دانشگاه مازندران

 Statistics

Number of Journals32
Number of Issues528
Number of Articles5,153
Article View7,887,306
PDF Download5,856,152
Pahkideh, A., Porkarami, J., Kheradmandy, S. (2022). The feasibility study of preventive civil liability with a comparative view of jurisprudence and international law. Journal of Executive Management, 6(2), 7-26. doi: 10.22080/lps.2022.23575.1341
Amin Pahkideh; Javad Porkarami; Saeid Kheradmandy. "The feasibility study of preventive civil liability with a comparative view of jurisprudence and international law". Journal of Executive Management, 6, 2, 2022, 7-26. doi: 10.22080/lps.2022.23575.1341
Pahkideh, A., Porkarami, J., Kheradmandy, S. (2022). 'The feasibility study of preventive civil liability with a comparative view of jurisprudence and international law', Journal of Executive Management, 6(2), pp. 7-26. doi: 10.22080/lps.2022.23575.1341
Pahkideh, A., Porkarami, J., Kheradmandy, S. The feasibility study of preventive civil liability with a comparative view of jurisprudence and international law. Journal of Executive Management, 2022; 6(2): 7-26. doi: 10.22080/lps.2022.23575.1341

The feasibility study of preventive civil liability with a comparative view of jurisprudence and international law

پژوهشنامه حقوق تطبیقی
Article 1, Volume 6, Issue 2 - Serial Number 10, October 2022, Pages 7-26    PDF (557.91 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.22080/lps.2022.23575.1341
Authors
Amin Pahkideh1; Javad Porkarami* 2; Saeid Kheradmandy2
1PhD Student, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran.
2Assistant Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran.
Receive Date: 21 May 2021,  Revise Date: 20 August 2021,  Accept Date: 10 October 2021 
Abstract
Man-made changes in the structure of new materials and compositions with the aim of meeting today's needs may cause long-term damage to which current civil liability cannot respond well. Finding the cause of damage in the long-lasting damages with their effects in the long run is a specialized issue that is beyond the capability of most individuals. Thus, first, the attribution of the causal relationship is complex and sometimes impossible. Second, the extent of the damage is such that even the richest people cannot compensate for it in some cases. Third, if there is financial capability, compensation will not be possible in most cases. Considering these items, there is a need for prevention in civil liability. In this regard, it is necessary to introduce a new literature in civil liability so that in case of such damages, preventive measures can be taken to reduce the damage. The data collection measure in this study was analytical-descriptive. Moreover, the preventive liability and the feasibility of choosing preventive and deterrent measures in civil liability have been investigated through valid jurisprudential and legal sources, laws and conventions at the national and international levels. Being inspired by jurisprudential capacities and based on various rules such as warning rule and obligation to prevention of possible damage, customary acceptance of prevention in international law and precautionary misconduct  can discuss about revolution in civil liability which has surfed beyond the limited boundaries of the traditional civil liability and prevented damage in the future.
Keywords
Preventive liability; Preventive measures; Prevention of Damage; long-term damages; Principle of caution; Modern Civil liability
References

 

