, C. (2007). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. Sage.
  27. Griffin, T., & Hayllar, B. (2009). Urban tourism precincts and the experience of place. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 18(2-3): 127-153.
  28. Hanzaee, K. H., & Saeedi, H. (2011). A model of destination branding for Isfahan city: Integrating the concepts of the branding and destination image. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business, 1(4): 12-28.
  29. Hayllar, B., & Griffin, T. (2005). The precinct experience: a phenomenological approach. Tourism Management, 26(4): 517-528.
  30. Hayllar, B., Griffin, T., & Edwards, D. (2008). City Spaces-Tourist Places: Urban Tourism Precincts. Routledge.
  31. Houghton, K. (2010). Augmenting public urban spaces: the impact of the digital future on the design of public urban spaces. Queensland Planner, 50(4): 19-23.
  32. Jacobs, A., & Appleyard, D. (1987). Toward an urban design manifesto. Journal of the American Planning Association, 53(1): 112-120.
  33. Khirfan, L., & Momani, B. (2013). (Re) branding Amman: A ‘lived’city's values, image and identity. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 9(1): 49-65.
  34. Kizil, C., & Atalan, A. (2015). Image and Reputation of Yalova City: A Study on Yalova University Students. Emerging Markets Journal, 5(2): 71.
  35. Kozak, M. (2002). Comparative analysis of tourist motivations by nationality and destinations. Tourism Management, 23(3): 221-232.
  36. Kozak, M. (2007). Tourist harassment: A marketing perspective. Annals of Tourism Research, 34(2): 384-399.
  37. Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage.
  38. Law, C. M. (1993). Urban tourism: attracting visitors to large cities. Mansell Publishing Limited.
  39. Luque-Martínez, T., et al. (2007). "Modeling a city’s image: The case of Granada." Cities, 24(5): 335-352.
  40. Madanipour, A. (1996). Design of urban space: An inquiry into a socio-spatial process. John Wiley & Son Ltd.
  41. Madanipour, A. (2003). Public and private spaces of the city. Routledge.
  42. Madanipour, A. (2014). Urban Design, Space and Society. UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
  43. McGehee, N. G., & Andereck, K. (2009). Volunteer tourism and the “voluntoured”: the case of Tijuana, Mexico. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 17(1): 39-51.
  44. Mitchell, D. (2003). The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space. New York: The Guilford Press.
  45. Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 3(1): 93-116.
  46. Nikšič, M., & Watson, G. B. (2017). Urban public open space in the mental image of users: the elements connecting urban public open spaces in a spatial network. Journal of Urban Design: 1-24.
  47. Nowacki, M., & Zmyślony, P. (2011). The Measurement of City Image: Urban Tourism Market Segmentation. Current Issues of Tourism Research, 1(1): 10-18.
  48. Parkerson, B., & Saunders, J. (2005). City branding: Can goods and services branding models be used to brand cities?. Place branding, 1(3): 242-264.
  49. Pearce, P. L. (1998). The relationship between residents and tourists: the research literature and management directions. Global tourism: 129-149.
  50. Pike, S. (2002). Destination image analysis—a review of 142 papers from 1973 to 2000. Tourism Management, 23(5): 541-549.
  51. Pike, S., & Ryan, C. (2004). Destination positioning analysis through a comparison of cognitive, affective, and conative perceptions. Journal of Travel Research, 42(4): 333-342.
  52. Puczko, L., Ratz, T., & Smith, M. (2007). Old city, new image: Perception, positioning and promotion of Budapest. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 22(3-4): 21-34.
  53. Qiu, S., Cai, L., Zhang, Y., & Chen, Z. (2017). Destination image of Japan and social reform generation of China: role of consumer products. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 22(3): 233-244.
  54. Reisinger, Y., & Turner, L. W. (2003). Cross-cultural behaviour in tourism: Concepts and analysis. Elsevier.
  55. Richards, G., & Wilson, J. (2004). The impact of cultural events on city image: Rotterdam, cultural capital of Europe 2001. Urban Studies, 41(10): 1931-1951.
  56. Ryan, C. (1991). Recreational tourism: A social science perspective. Routledge.
  57. Ryan, C., & Cave, J. (2005). Structuring destination image: A qualitative approach. Journal of Travel Research, 44(2): 143-150.
  58. San Martín, H., & Del Bosque, I. A. R. (2008). Exploring the cognitive–affective nature of destination image and the role of psychological factors in its formation. Tourism Management, 29(2): 263-277.
  59. Selby, M., & Morgan, N. J. (1996). Reconstruing place image: A case study of its role in destination market research. Tourism Management, 17(4): 287-294.
  60. Sharpley, R. (2008). Tourism, Tourists and Society, Routledge.
  61. Sharpley, R. (2014). Host perceptions of tourism: A review of the research. Tourism Management, 42: 37-49.
  62. Smith, A. (2005). Conceptualizing city image change: The ‘re-imaging’of Barcelona. Tourism Geographies, 7(4): 398-423.
  63. Smith, V. L. (Ed.). (2012). Hosts and guests: The anthropology of tourism. University of Pennsylvania Press.
  64. Stepchenkova, S., & Li, X. R. (2014). Destination image: Do top-of-mind associations say it all? Annals of Tourism Research, 45: 46-62.
  65. Tasci, A. D., & Gartner, W. C. (2007). Destination image and its functional relationships. Journal of Travel Research, 45(4): 413-425.
  66. The Urban Task Force. (2003). Towards an urban renaissance. Routledge.
  67. Tibbalds, F. (1992). Making People Friendly Towns: Improving the Public Environments in Towns and Cities. Harlow, UK: Longman.
  68. Tibbalds, F. (Ed.). (2012). Making people-friendly towns: Improving the public environment in towns and cities. Taylor & Francis.
  69. Violich, F. (1983). 'Urban Reading'and the design of small urban places: The village of Sutivan. Town Planning Review, 54(1): 41.
  70. White, C. J. (2004). Destination image: to see or not to see? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 16(5): 309-314.
  71. Woods, M., & Deegan, J. (2003). A warm welcome for destination quality brands: the example of the Pays Cathare region. International Journal of Tourism Research, 5(4): 269-282.
  72. Wu, C., Funck, C., & Hayashi, Y. (2014). The impact of host community on destination (re) branding: A case study of Hiroshima. International Journal of Tourism Research, 16(6): 546-555.
  73. Zhang, J., Inbakaran, R. J., & Jackson, M. S. (2006). Understanding community attitudes towards tourism and host—Guest interaction in the urban—rural border region. Tourism Geographies, 8(2): 182-204.
  74. Zhang, L., & Zhao, S. X. (2009). City branding and the Olympic effect: A case study of Beijing. Cities, 26(5): 245-254.

 

Statistics
Article View: 2,453
PDF Download: 1,396


Journal Management System. Powered by Sinaweb