پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 499 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,850 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,491,451 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,593,193 |
تحلیل موانع تحقق اهداف و چالشهای پیش روی پژوهش‌سراهای دانش‌آموزی از منظر مدیران و دبیران: دلالت‌هایی برای بهبود برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی | ||
| مطالعات برنامه ریزی آموزشی | ||
| دوره 14، شماره 27، شهریور 1404، صفحه 90-112 اصل مقاله (757.44 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/eps.2025.29308.2343 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| فیروز محمودی1؛ حسین استادحسنلو* 2؛ عیسی برقی3 | ||
| 1گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران | ||
| 2* دکتری تخصصی برنامه ریزی درسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه تبریز، ایران | ||
| 3گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهیدمدنی آذربایجان، تبریز، ایران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 01 خرداد 1404، تاریخ بازنگری: 09 خرداد 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 18 تیر 1404 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف: پژوهش‌سراهای دانش‌آموزی نقش مهمی در پرورش خلاقیت و مهارت‌های پژوهشی دانش‌آموزان ایفا می‌کنند. با این حال، این مراکز در مسیر دستیابی به اهداف خود با چالش‌هایی روبرو هستند که نیازمند بررسی دقیق است. این مطالعه با هدف شناسایی، بررسی چالشهای پیش روی پژوهش سراهای دانش آموزی از دیدگاه دو گروه اصلی بازیگر کلیدی (مدیران و دبیران تخصصی) و تبیین دلالتهای آن برای برنامه ریزی آموزشی مؤثر، به منظور درک موانع تحقق اهداف این مراکز در تقویت پژوهش و خلاقیت انجام شده است. روش‌شناسی: پژوهش حاضر با رویکرد کیفی و مبتنی بر تحلیل محتوای مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌ساختاریافته انجام پذیرفت. جامعه پژوهش شامل کلیه مدیران و دبیران تخصصی همکار در پژوهش‌سراهای دانش‌آموزی استان آذربایجان شرقی در سال تحصیلی ۱۴۰3-1404 بود. نمونه‌گیری به روش هدفمند انجام شد و شامل ۱۵ مدیر و ۲۵ دبیر گردید که بر اساس تجربه و درگیری فعال آنها در پژوهش‌سراها انتخاب شدند. داده‌های گردآوری‌شده با استفاده از روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی تحلیل شدند. برای افزایش اعتمادپذیری یافته‌ها، از راهبردهایی نظیر بازبینی توسط همکاران و تطبیق نتایج با مبانی نظری و پیشینه پژوهش بهره گرفته شد. یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد که مدیران و دبیران تخصصی با چالشهای متمایزی در ابعاد سیستمی، زیرساختی، نگرشی و مهارتی مواجه هستند که بر عملکرد کلی پژوهش‌سراها و تحقق اهداف برنامه‌ریزی شده برای آنها تأثیرگذار است. نتیجه‌گیری و پیشنهادها: تحلیل مقایسه‌ای دیدگاه‌های مدیران و دبیران، شکافی عمیق بین اهداف اولیه تأسیس پژوهش‌سراها (تقویت پژوهش و خلاقیت) و واقعیت اجرایی آنها را آشکار می‌سازد. این چالش‌ها بر ضرورت بازنگری در سیاست‌ها و برنامه‌ریزی‌های آموزشی مرتبط با این مراکز و همچنین اتخاذ رویکردی چندجانبه و هماهنگ برای رفع آنها از دیدگاه هر دو گروه تأکید دارد. نوآوری و اصالت: این پژوهش با ارائه دسته‌بندی دقیقی از موانع از دیدگاه مدیران و دبیران و برجسته‌سازی دیدگاه‌هایشان، به درک جامع‌تری از وضعیت موجود و ریشه‌های مشکلات کمک می‌کند. این امر مبنایی برای برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی هدفمندتر و مداخلات سیاستی مؤثرتر جهت بهبود عملکرد این مراکز فراهم می‌آورد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| پژوهش‌سراهای دانش‌آموزی؛ مدیران پژوهش سرا؛ معلمان تخصصی؛ برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Analyzing the Barriers to Achieving the Goals and the Challenges Facing Student Research Centers from the Perspectives of Administrators and Teachers: Implications for Improving Educational Planning | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| firooz mahmoudi1؛ hossein ostadhasanloo2؛ isa barqi3 | ||
| 1Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| 2Ph.D. in Curriculum, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Tabriz, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Madani University of Azerbaijan, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Aim: Student research centers play a vital role in fostering students’ creativity and research skills. However, these centers face various challenges in achieving their intended goals, which require thorough examination. This study aims to identify and analyze the challenges confronting student research centers from the perspectives of two key stakeholder groups—administrators and subject-specialist teachers—and to explore their implications for effective educational planning. The research seeks to better understand the obstacles hindering these centers from realizing their mission of promoting research and creativity among students. Methodology: A qualitative approach was employed using content analysis of semi-structured interviews. The study population consisted of all managers and subject teachers involved in student research centers in East Azerbaijan Province during the 2024–2025 academic year. A purposive sampling method was used, selecting 15 managers and 25 teachers based on their experience and active engagement in these centers. Data were analyzed through qualitative content analysis, and strategies such as peer review and alignment with theoretical frameworks and previous studies were used to enhance the trustworthiness of the findings. Findings: The results showed that managers and specialized secretaries face distinct challenges in systemic, infrastructural, attitudinal, and skill dimensions that affect the overall performance of research centers and the achievement of their planned objectives. Conclusions and suggestions: infrastructural, attitudinal, and skill-based dimensions. These challenges significantly impact the overall performance of student research centers and hinder the achievement of their intended goals. A comparative analysis of the perspectives of managers and teachers reveals a significant gap between the original objectives of these centers (enhancing research and creativity) and their practical implementation. The findings highlight the need for revisiting relevant educational policies and planning strategies, emphasizing a coordinated and multi-faceted approach to address the identified challenges from both managerial and instructional standpoints. Innovation and originality: By providing a detailed categorization of the challenges from the perspectives of administrators and teachers and highlighting their viewpoints, this study contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of the current situation and the underlying causes of existing problems. This, in turn, lays the groundwork for more targeted educational planning and more effective policy interventions aimed at improving the performance of these centers. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Student Research Centers, Research Center Managers, Subject Teachers, Educational Planning | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdulwahed, M. (2017). Technology Innovation and Engineering’ Education and Entrepreneurship (TIEE) in Engineering Schools: Novel Model for Elevating National Knowledge Based Economy and Socio-Economic Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 9(2), 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020171 Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the curriculum. McGraw-Hill Education (UK). Bilsland, C., Carter, L., & Wood, L. (2020). Beyond the degree: graduate transitions from a transnational campus in Vietnam. Higher Education, 80(6), 1103–1120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00533-2 Day, D. A., Ferrari, N., & Broadbridge, C. C. (2014). The Role of Collaborative Student Research on the Development of 21st Century Skills. MRS Proceedings, 1657. https://doi.org/10.1557/opl.2014.400 Fathzadeh, A. (2013). A study on the status of research in student research centers in Tehran, Master’s thesis, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Faculty of Educational Sciences. [In Persian] Ghaffari Esmaeili, S. A., Hassani, M., & Ghalavandi, H. (2022). An analysis of the development level of educational indicators as a factor for evaluating inequality and achieving sustainable educational equity: A case study of Mazandaran province. Journal of Educational Planning Studies, 11(21), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.22080/eps.2022.22184.2062 [In Persian] Gilak Hakimabadi, M. T., Rahimi, R., & Sa'adati, K. (2016). Measuring public education expenditure inequality in North, Razavi, and South Khorasan provinces. Journal of Educational Planning Studies, 5(10), 38–41. https://doi.org/10.22080/eps.2017.1614 [In Persian] Hajitabar Firoozjai, M., Khalvandi, F., & Hoseini, N. (2015). An analysis of educational expenditures in the educational districts of Tehran. Journal of Educational Planning Studies, 4(8), 89–114.[In Persian] Kalayi Darabi, R., & Taghvaei Yazdi, M. (2018). Presenting an educational and research dimension model for incubator centers and its impact on sustainable university development. Journal of Educational Planning Studies, 7(14), 146–171. https://doi.org/10.22080/eps.1970.2129 [In Persian] Kustitskaya, T. A., Esin, R. V., Kytmanov, A. A., & Zykova, T. V. (2023). Designing an Education Database in a Higher Education Institution for the Data-Driven Management of the Educational Process. Education Sciences, 13(9), 947. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090947 Laux, T., Stephens, M., & Meka, J. (2021). Student-generated learning objectives and curricular innovation. Journal of Regional Medical Campuses, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.24926/jrmc.v4i2.3637 Li, J., Xue, E., & Guo, S. (2025). The effects of PISA on global basic education reform: a systematic literature review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04403-z Lyu, J., Shepherd, D., & Lee, K. (2023). From intentional to nascent student entrepreneurs: The moderating role of university entrepreneurial offerings. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(1), 100305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100305 Motamedi, E. (2005). Student research centers create hope. Peyvand Magazine, 315, 4–6. (In Persian) Park, W. K. (2015). Student Research in Basic Medical Education: Why Do We Say Student Research? Korean Medical Education Review, 17(2), 57–59. https://doi.org/10.17496/kmer.2015.17.2.57 Rahman, F., Fizzano, P., Peck, E. M., Ahmed, S., & Thompson, S. (2018). How to Build a Student-Centered Research Culture for the Benefit of Undergraduate Students. Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 1064–1064. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3162179 Roffeei, S. H. M., Yusop, F., & Kamarulzaman, Y. (2018). Determinants of innovation culture amongst higher education students. In Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET 17 (1), 37-50, 2018. Salas-Velasco, M., Moreno-Herrero, D., & Sánchez-Campillo, J. (2020). Positive Geographical Spillovers of Human Capital on Student Learning Outcomes. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 14(2), 415–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-020-09366-z Schmidt, W. H., Guo, S., & Sullivan, W. F. (2024). Inequality in USA mathematics education: the roles race and socio-economic status play. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 56(3), 497–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01593-9 Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1) http://www.itdl.org/ Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm. Song, F., Yu, J., Zhang, G., & Li, Y. (2013). Carry out research experiments teaching to train students innovation capability. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Education Technology and Management Science. 2013 Conference on Education Technology and Management Science. https://doi.org/10.2991/icetms.2013.134 Supreme Council of Education. (2016). Statute of student research centers. Tehran: Ministry of Education. (In Persian) Swist, T., Gulson, K. N., & Thompson, G. (2023). Education Prototyping: a Methodological Device for Technical Democracy. Postdigital Science and Education, 6(1), 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00426-4 Tafi, Z. (2014). An evaluation of student research centers’ performance from the perspective of research staff, managers, and secondary school teachers in Tehran Province, Master’s thesis, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Faculty of Humanities. (In Persian) Teng, Y., Pu, R., & Hao, Y. (2024). How can an innovative teaching force be developed? The empowering role of distributed leadership. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101464 Weilerstein, P., & Couetil, N. D. (2016). CREATING A CULTURE OF INVENTION: FOSTERING STUDENT INNOVATION AND INVENTION THROUGH PROACTIVE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICY AND PRACTICE. Technology & Innovation, 17(4), 205–210. https://doi.org/10.3727/194982416x14520374943149 West, H., & Hill, J. L. (2018). Reflections on student-staff research partnership: Opportunities, benefits, & challenges. Yordanova, Z., Bozev, V., Stoimenova, B., & Biolcheva, P. (2020). Innovation and Competitiveness of Universities – An Empirical Research. In Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (pp. 438–447). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44322-1_32 Zhang, F., Wang, X., & Zhang, X. (2024). Applications of deep learning method of artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 30(2), 1563–1587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12883-w | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 62 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 9 |
||