| تعداد نشریات | 32 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 581 |
| تعداد مقالات | 5,665 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 8,610,306 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 6,280,628 |
تراکم جوامع صنعتی و محیط زیست: شواهدی از کشورهای آسیا | ||
| جامعه و محیط زیست | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 1، شماره 3، دی 1403، صفحه 21-47 اصل مقاله (588.93 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/jsn.2024.27813.1073 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| یوسف محنت فر* 1؛ فریبا عثمانی2؛ مهدی محمودی3؛ منوچهر جانبازی4 | ||
| 1دانشیار گروه اقتصاد انرژی، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم اداری، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران. | ||
| 2دانش آموخته دکترای اقتصاد، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران. | ||
| 3دانشجوی دکترای اقتصاد، گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران. | ||
| 4دانشجوی دکترای مدیریت، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ساری، ساری، ایران. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 08 مهر 1403، تاریخ پذیرش: 11 آذر 1403 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| زمینه و هدف:توسعه فرآیندهای تولید صنعتی به انرژی نیاز دارند و استفاده از انرژی سبب انتشار کربن میشود. از طرفی، امروزه با توجه به توسعه جوامع صنعتی، شناخت پیامدهای زیست محیطی تراکم صنعتی از چالشهای پیشروی اکثر کشورها است هدف اصلی پژوهش حاضر، ارزیابی اثر تراکم صنعتی بر انتشار دیاکسید کربن در پانلی از کشورهای آسیا طی دوره زمانی 1990- 2022 میباشد. روش شناسی: از اینرو، ابتدا تراکم صنعتی براساس شاخص آنتروپی مکان محاسبه شده است و سپس اثر تراکم صنعتی بر انتشار CO2 سرانه با رویکرد پانل کوانتایل مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. یافته ها: نتایج در سه گروه کوانتایلهای پایین، متوسط و بالا طبقهبندی شده است. ضمناً در این مطالعه رویکرد اثرات ثابت دریسکول- کرای نیز برای استحکام نتایج بکار گرفته شده است. نتایج حاکی از این است که افزایش تراکم صنعتی باعث افزایش انتشار کربن در کشورهای آسیا میشود. نتایج آنالیز بیشتر در گروه کشورهای عمده نفتی آسیا نیز بیانگر این است که بین تراکم صنعتی و انتشار دیاکسید کربن در کوانتایلهای بالا رابطه مثبت و معناداری وجود دارد. نتایج آزمون علیت پانل دومیترسکو و هورلین رابطه دو طرفه بین تراکم صنعتی و انتشار CO2 را نشان میدهد. نتیجه گیری: در این مطالعه، متغیرهای تولید صنعتی، جهانی شدن، شهرنشینی و پیچیدگی اقتصادی به عنوان متغیرهای کنترلی در نظر گرفته شده است. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| تراکم صنعتی؛ انتشار دیاکسید کربن؛ جهانی شدن؛ جوامع صنعتی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Agglomeration of industrial societies and the environment: evidence from Asian countries | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Yosef Mehnatfar1؛ Fariba Osmani2؛ mehdi mahmoodi3؛ manoocher janbazi4 | ||
| 1Associate Professor, Department of Economic Sciences, Energy Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran | ||
| 2PhD in Economics, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. | ||
| 3PhD in Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. | ||
| 4PhD student in Management, Department of Management, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University of Sari, Sari, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Context and Purpose :The development of industrial production processes requires energy, and the use of energy causes carbon emissions. On the other hand, today, due to the development of industrial societies, knowing the environmental consequences of industrial agglomeration is one of the challenges facing most countries. The main goal of this research is to evaluate the effect of industrial agglomeration on carbon dioxide emissions in a panel of Asian countries during the period 1990–2022. Methodology: Therefore, first the industrial agglomeration has been calculated based on the location entropy index and then the effect of industrial agglomeration on CO2 emissions per capita has been investigated with the quantile panel approach. Findings: The results are classified into three groups: low, medium, and high quantiles. In addition, in this study, the Driscoll-Cray fixed effects approach has been used to strengthen the results. The results indicate that increasing industrial agglomeration increases carbon emissions in Asian countries. The results of further analysis in the group of major Asian oil countries also show that there is a positive and significant relationship between industrial density and carbon dioxide emissions in high quantiles. The results of Dumitrescu and Hurlin's panel causality test show a two-way relationship between industrial density and CO2 emissions. Conclusion :In this study, the variables of industrial production, globalization, urbanization, and economic complexity are considered control variables. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| industrial agglomeration, carbon dioxide emission, globalization, industrial societies | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Arnaut, M., & Dada, J. T. (2023). Exploring the nexus between economic complexity, energy consumption and ecological footprint: new insights from the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 17(6), 1137-1160. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-06-2022-0015 Balsalobre-Lorente, D., dos Santos Parente, C. C., Leitão, N. C., & Cantos-Cantos, J. M. (2023). The influence of economic complexity processes and renewable energy on CO2 emissions of BRICS. What about industry 4.0?. Resources Policy, 82, 103547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103547 Brülhart, M., & Mathys, N. A. (2008). Sectoral agglomeration economies in a panel of European regions. