دانشگاه مازندران

 آمار

تعداد نشریات30
تعداد شماره‌ها467
تعداد مقالات4,519
تعداد مشاهده مقاله7,144,849
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله5,334,661
حسینی, نرگس سادات, ستایش پور, محمد. (1403). برهم‌کنش صلح‌سازی و عدالت انتقالی در دوره پس از درگیری‌های داخلی. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 8(3), 53-68. doi: 10.22080/lps.2022.24343.1400
نرگس سادات حسینی; محمد ستایش پور. "برهم‌کنش صلح‌سازی و عدالت انتقالی در دوره پس از درگیری‌های داخلی". پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 8, 3, 1403, 53-68. doi: 10.22080/lps.2022.24343.1400
حسینی, نرگس سادات, ستایش پور, محمد. (1403). 'برهم‌کنش صلح‌سازی و عدالت انتقالی در دوره پس از درگیری‌های داخلی', پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 8(3), pp. 53-68. doi: 10.22080/lps.2022.24343.1400
حسینی, نرگس سادات, ستایش پور, محمد. برهم‌کنش صلح‌سازی و عدالت انتقالی در دوره پس از درگیری‌های داخلی. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 1403; 8(3): 53-68. doi: 10.22080/lps.2022.24343.1400

برهم‌کنش صلح‌سازی و عدالت انتقالی در دوره پس از درگیری‌های داخلی

پژوهشنامه حقوق تطبیقی
مقاله 3، دوره 8، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 15، مهر 1403، صفحه 53-68    اصل مقاله (361.7 K)
نوع مقاله: علمی پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/lps.2022.24343.1400
نویسندگان
نرگس سادات حسینی* 1؛ محمد ستایش پور2
1دکتری حقوق بین الملل، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران.
2استادیار گروه حقوق بین الملل، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران.
تاریخ دریافت: 04 مهر 1401،  تاریخ بازنگری: 20 آبان 1401،  تاریخ پذیرش: 29 آذر 1401 
چکیده
صلح‌­سازی و عدالت انتقالی از جمله فرایندهای مداخله­‌ای قلمداد می‌­شوند که در جوامع جنگ زده در دوره پس از درگیری بسیار حائز اهمیت هستند و مناسبات آنان با یک­دیگر شایسته توجه است. اساساً همواره، چالش انتقام و بخشش یعنی عدالت کیفری از یک سو و آشتی ملی از سوی دیگر، وجود داشته است. در خصوص بر­هم­‌کنش صلح‌­سازی و عدالت انتقالی، نظراتی متمایز، متعارض و حتی متناقض مطرح شده است. سطور پیش رو بر آن شده است تا به برهم‌­کنش صلح­‌سازی و عدالت انتقالی در دوره پس از درگیری نظر بدوزد. در مقاله پیش رو نشان داده شده است که این دو با یکدیگر ارتباط دارند و به طور موازی در وضعیت­‌های درگیری با هم به پیش می­روند. به فراخور موضوع مورد بحث، تحقیق حاضر یک تحقیق توصیفی-تحلیلی است و از طریق روش کتابخانه‌­ای صورت گرفته است. صلح و عدالتی که با مداخله و ورود صلح­بانان و نیروهای خارجی صورت می­گیرد (اصطلاحاً صلح و عدالت بالا به پایین) متفاوت از صلح و عدالت محلی و بدون ورود و مداخله خارجی (اصطلاحاً صلح و عدالت پایین به بالا) است و همیشه نتایج مشابهی ندارند. از این رو است که عدالت انتقالی و صلح‌­سازی، نه تنها در تضاد با هم نیستند بلکه با یک­دیگر مرتبط دانسته می­شوند. با این­حال، نتایج حاصل از بررسی رابطه عدالت انتقالی و صلح‌­سازی حاکی از آن است که این دو فرایند به دلیل پرداختن صرف به خشونت­‌های گذشته موجب شده است عدالت اقتصادی-اجتماعی یا رفتارهای روزمره عادی و اجتماعی به حاشیه رانده شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
برهم‌کنش؛ صلح؛ صلح‌سازی؛ عدالت؛ عدالت انتقالی
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Interaction of Peacebuilding and Transitional Justice in the Internal Post-Conflict Period
نویسندگان [English]
Narges Sadat Hosseini1؛ Mohamad Setayeshpur2
1PhD in International Law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom, Qom, Iran
2Assistant Professor, Department of International Law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom, Qom, Iran.
چکیده [English]
Peacebuilding and transitional justice are the intervention processes that are very important in war-torn societies in the post-conflict period, and their relations with each other are worthy of attention. There has always been the challenge of revenge and forgiveness, that is, criminal justice on the one hand and national reconciliation on the other. Regarding the interaction between Peacebuilding and transitional justice, distinct, conflicting, and even contradictory opinions have been raised. The following lines are intended to comment on the interaction of Peacebuilding and transitional justice in the post-conflict period. Therefore, it is shown that these two are related to each other and work parallel in conflict situations. According to the topic under discussion, the current research is descriptive-analytical and it was done through the library method. The following article has shown that the peace and justice that takes place with the intervention and entry of peacekeepers and foreign forces (so-called top-down peace and justice) is different from the local peace and justice without the entry and intervention of outsiders. (so-called peace and justice from the bottom up) and they do not always have the same results. Therefore, transitional justice and Peacebuilding are not only in conflict with each other. However, the results of the study of the relationship between transitional justice and Peacebuilding indicate that these two processes due to only dealing with past violence, have caused socio-economic justice or normal and social daily behaviors to be marginalized.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Interaction, Peace, Peacebuilding, Justice, Transitional Justice
