| تعداد نشریات | 32 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 592 |
| تعداد مقالات | 5,809 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 8,765,482 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 6,418,189 |
قدرت مدنی و راهبرد سیاسی – امنیتی: مطالعه موردی ژاپن در آسیای جنوب غربی و جنوب شرقی | ||
| مطالعات راهبردی سیاست بین الملل | ||
| دوره 6، شماره 11، شهریور 1402، صفحه 223-238 اصل مقاله (410.13 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/jpir.2024.26154.1353 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| ابراهیم طاهری* 1؛ سید داوود آقایی2 | ||
| 1استادیار گروه علوم سیاسی دانشگاه یزد | ||
| 2دانشگاه تهران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 30 مهر 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 16 آبان 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 11 بهمن 1402 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| قدرت مدنی از نظامیگری اجتناب میکند و از ابزارهای نرم برای دستیابی به اهداف خود بهره میگیرد. آلمان، ژاپن و اتحادیه اروپا به عنوان قدرتهای مدنی در نظر گرفته میشوند. هدف این پژوهش بررسی راهبرد سیاسی –امنیتی قدرت مدنی با تاکید بر مقایسه راهبرد سیاسی – امنیتی ژاپن در آسیای جنوب غربی و آسیای جنوب شرقی است. سوال پژوهش این است که راهبرد سیاسی – امنیتی قدرتهای مدنی برای دستیابی به اهداف خود به صورت عام و ژاپن به عنوان یک قدرت مدنی در آسیای جنوب غربی و آسیای جنوب شرقی، دارای چه ویژگیهایی است؟. نتایج نشان میدهد که قدرتهای مدنی عمدتا به قدرت هژمون برای تأمین اهداف سیاسی- امنیتی خود اتکا میکنند. به همین خاطر است که ژاپن در آسیای جنوب غربی در قالب راهبرد انطباق، اهداف سیاست خارجی خود را پیگیری میکند و در آسیای جنوب شرقی تا 2010 در قالب راهبردی مشابه و از 2010 به بعد، به نظر میرسد در قالب راهبرد احاله مسئولیت مشارکتی با امریکا، اهداف سیاسی - امنیتی خود را پیگیری میکند؛ به همین خاطر گفته میشود در کنار موازنه نرم از ابزارهای مربوط به موازنه سخت نیز برای مهار چین بهره میگیرد. روش پژوهش مورد استفاده از نوع تطبیق نظریه با مورد و روش تحلیل کیفی مقایسهای است. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| «راهبرد»؛ «قدرت مدنی»؛ «انطباق»؛ «احاله مسئولیت»؛ «آسیای جنوب شرقی» | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Civilian Power and Political-Security Strategy: A Case Study of Japan in Southwest and Southeast Asia | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| ebrahim taheri1؛ davood Aghaee2 | ||
| 1Assistant professor of yazd university | ||
| 2University of Tehran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Civilian power avoids militarism and uses soft tools to achieve its goals. Germany, Japan, and the European Union are considered as civilian powers. The purpose of research is comparing the political-security strategy of civilian power with an emphasis on Japan political – security strategy in Southwest and Southeast Asia.The question of the research is what are the characteristics of the political-security strategy of civilian powers for achieving their goals in general and Japan as a civilian power in Southwest Asia and Southeast Asia?. The results show that the civilian powers mainly rely on the power of the hegemon to provide their political security goals. It is for this reason that Japan in Southwest Asia in the form of accommodative starategy and in Southeast Asia, until 2010 in the form of same strategy, sought to realize its political-security goals, but from 2010 onwards, it seems that it intends to use the Collaborative buck-passing strategy with US to pursue its political - security goals: For this reason, it is said that in addition to soft balancing, Tokyo also uses hard balancing tools to control China. The research method used is from the type of matching the theory with the case and the comparative qualitative analysis method. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| ‘Strategy’, ’ civilian power’, ‘accommodation’, ‘buck-passing’, ‘Southeast Asia’ | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
- هرسیچ، حسین و سیدی، مریم (138)، «نقش قدرت مدنی در سیاست خارجی»، پژوهش حقوق و سیاست، سال 9، شماره 22: 173-203.
-محروق، فاطمه و کرمپوری، محمد (1402)، «تحول استراتژی دفاعی و سیاست امنیتی ژاپن»، 2023 – 2021»، پژوهشنامه ایرانی سیاست بینالملل، دوره 12، شماره 3 (نسخه پیش از انتشار و فاقد شماره صفحات در مجله).
