Identification of the Genomics and Transcriptomics Regulators of the DNA Damage Response in Breast Cancer

Sadeghi, Mehdi; Karimi, Mohammad Reza; Karimi, Amir Hossein

doi:10.22080/jgr.2024.26741.1384

تعداد نشریات	30
تعداد شماره‌ها	467
تعداد مقالات	4,522
تعداد مشاهده مقاله	7,145,228
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله	5,334,938

	Identification of the Genomics and Transcriptomics Regulators of the DNA Damage Response in Breast Cancer
Journal of Genetic Resources
دوره 10، شماره 1، 2024، صفحه 57-65 اصل مقاله (636.73 K)
نوع مقاله: Research Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/jgr.2024.26741.1384
نویسندگان
Mehdi Sadeghi^* ¹؛ Mohammad Reza Karimi²؛ Amir Hossein Karimi³
¹Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
²Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
³Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
تاریخ دریافت: 20 مرداد 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 10 اردیبهشت 1403، تاریخ پذیرش: 01 مهر 1402
چکیده
Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent malignancies and the most common cancer in female patients. In recent years, the clinical utilization of a class of drugs called poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors has been observed to be detrimental to cells that harbor defective DNA damage repair mechanisms. Implementation of these drugs entails a series of unprecedented challenges, including the development of drug resistance to this treatment strategy. Thus, it is essential to gain a better understanding of the mechanisms that regulate the DNA damage response to maximize the treatment efficacy in breast cancer patients and minimize unwanted side effects. In this study, through the utilization of single-cell- and bulk-level transcriptional data, we set out to identify molecules and molecular circuits associated with DNA damage response in breast cancer patients. By identifying differentially expressed genes in single-cell cancer cell populations inherently different in DNA damage response, further clustering bulk RNA-sequencing samples based on the expression of these genes, and performing network and enrichment analysis at the bulk level, we have characterized breast cancer samples based on their DNA damage response. Moreover, we have been able to identify a central network module whose members can serve as treatment targets and yield further insights into the mechanisms of drug resistance and DNA damage response in breast cancer. Overall, this study contributes to the characterization of the transcriptional circuits involved in the heterogeneity of DDR in breast cancer and provides candidate avenues for the investigation of potential therapeutic interventions.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Breast cancer؛ DNA damage response؛ Single-cell sequencing؛ Genomics؛ Transcriptomics