مراجع
  • Aggestam, Karin, and Annika Björkdahl, ed, (2013), Rethinking Peacebuilding: The Quest for Just Peace in the Middle East and Western Balkans, London and New York: Routledge.
  • Akhavan, Payam, (2009), “Are International Criminal Tribunals a Disincentive to Peace? Reconciling Judicial Romanticism with Political Realism.” Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 624-654.
  • Amoui, Hossein and Elham Hosseinkhani, (2013), "Viewpoints of different approaches of international relations towards peace", Political Science Quarterly, No. 14, pp. 179-174.
  • Andrieu, Kora. (2010). “Civilizing Peacebuilding: Transitional Justice, Civil Society and the Liberal Paradigm.” Security Dialogue, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 537-558.
  • Arthur, Paige. (2009). “How ‘Transitions’ Reshaped Human Rights: A Conceptual History of Transitional Justice.” Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 321-367.
  • Arvelo, José E. (2006). “International Law and Conflict Resolution in Colombia: Balancing Peace and Justice in the Paramilitary Demobilization Process.” Georgetown Journal of International Law, Vol. 37, pp. 411-476.
  • Autesserre, Séverine, (2014), Peaceland: Conflict Resolution and the Everyday Politics of International Intervention, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Autesserre, Séverine. (2014), Peaceland: Conflict Resolution and the Everyday Politics of International Intervention, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bell, Christine, and Catherine O’Rourke. (2007). “Does Feminism Need a Theory of Transitional Justice? an Introductory Essay.” International Journal of Transitional Justice, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 23-44.
  • Bell, Christine. (2009). “Transitional Justice, Interdisciplinarity and the State of the ‘Field’ or ‘NonField’.” International Journal of Transitional Justice, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 5-27.
  • Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann, (1966), The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, London: Penguin.
  • Berreten, Charlotte, (2008), Security Paradigm after the Cold War in Global Insecurity, translated by: Asghar Eftekhari and others, Tehran: Research Center for Strategic Studies.
  • Bindi, Federiga and others, (2013) Foreign Policy of the European Union, translated by:: Parisa Shah Mohammadi, first edition, Tehran, Bureau of Political and International Studies, Ministry of Foreign Affairs Publishing Department.
  • Bratt, Duane. (1997). “Peace over Justice: Developing a Framework for UN Peacekeeping Operations in Internal Conflicts.” Global Governance, 5, pp. 63-81.
  • Chalabi, Masoud, (1997), Sociology of Order: Analysis and Analysis of Social Order, Tehran: Ney Publishing.
  • Clark, Janine Natalya. (2008). “The Three Rs: Retributive Justice, Restorative Justice, and Reconciliation.” Contemporary Justice Review, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 331-350.
  • Clark, Janine Natalya. (2009) “From Negative to Positive Peace: The Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina.” Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 360-384.
  • Clark, Janine Natalya. (2011). “Peace, Justice and the International Criminal Court: Limitations and Possibilities.” Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 521-545.
  • Clark, Janine Natalya. (2013). “Courting Controversy: the ICTY’s Acquittal of Croatian Generals Gotovina and Markač.” Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 399-423.
  • D’Amato, Anthony. (1994). “Peace vs. Accountability in Bosnia.” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 500-506. 
  • falsafi, Hedayat-Allah, (2022), perpetual peace and the rule of law, Nashre Noe.
  • Fazaeli, Mustafa and Hosseini, NarguesSadat, (2022), "The duality of peace and justice in post-civil conflict situations", Public Law Studies Quarterly, pp. 463-483.
  • Fraser, Nancy, (2008), Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World, New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Glasius, Marlies. (2009). “What is Global Justice and Who Decides? Civil Society and Victim Responses to the International Criminal Court’s First Investigations.” Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 496-520.
  • Gordy, Eric D. 2013. Guilt, Responsibility, and Denial: The Past at Stake in Post-Milošević Serbia. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Halilovich, Hariz, (2013) Places of Pain: Forced Displacement, Popular Memory and Trans-Local Identities in Bosnian War-Torn Communities, Oxford: Berghahn.
  • Hart, Chris, (1998), Doing a Literature Review, Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. London: Sage.
  • Hyden, Goran. (2015). “Rethinking Justice and Institutions in African Peacebuilding.” Third World Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 1007-1022.
  • Kerr, Rachel. (2007). “Peace Through Justice? the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 373-385.
