پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 499 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,861 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,497,655 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,596,577 |
تحقق عدالت آموزشی از طریق یادگیری ترکیبی: مرور تحلیلی فرصت‌ها، چالش‌ها و راهکارها | ||
| مطالعات برنامه ریزی آموزشی | ||
| دوره 14، شماره 27، شهریور 1404، صفحه 237-260 اصل مقاله (752.12 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/eps.2025.29316.2346 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| افسانه کلباسی* 1؛ زهرا عبداللهی2 | ||
| 1گروه آموزش علوم تربیتی. دانشگاه فرهنگیان. تهران . ایران | ||
| 2کارشناسی ارشدآموزش ابتدایی. دانشگاه فر هنگیان. اصفهان. ایران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 07 خرداد 1404، تاریخ بازنگری: 30 تیر 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 04 شهریور 1404 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف: با گسترش فناوری‌های آموزشی، یادگیری ترکیبی به‌عنوان یکی از رویکردهای نوین در آموزش و به‌عنوان ابزاری برای تحقق عدالت آموزشی در سطوح ملی و جهانی، ظرفیت‌هایی را برای بهبود کیفیت و دسترسی به فرصت‌های برابر یادگیری فراهم نموده است. در همین راستا پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی فرصت‌ها، چالش‌ها و راهکارهای یادگیری ترکیبی به‌منظور نیل به عدالت آموزشی انجام شده است. روش‌شناسی: پژوهش حاضر به روش مروری از نوع روایتی - تحلیلی انجام شده است. داده‌ها از طریق جستجوی نظام‌مند کلیدواژه‌های مرتبط در پایگاه‌های علمی داخلی و خارجی گردآوری شد. پس از بررسی بیش از پنجاه منبع، بیست و چهار منبع کلیدی بر اساس معیارهایی چون تازگی، اعتبار علمی و ارتباط مستقیم با موضوع انتخاب شد. یافته‌ها بر اساس سه پرسش اصلی پژوهش (فرصت‌ها، چالش‌ها و راهکارها) دسته‌بندی و تحلیل شدند و جمع‌بندی آن‌ها چارچوبی منسجم برای تبیین نقش یادگیری ترکیبی در تحقق عدالت آموزشی ارائه می‌دهد یافته‌ها: این مطالعه نشان داد که یادگیری ترکیبی از طریق افزایش کیفیت، انعطاف‌پذیری، دسترسی گسترده به منابع، و امکان شخصی‌سازی آموزش، ظرفیت قابل‌توجهی برای ارتقای عدالت آموزشی دارد؛ اما چالش‌هایی نظیر نابرابری زیرساخت‌ها، شکاف دیجیتال، و کمبود مهارت‌های فناورانه در میان معلمان و دانش‌آموزان، اجرای مؤثر آن را با محدودیت‌هایی مواجه می‌سازد. نتیجه‌گیری و پیشنهادها: در این راستا، نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که راهکارهایی همچون توسعه زیرساخت‌های فناورانه، توانمندسازی معلمان و خانواده‌ها از طریق آموزش و حمایت فناورانه و تربیتی، توجه به تفاوت‌های فردی، فرهنگی و جغرافیایی و طراحی انعطاف‌پذیر آموزشی با امکان شخصی‌سازی فرایند یادگیری مؤلفه‌های کلیدی برای تحقق عدالت آموزشی در بستر یادگیری ترکیبی هستند. پیشنهاد می‌شود که مطالعات آینده به بررسی تأثیر هر یک از راهکارها بر عدالت آموزشی تمرکز کنند. نوآوری و اصالت: این پژوهش با تحلیل فرصت‌ها، چالش‌ها و راهبردهای یادگیری ترکیبی، در راستای تحقق عدالت آموزشی به درک جامع‌تری از آن کمک می‌کند و سهم جدیدی در ادبیات در حال تکامل در مورد این شیوه آموزشی متحول‌کننده دارد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| عدالت آموزشی؛ برابری آموزشی؛ یادگیری ترکیبی؛ آموزش مجازی؛ فناوری آموزشی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Achieving Educational Justice through Blended Learning: An Analytical Review of Opportunities, Challenges, and Strategies | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| afsaneh کلباسی1؛ zahra Abdollahi2 | ||
| 1Department of Educational Sciences. Farhangian University. Tehran. Iran | ||
| 2Master of Elementary Education, Farhangian University of Isfahan, Isfahan | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Aim: With the expansion of educational technologies, blended learning, as one of the new approaches in education and as a tool for achieving educational justice at the national and global levels, has provided capacities for improving quality and access to equal learning opportunities. In this regard, the present study aims to examine the opportunities, challenges, and solutions of blended learning in order to achieve educational justice. Methodology: The study was conducted using a narrative-analytical review method.Data were collected through a systematic search of relevant keywords in national and international academic databases. After reviewing over fifty sources, twenty-four key studies were purposefully selected based on criteria such as recency, academic credibility, and direct relevance to the topic. The findings were categorized and analyzed according to the study’s three main research questions—opportunities, challenges, and strategies—and synthesized into a coherent framework for understanding the role of blended learning in achieving educational justice Results: The study indicated that blended learning, through enhanced quality, flexibility, broad access to resources, and the possibility of personalized instruction, holds significant potential for promoting educational justice. However, challenges such as infrastructure disparities, the digital divide, and the lack of technological competencies among teachers and students hinder its effective implementation. Conclusions and suggestions: The research results show that strategies such as developing technological infrastructure, empowering teachers and families through technological and educational training and support, paying attention to individual, cultural, and geographical differences, and flexible educational design with the possibility of personalizing the learning process are key components for achieving educational justice in the context of blended learning. Innovation and originality: By analyzing the opportunities, challenges, and strategies for blended learning, this research contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of it in order to achieve educational equity and makes a new contribution to the evolving literature on this transformative educational justice. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Educational justice, educational equity, blended learning, virtual education, educational technology | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ashraf, M. A., Tsegay, S. M., & Meijia, Y. (2021). Blended learning for diverse classrooms: Qualitative experimental study with in-service teachers. SAGE Open, 11(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211030623 Baharvand, Z., Mohamadi Poua, F., & Khakbaz, A. S. (2024). Phenomenological Study of Educational Justice in Virtual Learning Environment in Higher Education. Higher Education Letter, 17(67), 1-17. https://journal.sanjesh.org/article_711956.html#:~:text=10.22034/HEL.2024.2017692.1935 [In Persian] Brighouse, H. (2007). Educational equality and justice. In R. Curren (Ed.) , A companion to the philosophy of education (pp. 471–486). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996454.ch34 Chervonyi, P., Alieksieieva, S., Senchylo-Tatlilioglu, N., Chastnyk, O., & Diomidova, N. (2021). Peculiarities of the higher education development in a blended learning environment. Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional (RPGE), 25(3), 2241–2257. https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v25i3.15959 Darling-Aduana, J., Heath, M. K., Stewart, A., Viano, S., Asim, S., Garcia, A., Langran, E., Heinrich, C., & Woodley, X. (2025). Digital ethics and equity in K–12 blended and online learning. In D. A. Christakis & L. Hale (Eds.) , Handbook of children and screens: Digital media, development, and well-being from birth through adolescence (pp. 535–552). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69362-5_38 Dei, D.-G.J. (2024). Promoting quality education through blended learning during and post COVID-19 pandemic. Quality Education for All, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 256-276. https://doi.org/10.1108/QEA-10-2023-0011 Fobosi, S. C., & Mkuzo, Z. P. (2024). Social justice and human rights: A case of blended learning in higher education. Proceedings of the University of Fort Hare Teaching and Learning Conference (UFHTL 2023) January, 4–20. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-439-6_2 Ghalojeh, O., Jahanian, R., & Salimi, M. (2023). The causal relationships between the identified factors in the development model of blended training in Tehran education. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology, 6(4), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.61186/ijes.6.4.61[In Persian] Gunder, A., & Gay, K. (2023). Centering equity and quality in online, blended, and digital learning. Ubiquity Proceedings, 3(1), 345-350. https://doi.org/10.5334/uproc.107 Hamman, N., Hodgkinson-Williams, C., Karassellos, L., Nwanze, I. ., & Small, J. (2025). Enabling Design: Creating an Equity-Focused Framework for Blended Learning: Blended Learning as a Blueprint for Higher Education Transformation. Progressio, 45, 18 pages . https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-5895/16177 Halverson, R., et al. (2017). Personalized Learning in the Blended Classroom. Harvard Education Press. Hossain, M., & Kawsar, F. (2024). Navigating online education in primary level: Implementation and challenges. International Journal of Social Science and Innovation, 2(3), 285-296. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijssi.v2i3.2586 Hosseini, S.H., Azizi Shamami, M., Salehi Omran, E. (2024). Investigating the distribution of equal educational opportunities in the government primary school of Golestan province. Journal Educational Planning Studies, 12(23), 171-192. https://www.doi.org/10.22080/eps.2024.26429.2232 [In Persian] Istenič, A. (2024). Blended learning in higher education: The integrated and distributed model and a thematic analysis. Discover Education, 3(165). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00239-y Juwita, R., & Purwoko, L. F. (2022). Design and implementation of hybrid learning. International Journal of Educational Dynamics, 4(2), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.24036/ijeds.v4i2.340 Kalantari, F., Islampanah, M., Lai, S., Mohammadi, S. (2024). Presentation and validation of an educational justice model based on information and communication technology with a blended learning approach in education. Journal of Technology in Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management, 3(4), 172-187. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.jtesm.3.4.11 [In Persian] Kennedy, E. (2021) Blended Learning in Teacher Education & Training: Findings from Research & Practice, Brussels, Belgium. Khairuddin, R., & Maleki, F. (2022). Virtual communication infrastructures for educational justice education in the country in confronting the threats of inequality from educational service infrastructures. National conferences on sensitive infrastructure. https://sid. r/paper/1147906/fa [In Persian] Khodayi, S., Nasiri, F.,& Khalvandi, F. (2023). Identifying and examining indicators of educational justice in the Corona era from the perspective of primary school principals in Alborz province. University Management, 2(3), 1-19. 10.22034/jam.2023.62902 [In Persian] Khosravipoor, Z., & Mehr Alizadeh, Y. (2022). Analysis of educational inequalities in the light of the developments of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Journal of Educational Planning Studies, 10(20), 47-71. https://doi.org/10.22080/eps.2022.22814.2083 [In Persian] Kowsari, A. (2024). A Quantitative Study on the Efficacy of Online and Hybrid Learning Formats as Related to the Success Indicators of Equity. [Doctoral dissertation, Pepperdine University]. Kundu, A., Bej, T., & Dey, K. N. (2021). Time to Achieve: Implementing Blended Learning Routines in an Indian Elementary Classroom. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(4), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520984406 Liang, M., Lim, C. P., Park, J., & Mendoza, N. B. (2023). A review of ICT-based learning for schoolgirls in Asia and its impact on educational equity. A review of ICT-based learning for schoolgirls in Asia and its impact on educational equity. Education Tech Research Development, 71, 267–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10178-w Mohammadi, R., & Soleimani, A. (2024). A systematic review of educational equity in Iran: Conceptualization, Challenges, and Indicators. Journal of Educational Planning Studies, 12(23), 145-170. https://doi.org/10.22080/eps.2024.26091.2220 [In Persian] Moharami N., & Shakour, M. (2024). Evaluation of Clinical Course Assessment of Medical Students in Virtual Education. Res Med Edu , 16 (2) ,33-43. https://doi.org/10.32592/rmegums.16.2.33 [In Persian] Naidoo, J., & Singh-Pillay, A. (2025). Social justice implications of digital science, technology, engineering and mathematics pedagogy: Exploring a South African blended higher education context. Education and Information Technologies, 30,131–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12813-w Ni, L. B. (2020). Blended learning through Google Classroom. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 14(4), 220-226. https://doi.org/10011150/pdf OECD. (2000). The equity in education perspective. Directorate for Education, Employment, Labour and Social Affairs, Education Committee, Governing Board of the CERI. DEELSA/ED/CERI/CD/INES/GA(2000)11. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/1919678.pdf Rijal, S., Wei, Z., Jiao, D., & Wang, Y. (2024). The Impact of Implementing Hybrid Learning on Flexibility and Quality of Learning. Journal Emerging Technologies in Education, 2(2), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.70177/jete.v2i2.1061 Shahalizadeh, M., & Musavi, S. J. (2021). The perspective of e-learning in higher education: A systematized review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 12(3), 149-161. https://doi.org/10.30476/IJVLMS.2021.89746.1078 Tang, M., Zhao, Z., & Ren, P. (2024). Bridging the Gap: The Role of Educational Technology in Promoting Educational Equity. The Educational Review, USA, 8(8), 1077–1086. https://doi.org/10.26855/er.2024.08.012 UNESCO. (2017). A guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000248254.locale=en UNESCO. (2018a). Ensuring the right to equitable and inclusive quality education: Results of the Ninth Consultation of Member States on the implementation of the UNESCO Convention and Recommendation against Discrimination in Education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000251463.locale=en UNESCO. (2018b). Handbook on measuring equity in education. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. https://uis.unesco.org/en/news/handbook-measuring-equity-education UNESCO. (2021(.One year into COVID-19 education disruption: Where do we stand? https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/one-year-covid-19-education-disruption-where-do-we-stand Vali-ollahi-Roudbari, H., Rasouli, A., & Salimi, L. (2022). Identifying and prioritizing the components of cyber citizenship behavior, information and communication technology, and educational justice in the educational system. Quarterly Journal of Educational Research, 18(73), 25-64. https://doi.org/10.30495/educ.2022.1972143.2928 [In Persian] Valipour, J. (2021). Educational Justice and Social Gap: A Study of Educational Systems and Access to Mass Media in the Era of Virtual Education. Horizons of Humanities, 5(5), 81-96. https://civilica.com/doc/1880049 [In Persian] Munoz-Najar, A; Gilberto, A; Hasan, A; Cobo, C; Azevedo, J; Akmal, M. (2021). Remote Learning During COVID-19: Lessons from Today, Principles for Tomorrow. World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/36665 Yıldırımer, K. Ş. (2024). Roadmap for equality in education: Problems, solutions and implementation strategies. Dinamika Ilmu, 24(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v24i1.1715 Zarei, M., Salimi, M.,& Abdollahi, M. (2024). Identifying the dimensions and components of virtual education based on educational justice. Quarterly Journal of Excellence in Education, Training and Training, 2(2), 51-62. https://sanad.iau.ir/journal/eetj/article/1101386 [In Persian] Zhang, Y., Rebrina, F., Sabirova, F., & Afanaseva, J. (2020). Blended learning environments in inclusive education at the university. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(21), 145-161. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i21.16013 Zhu, W., Liu, Q., & Hong, X. (2022). Implementation and challenges of online education during the COVID-19 outbreak: A national survey of children and parents in China. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 61, 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.07.004 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1 |
||