مراجع
Abuetabh, Y., Wu, H. H., Chai, C., Al Yousef, H., Persad, S., Sergi, C. M., & Leng, R. (2022). DNA damage response revisited: the p53 family and its regulators provide endless cancer therapy opportunities. Experimental and Molecular Medicine, 54(10), 1658-1669. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-022-00863-4 Agrawal, A., Balcı, H., Hanspers, K., Coort, S. L., Martens, M., Slenter, D. N., ... & Pico, A. R. (2024). WikiPathways 2024: next generation pathway database. Nucleic Acids Research, 52(D1), D679-D689. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad960 Ai, D., Yao, J., Yang, F., Huo, L., Chen, H., Lu, W., ... & Ding, Q. (2021). TRPS1: a highly sensitive and specific marker for breast carcinoma, especially for triple-negative breast cancer. Modern Pathology, 34(4), 710-719. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-020-00692-8 Bai, P., Fan, T., Sun, G., Wang, X., Zhao, L., & Zhong, R. (2023). The dual role of DNA repair protein MGMT in cancer prevention and treatment. DNA Repair, 123, 103449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2023.103449 Belli, C., Duso, B. A., Ferraro, E., & Curigliano, G. (2019). Homologous recombination deficiency in triple negative breast cancer. The Breast, 45, 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.02.007 Brambillasca, C. S., Henneman, L., de Ruiter, J., Drenth, A. P., & Jonkers, J. (2016). Abstract 889: Dissecting the role of MYC in BRCA1-associated breast cancer. Cancer Research, 76(14-Supplement),889-889. https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.AM2016-889 Burguin, A., Diorio, C., & Durocher, F. (2021). Breast cancer treatments: updates and new challenges. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 11(8), 808. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080808 Campaner, S., & Amati, B. (2012). Two sides of the Myc-induced DNA damage response: from tumor suppression to tumor maintenance. Cell Division, 7, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-1028-7-6 Cancer Genome Atlas Network. (2012). Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature, 490(7418), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11412 Choi, E.-H., & Kim, K. P. (2019). E2F1 facilitates DNA break repair by localizing to break sites and enhancing the expression of homologous recombination factors. Experimental and Molecular Medicine, 51(9), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-019-0307-2 de Bruijn, I., Kundra, R., Mastrogiacomo, B., Tran, T. N., Sikina, L., Mazor, T., ... & Schultz, N. (2023). Analysis and visualization of longitudinal genomic and clinical data from the AACR project GENIE biopharma collaborative in cBioPortal. Cancer Research, 83(23), 3861-3867. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-0816 Dubrez, L. (2017). Regulation of E2F1 transcription factor by ubiquitin conjugation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18(10), 2188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18102188 Fouad, S., Hauton, D., & D'Angiolella, V. (2021). E2F1: cause and consequence of DNA replication stress. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 7, 599332. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2020.599332 Gabay, M., Li, Y., & Felsher, D. W. (2014). MYC activation is a hallmark of cancer initiation and maintenance. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, 4(6), a014241.https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a014241 Han, H., Cho, J. W., Lee, S., Yun, A., Kim, H., Bae, D., ... & Lee, I. (2018). TRRUST v2: an expanded reference database of human and mouse transcriptional regulatory interactions. Nucleic Acids Research, 46(D1), D380-D386. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1013 Hao, Y., Stuart, T., Kowalski, M. H., Choudhary, S., Hoffman, P., Hartman, A., ... & Satija, R. (2024). Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysis. Nature Biotechnology, 42(2), 293-304. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-01767-y Herzog, T. J., Vergote, I., Gomella, L. G., Milenkova, T., French, T., Tonikian, R., ... & Hussain, M. (2023). Testing for homologous recombination repair or homologous recombination deficiency for poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors: A current perspective. European Journal of Cancer, 179, 136-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2022.10.021 Howard, F. M., & Olopade, O. I. (2021). Epidemiology of triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Journal, 27(1), 8-16. https://doi.org/10.1097/PPO.0000000000000500 Hurlin, P. J. (2013). Control of vertebrate development by MYC. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, 3(9), a014332. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a014332 Korsunsky, I., Millard, N., Fan, J., Slowikowski, K., Zhang, F., Wei, K., Baglaenko, Y., Brenner, M., Loh, P., & Raychaudhuri, S. (2019). Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nature Methods, 16(12), 1289-1296. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0619-0 Lei, H., He, A., Jiang, Y., Ruan, M., & Han, N. (2022). Targeting DNA damage response as a potential therapeutic strategy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Frontiers in Oncology, 12, 1031944. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1031944 Liu, P., Deng, X., Zhou, H., Xie, J., Kong, Y., Zou, Y., ... & Li, X. (2023). Multi-omics analyses unravel DNA damage repair-related clusters in breast cancer with experimental validation. Frontiers in Immunology, 14, 1297180. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1297180 Liu, H., Liao, Y., Tang, M., Wu, T., Tan, D., Zhang, S., & Wang, H. (2018). Trps1 is associated with the multidrug resistance of lung cancer cell by regulating MGMT gene expression. Cancer Medicine, 7(5),1921-1932. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1421 Liu, Y., & Kulesz-Martin, M. (2001). P53 protein at the hub of cellular DNA damage response pathways through sequence-specific and non-sequence-specific DNA binding. Carcinogenesis, 22(6), 851-860. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/22.6.851 Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014). Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology, 15(12), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 Madden, S. K., de Araujo, A. D., Gerhardt, M., Fairlie, D. P., & Mason, J. M. (2021). Taking the Myc out of cancer: toward therapeutic strategies to directly inhibit c-Myc. Molecular Cancer, 20(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-020-01291-6 Marei, H. E., Althani, A., Afifi, N., Hasan, A., Caceci, T., Pozzoli, G., ... & Cenciarelli, C. (2021). P53 signaling in cancer progression and therapy. Cancer Cell International, 21(1), 703. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-021-02396-8 Mylavarapu, S., Das, A., & Roy, M. (2018). Role of BRCA mutations in the modulation of response to platinum therapy. Frontiers in Oncology, 8, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2018.00016 Pham, M. M., Hinchcliff, E., Avila, M., & Westin, S. N. (2021). The clinical challenges, trials, and errors of combatting Poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase inhibitors resistance. The Cancer Journal, 27(6), 491-500. https://doi.org/10.1097/PPO.0000000000000562 Sedeta, E. T., Jobre, B., & Avezbakiyev, B. (2023). Breast cancer: Global patterns of incidence, mortality, and trends. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 41(16-suppl), 10528-10528. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.10528 Sheldon, L. A. (2017). Inhibition of E2F1 activity and cell cycle progression by arsenic via retinoblastoma protein. Cell Cycle, 16(21), 2058-2072. https://doi.org/10.1080/15384101.2017.1338221 Toh, M., & Ngeow, J. (2021). Homologous recombination deficiency: cancer predispositions and treatment implications. The Oncologist, 26(9), e1526-e1537. https://doi.org/10.1002/onco.13829 Tung, N., & Garber, J. E. (2022). PARP inhibition in breast cancer: progress made and future hopes. NPJ Breast Cancer, 8(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-022-00411-3 Walerych, D., Napoli, M., Collavin, L., & Del Sal, G. (2012). The rebel angel: mutant p53 as the driving oncogene in breast cancer. Carcinogenesis, 33(11), 2007-2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgs232 Wang, Z., Jia, R., Wang, L., Yang, Q., Hu, X., Fu, Q., ... & Ren, Y. (2022). The emerging roles of Rad51 in cancer and its potential as a therapeutic target. Frontiers in Oncology, 12, 935593. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.935593 Wooten, J., Mavingire, N., Damar, K., Loaiza‐Perez, A., & Brantley, E. (2023). Triumphs and challenges in exploiting poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition to combat triple-negative breast cancer. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 238(8), 1625-1640. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.31015 Wu, S. Z., Al-Eryani, G., Roden, D. L., Junankar, S., Harvey, K., Andersson, A., ... & Swarbrick, A. (2021). A single-cell and spatially resolved atlas of human breast cancers. Nature Genetics, 53(9), 1334-1347. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-021-00911-1 Xu, J., Chen, Y., & Olopade, O. I. (2010). MYC and breast cancer. Genes and Cancer, 1(6), 629-640. https://doi.org/10.1177/1947601910378691 Zhou, Y., Zhou, B., Pache, L., Chang, M., Khodabakhshi, A. H., Tanaseichuk, O., ... & Chanda, S. K. (2019). Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1523. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09234-6
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 129 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 160

سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب

پیوندهای مفید

پیوندهای مفید

آمار

Identification of the Genomics and Transcriptomics Regulators of the DNA Damage Response in Breast Cancer