دانشگاه مازندران

 Statistics

Number of Journals32
Number of Issues554
Number of Articles5,380
Article View8,161,418
PDF Download6,064,433
(2025). . Journal of Executive Management, 1(2), 55-73. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2025.29333.1016
. "". Journal of Executive Management, 1, 2, 2025, 55-73. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2025.29333.1016
(2025). '', Journal of Executive Management, 1(2), pp. 55-73. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2025.29333.1016
. Journal of Executive Management, 2025; 1(2): 55-73. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2025.29333.1016

Civil Engineering and Applied Solutions
Volume 1, Issue 2, January 0, Pages 55-73    PDF (2.19 M)
DOI: 10.22080/ceas.2025.29333.1016
Receive Date: 25 May 2025,  Revise Date: 07 June 2025,  Accept Date: 13 June 2025 
References
  1. Rincon, L. F., Moscoso, Y. M., Hamami, A. E. A., Matos, J. C., Bastidas-Arteaga, E. Degradation Models and Maintenance Strategies for Reinforced Concrete Structures in Coastal Environments under Climate Change: A Review. Buildings, 2024; 14 (3). doi:10.3390/buildings14030562.
  2. Feng, D., Feng, M. Q. Computer Vision for SHM of Civil Infrastructure: From Dynamic Response Measurement to Damage Detection – A Review. Engineering Structures, 2018; 156: 105–117. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.018.
  3. Asgari, A., Khabiri, A. Dynamic Analysis of Fatigue-Cracked Beams: The Nonlinear Response with the Analytical Method. Civil Engineering and Applied Solutions, 2025; 1(2): 43-54. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2025.29000.1002.
  4. Tibaduiza Burgos, D. A., Gomez Vargas, R. C., Pedraza, C., Agis, D., Pozo, F. Damage Identification in Structural Health Monitoring: A Brief Review from Its Implementation to the Use of Data-Driven Applications. Sensors (Switzerland), 2020; 20 (3). doi:10.3390/s20030733.
  5. Kong, K., Dyer, K., Payne, C., Hamerton, I., Weaver, P. M. Progress and Trends in Damage Detection Methods, Maintenance, and Data-Driven Monitoring of Wind Turbine Blades – A Review. Renewable Energy Focus , 2023; 44: 390–412. doi:10.1016/j.ref.2022.08.005.
  6. Doebling, S. W. S., Farrar, C. R. C., Prime, M. B. M., Shevitz, D. W. D. Damage Identification and Health Monitoring of Structural and Mechanical Systems from Changes in Their Vibration Characteristics: A Literature Review. Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1996; doi:10.2172/249299.
  7. Xiang, Z., Wang, L., Zhou, M. Suppressing Damage Identification Errors from Selected Natural Frequencies and Mode Shape Points. Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering, 2012; 20 (7): 871–890. doi:10.1080/17415977.2011.589902.
  8. Abe, M. Structural Damage Detection by Natural Frequencies. In 37th Structure, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics: Reston, Virigina, 1996; pp 1064–1069. doi:10.2514/6.1996-1440.
  9. Kaveh, A., Zolghadr, A. An Improved CSS for Damage Detection of Truss Structures Using Changes in Natural Frequencies and Mode Shapes. Advances in Engineering Software, 2015; 80: 93–100. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.09.010.
  10. Cawley, P., Adams, R. D. The Location of Defects in Structures from Measurements of Natural Frequencies. The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design, 1979; 14 (2): 49–57. doi:10.1243/03093247V142049.
  11. Adams, R. D., Cawley, P., Pye, C. J., Stone, B. J. Vibration Technique for Non-Destructively Assessing the Integrity of Structures. J Mech Eng Sci, 1978; 20 (2): 93–100. doi:10.1243/jmes_jour_1978_020_016_02.
  12. Ciambella, J., Pau, A., Vestroni, F. Modal Curvature-Based Damage Localization in Weakly Damaged Continuous Beams. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2019; 121: 171–182. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.11.012.
  13. Chu, S. Y., Wu, R. L. A Normalized-Relative-Displacement-Vibration-Shape (NRDVS)-Based Structural Damage Assessment Scheme. Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance, 2018; 3 (3): 150–159. doi:10.1080/24705314.2018.1492667.
  14. Liu, Y. Research on Bridge Damage Identification Method Based on Dynamic Characteristics. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports, 2023; 25 (8): 87–93. doi:10.9734/jerr/2023/v25i8961.