  1. Asghari, M. (2011). The condition of non-responsibility in Imami jurisprudence, Fiqh Research Journal, No. 4.(In Persian)
  2. Badini,H.(2002).Assessment of Civil Liability with Safety Regulations in the Prevention of Dangerous Activities,Legal and Judicial Law,No99.(In Persian)
  3. Bariklo,A.(2008).Civil liability,second edition,Mizan Publication.(In Persian)
  4. R., &Rothwell.(1998).internationalEnvironmental  law  in the asia pacific, London, Kluwer Law international,The HAGUE (NETHERLANDS).
  5. Cancando,T.(2010).separate opinion of  I.C.J summary of the judgement on  pulpmills on the river Uruguay.
  6. Caranta,R.(2007).the Precautionary Principle in Italian Law, precautionary principle and Administrative ,Law Congress, Paqus, Michel, Bruxelles, Bruylant.
  7. Firouzabadi, S.(1979). Inayat al-Osul fi Sharhe Kefayat al-Osul, 4th ed,Qom,Firouzabadi.(In Arabic)
  8. A.(2014).The concept of the principle of precaution and its place in civil responsibility,vol 40, Research Journal of Islamic Law.(In Persian)
  9. HekmatNia.(2009). Civil Responsibility in Imamiah Jurisprudence, Qom, Research Institute of Islamic Sciences and Culture.(In Persian)
  10. Hodavand, M,.& Mashhadi, A. (2010). Principles of Administrative Law in the Light of the Judgments of the Court of Administrative Justice, Legal Deputy and Judicial Development of the Judiciary, Khorsandi Publications.(In Persian)
  11. (1970).judgement of case concerning the gabcikovo-nagymaros Project (hungary –oslovaki)
  12. (2010).pulp mills on the river Uruguay,ICJ Reports.
  13. (1949).Corfu Channel Case (United Kingdom- Albania), ICJ Reports.
  14. Iraqi,A.Z.(1984).Nahayeh al-Afkar, Ed: M. T.Boroujerdi,Qom, Al-Nashar Al-Islami Institute.(In Arabic).
  15. Iraqi,A.Z.(2008). Al-Ijtehad Al-Taqlid, Qom: Navid Islam.(In Arabic)
  16. Izanloo,M.(2019).Comparative Studies Dual Functions Principle of Precaution in Civil Liability, Comparative Law Studies,vol.(In Persian)
  17. Jourdain,P.(2012).Analysis of judicial procedure in civil responsibility,translated by Majid Adib, Mizan.(In Persian)
  18. Jourdain,P.(2014).principles of civil responsibility,translated by Majid Adib, Mizan.(In Persian)
  19. Katouzian, N & Ansari, M. (2003). responsibility due to environmental damage, Journal of Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran.(In Persian)
  20. Khoi,A.(1996).Mesbah al-Asul, translation: S. M ,Vaez Hosseini, Qom, Davari Publications. (In Arabic)
  21. Khorasani,M. K. (1993), Kefayeh al-Usul, second edition, Qom, Al-Nashar al-Islami Institute. (In Arabic)
  22. Lanoie,P.(1992).Government Intervention in Occupational Safety: Lessons from the American and Canadian Experience,Canadian Public Policy,Vol.18,No.1.
  23. Mohagheq Damad,S.M.(1985). Rules of Jurisprudence, vol.2,Islamic Science Publishing. (In Persian)
  24. Novagliz,A.Z.(2009).The principle of precaution as a sign of the mentality and needs of postmodern human beings, Bi-Philosophical Journal of Cognition, Journal of Humanities.(In Persian)
  25. Oriordan,T,& Comeron,J.(2013).interpreting the precautionary  principal Routledge,London.
  26. Sadeleer,N.(2002).Environmental principles from Political  Slogans  to Legal Rules, Oxford University  press,
  27. Safai,S.H,.&Rahimi.H.(2018).Comparative Tort Law,Shahre Danesh Institute of Law. (In Persian)
  28. P,&peel,J.(2012).principal of International Environmental law,Cambridge University Press.
  29. Shapo,M.(2007).Tort Law and Regulatory Law in the United States of America,In:Tort and Regulatory Law,by:Willem H.,Van Boom-Meinhard,Lukas and Christa Kissling, Springer Wien New York.
  30. Shavell,S.(1984).Liability for Harm versus Regulation of Safety,The Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 13,No.2.
  31. Shelton,D.,&Kiss.A.(2017).Judicial Handbook on Enviromental Law, translated by M. Abdallahi, Khorasandi Publications.(In Persian)
  32. Sistani,S.(1993).The Rule of La Zarar, Office of the Ayatollah Seyyed Sistani, Qom. (In Arabic)
  33. Sobhani,J.(1998). Al-Mahsul fi Usul al-Fiqh, edited:S. J.Mazandarani, Qom, Al-Imam Al-Sadiq Institute.(In Arabic)
  34. Sugarman,S.D.(1985).doing away with  tort  law,California  law Review,vol,73.

 

Statistics
Article View: 1,167
PDF Download: 1,425


Journal Management System. Powered by Sinaweb