دانشگاه مازندران

 Statistics

Number of Journals32
Number of Issues591
Number of Articles5,779
Article View8,660,891
PDF Download6,342,771
Rezaei Manesh, S., Shetab boushehri, N., shafeinia, P., Doustan, M. (2021). Effect of foreperiod duration and dominant hand on simple and choice auditory reaction time. Journal of Executive Management, 17(34), 66-55. doi: 10.22080/jsmb.2018.10620.2431
Somayeh Rezaei Manesh; Nahid Shetab boushehri; Parvaneh shafeinia; Mohammad Reza Doustan. "Effect of foreperiod duration and dominant hand on simple and choice auditory reaction time". Journal of Executive Management, 17, 34, 2021, 66-55. doi: 10.22080/jsmb.2018.10620.2431
Rezaei Manesh, S., Shetab boushehri, N., shafeinia, P., Doustan, M. (2021). 'Effect of foreperiod duration and dominant hand on simple and choice auditory reaction time', Journal of Executive Management, 17(34), pp. 66-55. doi: 10.22080/jsmb.2018.10620.2431
Rezaei Manesh, S., Shetab boushehri, N., shafeinia, P., Doustan, M. Effect of foreperiod duration and dominant hand on simple and choice auditory reaction time. Journal of Executive Management, 2021; 17(34): 66-55. doi: 10.22080/jsmb.2018.10620.2431

Effect of foreperiod duration and dominant hand on simple and choice auditory reaction time

پژوهشنامه مدیریت ورزشی و رفتار حرکتی
Article 4, Volume 17, Issue 34, November 2021, Pages 66-55    PDF (721.06 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.22080/jsmb.2018.10620.2431
Authors
Somayeh Rezaei Manesh* ; Nahid Shetab boushehri; Parvaneh shafeinia; Mohammad Reza Doustan
shahid chamran University of ahvaz
Receive Date: 29 July 2016,  Revise Date: 21 September 2017,  Accept Date: 10 December 2018 
Abstract
Introduction and objective: Preparation is the time following the receipt ofa warning signal during which the motor system is activated prior to action and prepares the individual for performance. We investigate the impact of the effect of various foreperiods (0/5, 1/5, 2/5 and 3/5 seconds) also the handedness ofthe athletes upon the time of simple and choice auditory reaction time.

Methodology: The current research followed a semi-empirical methodology andwas carried out using a self-made software. The statistical population was comprised of the female students of Shahid Chamran University, of which 40 was selected through purposive sampling and classified intwo groups of right-handed and left-handed. Each individual was randomly tested for simple and selective reaction with randomly chosen pre-periods.

Results: The findings demonstrated that short (0/5 seconds) and long (3/5 seconds) foreperiods will result in the increase of reaction time, and that left-handed individuals are associated with shorter reaction times compared to their right-handed counterparts.