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 38(4), 348-362. Chang, C. L., & Oxley, L. (2009). Industrial agglomeration, geographic innovation and total factor productivity: The case of Taiwan. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 79(9), 2787-2796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2008.09.003 Chen, D., Chen, S., & Jin, H. (2018). Industrial agglomeration and CO2 emissions: Evidence from 187 Chinese prefecture-level cities over 2005–2013. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 993-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.068 Chen, Y., Wang, Z., & Zhong, Z. (2019). CO2 emissions, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy production and foreign trade in China. Renewable Energy, 131, 208-216. https://doi.org/210.1016/j.renene.2018.1007.1047. Cheng, Z. (2016). The spatial correlation and interaction between manufacturing agglomeration and environmental pollution. Ecological indicators, 61, 1024-1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.060 Cui, S., Wang, Y., Xu, P., & Li, L. (2024). Ecological welfare performance, industrial agglomeration and technological innovation: an empirical study based on Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei, Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(1), 1505-1528. Doğan B, Saboori B, Can M (2019) Does economic complexity matter for environmental degradation? An empirical analysis for different stages of development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26(31): 31900-31912. https://doi.org/31910.31007/s11356-31019-06333-31901. Doğan, B., Driha, O.M., Balsalobre- Lorente, D., & Shahzad, U. (2021). The mitigating effects of economic complexity and renewable energy on carbon emissions in developed countries. Sustainable Development, 29(1), 1-12. doi: 10.1002/sd.2125. Dogan, B., Madaleno, M., Tiwari, A.K., & Hammoudeh, S. (2020). Impacts of export quality on environmental degradation: does income matter? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 13735–13772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07371-5. Dong, F., Yu, B., & Pan, Y. (2019). Examining the synergistic effect of CO2 emissions on PM2. 5 emissions reduction: Evidence from China. Journal of cleaner production, 223, 759-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.152 Dumitrescu, E. I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29, 1450–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014 Eslami Giski Sakineh, Salimi Far Mostafa, Saifi Ahmad. (2022). Investigating the impact of industrial density on pollution density: spatial econometric approach, Planning and Budgeting Quarterly 1401; 27 (1): 155-176. doi:10.52547/jpbud.27.1.155 (In Persian). Figge, L., Oebels, K., & Offermans, A. (2017). The effects of globalization on Ecological Footprints: an empirical analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19(3), 863-876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9769-8 Ghazouani, T., & Maktouf, S. (2024, February). Impact of natural resources, trade openness, and economic growth on CO2 emissions in oil‐exporting countries: A panel autoregressive distributed lag analysis. In Natural Resources Forum. 48 (1), 211-231. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12318 He, C.F., Huang, Z.J., Ye, X.Y., 2014. Spatial heterogeneity of economic development and industrial pollution in urban China. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 28 (15), 767-781.10.1007/s00477-013-0736-8 Kazemzadeh, E., Fuinhas, J. A., Koengkan, M., & Osmani, F. (2022). The heterogeneous effect of economic complexity and export quality on the ecological footprint: a two-step club convergence and panel quantile regression approach. Sustainability, 14(18), 11153. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811153 Koenker, R. (2004). Quantile regression for longitudinal data. J. Multivar. 91, 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2004.05.006. Koenker, R., & Xiao, Z. (2002). Inference on the quantile regression process. Econometrica, 70(4), 1583-1612. https://doi.org/1510.1111/1468-0262.00342. Koenker, R., Bassett, J.G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 33-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913643. Li, H., & Liu, B. (2022). The effect of industrial agglomeration on China’s carbon intensity: Evidence from a dynamic panel model and a mediation effect model. Energy Reports, 8, 96-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.05.070 Li, X., Lai, X., & Zhang, F. (2021). Research on green innovation effect of industrial agglomeration from perspective of environmental regulation: Evidence in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 288, 125583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125583 Liu, J., Cheng, Z., & Zhang, H. (2017). Does industrial agglomeration promote the increase of energy efficiency in China?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.179 Liu, X., Yu, Z., Wei, Q., Wen, G., Duan, X., & You, X. (2013). Modification of polycrystalline nanodiamonds by using periodic magnetic field enhanced hydrogen plasma and the application on nanogrinding of thin film magnetic head. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 416, 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.10.024 Lv, Z., & Xu, T. (2019). Trade openness, urbanization and CO2 emissions: Dynamic panel data analysis of middle-income countries. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 28(3), 317-330. https://doi.org/310.1080/09638199.09632018.01534878. Mehnat-Far, Y., Osmani, F., Cheshmi, M., & Argha, L. (2023). Does the development of technology and the expansion of trade reduce the ecological footprint? Case study: evidence from developing countries. Economic Growth and Development Research, 14(53), 110-97. doi: 10.30473/egdr.2023.68695.6758 (In Persian). Nie, X., Wei, X., Xia, Q., & Zhou, M. (2021). Customers’ purchase intention for hydrogen vehicle and industrial agglomeration: Evidence from Jiangsu Province, China. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(34), 18011-18019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.055 Ning, L., Wang, F., & Li, J. (2016). Urban innovation, regional externalities of foreign direct investment and industrial agglomeration: Evidence from Chinese cities. Research Policy, 45(4), 830-843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.014 Pata, U.K. (2020). Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic complexity, CO2 emissions, and ecological footprint in the USA: testing the EKC hypothesis with a structural break. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-11020-10446-11353. Pei, Y., Zhu, Y., Liu, S., & Xie, M. (2021). Industrial agglomeration and environmental pollution: based on the specialized and diversified agglomeration in the Yangtze River Delta. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(3), 4061-4085. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers. Economics, 1240(1), 1. http://ssrn.com/abstract=572504. Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of econometrics, 142(1), 50-93.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010 Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Boston: Harvard Business Review. 76 (6), 77-90. Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard business review, 86(1), 78. Raza, S. A., & Shah, N. (2018). Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in G7 countries: the role of renewable energy consumption and trade. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(27), 26965-26977. https://doi.org/26910.21007/s11356-26018-22673-z. Rizov, M., Oskam, A., & Walsh, P. (2012). Is there a limit to agglomeration? Evidence from productivity of Dutch firms. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(4), 595-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2012.02.006 Song, Y., Zhu, J., Yue, Q., Zhang, M., & Wang, L. (2023). Industrial agglomeration, technological innovation and air pollution: Empirical evidence from 277 prefecture-level cities in China. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 66, 240-252. Su, Y., & Yu, Y. Q. (2020). Spatial agglomeration of new energy industries on the performance of regional pollution control through spatial econometric analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 704, 135261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135261 Swann, P., & Prevezer, M. (1996). A comparison of the dynamics of industrial clustering in computing and biotechnology. Research policy, 25(7), 1139-1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00897-9 Wang, J., & Long, F. (2024). Grain industrial agglomeration and grain green total factor productivity in China: A dynamic spatial durbin econometric analysis. Heliyon. Wang, Y., & Wang, J. (2019). Does industrial agglomeration facilitate environmental performance: new evidence from urban China?. Journal of environmental management, 248, 109244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.07.015 Wang, Y., Chen, L., & Kubota, J. (2016). The relationship between urbanization, energy use and carbon emissions: evidence from a panel of Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1368-1374. https://doi.org/1310.1016/j.jclepro.2015.1306.1041. Xiao, Z. Y., & Shen, Z. C. (2019). The temporal and spatial evolution of population & industrial agglomeration and environmental pollution and the relevance analysis. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment. 2, 1-8. http://open.oriprobe.com/order.htm?id=55334626&ftext=base Xu, L., Jiang, T., Lin, P., Shao, J. J., He, C., Zhong, W.,.. & Wang, Z. L. (2018). Coupled triboelectric nanogenerator networks for efficient water wave energy harvesting. ACS nano, 12(2), 1849-1858. Xu, X. (2023). Identifying the Impact of Industrial Agglomeration on China’s Carbon Emissions Based on the Spatial Econometric Analysis. Journal of Environmental and Public Health.1- 17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4354068 Zhang, K., Xu, D., & Li, S. (2019). The impact of environmental regulation on environmental pollution in china: an empirical study based on the synergistic efect of industrial agglomeration. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(25), 25775–25788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05854-z. Zhang, L., Rong, P., Qin, Y., & Ji, Y. (2018). Does industrial agglomeration mitigate fossil CO2 emissions? An empirical study with spatial panel regression model. Energy Procedia, 152, 731-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.09.237 Zheng, Q., & Lin, B. (2018). Impact of industrial agglomeration on energy efficiency in China’s paper industry. Journal of cleaner production, 184, 1072-1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.016 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 240 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 251 |
||