دانشگاه مازندران

 آمار

تعداد نشریات31
تعداد شماره‌ها491
تعداد مقالات4,778
تعداد مشاهده مقاله7,410,524
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله5,529,311
Hosseinpour, Iman. (1403). Contribution of Granular Platform on the Behavior of Embankment on Encased Granular Columns. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 1(3), 35-42. doi: 10.22080/cste.2024.5113
Iman Hosseinpour. "Contribution of Granular Platform on the Behavior of Embankment on Encased Granular Columns". پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 1, 3, 1403, 35-42. doi: 10.22080/cste.2024.5113
Hosseinpour, Iman. (1403). 'Contribution of Granular Platform on the Behavior of Embankment on Encased Granular Columns', پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 1(3), pp. 35-42. doi: 10.22080/cste.2024.5113
Hosseinpour, Iman. Contribution of Granular Platform on the Behavior of Embankment on Encased Granular Columns. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 1403; 1(3): 35-42. doi: 10.22080/cste.2024.5113

Contribution of Granular Platform on the Behavior of Embankment on Encased Granular Columns

Contributions of Science and Technology for Engineering
دوره 1، شماره 3، آذر 2024، صفحه 35-42    اصل مقاله (1.28 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/cste.2024.5113
نویسنده
Iman Hosseinpour*
Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Guilan
تاریخ دریافت: 24 تیر 1403،  تاریخ بازنگری: 07 مرداد 1403،  تاریخ پذیرش: 26 مرداد 1403 
چکیده
Conventional stone columns are widely used to improve soft soils in which high compressibility and low shear strength are observed. In very soft soils, granular columns may undergo excessive bulging due to a lack of lateral support provided by the surrounding soil. Wrapping the granular columns with appropriate geosynthetic material can reduce the total and differential settlements while improving the load-carrying capacity of the reinforced ground. A compacted sand or gravel mat (known as a working platform) placed below the embankment is commonly used to prevent excessive lateral deformation of the foundation’s soft soil. In the circumstance of very high applied load, this granular mat may be further reinforced with a geogrid layer to enhance its effectiveness and control the overall stability of the embankment. This paper presents the results of a series of three-dimensional numerical analyses to study the development of hoop forces in geosynthetic encasement under different combinations of working platform thickness and basal geogrid stiffness. The results showed that for a constant working platform thickness, the hoop forces increased with the height of the embankment. The maximum values of the encasement hoop forces were also observed to reduce significantly as the thickness of the working platform increased
کلیدواژه‌ها
Geosynthetics
مراجع
  • Bahadori, H., Farzalizadeh, R., Barghi, A., & Hasheminezhad, A. (2018). A comparative study between gravel and rubber drainage columns for mitigation of liquefaction hazards. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 10(5), 924–934. doi:10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.03.008.
  • Zheng, G., Yu, X., Zhou, H., Wang, S., Zhao, J., He, X., & Yang, X. (2020). Stability analysis of stone column-supported and geosynthetic-reinforced embankments on soft ground. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 48(3), 349–356. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.12.006.
  • Aghili, E., Hosseinpour, I., Jamshidi Chenari, R., & Ahmadi, H. (2021). Behavior of granular column-improved clay under cyclic shear loading. Transportation Geotechnics, 31, 100654. doi:10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100654.
  • Alkhorshid, N. R., Araujo, G. L. S., & Palmeira, E. M. (2021). Consolidation of soft clay foundation improved by geosynthetic-reinforced granular columns: Numerical evaluation. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 13(5), 1173–1181. doi:10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.03.004.
  • Basack, S., & Nimbalkar, S. (2023). Load-Settlement Characteristics of Stone Column Reinforced Soft Marine Clay Deposit: Combined Field and Numerical Studies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(9). doi:10.3390/su15097457.
  • Pandey, B. K., Rajesh, S., & Chandra, S. (2022). Time-Dependent Behavior of Embankment Resting on Soft clay Reinforced with Encased Stone Columns. Transportation Geotechnics, 36, 100809. doi:10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100809.
  • Hosseinpour, I., Rezvani, R., & Ebrahimzade, S. (2024). Undrained Stability Analysis of Embankment on Ordinary and Encased-Granular Columns in Soft Clay. Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, 11(4), 2791–2813. doi:10.1007/s40515-023-00339-6.
  • Grizi, A., Al-Ani, W., & Wanatowski, D. (2022). Numerical Analysis of the Settlement Behavior of Soft Soil Improved with Stone Columns. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 12(11). doi:10.3390/app12115293.
  • Zhang, L., Peng, B., Xu, Z., & Zhou, S. (2022). Shear performance of geosynthetic-encased stone column based on 3D-DEM simulation. Computers and Geotechnics, 151, 104952. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104952.
  • Jasim, O. H., & Tonaroğlu, M. (2023). Using Geogrid Encased Granular Columns for Embankment’s Slope Protection: 3D-Finite Difference Analysis. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 13(4), 2448. doi:10.3390/app13042448.
  • Abusharar, S. W., & Han, J. (2011). Two-dimensional deep-seated slope stability analysis of embankments over stone column-improved soft clay. Engineering Geology, 120(1–4), 103–110. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.04.002.
  • Chen, J. F., Li, L. Y., Xue, J. F., & Feng, S. Z. (2015). Failure mechanism of geosynthetic-encased stone columns in soft soils under embankment. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 43(5), 424–431. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.04.016.
  • Ghorbani, A., Hosseinpour, I., & Shormage, M. (2021). Deformation and Stability Analysis of Embankment over Stone Column-Strengthened Soft Ground. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 25(2), 404–416. doi:10.1007/s12205-020-0349-y.
  • Murugesan, S., & Rajagopal, K. (2006). Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: Numerical evaluation. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 24(6), 349–358. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.05.001.
  • Ali, K., Shahu, J. T., & Sharma, K. G. (2014). Model tests on single and groups of stone columns with different geosynthetic reinforcement arrangement. Geosynthetics International, 21(2), 103–118. doi:10.1680/gein.14.00002.
  • Mirrashed, A. H., Hosseinpour, I., Mirmoradi, S. H., & Ahmadi, H. (2023). Influence of Granular Columns on the Behavior of Reinforced-Soil Wall on Layered Soft Foundation. Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, 10(5), 749–773. doi:10.1007/s40515-022-00241-7.
  • Fatehi, M., Yaghoobi, B., Payan, M., Hosseinpour, I., & Jamshidi Chenari, R. (2023). Combined bearing capacity of footings on geogrid-reinforced granular fill over soft clay. In Geosynthetics International. Geosynthetics International. doi:10.1680/jgein.23.00049.
  • Mohamadi Merse, M., Hosseinpour, I., Payan, M., Jamshidi Chenari, R., & Mohapatra, S. R. (2023). Shear Strength Behavior of Soft Clay Reinforced with Ordinary and Geotextile-Encased Granular Columns. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 9(6). doi:10.1007/s40891-023-00492-5.
  • Hosseinpour, I. (2024). Three-Dimensional Numerical Analysis of Embankment Overlying Geotextile-Encased Columns with Granular Platform. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology - Transactions of Civil Engineering, 48(3), 1641–1653. doi:10.1007/s40996-024-01390-0.
  • Hosseinpour, I. (2015). Test embankment on geotextile encased granular columns stabilized soft ground (Doctoral dissertation, PhD Thesis, Alberto Luiz Coimbra Institute of Postgraduate Studies and Research in Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Brinkgreve, R. B. J., & Vermeer, P.A. (2008). PLAXIS: Finite element code for soil and rock analyses. CRC Press, , Leiden, Netherlands.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 69
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 108


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب