تعداد نشریات | 30 |
تعداد شمارهها | 467 |
تعداد مقالات | 4,522 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,145,310 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,334,972 |
تاثیر خودگفتاری آموزشی همراه با بازخورد خودکنترل بر اکتساب و یادداری شوت فوتبال | ||
پژوهشنامه مدیریت ورزشی و رفتار حرکتی | ||
دوره 17، شماره 33، شهریور 1400، صفحه 159-147 اصل مقاله (406.31 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/jsmb.2021.13670.2810 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
سعید شکری* 1؛ بهروز عبدلی2؛ نصور احمدی3 | ||
1رفتارحرکتی، علوم ورزشی، شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران | ||
2رئیس دانشکده و عضو هیئت علمی دانشکده تربیت بدنی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی تهران | ||
3استادیار دانشکده تربیت بدنی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 24 بهمن 1396، تاریخ بازنگری: 20 اسفند 1397، تاریخ پذیرش: 20 خرداد 1398 | ||
چکیده | ||
مقدمه و هدف: هدف از اجرای این تحقیق، بررسی میزان تأثیر خودگفتاری آموزشی همراه با بازخورد خودکنترل بر یادگیری شوت فوتبال بود. روششناسی: شصت دانشآموز پسر غیرورزشکار با دامنه سنی 10-12 سال به صورت داوطلبانه انتخاب شدند. بعد از اجرای پیشآزمون عملکرد شوت فوتبال، شرکتکنندگان در پنج گروه خودگفتاری آموزشی، گروه بازخورد خودکنترل، گروه خودگفتاری آموزشی همراه با بازخورد خودکنترل، گروه خودگفتاری آموزشی همراه با بازخورد جفت شده و کنترل قرار گرفتند. دوره اکتساب به مدت شش جلسه بود که شرکت کنندگان در هر جلسه چهار بلوک شش کوششی را اجرا میکردند. بعد از آخرین جلسه اکتساب، پس آزمون و بعد از 48 ساعت آزمون یادداری گرفته شد. همچنین، در حین زدن ضربات، الگوی حرکتی شرکتکنندگان با استفاده از دوربین فیلمبرداری ثبت شد. برای تحلیل دادهها از روش تحلیل واریانس در سطح معنیداری 05/0 آزمون تعقیبی توکی و دانت-سی استفاده شد. یافتهها: نتایج تحقیق حاضر برای الگو نشان داد که گروه خودگفتاری آموزشی و گروه خودگفتاری آموزشی همراه با بازخورد خودکنترل عملکرد بهتری را نسبت به گروههای بازخورد خودکنترل، خودگفتاری آموزشی همراه با بازخورد جفت شده و کنترل در آزمونهای اکتساب و یادداری کسب کردند ولی در نتیجه تفاوت گروهها معنیدار نبود. نتیجهگیری: بازخورد خودکنترل، هم به تنهایی و هم در تعامل با خودگفتاری آموزشی میتواند برای افزایش سطح مهارت حرکتی مفید واقع شود. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
خودگفتاری؛ بازخورد؛ مهارت فوتبال؛ یادگیری | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
The Effect of Instructional Self-Talk Combined with Self-control Feedback on Soccer Shot Acquisition and Retention | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
saeed shokri1؛ behrouz abdoli2؛ Nassour Ahmadi3 | ||
1Motor Behavior, Shahid Beheshti, Tehran, Iran | ||
2shahid beheshti, tehran, iran | ||
3Shahid beheshti, Tehran, Iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Introduction and purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of instructional self-talk in combination with self-control feedback on learning to shoot in soccer. Methodology: In the current study, 60 male non-athlete volunteer students aged 10-12 were selected for data collection. Initially, a shooting pre-test was held and then the subjects were placed in five groups of 12. The groups practiced shooting for six sessions and included the instructional self-talk, self-control feedback, instructional self-talk with self-control feedback, instructional self-talk with paired feedback, and control groups. After the last training session, a post-test was held and an exam was held after 48 hours, in which the shooting movement patterns of the participants was video taped. In order to register the pattern, a researcher-made football shooting questionnaire was used. After the three stages of the study (pre-test, post-test, and a delayed test) were conducted, the collected data was analyzed. In order to test hypotheses, ANOVA at a significance level of 0.05 was used, in which Tukey's and Dante-C's post hoc tests were utilized to determine the difference between the groups in different stages. Results: The pattern findings showed that the instructional self-talk group and the instructional self-talk with self-control feedback group performed better than the other groups in the learning and delayed tests. However, no significant difference was found between the groups. Discussion and conclusion: Overall, according to the results of the current study, the use of self-talk techniques can be beneficial in the preliminary stages of learning how to shoot in soccer, which is one of the basic skills in the sport and requires focus, coordination, and accuracy. Additionally, the results showed that self-control feedback in combination with instructional self-talk can be beneficial in increasing the level of motor skills. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
self-talk, self-control, soccer skill, learning | ||
مراجع | ||
10.Johnson J, Hrycaiko D W, Johnson G V, Hallas J M (2004). Self-talk and female youth soccer performance. The Sport Psychologist, (18), 44–59. 11.Zinsser N.Bunker L & Williams J (2006). Cognitive techniques for building confidence and enhancing performance. New York, 6, 67-70. 12.Cutton, D. M., & Landin, D (1999). The comparative effects of two cognitive learning strategies on learning the tennis forehand. Journal of Sport Pedagogy, 5(2), 33–53. 13.Schmidt R A, Lee T D (2011). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Champaign, IL. 5th ed. Human Kinetics. 14.Cutton, D. M., & Landin, D (2001). The effects of a cognitive learning strategy and augmented feedback on learning the tennis forehand. Journal of Sport Pedagogy, 7(1), 16–35. 15.Alexander T. Latinjak & Miguel Torregrosa (2011). Combining Self Talk and Performance Feedback: Their Effectiveness With Adult Tennis Players. Journal of Human Kinetics, Inc. 16.Janelle, C.M.,Barba, D. A, Frehilch,S.G., Tennant, L. K,. Cauraugh,. J.H (1997). Maximizing performance effectiveness throught video tape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Research Quarterly for exercise and sport, 68, 269-279. 17.Chiviasowsky S.,Wulf, G (2002). Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it?Research Quarterly for exercise and sport, 7, 708-415. 18.Chiviasowsky S, Godinho (2005). Self-controlled knowledge of results: Effects of different schedules and task complexity. Jurnal of human movement studies, 49(4), 277-296. 19.Wulf G (2007). Self-controlled practice enhances motor learning: implications for physiotherapy. Physiotherapy, Jun, 93(2), 96-101. 20.Schmidt R A, Lee T D (2005). Motor control and learning. 4th ed. Champaign. IL: Human Kinetic, P. 46-53. 21.Roberts, Gelin (2003). Exercise Psychology Training. Translation by Mohammad Kazem Vaez Mousavi. Masoumeh Shojaee. Tehran. Growth [Persian]. 22.Gharakhanlou, Reza, Mohammad Reza Kordi, Abbas Ali Gaeni, Mohammad Hossein Alizadeh, Mohammad Kazem Vaez Mousavi and Majid Kashef (2006). Physical, skill and psychological fitness tests. Tehran: Publication of the National Olympic Committee of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 202 [Persian]. 23.Hardy J. Hall C.R. Alexander M.R (2001). Exploring self-talk and affective states in sport. Journal of Sport Sciences, 19(7),469-75. 24.Harbalis, T., Hatzigeorgiadis, A,. & Theodorakis, Y (2008). Self-Talk in Wheelchair Basketball: The Effects of an Intervention Program on Dribbling and Passing Performance . International Journal of Special Education, 23(3),62-69. 25.Rezaei, Fatemeh. Ahmad Farrokhi and Fazlollah Bagherzadeh (2012). The motivational self-concept effect on the implementation of simple and complex motorist's basketball skills. Sports and Education Learning Development, 10: 29-44 [Persian]. 26.Hayes, S. C (1989). Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control: Plenum press. Rule-governed behavior. 27.Landin D (1994). The Role of Verbal Cues in skill Learning. Quest, 46(3):299-313. 28.Palmer, S. L (1992). A comparsion of mental practice techniques as applied to the developimg competive figuee skater. The sport Psychology, 6:148-155. 29.Tsiggilis, N., Daroglou, G., Ardamerions, N., Partemian, S., Ioakimidis, P (2003). The Effect of self-talk on Self-Efficacy and Performance in Handball Throwing Test. Inquiries Sport Phys Educ,1: 189-196. 30.Hardy, J., Hall, C.R., Gibbs, C., & Greenslade, C (2005). Self-talk and gross motor skill performance: An Experimental Approach. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 7(2):36-45 31.Chroni, S., S. Perkos, and Y. Theodorakis (2007). Function and preferences of motivational and instructional self-talk for adolescent basketball players. Athletic Insight, 9(1). 9, 19–31. 32.Hardy, J., E. Oliver, and D. Tod (2009). A framework for the study and application of self-talk within sport. Advances in applied sport psychology: A review, p. 37-74. 33.Wulf, G. and W. Prinz (2001), Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(4): p. 648-660. 34.Chiricowsky, S., & Wulf, G (2005). Self – control feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance. Res. q. exerc. Sport, 76(1): 42-48. 35.Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, Lewthwaite R (2012). Self-controlled learning: The importance of protecting perceptions of competence. Front Psychol, 3: 458. 36.Zimmerman B J (2000). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: an overview. Educ psychol, 25(1):3-17. 37.Ferrari, M (1996). Observing the observers: Self-regulation in the observational lerrning of motor skills. Developmental Review, 16,203-240 38.Bandura A(1986). Social foundation of thought and action; a social cognitive theory. Englewood cliffs. Nj: Prentice-Hall. 39.Wulf G, Raupach M, Pfeiffer F (2005). Self-controlled observational practice enhances learning. Res Q Exerc Sport, Mar;76(1):107-1. 40.Cutton, D., & Landin, (2007). The effects of self-talk and augmented feedback on learning the tennis forehand. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 19, 288–303 | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,865 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 344 |