پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 30 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 467 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,519 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,144,877 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,334,688 |
بررسی عوامل تاثیر گذار شبکه اجتماعی بر توسعه کارآفرینی کسب کارهای خانگی بامیانجی ویژگیهای شبکه اجتماعی (شواهدی از صنایع غذایی) | ||
| پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی | ||
| دوره 13، شماره 25، شهریور 1400، صفحه 189-208 اصل مقاله (439.23 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مدیریت کارآفرینی( مدیریت کسب‌وکار، فرایندهای کسب‌وکار، سیاست‌های کارآفرینانه، کارآفرینی سازمانی، اکوسیستم کارآفرینی، فضای کسب‌وکار، مدل‌های کسب‌وکار، چرخه حیات کسب و کارها، . . . ) | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/jem.2021.19410.3296 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| منیژه صفایی کنجین1؛ میر علی سید نقوی* 2؛ محمد جواد کاملی3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری کارآفرینی بین الملل، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران | ||
| 2نویسنده مسئول، دانشیار گروه مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3دانشیارگروه مدیریت منابع انسانی دانشگاه علوم انتظامی امین، تهران، ایران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 12 مرداد 1399، تاریخ بازنگری: 18 شهریور 1399، تاریخ پذیرش: 23 شهریور 1399 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| امروزه کسب و کارهای خانگی از بخشهای حیاتی و ضروری فعالیت‌های اقتصادی کشورهای پیشرفته محسوب می‌شوند. بر همین اساس فراهم بودن بستر برای این نوع کسب و کارها چالش و دغدغه بسیاری صاحبان کسب و کارهای خانگی است. مطالعه حاضر با هدف بررسی نقش میانجی ویژگیهای شبکه اجتماعی کارآفرینان در ارتباط عوامل تأثیرگذار شبکه‌های اجتماعی بر توسعه کارآفرینی کسب وکارهای خانگی انجام گرفت. این پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی، از نظر شیوه جمع‌آوری داده‌ها توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش حاضر، مدیران و کارشناسان کسب و کار صنایع غذایی می‌باشند که 150 نفر به شیوه نمونهگیری تصادفی ساده انتخاب شدند. ابزار جمع آوری داده‌ها، پرسشنامه محقق ساخته بود. جهت بررسی روائی و پایایی ابزارهای اندازهگیری به نتایج مدل اندازهگیری استناد شد که روایی و پایایی آنها تأیید شد. برای تحلیل داده‌ها از مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری با کمک نرم افزار Smart PLS استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد، عوامل تأثیرگذار شبکه‌های اجتماعی هم بصورت مستقیم و هم با واسطه ویژگیهای شبکه اجتماعی کارآفرینان بر توسعه کارآفرینی کسب‌وکارهای خانگی تأثیر دارند. با توجه به تأثیر شبکه‌های اجتماعی بر کسب و کارهای خانگی، نتیجه می‌شود، توسعه این شبکه‌های اجتماعی می‌توان به توسعه کسب و کارهای خانگی منجر شود. در همین راستا لازم است، اقدامات لازم برای این مهم صورت گیرد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| ویژگیهای شبکه اجتماعی؛ توسعه؛ کارآفرینی؛ کسب‌وکارهای خانگی؛ صنایع غذایی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Effects of Social Network Factors on Entrepreneurship Development of Home-Based Businesses: An Investigation of the Mediating Role of Social Network Characteristics (Evidences from Food Industry) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Manijeh Safai Konjin1؛ Mir ali Syed Nagavi2؛ Mohamad Javad Kameli3 | ||
| 1PhD Student in International Entrepreneurship, Qazvin Islamic Azad University, Iran | ||
| 2Corresponding author, Associate Professor, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Associate Professor, Amin University of Law Enforcement Sciences , Tehran,, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Nowadays, home-based businesses are considered as a vital and crucial section of economic activities in developed countries. In terms of job creation, and innovation in offering products or services, home-based businesses can induce extensive diversity and variation to community and economy of a state. Furthermore, home-based businesses are an apt starting point for the youth to launch an individual business because it is a simple and easy one comparing to other types of business. The present study aims to investigate the mediating role that characteristics of entrepreneurs' social network play in relation to factors of social media which influence entrepreneurship development of home-based businesses. In terms of purpose, the present study is applied, and in terms of data collection, it is a descriptive correlational one. The statistical population of this study includes managers and experts of food industry business and 150 of them were selected by simple random sampling. Data collection tools are researcher-made questionnaires. The results from the measurement model were cited in order to evaluate validity and reliability of measurement tools and the conclusions confirmed validity and reliability of the questionnaires. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used with Smart PLS software in order to analyze the data. According to the obtained results of the research, the effective factors of social media influence entrepreneurship development of home-based businesses both directly and by mediation of the characteristics of entrepreneurs' social network. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Characteristics of Social Network؛, Entrepreneurship, Development, Home-based Businesses | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Adams, P., Freitas, I., & Fontana, R. (2019). Strategic orientation, innovation performance and the moderating influence of marketing management. Journal of Business Research, 97, 129-140.
Albrecht, K. (2002). The power of minds at work: organizational intelligence in action. Amacom, New York.
Bahrami, M-A., Kiani, MK., Montazeralfaraj, R., Fallah Zadeh, H., & Mohammad Zadeh, M. (2016). The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning in the Relationship of Organizational Intelligence and Organizational Agility. Osong Public Health Res Perspect, 7(3), 190-196.
Barney, J. B., & Clark, D. N. (2007). Resource-based theory: Creating and sustaining competitive advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
Camisón, C., & Villar-López, A. (2011). Non-technical innovation: Organizational memory and learning capabilities as antecedent factors with effects on sustained competitive advantage. Industrial Marketing Management, 40, 1294–1304.
Czakon, W., & Czernek, K. (2016). The role of trust-building mechanisms in entering into network coopetition: The case of tourism networks in Poland. Industrial Marketing Management, 57, 64–74.
Dreyer, B., & Grønhaug, K. (2004). Uncertainty, flexibility, and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Business Research, 57, 484– 494.
Ellitan, L. (2017). The role of environmental uncertainty, competitive strategy, and operation strategy to achieve competitive advantage: the case of east JAVA manufacturing SMEs. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR), 3(11), 9-23.
Harrigan, K. (2017). Strategic Flexibility and Competitive Advantage. Oxford Research Encyclopedia, Business and Management.
Han, X. (2020). Risk management, legitimacy, and the overseas subsidiary performance of emerging market MNEs. International Business Review, In Press, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101732.
Ibidunni, O. S. (2011). Marketing Mix as Tools for Achieving Competitive Advantage in Nigerian Market Place: Multi-National and Indigenous Companies in Perspective. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 5(7), 81-94.
Kumar, B., Sharma, A., Vatavwala, S., & Kumar, P. (2019). Digital mediation in business-to-business marketing: A bibliometric analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 85, 126-140.
Krishnan, R., Martin, X., & Noorderhaven, N. G. (2006). When does trust matter to alliance performance? Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 894–917.
Latusek, D., & Vlaar, P. W. (2018). Uncertainty in interorganizational collaboration and the dynamics of trust: A qualitative study. European Management Journal, 36(1), 12–27.
Mahdi, O. R., Nassar, I., & Almsafir, M. Kh. (2018). Knowledge management processes and sustainable competitive advantage: An empirical examination in private universities. Journal of Business Research, 94, 320-334.
Mamonov, S., & Peterson, R. (2020). The Role of IT in Innovation at the Organizational Level – A Literature Review. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1-10.
Miotto, G., Del-Castillo-Feito, C., & Blanco-González, A. (2020). Reputation and legitimacy: Key factors for Higher Education Institutions’ sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Business Research, 112, 342-353.