  • Lai, Daniela (2016). “Transitional justice and its discontents: socioeconomic justice in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the limits of international intervention” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 361-381.
  • Lambourne, Wendy. (2004). “Post-Conflict Peacebuilding: Meeting Human Needs for Justice and Reconciliation.” Peace, Conflict and Development, Vol. 4, pp. 1-24.
  • Lambourne, Wendy. (2009). “Transitional Justice and Peacebuilding after Mass Violence.” International Journal of Transitional Justice, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 28-48.
  • Leonardsson, Hanna, and Gustav Rudd. (2015). “The ‘Local Turn’ in Peacebuilding: A Literature Review of Effective and Emancipatory Local Peacebuilding.” Third World Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 825-839.
  • Lundy, Patricia, and Mark McGovern. (2008). “Whose Justice? Rethinking Transitional Justice from the Bottom Up.” Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 265-292.
  • Mac Ginty, Roger. (2015). “Where is the Local? Critical Localism and Peacebuilding.” Third World Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 840-856.
  • Mac Ginty, Roger. (2011). International Peacebuilding and Local Resistance: Hybrid Forms of Peace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; Richmond, Oliver P., and Audra Mitchell, ed, (2012) Hybrid Forms of Peace: from Everyday Agency to Post-Liberalism, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Maddison, Sarah, and Laura J. Shepherd. (2014). “Peacebuilding and the Postcolonial Politics of Transitional Justice.” Peacebuilding, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 253-269.
  • Majstorović, Danijela. (2007). “Construction of Europeanization in the High Representative’s Discourse in Bosnia and Herzegovina.” Discourse and Society, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 627-651.
  • Mani, Rama, (2002), Beyond Retribution: Seeking Justice in the Shadows of War, Cambridge: Polity.
  • Mani, Rama. (2005). “Rebuilding an Inclusive Political Community after War.” Security Dialogue, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 511-526.
  • McGrattan, Cillian. (2009). ‘“Order out of Chaos”: the Politics of Transitional Justice.” Politics, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 164-172.
  • McGrattan, Cillian. (2010). “The Politics of Transitional Justice or All’s Well That Ends Well: A Reply to Brown.” Politics, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 125-130.
  • Nagy, Rosemary. (2008). “Transitional Justice as Global Project: Critical Reflections.” Third World Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 275-289.
  • Oette, Lutz. (2010). “Peace and Justice, or Neither? the Repercussions of the al-Bashir Case for International Criminal Justice in Africa and Beyond.” Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 345-364.
  • Pugh, Michael. (2005). “The Political Economy of Peacebuilding: A Critical Theory Perspective.” International Journal of Peace Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 23-42.
  • Qazlsafli, Mohammad Taqi, (2016), "Sustainable Peace in a Plural World", Political Sciences, Year 20, No. 78, pp. 108-79.
  • Saee, Ali, (2016), Democratization in Iran, Tehran: Agh.
  • Sai, Ali and Jafar Mahdavi, (2013) "Analysis of the process of democratization in Afghanistan (1907-2008)", Historical Sociology, Volume 6, Number 1, pp. 1-43.
  • Schuett, Oliver. (1997). “The International War Crimes Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia and the Dayton Peace Agreement: Peace Versus Justice?” International Peacekeeping, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 91-114.
  • Sharp, Dustin N. (2013a). “Beyond the Post-Conflict Checklist: Linking Peacebuilding and Transitional Justice Through the Lens of Critique.” Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 14, No, pp. 165-196.
  • Sharp, Dustin N. (2013b). “Interrogating the Peripheries: The Preoccupations of Fourth Generation Transitional Justice”. Harvard Human Rights Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 149-178.
  • Simić, Olivera, and ZalaVolčič, ed, (2013) Transitional Justice and Civil Society in the Balkan, New York: Springer.
  • Smith, Anthony, (1998), "Ethnic sources of nationalism", Strategic Studies Quarterly, Issue 1, pp. 206-183.
  • Sriram, Chandra Lekha, and Suren Pillay (ed.), (2011), Peace Versus Justice? the Dilemmas of Transitional Justice in Africa, Martlesham: James Currey.
  • Sriram, Chandra Lekha. (2004) Confronting Past Human Rights Violations: Justice vs. Peace in Times of Transition, London: Frank Cass.
  • Sriram, Chandra Lekha. (2007). “Justice as Peace? Liberal Peacebuilding and Strategies of Transitional Justice.” Global Society, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 579-591.

 

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 293
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 115


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب