تعداد نشریات | 30 |
تعداد شمارهها | 467 |
تعداد مقالات | 4,522 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,145,281 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,334,966 |
قابلیت یا عدم قابلیت انتساب عملیات طوفان الاقصی به جمهوری اسلامی ایران در پرتو رویه قضایی و اسناد بین المللی | ||
پژوهشنامه حقوق تطبیقی | ||
مقاله 5، دوره 8، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 16، دی 1403 | ||
نوع مقاله: علمی پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/lps.2024.26677.1597 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
حسین رضازاده* 1؛ محمد عباسی اتوئی2 | ||
1استادیار گروه حقوق عمومی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران. | ||
2دکتری حقوق عمومی، واحد ساری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ساری، ایران. | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 13 بهمن 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 11 اردیبهشت 1403، تاریخ پذیرش: 27 خرداد 1403 | ||
چکیده | ||
گروه فلسطینی حماس در تاریخ 7 اکتبر سال 2023، به عملیات نظامی علیه اسرائیل مبادرت ورزیدند. در پی عملیات مذکور که به عملیات طوفان الاقصی معروف گشت برخی از انتساب این عملیات به جمهوری اسلامی ایران سخن گفته اند. بر طبق ماده 8 طرح پیش نویس مسئولیت دولت ها برای ارتکاب اعمال متخلفانه بین المللی (2001) زمانی اعمال شخص یا گروهی از اشخاص به یک دولت منتسب می شود که اعمال مذکور به دستور، تحت هدایت یا کنترل دولت صورت گیرد. منتها مسئله اصلی این است که آستانه هدایت و کنترل بر اساس چه معیار یا معیارهایی تعریف می شود. براساس اسناد بین المللی و رویه های قضایی معیارهای متعددی شامل کنترل کلی، کنترل موثر، کنترل کلی موثر و کنترل نهائی برای انتسابِ اعمالِ یک گروه نظامی به یک دولت خارجی مطرح شده است. بنظر می رسد با توجه به قواعد حقوق بین الملل و هر کدام از معیارهای مذکور در چهارچوب قواعد حقوق بین الملل، عملیات طوفان الاقصی به جمهوری اسلامی ایران قابلیت انتساب ندارد. نوع پژوهش پایه، توصیفی- تحلیلی بوده و با استفاده از منابع کتابخانه ای و همچنین استفاده از منابع الکترونیکی از قبیل کتاب، مقاله، پایان نامه، کنفرانس های رسمی مرتبط با موضوع (منطقه ای و بین المللی) به زبان های موجود فارسی و انگلیسی انجام خواهد شد. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
طوفان الاقصی؛ کنترل کلی؛ کنترل موثر؛ کنترل کلی موثر؛ کنترل نهائی؛ جمهوری اسلامی ایران؛ حقوق بین الملل | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
The possibility or not possibility of assigning the toofan Al-Aqsa operation to the Islamic Republic of Iran in the light of international judicial procedure and documents | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Hossein Rezazadeh1؛ Mohammad Abbasi Atoie2 | ||
1Assistant Professor, Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran , Babolsar, Iran. | ||
2Ph.D. in Public Law, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran. | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
the palestinian group hamas launched military operations against israel on october 7 , 2023 . following the operation , known as al - aqsa storm operations , some of the assignment of the operation to the islamic republic of iran have spoken . according to article 8 of the draft plan , the responsibility of the government to commit wrongful acts of international ( 2001 ) is attributed to the actions of a person or group of persons to a government that the actions are directed to the government under guidance or control of the government . only the main question is what criteria or criteria are defined based on the threshold of guidance and control . according to international documents and judicial procedures , several criteria include total control , effective control , effective total control and final control for attribution of a military group to a foreign government . it seems that according to the international law on the international community and any of the above mentioned measures in the field of international law , the operations of the al - aqsa storm to the islamic republic of iran is not attributable .T. In response to this question, the criteria mentioned in the international law have been examined and the result is that according to the position of the official and political representatives of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the report of the permanent mission of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations, design, planning And the implementation of the Al-Aqsa storm operation was completely carried out by the Palestinian forces, and with none of the above-mentioned criteria, the Al-Aqsa storm operation cannot be attributed to Iran. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Al-Aqsa storm, overall control, effective control, effective overall control, final control, Islamic Republic of Iran, international law | ||
مراجع | ||