Ocasio, W., Rhee, L., & Boynton, D. (2019). March and the pursuit of organizational intelligence: the interplay between procedural rationality and sensible foolishness. Industrial and Corporate Change, 29(1), 225-239.
Parida, V., Pesämaa, O., Wincent, J., & Westerberg, M. (2017). Network capability, innovativeness, and performance: a multidimensional extension for entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29(1-2), 94–115.
Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press: New York.
Priporas, V. (2019). Middlesex University Research Repository. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 47 (9), 997-1010.
Rikhardsson, P., & Yigitbasioglu, O. (2018). Business intelligence & analytics in management accounting research: Status and future focus. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 29, 37–58.
Rouach, D., & Santi, P. (2001). Competitive intelligence adds value: Five intelligence attitudes. European Management Journal, 19, 552-559.
Sachitra, V., & Chong, S. (2018). Resources, capabilities and competitive advantage of minor export crops farms in Sri Lanka: an empirical investigation. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 28(5), 478–502.
Saeidi, S.P., Nilashi, M., & Mardani, A. (2018). The Impact of Enterprise Risk Management on Competitive Advantage by Moderating Role of Information Technology. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 63, 67–82.
Saranga, H., George, R., Beineb, J., & Arnold, U. (2018). Resource configurations, product development capability, and competitive advantage: An empirical analysis of their evolution. Journal of Business Research, 85, 32–50.
Seyedkalali, N., Heydari, A., (2015). Studying the Role of Trust-building Capabilities in Making the Business of Management Consulting Firms Dynamic. Journal of Executive Management (JEM), 7(14), 51-33. [In Persian]
Srivastava, G., Paudayal, Kh. TorstenUtescher, T., & Mehrotra, R.C. (2018). Miocene vegetation shift and climate change: Evidence from the Siwalik of Nepal. Global and Planetary Change, 161, 108–120.
Syapsan, S. (2019). The effect of service quality, innovation towards competitive advantages and sustainable economic growth. Marketing mix strategy as mediating variable. Benchmarking: An International, 26(4), 1336–1356.
Tabarsa, Gh., Rezaeian, A., & Nazarpouri, A., ( 2012). Designing and Describing the Model of Competitive Advantage based on Organizational Intelligence in Knowledge-Based Organizations. Journal of Executive Management (JEM), 4(7), 37-58. [In Persian]
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509.
Wang, H. (2014). Theories for competitive advantage. In H. Hasan (Eds.), Being Practical with Theory: A Window into Business Research, Wollongong, Australia, 33–43.
Widyaningdyah, A., & Aryani, A. (2016). Perceived Environmental Uncertainty, Performance Measurement Systems, and Competitive Advantage. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 5(3), 117–134.
Wu, K.-J., Tseng, M.-L., Chiu, A. S. F., & Lim, M. K. (2017). Achieving competitive advantage through supply chain agility under uncertainty: A novel multi-criteria decision-making structure. International Journal of Production Economics, 190, 96–107.
Xu, H., Guo, H., Zhang, J., & Dang, A. (2018). Facilitating dynamic marketing capabilities development for domestic and foreign firms in an emerging economy. Journal of Business Research, 86, 141–152.
Yap, C., Zabid Abdul Rashid, M., & Amat Sapuan, D. (2013). Perceived environmental uncertainty and competitive intelligence practices. Journal of information and knowledge management system, 43(4), 462–481.
Zarei, A., Farsizadeh, H., Siahsarani Kojouri, M., & Dehghani Soltani, M., (2015). The impact of organizational intelligence on organizational performance by using marketing capacities. Journal of Executive Management (JEM), 7(13), 39-64. [In Persian] Zhang, Y., Gregory, M., & Neely, A. (2016). Global engineering services: Shedding light on network capabilities. Journal of Operations Management, 42–43, 80–94. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 550 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 428 |
||