-مرشایمر، جان (1400)، تراژدی سیاست قدرتهای بزرگ، ترجمه غلامعلی چگنی زاده، تهران: مرکز مطالعات سیاسی و بینالمللی وزارت امور خارجه.
-Abe, Sinzo (2012), “Asia’s Democratic Security Diamond”, Project Syndicate, Available at:
-Bleiker, Roland (2003), “A Rogue Is a Rogue Is a Rogue: US Foreign Policy and the Korean Nuclear
Crisis”,International Affairs,Vol. 79, No.4, pp. 719-737
-Buszynski, Leszek (2006), “Japan’s Security Policy in the Koizumi Era”, Security Challenges, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 93-107
-Demirtas, Birgul & Mazlum, Mahmut (2018), “Civilan powers and use of force, the evolution og Germany as a realist civilian power”,
Perceptions, Vol. XXIII, No.1, pp. 27-62
-Dowty, Alan(2000), “Japan And The Middle East: Signs Of Change”?, Middle East Review of International Affairs, Vol.4, No.4
-Edström, Bert (2007), “The Success of a Successor: Abe Shinzo and Japan’s Foreign Policy, Silk Road Paper”, Washington (DC): Central Asia-Caucasus Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Available at:
http://www.silkroadstudies.org /new/docs/Silkroadpapers/2007/0603PT.pdf (Accessed: 22/07/2023).
Granstrategy of weak states and great power, London: Palgrave Macmilan
-Hellmann, Gunther (1997). “The Sirens of Power and German Foreign Policy: Who is Listening?”, German
Politics, Vol. 6, No. 2.
-Hettne, Bjorn and Fredrik, Soderbaum (2005), “Civilian Power or Soft Imperialism? The EU as a Global Actor and The Role of
Interregionalism”, Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/FredrikSoederbaum/publication/259576731_'Civilian_Power_or_Soft_Imperialism_EU_as_a_Global_Actor_and_the_Role_of_Interregionalism'/links/59e0a0250f7e9bc5126be6a6/Civilian-Power-or-Soft-Imperialism-EU-as-a-Global-Actor-and-the-Role-of-Interregionalism.pdf (Accessed: 21/05/2023).
-Hook, Gelen D and et al(2011), Japan's International Relations: Politics, Economics and Security, London: Routledge
Hughes, Christopher W (2007), “Not Quite the ‘Great Britain of the Far East’: Japan’s Security, the US-Japan Alliance and the ‘War on Terror”, East Asia, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 325–338
-Hughes, Cristopher (2015), “Japan’s foreign and security policy under the Abe Doctrine”, New York: Springer, Giulio Pugliese and Aurelio Insisa, Sino-Japanese power politics: might, money and minds, New York: Springer
-Ian Manners (2006), “Normative Power Europe Reconsidered: Beyond The Crossroads”, Journal of European Public Policy,Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 182-199
-Ikenbery, j. Jhon (1999), “the source and the nature of libral international Order”, Review of international Studies, Vol. 25, pp. 179-196
-Islam, Shafiq(1993), “Foreign aid and burdensharing: is japan free riding to a coprosperity sphere in pacific Asia”?, Available at:
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6876859.pdf (accessed; 25/11/2022).
-J. Rynhold (2002), “Japan’s cautious new activism in the Middle East: a qualitative change or more of the same?”, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 245-263.
-Jiang, Wenran (2007), “New Dynamics of Sino-Japanese Relations”, Asian Perspective, Vol. 31, No1, pp. 15-41
-Joshi, Shashank (2017), “Malabar 17 exercise: the China subtext”, The Interpreter, Available at:
https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/malabar-17-exercise-china-subtext (Accessed: 05/07/2023).
-Kassab, Hanna Samir (2018), Grand strategy of weak states and great powers, London; Palgrave macmailan
-Koga, Kei (2016), “The Rise of China and Japan’s Balancing Strategy: Critical Junctures and Policy Shifts in the 2010s”, Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 25, No.101, pp. 777–91
-Koga, Kei (2018), “The Concept of “Hedging” Revisited: The Case of Japan's Foreign Policy Strategy in East Asia's Power Shift”, International Studies Review, Vol. 20, Issue 4, pp. 633–660.
-Licklider, Roy (1985), Political Power and the Arab Oil Weapon: The
Experience of Five Industrial Nations, Berkeley: University of California Press
-Manners, Ian (2002), “Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in
Terms?”, Journal of Commom Market Studies, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 232-25
-Maull, Hanns w (1990), “Germany and Japan: The New Civilian Powers”, Foreign Affairs, Vol.69, No. 5, pp. 92-93.