Conclusion: In left-handed, the dominance ofthe right hemisphere which contains higher numbers of neurons might have lower reaction times compared to the right-handed individuals. Additionally, we recommend that pre-periods with too short or too long durations be avoided when preparing the individuals fordifferent motor skills.
Keywords
foreperiod; preparation; hand dominance; simple reaction time; choice reaction time
References
  1. Miller DI, Taler V, Davidson PS, Messier C. Measuring the impact of exercise on cognitive aging: methodological issues. Neurobiology of aging. 2012;33(3):622-e29.
  2. Shelton J, Kumar GP. Comparison between auditory and visual simple reaction times. Neuroscience and Medicine. 2010;1(1):30.
  3. Colonius H, Diederich A. The optimal time window of visual-auditory integration: a reaction time analysis. Frontiers in integrative neuroscience. 2010 May 11;4:11.
  4. Ellemberg D, St-Louis-Descheˆnes M. The effect of acute physical exercise on cognitive function during development. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2010;11: 22–12.
  5. Turhanoglu AD, Beyazova M. Reaction time and movement time in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: an electromyographic study. Clin.Biomech.2003;18: 380–384.
  6. Magill Richard. A. Motor Control and learning concept and application. 9thed. McGraw-Hill Company. 2011.
  7. Vallesi, A., Lozano, V. N., & Correa, Á. Dissociating temporal preparation processes as a function of the inter-trial interval duration.Cognition. 2013; 127(1): 22-30.
  8. Shafizadeh, A, Farokhi, A, Namazizadeh, M, Sheikh, M. Effect of foreperiod duration on simple and choice reaction time in simple and complex task. Motor Behavior. 2014; 6(16):121-138. (in persian)
  9. Muller-Gethmann H, Ulrich R, Rinkenauer G. Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: Evidence from the lateral readiness potential. Psychophysiology. 2003; 40:597–611.
  10. Los SA, Knol DL, Boers RM. The foreperiod effect revisited: Conditioning as a basis for nonspecific preparation. Acta psychologica. 2001;106(1):121-45.
  11. Tsunoda Y, Kakei S. Anticipation of future events improves the ability to estimate elapsed time. Experimental brain research. 2011;214(3):323-34.
  12. Leth-Steensen, C. Lengthening fixed preparatory foreperiod durations within a digit magnitude classification task serves mainly to shift distributions of response times upwards. Acta psychological. 2009; 130(1): 72-80.
  13. van der Hoorn A, Burger H, Leenders KL, de Jong BM. Handedness correlates with the dominant parkinson side: A systematic review and meta‐ Movement Disorders. 2012 Feb 1;27(2):206-10.
  14. Kosinski, R. J. A literature review on reaction time. Clemson University, 2008.
  15. Gursoy, R. Effects of left-or right-hand preference on the success of boxers in Turkey. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2009; 43(2): 142-144.
  16. Chittibabu B. Comparison of repeated sprint ability and fatigue index among male handball players with respect to different playing position. International Journal of Physical Education Fitness and Sports. 2014;3(01):71-5.
  17. Zuoza A, Skurvydas A, Mickeviciene D, Gutnik B, Zouzene D, Penchev B, Pencheva S. Behavior of dominant and non dominant arms during ballistic protractive target-directed movements. Human physiology. 2009; 35(5):576-84.
  18. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9(1):97-113.
  19. Steinborn MB, Rolke B, Bratzke D, Ulrich R. Dynamic adjustment of temporal preparation: Shifting warning signal modality attenuates the sequential foreperiod effect. Acta psychologica. 2009;132(1):40-7.
  20. Williams AM, Grant A. Training perceptual skill in sport. International Journal of Sport Psychology. 1999 ;( 30): 194–220.
  21. Narhare, Pandurang, B. Chaitra, and Vijay Maitri. A comparative study of choice reaction time in young males and females. (2012).
  22. Thomas, E. A. C. REACTION‐TIME STUDIES: THE ANTICIPATION AND INTERACTION OF RESPONSES. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 1967; 20(1): 1-29.
  23. Al Awamleh AA, Mansi T, Alkhaldi H. Handedness differences in eye-hand coordination and, Choices, simple reaction time of international handball players. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2013 Mar 1;13(1):78.
  24. Fernaghi, Z. Badami, R. Nezakathostni, M. Effect of Handedness and the type of training (overt and covert) on the accuracy and reaction time in a row. Journal of Motor Learning. 2015; 7(4): 529-548.
  25. Mickevičienė D, Motiejūnaitė K, Karanauskienė D, Skurvydas A, Vizbaraitė D, Krutulytė G, Rimdeikienė I. Gender-dependent bimanual task performance. Medicina. 2011;47(9):497-503.
  26. Steinborn Michael B, Rolke Bettina, Bratzke Daniel, Ulrich Rolf. Sequential effects within a short foreperiod context: Evidence for the conditioning account of temporal preparation. Acta Psychological. 2008; 129: 297–307.

 

 

Statistics
Article View: 682
PDF Download: 816


Journal Management System. Powered by Sinaweb