| Number of Journals | 32 |
| Number of Issues | 554 |
| Number of Articles | 5,380 |
| Article View | 8,161,418 |
| PDF Download | 6,064,433 |
| Interdisciplinary Studies in English Language Teaching | ||
| Volume 2, Issue 1 - Serial Number 3, 0, Pages 18-37 PDF (1.38 M) | ||
| Document Type: Original Article | ||
| DOI: 10.22080/iselt.2023.24593.1043 | ||
| Receive Date: 28 March 2023, Revise Date: 31 July 2023, Accept Date: 14 June 2023 | ||
| References | ||
|
Aghajani, M., & Zoghipour, M. (2018). The comparative effect of online self-correction, peer-correction, and teacher correction in descriptive writing tasks on intermediate EFL learners’ grammar knowledge. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 7(3), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.3p.14.
Alderson, J. C., & Huhta, A. (2005). The development of a suite of computer-based diagnostic tests based on the Common European Framework. Language Testing, 22, 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532205lt310oa
Andujar, A. (2016). Benefits of mobile instant messaging to develop ESL writing. System, 62, 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.07.004
Arnold, N., Ducate, L., & Kost, C. (2012). Collaboration or cooperation? Analyzing group dynamics and revision process in wikis. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 431–448. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.3.431-448
Bikowski, D., & Vithanage, R. (2016). Effects of web-based collaborative writing on individual L2 writing development. Language Learning & Technology, 20, 79–99. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44457
Bradley, L. (2014). Peer-reviewing in an intercultural wiki environment: Student interaction and reflections. Computers and Composition, 34, 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2014.09.008
Bruffee, K. A. (1984). Collaborative learning and the conversation of ‘mankind’. College English, 46, 635–652. https://doi.org/10.2307/376924
Burston, J. (2015). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27, 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000159
Chang, C. F. (2012). Peer review via three modes in an EFL writing course. Computers and Composition, 29, 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2012.01.001
Chen, H. C., Pisoni, G., & Gijlers, H. (2020). An exploratory study into graduate students’ attitudes towards peer assessment. In International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (pp. 310-325). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68198-2_30.
Choi, J. W. C. (2007). The role of online collaboration in promoting ESL writing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Leicester, United Kingdom.
Ciftci, H., & Kocoglu, Z. (2012). Effects of peer e-feedback on Turkish EFL students’ writing performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.46.1.c
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Routledge Falmer.
Ducate, L., Anderson, L., & Moreno, N. (2011). Wading through the world of wikis: An analysis of three wiki projects. Foreign Language Annals, 44(3), 495–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2011.01144.x.
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning and Technology, 14(3), 51–71. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44226
Gass, S. (2003). Input and interaction. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224–255). Blackwell.
Guardado, M., & Shi, L. (2007). ESL students’ experiences of online peer feedback. Computers and Composition, 24(4), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2007.03.002
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 3–30). Erlbaum.
Ho, M. C. (2015). The effects of face-to-face and computer-mediated peer review on EFL writers’ comments and revisions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.495
Ho, M. C., & Savignon, S. J. (2007). Face-to-face and computer-mediated peer review in EFL writing. CALICO Journal, 24(2), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v24i2.269-290
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues. Cambridge University Press.
Jurkowski, S. (2018). Do question prompts support students in working with peer feedback? International Journal of Educational Research, 92, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.09.004
Kaufman, J. H., & Schunn, V. (2011). Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: their origin and impact on revision work. Instructional Science, 39(3), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9133-6
Lam, R. (2010). A peer review training workshop: Coaching students to give and evaluate peer feedback. TESL Canada Journal, 27(2), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v27i2.1052.
Lee, L. (2010). Exploring wiki-mediated collaborative writing: A case study in an elementary Spanish course. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 260–276. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.27.2.260-276
Li, M., & Kim, D. (2016). One wiki, two groups: Dynamic interactions across ESL collaborative writing tasks. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.002.
Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2013). Patterns of computer-mediated interaction in small writing groups using wikis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(1), 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.631142
Liou, H. C., & Peng, Z. Y. (2009). Training effects on computer-mediated peer review. System, 37, 514–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.01.005
Liu, J., & Hansen, J. (2005). Peer response in second language writing classrooms. University of Michigan Press.
Liu, J., & Sadler, R.W. (2003). The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 193–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00025-0(03
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (Eds.). (2012). Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide. Wiley Blackwell Publication.
Miller, L. (2016). Collaborative script writing for a digital media project. Writing and Pedagogy, 8(1), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v8i1.27593.
Min, H. T. (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), 118–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003
Neumann, K. L., & Kopcha, T. J. (2019). Using Google Docs for peer-then-teacher review on middle school students’ writing. Computers and Composition, 54, 102524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.102524
Ngaleka, A., & Uys, W. (2013). M-learning with WhatsApp: A conversation analysis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Learning. Academic Conferences International Limited. http://search.proquest.com/openview/d5bebb577d879e5cfeec5c635e0a8924/1?pq-origsite=gscholar
Pritchard, R. J., & Morrow, D. (2017). Comparison of online and face-to-face peer review of writing. Computers and Composition, 46, 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2017.09.006.
Rouhshad, A., Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2016). The nature of negotiations in face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication in pair interactions. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 514–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815584455
Samaie, M., Mansouri Nejad, A., & Qaracholloo, M. (2018). An inquiry into the efficiency of WhatsApp for self‐ and peer‐assessments of oral language proficiency. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12519
Shang, H. (2017). An exploration of asynchronous and synchronous feedback modes in EFL writing. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(3), 496–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9154-0
Soria, S., Gutiérrez-Colón, M., & Frumuselu, A. D. (2020). Feedback and mobile instant messaging: Using WhatsApp as a feedback tool in EFL. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 797-812. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13151a
Strijbos, J. W., Narciss, S., & Dünnebier, K. (2010). Peer feedback content and sender’s competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008.
Tang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2017). Is mobile instant messaging (MIM) useful in education? Examining its technological, pedagogical, and social affordances. Educational Research Review, 21, 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.05.001.
van den Bos, A. H., & Tan, E. (2019). Effects of anonymity on online peer review in second-language writing. Computers and Education, 142, 103638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103638
Van der Pol, J., Van den Berg, B. A. M., Admiraal, W. F., & Simons, P. R. J. (2008). The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education. Computers and Education, 51(4), 1804–1817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.001
Vo, T. T. M. (2022). EFL students’ attitudes towards teacher correction and peer correction in writing skills. International Journal of Language Instruction, 1(1), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.221113
Winet, D. (2016). Mobile instant messaging in the ESL writing class. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 20(3), 1–6. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 507 PDF Download: 591 |
||