پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 30 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 467 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,522 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,145,272 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,334,962 |
بررسی تأثیر شکاف تکنولوژی در کشورهای اوراسیا بر رشد بخش‌های اقتصادی ایران (رهیافت مدل تعادل عمومی قابل محاسبه منطقه‌ای) | ||
| پژوهشنامه اقتصاد کلان Macroeconomics Research Letter | ||
| مقاله 4، دوره 18، شماره 38، دی 1402، صفحه 81-102 اصل مقاله (842.79 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/iejm.2024.26324.2016 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| نسرین کرمی1؛ سید عبدالمجید جلایی اسفندآبادی* 2؛ محسن زاینده رودی3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری اقتصاد، گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده‌ی ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ،کرمان، ایران. | ||
| 2عضو هیئت علمی دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان | ||
| 3دانشیار اقتصاد، گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده‌ی ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمان، ایران. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 28 آبان 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 18 دی 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 18 دی 1402 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| بر اساس نظریه شکاف تکنولوژیک، شکاف تکنولوژیک بین کشورها می‌تواند بر رشد اقتصادی و تجارت آن‌ها اثرگذار باشد. از این‌رو، در این مطالعه به بررسی سناریوهای کاهش شکاف دیجیتال (1%، 2% و 5%) در کشورهای اوراسیا بر رشد بخش‌های اقتصادی ایران (کشاورزی، صنعت و خدمات) با استفاده از مدل تعادل عمومی قابل محاسبه (CGE) پرداخته شد. برای این منظور، از سهم هزینه‌های تحقیق-وتوسعه از تولید ناخالص داخلی (GDP) به عنوان شاخص شکاف دیجیتال استفاده شد. علاوه براین، جهت گردآوری داده‌های مورد نیاز از نسخه 10 پایگاه اطلاعاتی GTAP که شامل ماتریس حسابداری اجتماعی (SAM) 141 کشور یا همان منطقه و 65 بخش می‌باشد، استفاده شد. داده‌ها در قالب سه بخش شامل: 1- کشاورزی، 2- صنعت و 3- خدمات و پنج عامل تولیدی شامل: نیروی کار ماهر، نیروی کار غیرماهر، منابع طبیعی، زمین و سرمایه و هفت منطقه شامل: ایران، کشورهای عضو اتحادیه اوراسیا (روسیه، بلاروس، قزاقستان، قرقیزستان و ارمنستان) و نیز سایر کشورها تجمیع شد. در نهایت، تجزیهوتحلیل داده‌ها با بهرهگیری از نرمافزار MathLab صورت گرفت. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد که در میان بخش‌های اقتصادی مورد بررسی، با کاهش شکاف دیجیتال GDP در کشورهای اوراسیا، به‌ترتیب، رشد اقتصادی بخش‌های خدمات، صنعت و معدن و کشاورزی در ایران افزایش می‌یابد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| شکاف تکنولوژی؛ رشد اقتصادی؛ کشورهای اوراسیا؛ مدل تعادل عمومی قابل محاسبه (CGE)؛ پروژه تحلیل تجارت جهانی (GTAP) | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investigating the Impact of the Technology Gap in Eurasian Countries on the Growth of Iran's Economic Sectors (Regional Computable General Equilibrium Model Approach) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Nasrin karami1؛ Seyed Abd-Al-Majid Jalaee2؛ Mohsen Zayanderoody3 | ||
| 1PhD student in Economics, Department of Economics, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran. | ||
| 2Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman, Iran. | ||
| 3Associate Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| According to the technological divide theory, when an innovation company in a country produces a new product, the considered country has a temporary monopoly position in the production of that product, and by exporting to other countries, the relative advantage of producing goods will transfer from origin country to the country of destination. Therefore, the technological gap between countries can affect their economic growth and trade. Hence, in this study, the scenarios of reducing the digital divide (1%, 2%, and 5%) of Eurasian countries on the growth of Iran's economic sectors (agriculture, industry, and services) was studied using the regional computable general equilibrium (CGE) model. For this purpose, the share of research and development expenses to GDP was used as an index of the digital divide. In addition, to collect the required data, version 10 of the GTAP database, which includes the Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) of 141 countries or regions and 65 sectors, was used. Data were collected in the form of three sections, including agriculture, industry, and services, and five production factors, including skilled labor, unskilled labor, natural resources, land, and capital, and seven regions, including Iran, members of Eurasian Union (Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Armenia), and other countries. Finally, data analysis was done using MathLab software. Results show that with the decrease in the digital divide of Eurasian countries, the economic growth of Iran's industry and mining, agriculture, and service sectors will increase. In addition, among the examined economic sectors, with the reduction in the digital divide of Eurasian countries, the economic growth of services, industry, mining, and agriculture sectors in Iran will increase, respectively. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| echnology gap, economic growth, Eurasian countries, ژomputable general equilibrium (CGE) model, Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aggarwal, V., & Karwasra, N. (2023). Economic Modelling on Economic Growth and International Trade in G20 Countries: The role of Digital Economy. European Economic Letters (EEL), 13(4), 951-966. Arbeláez-Rendón, M., Giraldo, D. P., & Lotero, L. (2023). Influence of digital divide in the entrepreneurial motor of a digital economy: a system dynamics approach. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(2), 100046. Brodzicki, T., & Kwiatkowski, J. (2018). An empirical investigation into the role of technology gap in the trade relations of the EU member states. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 6(2), 111-135. Clercq, M., D'Haese, M., & Buysse, J. (2023). Economic growth and broadband access: The European urban-rural digital divide. Telecommunications Policy, 47(6), 102579. Corong, E. L., Hertel, T. W., McDougall, R., Tsigas, M. E., & van der Mensbrugghe, D. (2017). The Standard GTAP Model, Version 7. Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 2(1), 1–119. Daud, S. N. M. (2023). Financial inclusion, economic growth and the role of digital technology. Finance Research Letters, 53, 103602. Ding, C., Liu, C., Zheng, C., & Li, F. (2021). Digital economy, technological innovation and high-quality economic development: Based on spatial effect and mediation effect. Sustainability, 14(1), 216. Fahimifard, S. M., Rafaati, M., & Gilanpour, O. (2022). Investigating the Effects of Removing the Preferred Exchange Rate of Agricultural Inputs on Agriculture Sector of Iran: RDCGE Approach. Agricultural Economics and Development, 30(2), 201-235. (In Persian) Gebrerufael, S. (2021). Dynamics of technology gap between OECD and African countries: A structural estimation. Scientific African, 11, e00674. Gomez, S., Lopes, J., & Ferrira. L. (2022). The impact of the digital economy on economic growth: The case of OECD countries. Special Issue. RAM, Rev. Adm. Mackenzie 23 (6). 2022. Jiang, H., & Xie, R. (2021). Participation in global value chains and the US–China technology gap: an application of the generalized propensity score. Applied Economics Letters, 28(19), 1656-1660. Makieła, K., Wojciechowski, L., & Wach, K. (2020). Effectiveness of FDI, technological gap and sectoral level productivity in the Visegrad Group. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(1), 149-174. Mekuria, T., & Kwon, Y. (2017). Investigating the Influence of Bridging the Digital Divide on Economic Growth and Corruption Control: Lessons from Developmental Economies to Developing Countries. The case of East African Countries. 14th Asia-Pacific Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS): Mapping ICT into Transformation for the Next Information Society, Kyoto, Japan, 24th-27th June, 2017. Mousavi Jahromi, Y., Shaygani, B., Noraniazad, S., & Hydari, M. (2022). Investigating The Effect of Technology Gap on industrial Trade: Using Gravity Model. New Economy and Trade, 17(3), 149-174. (In Persian) Myovella, G., Karacuka, M., & Haucap, J. (2020). Digitalization and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa and OECD economies. Telecommunications Policy, 44(2), 101856. Nejati, M., & Akhbari, R. (2020). Technology Gap and the Effect of Foreign Direct Investment on Total Factor Productivity (Case Study: Iran’s Industry). Quarterly Journal of Economic Researches, 20(2), 99-120. (In Persian) Nejati, M., Bahmani, M., Jalaee Esfandabadi, S. A., & Balaghi Inalo, Y. (2020). Analyzing the Welfare Effects of Trade Liberalization using Multi-Regional Computable General Equilibrium Model Approach: The Case of Iran and Eurasia Economic Union. Journal of Economics and Modelling, 11(1), 153-179. (In Persian) Ohadi Esfahani, S., Tayebi, S. K., & Vaez Barzani, M. (2017). Effect of Technological Gap on Iran’s Bilateral Trade Relations: A Semi-parametric Approach. Journal of Economics and Modelling, 8(31), 1-26. (In Persian) Sayadi, M., Mohammadi, T. & Shakeri, A. (2016). Fiscal policy framework for oil revenue management in Iran: stochastic dynamic general equilibrium approach. Quarterly Journal of Energy Policy and Planning Research, 2(1): 33-76. (In Persian) Sadigh Mohammadi, M., Sarlak, A., Najafizadeh, S. A., & Hassanzadeh, M. (2021). The Effect of Exchange Rate Shocks on Households Welfare in Iran: A CGE Approach. Economic Growth and Development Research, 11(42), 108-81. (In Persian) Solomon, E. M., & van Klyton, A. (2020). The impact of digital technology usage on economic growth in Africa. Utilities policy, 67, 101104. Wang, W., He, T., & Li, Z. (2023). Digital inclusive finance, economic growth and innovative development. Kybernetes, 52(9), 3064-3084. Ye, Q., Wen, W., & Zhang, C. (2021). Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of the Influence of Technology Gap on Carbon Emission: The Case of China. Processes, 9(11), 2013. Zhang, W., Zhao, S., Wan, X., & Yao, Y. (2021). Study on the effect of digital economy on high-quality economic development in China. PLoS ONE, 16(9): e0257365. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 160 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 220 |
||