Akgül-Açıkmeşe S. & Soli Özel (2024), EU Policy towards the Israel-Palestine Conflict: The Limitations of Mitigation Strategies, Italian Journal of International Affairs, 59(1), 59-78. Alam M. (2024), Postscripts on Israel October 7 Surprise?, Northeastern University, available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4698385 ARAL b. (2023). Israel’s Fateful March: From Settler Colonialism to Genocidal State, Insight Turkey, 25(4), 181-196. AbuHasballah b. (2024). The Palestinian Operation on October 7 Between International Legitimacy and Criminalization, International Journal of Law and Politics Studies, 6(1), 87-95 Beigzadeh E. (1391). Law of International Organization, Tehran, Majd publication. Cassese, A. (2007). The Nicaragua and Tadić Tests Revisited in Light of the ICJ Judgment on Genocide in Bosni. The European Journal of International Law, 18(4), EJIL, 649-668. Danesh S. (1999). The General Legal Framework Governing the Process of a Delegation by the UN Security Councilش of its Chapter VII Powers, Clarendon Press Oxford, 3-49. Dannenbaum, T. (2010). Translating the Standard of Effective Control into a System of Effective Accountability: How Liability Should Be Apportioned for Violations of Human Rights by Member State Troop Contingents Serving as United Nations Peacekeepers, Harvard International Law Journal, 51(1), 113-192. Elhovi Nazari, H., Zawar Jalali, A. (2016). International responsibility of states that finance terrorism, Public Law Studies, 47(3), 725-747. [In Persisn] Gasseling, K. (2017). The Legacy of Srebrenica: Potential Consequences of Reducing Liability for Troop Contributing Countries in Modern UN Peacekeeping Operations, 40 B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 343, 343-361. Mahmoudian, A. (2023). Israel-Hamas Conflflict: Operational Considerations and Strategy, Global and National Security Institute (GNSI), University of South Florida. Messineo, F. (2009). The house of lords in al-jedda and public international law: Attribution of conduct to un-authorized forces and the power of the security council to displace human rights, Netherlands International Law Review, 35-62. Mujezinović Larsen, K. (2008). Attribution of Conduct in Peace Operations: The ‘Ultimate Authority and Control’ Test, The European Journal of International Law, 19(3), 509-531. Nollkaemper, A. (2011). Dual Attribution: Liability of the Netherlands for Conduct of Dutchbat in Srebrenica, Journal of International Criminal Justice 9(1), 1143-1157. Palchetti, P. (2016). Who must bear international responsibility for wrongful conducts of UN peacekeeping forces?, Право и управление. XXI век, 98-114. Palchetti, Paolo (2015), International Responsibility for Conduct of UN Peacekeeping Forces: the question of attribution, University of Macerata, 19-56. Philosophi, H. E. (2012). Eternal Peace and the Rule of Law. New Publication, 2nd Editio, Appendix I. Ryngaert, C. (2017). Peacekeepers Facilitating Human Rights Violations: The Liability of the Dutch State in the Mothers of Srebrenica Cases, Netherlands Judicial Developments, 453–535. Seifi, J., Abdulahi, M., Malekizadeh, A. H. (2013). the possibility of assigning responsibility in the procedure of the International Court of Justice in the light of the genocide case (Bosnia and Herzegovina against Serbia and Montenegro), legal research, 1(5). [In Persian] Smith J, Edwin Jit Leung Kwong, Layth Hanbali, Sali Hafez, Amy Neilson, Rasha Khoury (2023), violence in Palestine demands immediate resolution of its settler colonial root causes, BMJ Glob Health, available at: gh.bmj.com Talmon, S. (2009). The responsibility of outside powers for acts of secessionist entities, 58 Int'l & Comp. L. Tohidi, A. (2024). Zionist Regime Violation of International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Following the October 7, 2023 Hostilities, International Law Review. 40(71), 203-208. [In Persian]
Cases Al-jedda v. (2011). European Court of Human Rights, United Kingdom, 7 July 2011. Behrami v. France, and Saramati v. France, Germany and Norway (2007). European Court of Human Rights, Application No. 71412/01 v. France, and App. No. 78166/01 Grand Chamber decision of 2 May 2007. Court of Appeal of The Hague, Nuhanovic´ v. Netherlands. (2011). No.200.020.174/01, available at: http://www.nuhanovicfoundation.org/user/file/2011_nuhanovic_court_of_appeal_judgment.pdf Hague District Court, Mothers of Srebrenica/Netherlands, 16 july 2014, No. 09/295247 / HA ZA 07-2973. Hague, X and Stichting Mothers of Srebrenica v. (2017). State of the Netherlands, judgment of 27 June 2017, No.200.160.317. ICTY, (1999). Appeals Chamber, Tadić case, 15 July 1999, Case no. IT-94-1-A. Loizidou v. Turkey (1996). European Court of Human Rights, No. 40/1993/435/514, 18 December 1996 Nicaragua v. United States of America (1986). Icj report, case concerning military and paramilitary activities in and against nicaragua, Judgment of 27 june 1986. Stichting mothers of srebrenica and others against the Netherlands (2013). The European Court of Human Rights, Application No. 65542/12, 11 June 2013.
Documents International law commission (2001). Draft articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, with commentaries, 2001, A/56/10. The report, which also contains commentaries on the draft articles, appears in the Yearbook of the International Law Commission, vol. II, Part Two, as corrected International law commission (2011). Draft articles on the responsibility of international organizations, with commentaries, 2011, A/66/10. The report will appear in Yearbook of the International Law Commission, vol. II, Part Two. Remarks of the Secretary-General. (2016). retrieved from…………………………….. https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2016-12-01/secretary-generals-remarks-general-assembly-new-approach-address. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, Human Rights Council (Francesca Albanese), 20 October 2023, A/78/545 Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, Human Rights Council (Francesca Albanese), 25 March 2024, A/HRC/55/73
| ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 154 |