Related Links
Statistics
| Number of Journals | 32 |
| Number of Issues | 554 |
| Number of Articles | 5,380 |
| Article View | 8,161,418 |
| PDF Download | 6,064,433 |
A critical examination of the three foundations of the Teleogical argument, from the perspective of John Hospers | ||
| کاوشهای فلسفه و دین | ||
| Volume 3, Issue 1 - Serial Number 5, September 2024, Pages 143-157 PDF (370.11 K) | ||
| DOI: 10.22080/jre.2024.28028.1221 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Mohammadjavad Hasanzadeh Meshkani* 1; Ruhollah Shakeri2 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Student, of Philosophy, Farabi Campus University of Tehran, Qom, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Farabi Campus University of Tehran, Qom, Iran | ||
| Receive Date: 15 September 2024, Revise Date: 30 October 2024, Accept Date: 22 November 2024 | ||
| Abstract | ||
| The Argument of Order is one of the simplest and most general arguments for the existence of God. This argument consists of two premises and a conclusion, and in Islamic texts, especially in theological discussions, it is more supported and supported than other arguments. On the other hand, some Western philosophers have questioned the validity of this argument. This research is dedicated to examining and analyzing the criticisms of Dr. John Hospers, head of the Department of Philosophy and professor at the University of Southern California, regarding the three main pillars of this argument (the concept of order, the order of the world, and the design of order). In addition, the lack of attention to his works also adds to the importance of this issue. John Hospers has brought the most serious problems to the field of theology in two books, "The Philosophy of Religion" and "An Introduction to Philosophical Analysis". The following research analyzes and examines John Hospers' criticisms of the three pillars of the Argument of Order. The method of this research includes data collection, library studies, and critical analysis of the materials based on the sources available in John Hospers' works. According to the findings of this research, it is clear that Hospers' criticisms of the three pillars of the argument from order do not seem acceptable from a logical and scientific perspective, because "order" has a clear concept that does not need a definition, and it is possible to reach the designer of a phenomenon from the order of it, even if its designer has not been observed. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Argument from order; orderliness of the world; natural and artificial world; divine and human design; John of Hospers | ||
|
Supplementary Files
|
||
| References | ||
|
Holy Quran Ash'ari. A. (No date) Al-La'ma' fi rad'e ala Ahl al-Zigh val Bada'. (Brilliance In Response To The People Of Deviation And Heresy) Research: Hammouda Gharabah. 1 vol. Cairo. Egypt: Al-Maktab Al-Azhariya for Heritage. [In Arabic] Barbour. I. (2015). Elm va dine. (Science and Religion). translated by Bahauddin Khorramshahi, Tehran: Academic Publishing Center. [In Persian] Fakhr Razi. M. (1989). Al-Tafsir al-Kabeer (The Great Interpretation). Beirut. [In Arabic] Ghazali. M. (1985). ehyaee olome din (Revival of Religious Sciences). Beirut. [In Arabic] Gharavian, Mohsen. (1998). Seyri dar adelleye esbate khoda. (A Journey Through the Evidences of the Existence of God). Second Edition, Qom: Bostan Kitab. [In Persian]. Hadi. J. (2003) Allah khalegh–alkaon._(allah the Creator of the Universe). 1 vol. Qom, Iran, Imam Sadiq (peace be upon him) Institute. [In Arabic] Hospers. J. (No date) falsafeye dine. (Philosophy of Religion. Criticism of Arguments for the Existence of God by the Method of Philosophical Analysis). translated by the Translation and Editorial Group of the Center for Islamic Studies and Research, Qom: Islamic Propaganda Office of the Qom Seminary. [In Persian]. Hollingdale, R, (2008) tarikhe falsafeye din. (History of Western Philosophy), translated by Abdolhossein Azarang, 7th edition, Tehran: Qoqnoos Publications. [In Persian]. Hick. J. (2008) vojode khoda. (The Existence of God). translated by Abdolrahim Gawahi, first edition. Tehran: Alam Publishing House. [In Persian]. Hospers. J. (1990). An Introduction to Philosophical Analysis. 3rd Ed, Routledge. London. Javadi Amoli.A. (2007) tabyine barahine esbate khoda. (Explanation of the proofs of God). Qom: Isra Publishing Center. [In Persian] Kant.I. (1992) Critic of Pure Reason، trans، Abbot، in the Great Books university of chicago. Motahari. M. (2009). Elale gerayesh be maddigarayi. (Causes of the Tendency to Materialism), Tehran: Sadra Publications. [In Persian]. Pour Rostayi. J. (2013). Rahyafti Qurani be nezame ahsan. (A Qur'anic approach to good system.) first edition, Qom: Hozwa Research Institute and University. [In Persian] Sobhani. J. (2002). al-elahiat ala-lhoda va-sonna va-laghle. (Theology on the Guidance of the Book, the Sunnah, and the Mind.) Qom: Imam al-Sadiq (a.s.) Foundation. [In Arabic] Sobhani. J. (2017 b). porseshha va pasokhha. (Questions and answers) Qom: Imam Sadiq Institute. [In Persian] Sobhani. J. (2017 a) madkhle masaele jadid dar elme kalam. (Introduction to new issues in theology). third edition, Qom: Imam Sadiq Institute. [In Persian] Salari. a. (2005). Pasokh be shobahate jon hospers dar falsafeye din. (Response to John Hospers' Doubts in the Philosophy of Religion.) Tehran: Islamic Azad University. [In Persian]. Shahid Sadr. M. (1970). Dalile elmi baraye esbate vojode khoda. (Scientific Evidence for Proving the Existence of God). First Edition. Tehran: Saeed Publications. [In Persian]. Warburton. N. (2007) alefbaye falsafeh. (The Alphabet of Philosophy), translated by Masoud Alia, third edition, Tehran: Qognoos. [In Persian]. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 151 PDF Download: 95 |
||