-Maull, Hanns w (2000), “Germany and the Use of Force: Still a ‘Civilian Power?”, Survival, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 56-80.
-Maull, Hanns. W (1991), “Germany and Japan: the new civilian powers”, Foreign Affairs Journal, Vol. 69, Issue, 5, pp. 92-93.
-Miyagi, Yukiko (2011), “Japan’s Middle East Security Policy: Rethinking Roles and Norms”, Ortadoğu Etütleri, Vol. 3, No 1, pp.9-32.
-Miyagi, Yukiku (2008), Japans Middle East security policy, theory and cases, London: Routledge.
-Miyagi, Yukiku (2011), “Japans Middle East security policy: rethinking roles and norms”, Ortadoğu Etütleri, Volume 3, No 1, pp.9-32.
-Nakamura, Satoru & wright, Steven (2023), Japan and the Middle East, foreign policy and interdependence, London: Palgrave Macmilan
-Nukii, Mari (2018), “Japan – Iran relation since the 2015 Iran nuclear deal”, contemporary Review of the Middle East, Vol.5, No.3,
-Ozcelik, Sezaei (2008), “the Japanese foreign policy of the Middle East between 1904-1998”, Humanity & Social Sci. J., Vol. 3, No.2, pp. 129-142
-Ozer, Yonca(2012), “The European union civilian power: the case of eus trade policy”, Marmara Journal of
European studies, Vol. 20, No. 2, PP. 63-94
-Pehlivanturk, Bahadir & Demirtas, Birgul (2018), “Civilian Powers and Contemporary Global Challenges”, Perception, Vol. XXIII, No. 1, pp. 1-7.
-Reinhard Drifte, Reinhard (2016), “Japan’s policy towards the South China Sea—applying ‘proactive peace diplomacy?”, PRIF report, No. 140, Frankfurt: Peace Research Institute Frankfurt, pp. 4–12
-Robert. M. Orr (1990), The Emergence of Japan’s Foreign Aid Power, New York: Colombia University Press
-Rozman, G & et al (2007), Japanese strategic thouth toward Asia, London: Palgrave Macmillan
Rynhold, Jonathan (2002), “Japans cautious new activism in the Middle East: a qualitative change or more of the same?”, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific”, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 245-263
-Ryoji, Tateyama (1993), “Japan and the Middle East peace talks”, JIME Review, No. 19, pp. 19-22
-Sadako, Ogata (1990), “The United Nations and Japanese diplomacy”, Japan Review of International Affairs, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 141-65.
-Sakaki, Alexandra (2016),” Keeping the dragon at bay: the South China Sea dispute in Japan’s security
strategy’, in Enrico Fels and Truong-Minh Vu, eds, Power politics in Asia’s contested waters”, NewYork: Springer, pp.425–40
-Siew Mun, Tang(2007), “Japans Gran strategic shift from yoshida to k oizumi: reflections on Japans strategic focus in the 21 century”, Akademika 70, pp. 117-136.
-Smith, Karen E (2000), “the end of civilian power Eu: A welcome demise or cause for concern”, the
international spectator, Vol. xxxv, No. 2, pp. 11-28
-Statista (2023), “Import volume of crude oil to Japan in 2022, by country’, Available at ;https://www.statista.com/statistics/761568/japan-crude-oil-import-by-country/ (Accessed; 11/04/2023).
-Togo, Kazuhiko (2010), Japan foreign policy, 1945-2009, the quest for proactive policy, Leiden: Bril
-Uchiyama, Yu (2010), Koizumi and
Japanese politics: Reform strategies and leadership, London: Routledge
-Wallace, Corey (2018), “leaving (north-east) Asia? Japan southern strategy”, International Affairs, Vol. 94, No. 4, pp. 883–904; doi: 10.1093/ia/iiy027
-Wroe, David and Needham, Kirsty (2007), “China weighs in as Julie Bishop backs Japanese right to sail through troubled South China Sea”, Sydney Morning Herald, Available at:
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/japanese-war-ship-through-the-south-china-sea-signals-regions-nervousness-aboutdonald-trump-20170314-guxu91.html (Accessed: 13/05/2023).
-Yoshitsu, Michael M (1984), Caught in the Middle East: Japan’s Diplomacy in Transition, Lexington, Mass: D.C. Health.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 518 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 554 |
||