دانشگاه مازندران

 آمار

تعداد نشریات31
تعداد شماره‌ها485
تعداد مقالات4,746
تعداد مشاهده مقاله7,385,743
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله5,515,725
Izadi, Ardalan, Yazdandoost, Farhad. (1402). Asset Management of WDNs Based on Risk Detection (Case Study). پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 1(1), 25-31. doi: 10.22080/cste.2024.5011
Ardalan Izadi; Farhad Yazdandoost. "Asset Management of WDNs Based on Risk Detection (Case Study)". پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 1, 1, 1402, 25-31. doi: 10.22080/cste.2024.5011
Izadi, Ardalan, Yazdandoost, Farhad. (1402). 'Asset Management of WDNs Based on Risk Detection (Case Study)', پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 1(1), pp. 25-31. doi: 10.22080/cste.2024.5011
Izadi, Ardalan, Yazdandoost, Farhad. Asset Management of WDNs Based on Risk Detection (Case Study). پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 1402; 1(1): 25-31. doi: 10.22080/cste.2024.5011

Asset Management of WDNs Based on Risk Detection (Case Study)

Contributions of Science and Technology for Engineering
دوره 1، شماره 1، خرداد 2024، صفحه 25-31    اصل مقاله (563.72 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/cste.2024.5011
نویسندگان
Ardalan Izadi* ؛ Farhad Yazdandoost
K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Civil Engineering Department, Tehran, 1996715433, Iran
تاریخ دریافت: 18 دی 1402،  تاریخ بازنگری: 15 بهمن 1402،  تاریخ پذیرش: 01 اسفند 1402 
چکیده
Traditionally, the focus of many urban decision-makers has been on the expansion of city infrastructures, while management of valuable assets within the existing aging infrastructure is gaining more attention. Consideration of social developments, conflict criteria, risk management, sustainability, and resiliency has further introduced holistic approaches in Water Distribution Networks (WDN) management. Here in this research, a WDN, aged more than 30 years and serving a population of around 20000 people, comprising three municipal districts in a municipality of Iran, has been selected as the case study. Despite the limitations of comprehensive data, it is evident that the network suffers from two major issues, namely the high rate of leakage and frequent pipe failures. The existing condition of the WDN has been simulated using the EPANET software linked to a designed MATLAB suit. The simulation was based on three main modelling processes: Pressure Dependent Demand for water consumption, Poisson Process for pipe failure, and Integrated Model for pipe water leakage. Based on the calibrated results, risk maps of water leakage and pressure/pipe failure of the WDN were developed, and areas with assets that had high priority for intervention were identified. Multiple practical management methods, such as pressure management, pipe renewal, and designing district metering areas (DMA), are proposed to decrease the severity of the detected problems
کلیدواژه‌ها
Asset Management؛ Water Distribution Network (WDN)؛ Risk؛ Pipe Failure؛ Leakage
مراجع
  • Christodoulou, S., Deligianni, A., Aslani, P., & Agathokleous, A. (2009). Risk-based asset management of water piping networks using neurofuzzy systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33(2), 138–149. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2008.12.001.
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2013). Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey and Assessment: Fifth Report to Congress. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Washington, United States. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-07/documents/epa816r13006.pdf (accessed on August 2024).
  • van Heck, G. J. (2008). Asset management frameworks for (drinking water) infrastructures around the world: A (not exhaustive) overview of different initiatives and developments. 2008 First International Conference on Infrastructure Systems and Services: Building Networks for a Brighter Future (INFRA). doi:10.1109/infra.2008.5439626.
  • Halfawy, M. (2004). The interoperability of geographic information systems for municipal asset management applications. Municipal Infrastructure Investment Planning (MIIP) Project Report, Part II, National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2009). Asset Management: A Best Practices Guide. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Washington, United States.
  • Clair, A. M., & Sinha, S. (2012). State-of-the-technology review on water pipe condition, deterioration and failure rate prediction models. Urban Water Journal, 9(2), 85–112. doi:10.1080/1573062X.2011.644566.
  • Lansey, K. E., Basnet, C., Mays, L. W., & Woodburn, J. (1992). Optimal maintenance scheduling for water distribution systems. Civil Engineering Systems, 9(3), 211–226. doi:10.1080/02630259208970650.
  • Roshani, E., & Filion, Y. R. (2014). Event-Based Approach to Optimize the Timing of Water Main Rehabilitation with Asset Management Strategies. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 140(6), 4014004. doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000392.
  • Hall, J. W., Le Masurier, J. W., Baker-Langman, E. A., Davis, J. P., & Taylor, C. A. (2004). A decision-support methodology for performance-based asset management. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 21(1), 51–75. doi:10.1080/1028660031000135086.
  • Heather, A. I. J., & Bridgeman, J. (2007). Water industry asset management: A proposed service-performance model for investment. Water and Environment Journal, 21(2), 127–132. doi:10.1111/j.1747-6593.2006.00057.x.
  • Parton, C., Conner, D., Kumar, D., & Heart, S. (2011). Risk-Based Linear Asset Management at Fort Collins Utilities. Pipelines 2011, 3, 236–247. doi:10.1061/41187(420)23.
  • Cardoso, M. A., Santos Silva, M., Coelho, S. T., Almeida, M. C., & Covas, D. I. C. (2012). Urban water infrastructure asset management - A structured approach in four water utilities. Water Science and Technology, 66(12), 2702–2711. doi:10.2166/wst.2012.509.
  • Marlow, D. (2010). Sustainability-Based Asset Management in the Water Sector. Definitions, Concepts and Scope of Engineering Asset Management, Engineering Asset Management Review, 1, Springer, London, United Kingdom. doi:10.1007/978-1-84996-178-3_13.
  • Wagner, J. M., Shamir, U., & Marks, D. H. (1988). Water Distribution Reliability: Simulation Methods. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 114(3), 276–294. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(1988)114:3(276).
  • Kleiner, Y., & Rajani, B. (2008). Prioritising Individual Water Mains for Renewal. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008, 16, 1–10. doi:10.1061/40976(316)498.
  • Zhuang, B., Lansey, K., & Kang, D. (2013). Resilience/Availability Analysis of Municipal Water Distribution System Incorporating Adaptive Pump Operation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 139(5), 527–537. doi:10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0000676.
  • Giustolisi, O., Berardi, L., Laucelli, D., Savic, D., Walski, T., & Brunone, B. (2014). Battle of Background Leakage Assessment for Water Networks (BBLAWN) at WDSA Conference 2014. Procedia Engineering, 89, 4–12. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.153.
  • Ruzza, V., Crestani, E., Darvini, G., & Salandin, P. (2015). Losses identification in water distribution networks through EnKF and ES. Journal of Applied Water Engineering and Research, 3(1), 12–18. doi:10.1080/23249676.2015.1032373.
  • Tabesh, M., Asadiyami Yekta, A. H., & Burrows, R. (2009). An integrated model to evaluate losses in water distribution systems. Water Resources Management, 23(3), 477–492. doi:10.1007/s11269-008-9284-2.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 51
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 103


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب