تعداد نشریات | 31 |
تعداد شمارهها | 498 |
تعداد مقالات | 4,829 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,479,040 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,581,899 |
In-Field vs. Out-of-Field EFL Teachers’ Self-Efficacy, Classroom Management Styles and Students’ Performance | ||
Interdisciplinary Studies in English Language Teaching | ||
دوره 01، شماره 02، مهر 2023، صفحه 117-129 اصل مقاله (393.67 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/iselt.2022.23589.1036 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Sima Modirkhamene1؛ Kamran Hassanzad* 2 | ||
1Corresponding author, Associate Professor, Department of English Language and Literature, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran | ||
2MA, Department of English Language and Literature, Urmia University Urmia, Iran | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 30 مهر 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 21 آبان 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 15 آذر 1402 | ||
چکیده | ||
Given that teachers’ academic qualification exerts significant effects upon their cognitive- behavioral conduct, especially in the teaching context, which, in turn, has an undeniable and crucial role in their learners’ performance, the present study aimed at investigating the differences between In-Field-Teaching (IFT) EFL teachers and their Out-of-Field Teaching (OFT) counterparts with regard to their Classroom Management (CM) strategies and Teachers’ Self-Efficacy (TSE) beliefs and their students’ achievement. To this end, 60 (30 IFT and 30 OFT) EFL teachers from three different cities in Iran were conveniently selected, and a random sample of 64 EFL learners were picked from the students of both groups of teachers. Two questionnaires, namely, CM Techniques Scale and Teacher Efficacy Scale were used to gather data on CM and TSE, respectively. Moreover, an adapted version of the first certificate in English test was used to assess students’ achievement before and after the instruction. Results revealed that the IFT EFL teachers majorly used positive CM strategies compared to the OFT EFL teachers who mainly used negative CM strategies. Further comparisons, moreover, showed that the IFT EFL teachers had a significantly higher sense of self-efficacy than their counterparts. Additionally, statistical tests indicated that the IFT EFL teachers had a better performance in comparison to the OFT-EFL teachers. Implications of these findings for quality education and quality teaching are discussed in terms of providing subject-specific skills and training programs, specifically for the OFT teachers. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Classroom Management (CM)؛ In-Field Teaching (IFT)؛ Out-of-Field Teaching (OFT)؛ Teachers’ Self-Efficacy (TSE) | ||
مراجع | ||
Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Abu-Tineh, A. M., Khasawneh, S. A., & Khalaileh, H. A. (2011). Teacher self-efficacy and classroom management styles in Jordanian schools. Management in Education, 25(4), 175-181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020611420597
Allen, K. (2010). Classroom management, bullying, and teacher practices. Professional Educator, 34(1), 1–15.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company.
Barbieri, G., Rossetti, C., & Sestito, P. (2011). The determinants of teacher mobility: Evidence using Italian teachers’ transfer applications. Economics of Education Review, 30(6), 1430-1444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.07.010
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y. M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133-180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157
Bosse, M., & Törner, G. (2012). Out-of-field teaching math teachers and the ambivalent role of beliefs-report from interviews with these teachers. In Unpublished paper presented at the 18th MAVI Mathematical Views conference Helsinki (pp. 1-11).
Brophy, J. (2010). Stress and strain in teaching: A structural equation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 243– 259. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158497
Darling-Hammond, L., Berry, B., & Thoreson, A. (2001). Does teacher certification matter? Evaluating the evidence. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(1), 57-77. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023001057
Dee, T. S., & Cohodes, S. R. (2008). Out-of-field teachers and student achievement: Evidence from matched-pairs comparisons. Public Finance Review, 36(1), 7-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142106289330
Denham, C. H., & Michael, J. J. (1981). Teacher sense of efficacy: A definition of the construct and a model for further research. Educational Research Quarterly, 5, 39– 61.
du Plessis, A. E. (2015). Effective education: Conceptualising the meaning of out-of-field teaching practices for teachers, teacher quality and school leaders. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.05.005
du Plessis, A. E., Gillies, R. M., & Carroll, A. (2014). Out-of-field teaching and professional development: A transnational investigation across Australia and South Africa. International Journal of Educational Research, 66, 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.03.002
Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.569.
Goldhaber, D., & Anthony, E. (2007). Can teacher quality be effectively assessed? National board certification as a signal of effective teaching. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(1), 134-150. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.89.1.134
Goldhaber, D., & Brewer, D. J. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 129–146. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737022002129
Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000.
Hobbs, L. (2012). Teaching out-of-field: Factors shaping identities of secondary science and mathematics. Teaching Science, 58(1), 21-29.
Hobbs, L. (2013). Teaching ‘out-of-field’ as a boundary crossing event: Factors shaping teacher identity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 271–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9333-4
Hobbs, L., & Törner, G. (2019). Teaching out-of-field as a phenomenon and research problem. In L. Hobbs & G. Törner (Eds.), Examining the Phenomenon of “Teaching Out-of-field” (pp. 3-20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_1
Hoffmann, L., & Richter, D. (2015). Aspekte der Aus-und Fortbildung von deutsch-und Englischlehrkräften im Ländervergleich. IQB-Bildungstrend, 481-507.
Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., & Anderson, C. M. (2010). Examining the evidence base for school-wide positive behavior support. Focus on Exceptional Children, 42(8). https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v42i8.6906
Ingersoll, R. M. (2003). Out-of-field teaching and the limits of teacher policy. Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
Ingersoll, R. M. (2019). Measuring out-of-field teaching. In L. Hobbs & G. Törner (Eds.), Examining the Phenomenon of “Teaching Out-of-field” (pp. 21-51). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_2.
Lewis, R. (2001). Classroom discipline and student responsibility: The students’ view. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(3), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00059-7
Magableh, A., & Hawamdeh, B. (2007). Accountability and discipline in classroom management: Case study: Jarash—Jordan. College Student Journal, 41(4), 901–908.
Nixon, R. S., & Luft, J. A. (2015). Teaching chemistry with a biology degree. In J. A. Luft & S. L. Dubois (Eds.), Newly Hired Teachers of Science (pp. 75-85). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-058-1_6
Nixon, R. S., Hill, K. M., & Luft, J. A. (2017). Secondary science teachers’ subject matter knowledge development across the first 5 years. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(7), 574–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2017.1388086
Pillay, H., Goddard, R., & Wilss, L. (2005). Well-being, burnout and competence: Implications for teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 30(2), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2005v30n2.3.
Porsch, R., & Whannell, R. (2019). Out-of-field teaching affecting students and learning: What is known and unknown. In L. Hobbs & G. Törner (Eds.), Examining the Phenomenon of “Teaching Out-of-field” (pp. 179-191). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_8
Price, A., Vale, C., Porsch, R., Rahayu, E., Faulkner, F., Ríordáin, M. N., Luft, J. A., & Hobbs, L. (2019). Teaching out-of-field internationally. In L. Hobbs & G. Törner (Eds.), Examining the Phenomenon of “Teaching Out-of-field” (pp. 53-83). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_3.
Prieto, L. R., & Altmaier, E. M. (1994). The relationship of prior training and previous teaching experience to self-efficacy among graduate teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 35(4), 481-497. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496384
Reupert, A., & Woodcock, S. (2015). Does a year make a difference? The classroom management practices of primary student teachers before and after a one-year teacher education programme. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 20(3), 265-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2014.949986
Revilla, M. A., Saris, W. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (2014). Choosing the number of categories in agree–disagree scales. Sociological Methods & Research, 43(1), 73-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113509605
Ríordáin, M. N., Paolucci, C., & O’Dwyer, L. M. (2017). An examination of the professional development needs of out-of-field mathematics teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 162-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.001
Ní Ríordáin, M., Paolucci, C., & Lyons, T. (2019). Teacher professional competence: What can be learned about the knowledge and practices needed for teaching?. In L. Hobbs & G. Törner (Eds.), Examining the Phenomenon of “Teaching Out-of-field” (pp. 129-149). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3366-8_6.
Rosas, C., & West, M. (2009). Teachers beliefs about classroom management: Pre service and in service teachers’ beliefs about classroom management. International Journal of Applied Educational Studies, 5(1), 54-61.
Ross, S. W., & Horner, R. H. (2007). Teacher outcomes of School-Wide Positive Behavior Support. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 3(6), n6.
Salleh, U. K. M., & Darmawan, I. G. N. (2013). Differences between in-field and out-of-field history teachers influence on students learning experience in Malaysian secondary schools. Creative Education, 4(09), 5. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.49B002
Sanders, L. R., Borko, H., & Lockard, J. D. (1993). Secondary science teachers’ knowledge base when teaching science courses in and out of their area of certification. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(7), 723-736. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300710.
Schueler, S., Roesken-Winter, B., Weißenrieder, J., Lambert, A., & Römer, M. (2015, February). Characteristics of out-of-field teaching: Teacher beliefs and competencies. In CERME 9-Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 3254-3261).
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Soheili, F., Alizadeh, H., Murphy, J. M., Bajestani, H. S., & Ferguson, E. D. (2015). Teachers as leaders: The impact of Adler-Dreikurs classroom management techniques on students’ perceptions of the classroom environment and on academic achievement. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 71(4), 440-461. https://doi.org/10.1353/jip.2015.0037
Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk-Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-248. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 360 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 421 |