  15. Yoo, S.-H. Damage Detection of Shear Building Structures Using Dynamic Response. Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection, 2014; 18 (3): 101–107. doi:10.11112/jksmi.2014.18.3.101.
  16. Hsieh, K. H., Halling, M. W., Barr, P. J., Robinson, M. J. Structural Damage Detection Using Dynamic Properties Determined from Laboratory and Field Testing. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2008; 22 (4): 238–244. doi:10.1061/(asce)0887-3828(2008)22:4(238).
  17. Sun, G., Liu, C., Zhang, S., Hao, E. Three-Step Damage Identification Method Based on Dynamic Characteristics. Transactions of Tianjin University, 2014; 20 (5): 379–384. doi:10.1007/s12209-014-2115-z.
  18. Feng, D., & Feng, M. Q.  Computer vision for SHM of civil infrastructure: From dynamic response measurement to damage detection–A review.  Engineering Structures, 2018; 156:105-117. Doi: 1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.018.
  19. Pothisiri, T., Hjelmstad, K. D. Structural Damage Detection and Assessment from Modal Response. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2003; 129 (2): 135–145. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2003)129:2(135).
  20. Huynh, D., He, J., Tran, D. Damage Location Vector: A Non-Destructive Structural Damage Detection Technique. Computers and Structures, 2005; 83 (28-30): 2353–2367. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.03.029.
  21. Escobar, J. A., Sosa, J. J., Gómez, R. Structural Damage Detection Using the Transformation Matrix. Computers and Structures, 2005; 83 (4–5): 357–368. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.08.013.
  22. Magacho, E. G., Jorge, A. B., Gomes, G. F. Inverse Problem Based Multiobjective Sunflower Optimization for Structural Health Monitoring of Three-Dimensional Trusses. Evolutionary Intelligence, 2023; 16 (1): 247–267. doi:10.1007/s12065-021-00652-4.
  23. Mashayekhi, M., Shirpour, A., Sadeghi, R. Finding Optimum Parameters of Passive Tuned Mass Damper by PSO, WOA, and Hybrid PSO-WOA (HPW) Algorithms. Journal of Soft Computing in Civil Engineering, 2023; 7 (4): 72–92. doi:10.22115/SCCE.2023.352340.1489.
  24. Ghaemifard, S., Ghannadiasl, A. Usages of Metaheuristic Algorithms in Investigating Civil Infrastructure Optimization Models; a Review. AI in Civil Engineering, 2024; 3 (1). doi:10.1007/s43503-024-00036-4.
  25. Sahoo, B., Maity, D. Damage Assessment of Structures Using Hybrid Neuro-Genetic Algorithm. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 2007; 7 (1): 89–104. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2005.04.001.
  26. Aval, S. B. B., Mohebian, P. A Novel Optimization Algorithm Based on Modal Force Information for Structural Damage Identification. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 2021; 21 (7). doi:10.1142/S0219455421501005.
  27. Abdolkhani, A., Raoufi, R. Structural Modal Identification and Damage Detection with Incomplete Data Utilized by Genetic Algorithm Optimization. Structures, 2023; 55: 16–27. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2023.06.009.
  28. Gökdaǧ, H., Yildiz, A. R. Structural Damage Detection Using Modal Parameters and Particle Swarm Optimization. Materialpruefung/Materials Testing, 2012; 54 (6): 416–420. doi:10.3139/120.110346.
  29. Chandrupatla, T., Belegundu, A. Introduction to finite elements in engineering. London: Pearson; 2021. doi:10.1017/9781108882293.
  30. Kaveh, A., Dadras, A. Structural Damage Identification Using an Enhanced Thermal Exchange Optimization Algorithm. Engineering Optimization, 2018; 50 (3): 430–451. doi:10.1080/0305215X.2017.1318872.
  31. Zhu, J. J., Huang, M., Lu, Z. R. Bird Mating Optimizer for Structural Damage Detection Using a Hybrid Objective Function. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 2017; 35: 41–52. doi:10.1016/j.swevo.2017.02.006.
  32. Zamani, F., Alavi, S. H., Mashayekhi, M., Noroozinejad Farsangi, E., Sadeghi-Movahhed, A., Majdi, A. Optimum Design of Double Tuned Mass Dampers Using Multiple Metaheuristic Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms under Seismic Excitation. Frontiers in Built Environment, 2025; 11. doi:10.3389/fbuil.2025.1559530.
  33. Minh, H. Le, Sang-To, T., Abdel Wahab, M., Cuong-Le, T. A New Metaheuristic Optimization Based on K-Means Clustering Algorithm and Its Application to Structural Damage Identification. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2022; 251 (109189). doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109189.
  34. Tran-Ngoc, H., Khatir, S., Ho-Khac, H., De Roeck, G., Bui-Tien, T., Abdel Wahab, M. Efficient Artificial Neural Networks Based on a Hybrid Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithm for Damage Detection in Laminated Composite Structures. Composite Structures, 2021; 262 (113339). doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113339.
  35. Zacharakis, I., Giagopoulos, D. Vibration‐Based Damage Detection Using Finite Element Modeling and the Metaheuristic Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm. Sensors, 2022; 22 (14). doi:10.3390/s22145079.
  36. Kareem, S. W., Hama Ali, K. W., Askar, S., Xoshaba, F. S., Hawezi, R. Metaheuristic Algorithms in Optimization and Its Application: A Review. JAREE (Journal on Advanced Research in Electrical Engineering), 2022; 6 (1). doi:10.12962/jaree.v6i1.216.
  37. Abbasi, M. H., Moradi, H. Optimum Design of Tuned Mass Damper via PSO Algorithm for the Passive Control of Forced Oscillations in Power Transmission Lines. SN Applied Sciences, 2020; 2 (5). doi:10.1007/s42452-020-2677-4.
  38. Mashayekhi, M. R., Mosayyebi, S. A New Hybrid Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) Algorithm for the Design of Castellated Beams. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2023; 24 (7): 2121–2139. doi:10.1007/s42107-023-00630-4.
  39. Coello Coello, C. A., Pulido, G. T., Lechuga, M. S. Handling Multiple Objectives with Particle Swarm Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2004; 8 (3): 256–279. doi:10.1109/TEVC.2004.826067.
  40. Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of ICNN'95 – International Conference on Neural Networks; 1995 Nov 27–Dec 1; Perth, Australia. Vol. 4. p. 1942–8.
  41. Mashayekhi, M., Harati, M., Estekanchi, H. E. Development of an Alternative PSO-Based Algorithm for Simulation of Endurance Time Excitation Functions. Engineering Reports, 2019; 1 (3). doi:10.1002/eng2.12048.
  42. lu, junhui, Zhang, L., Yue, Y. A Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm with Dynamic Weights. In Second International Conference on Electronic Information Technology (EIT 2023), SPIE; Xiao, W., Leng, L., Eds.; 2023; p 142. doi:10.1117/12.2685758.
  43. Heidari, A. A., Mirjalili, S., Faris, H., Aljarah, I., Mafarja, M., Chen, H. Harris Hawks Optimization: Algorithm and Applications. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2019; 97: 849–872. doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.02.028.
  44. Alabool, H. M., Alarabiat, D., Abualigah, L., Heidari, A. A. Harris Hawks Optimization: a comprehensive review of recent variants and applications. Neural Computing and Applications. 2021; 33:8939–80. doi:10.1007/s00521-021-05720-5.
  45. Clerc, M., Kennedy, J. The Particle Swarm-Explosion, Stability, and Convergence in a Multidimensional Complex Space. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002; 6 (1): 58–73. doi:10.1109/4235.985692.
  46. Devarapalli, R., Kumar, V. Power System Oscillation Damping Controller Design: A Novel Approach of Integrated HHO-PSO Algorithm. Archives of Control Sciences, 2021; 31 (3): 553–591. doi:10.24425/acs.2021.138692.
  47. Ashfaq, R., Sajjad, I. A. Multiobjective optimal power flow (MO-OPF) using hybrid Harris Hawk–Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm (HHO–PSO). In: 2023 6th International Conference on Energy Conservation and Efficiency (ICECE); 2023 Mar 15–16; Lahore, Pakistan. p. 1–6. doi:10.1109/ICECE58062.2023.10092489.
  48. Murugesan, S., Suganyadevi, M. V. Performance Analysis of Simplified Seven-Level Inverter Using Hybrid HHO-PSO Algorithm for Renewable Energy Applications. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology - Transactions of Electrical Engineering, 2024; 48 (2): 781–801. doi:10.1007/s40998-023-00676-9.
  49. Laier, J. E., Villalba, J. D. Ensuring Reliable Damage Detection Based on the Computation of the Optimal Quantity of Required Modal Data. Computers and Structures, 2015; 147: 117–125. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.09.020.
  50. Hibbeler, R. C., Tan, K. H. Structural analysis. Harlow (UK): Pearson Prentice Hall; 2006.
Statistics
Article View: 241
PDF Download: 230


Journal Management System. Powered by Sinaweb