پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 30 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 467 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,522 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,145,278 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,334,963 |
فشار نهادی و عملکرد پایدار شرکت‌های صنعتی و تولیدی: تحلیل نقش میانجی یادگیری استراتژیک (مطالعه موردی؛ شهرک صنعتی کرمانشاه) | ||
| پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی | ||
| دوره 13، شماره 25، شهریور 1400، صفحه 165-188 اصل مقاله (505.99 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مدیریت استراتژیک (برنامه‌ها، تحلیل‌های استراتژیکی تولید، استراتژی‌های بازاریابی و مدیریت بازار، کسبوکار، سرمایه گذاری، منابع انسانی، مالی، رقابت، . . . ) | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/jem.2021.19395.3289 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| ابراهیم حاجی پور1؛ محمدامین آئینی2 | ||
| 1استاد یار گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه امام علی (ع)، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، گرایش منابع انسانی، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 09 مرداد 1399، تاریخ بازنگری: 22 مهر 1399، تاریخ پذیرش: 06 آبان 1399 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف پژوهش حاضر، بررسی تأثیر فشار نهادی بر عملکرد پایدار شرکت‌های تولیدی و صنعتی با تحلیل نقش میانجی یادگیری استراتژیک است. روش تحقیق حاضر، ازنظر هدف، کاربردی و ازنظر شیوه جمعآوری داده‌ها، توصیفی از نوع همبستگی است. جامعه آماری شامل مدیران مختلف 256 شرکت صنعتی و تولیدی شهرک صنعتی کرمانشاه هستند که بر اساس جدول نمونه‌گیری مورگان، 152 شرکت تعیین و با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده انتخاب شدند. ابزار اصلی جمعآوری اطلاعات، پرسش‌نامه و تجزیه‌وتحلیل اطلاعات با استفاده از مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری و نرم‌افزار لیزرل انجام‌گرفته است. یافته‌ها حاکی از اینکه فشار نهادی بر عملکرد پایدار شرکت‌های صنعتی و تولیدی تأثیر مستقیم و معناداری دارد. همچنین، فشار نهادی به‌طور غیرمستقیم و از طریق متغیر یادگیری استراتژیک بر عملکرد پایدار تأثیر مستقیم و معنادار دارد. نتایج نشان می‌دهند، یادگیری استراتژیک نقش میانجی بین فشار نهادی و عملکرد پایدار دارد. علاوه براین، فشار نهادی و یادگیری استراتژیک از مهمترین عوامل تأثیرگذار بر عملکرد پایدار شرکت‌های صنعتی و تولیدی هستند. همچنین، نتایج در خصوص مباحث فشار نهادی، یادگیری استراتژیک و عملکرد پایدار، نوآوری‌های نظری به همراه داشته و به مدیران، صاحبان و ذی‌نفعان شرکت‌های صنعتی و تولیدی در درک و چگونگی تأثیرگذاری فشار نهادی بر عملکرد پایدار با تأکید بر یادگیری استراتژیک کمک می‌کند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| عملکرد پایدار؛ فشار نهادی؛ یادگیری استراتژیک؛ شهرک صنعتی کرمانشاه؛ لیزرل | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Institutional Pressure and Sustainable Performance of Industrial Manufacturing Companies: Analyzing the Mediating Role of Strategic Learning (Case study; Kermanshah Industrial Town) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ebrahim Haji Pour1؛ Mohammad Amin Aeiny2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Management, Imam Ali University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2PhD student in Public Administration, Human Resources, University of Lorestan, Khoramabad, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of institutional pressure on the sustainable performance of manufacturing and industrial companies by analyzing the mediating role of strategic learning. The research method is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive in terms of data collection method. The statistical population includes managers from 256 different industrial and production companies of Kermanshah Industrial Town. According to Morgan sampling table, 152 companies were determined and selected using simple random sampling method. Data collection tools, questionnaires and analysis were performed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) in LISREL software. Findings indicate that institutional pressure has a direct significant effect on the sustainable performance of industrial and manufacturing companies. Also, institutional pressure has an indirect significant effect on sustainable performance through the variable of strategic learning. The results show that strategic learning plays a mediating role between institutional pressure and sustainable performance. In addition, institutional pressure and strategic learning are the most important factors affecting the sustainable performance of industrial and manufacturing companies. Moreover, the results have provided theoretical innovations in the areas of institutional pressure, strategic learning and sustainable performance. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Sustainable Performance, Institutional Pressure, Strategic Learning, Kermanshah Industrial Town | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Adams, P., Freitas, I., & Fontana, R. (2019). Strategic orientation, innovation performance and the moderating influence of marketing management. Journal of Business Research, 97, 129-140.
Albrecht, K. (2002). The power of minds at work: organizational intelligence in action. Amacom, New York.
Bahrami, M-A., Kiani, MK., Montazeralfaraj, R., Fallah Zadeh, H., & Mohammad Zadeh, M. (2016). The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning in the Relationship of Organizational Intelligence and Organizational Agility. Osong Public Health Res Perspect, 7(3), 190-196.
Barney, J. B., & Clark, D. N. (2007). Resource-based theory: Creating and sustaining competitive advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
Camisón, C., & Villar-López, A. (2011). Non-technical innovation: Organizational memory and learning capabilities as antecedent factors with effects on sustained competitive advantage. Industrial Marketing Management, 40, 1294–1304.
Czakon, W., & Czernek, K. (2016). The role of trust-building mechanisms in entering into network coopetition: The case of tourism networks in Poland. Industrial Marketing Management, 57, 64–74.
Dreyer, B., & Grønhaug, K. (2004). Uncertainty, flexibility, and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Business Research, 57, 484– 494.
Ellitan, L. (2017). The role of environmental uncertainty, competitive strategy, and operation strategy to achieve competitive advantage: the case of east JAVA manufacturing SMEs. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR), 3(11), 9-23.
Harrigan, K. (2017). Strategic Flexibility and Competitive Advantage. Oxford Research Encyclopedia, Business and Management.
Han, X. (2020). Risk management, legitimacy, and the overseas subsidiary performance of emerging market MNEs. International Business Review, In Press, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101732.
Ibidunni, O. S. (2011). Marketing Mix as Tools for Achieving Competitive Advantage in Nigerian Market Place: Multi-National and Indigenous Companies in Perspective. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 5(7), 81-94.
Kumar, B., Sharma, A., Vatavwala, S., & Kumar, P. (2019). Digital mediation in business-to-business marketing: A bibliometric analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 85, 126-140.
Krishnan, R., Martin, X., & Noorderhaven, N. G. (2006). When does trust matter to alliance performance? Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 894–917.
Latusek, D., & Vlaar, P. W. (2018). Uncertainty in interorganizational collaboration and the dynamics of trust: A qualitative study. European Management Journal, 36(1), 12–27.
Mahdi, O. R., Nassar, I., & Almsafir, M. Kh. (2018). Knowledge management processes and sustainable competitive advantage: An empirical examination in private universities. Journal of Business Research, 94, 320-334.
Mamonov, S., & Peterson, R. (2020). The Role of IT in Innovation at the Organizational Level – A Literature Review. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1-10.
Miotto, G., Del-Castillo-Feito, C., & Blanco-González, A. (2020). Reputation and legitimacy: Key factors for Higher Education Institutions’ sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Business Research, 112, 342-353.
Ocasio, W., Rhee, L., & Boynton, D. (2019). March and the pursuit of organizational intelligence: the interplay between procedural rationality and sensible foolishness. Industrial and Corporate Change, 29(1), 225-239.
Parida, V., Pesämaa, O., Wincent, J., & Westerberg, M. (2017). Network capability, innovativeness, and performance: a multidimensional extension for entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29(1-2), 94–115.
Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press: New York.
Priporas, V. (2019). Middlesex University Research Repository. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 47 (9), 997-1010.
Rikhardsson, P., & Yigitbasioglu, O. (2018). Business intelligence & analytics in management accounting research: Status and future focus. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 29, 37–58.
Rouach, D., & Santi, P. (2001). Competitive intelligence adds value: Five intelligence attitudes. European Management Journal, 19, 552-559.
Sachitra, V., & Chong, S. (2018). Resources, capabilities and competitive advantage of minor export crops farms in Sri Lanka: an empirical investigation. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 28(5), 478–502.
Saeidi, S.P., Nilashi, M., & Mardani, A. (2018). The Impact of Enterprise Risk Management on Competitive Advantage by Moderating Role of Information Technology. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 63, 67–82.
Saranga, H., George, R., Beineb, J., & Arnold, U. (2018). Resource configurations, product development capability, and competitive advantage: An empirical analysis of their evolution. Journal of Business Research, 85, 32–50.
Seyedkalali, N., Heydari, A., (2015). Studying the Role of Trust-building Capabilities in Making the Business of Management Consulting Firms Dynamic. Journal of Executive Management (JEM), 7(14), 51-33. [In Persian]
Srivastava, G., Paudayal, Kh. TorstenUtescher, T., & Mehrotra, R.C. (2018). Miocene vegetation shift and climate change: Evidence from the Siwalik of Nepal. Global and Planetary Change, 161, 108–120.
Syapsan, S. (2019). The effect of service quality, innovation towards competitive advantages and sustainable economic growth. Marketing mix strategy as mediating variable. Benchmarking: An International, 26(4), 1336–1356.
Tabarsa, Gh., Rezaeian, A., & Nazarpouri, A., ( 2012). Designing and Describing the Model of Competitive Advantage based on Organizational Intelligence in Knowledge-Based Organizations. Journal of Executive Management (JEM), 4(7), 37-58. [In Persian]
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509.
Wang, H. (2014). Theories for competitive advantage. In H. Hasan (Eds.), Being Practical with Theory: A Window into Business Research, Wollongong, Australia, 33–43.
Widyaningdyah, A., & Aryani, A. (2016). Perceived Environmental Uncertainty, Performance Measurement Systems, and Competitive Advantage. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 5(3), 117–134.
Wu, K.-J., Tseng, M.-L., Chiu, A. S. F., & Lim, M. K. (2017). Achieving competitive advantage through supply chain agility under uncertainty: A novel multi-criteria decision-making structure. International Journal of Production Economics, 190, 96–107.
Xu, H., Guo, H., Zhang, J., & Dang, A. (2018). Facilitating dynamic marketing capabilities development for domestic and foreign firms in an emerging economy. Journal of Business Research, 86, 141–152.
Yap, C., Zabid Abdul Rashid, M., & Amat Sapuan, D. (2013). Perceived environmental uncertainty and competitive intelligence practices. Journal of information and knowledge management system, 43(4), 462–481.
Zarei, A., Farsizadeh, H., Siahsarani Kojouri, M., & Dehghani Soltani, M., (2015). The impact of organizational intelligence on organizational performance by using marketing capacities. Journal of Executive Management (JEM), 7(13), 39-64. [In Persian] Zhang, Y., Gregory, M., & Neely, A. (2016). Global engineering services: Shedding light on network capabilities. Journal of Operations Management, 42–43, 80–94. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 569 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 432 |
||