| تعداد نشریات | 32 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 591 |
| تعداد مقالات | 5,779 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 8,660,888 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 6,342,770 |
تأملی بر چگونگی احراز مفهوم سرمایهگذاری در دعاوی مالکیت فکری بر مبنای کنوانسیون داوری ایکسید با نگاهی به حقوق ایران | ||
| پژوهشنامه حقوق تطبیقی | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 10، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 21، فروردین 1405، صفحه 207-232 اصل مقاله (614.99 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/lps.2025.28825.1726 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمد جواد عبداللهی* 1؛ احسان مشکل گشا2 | ||
| 1استادیار گروه حقوق، دانشکده حقوق و اقتصاد، واحد خمینی شهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، خمینی شهر، ایران | ||
| 2استادیار گروه حقوق، واحد شیراز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شیراز، ایران. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 23 فروردین 1404، تاریخ بازنگری: 20 تیر 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 13 مرداد 1404 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هر چند بررسی متون قانونی و مفاد برخی معاهدات دوجانبه سرمایه گذاری در حقوق ایران؛ دلالت بر پذیرش مفهومی وسیع از سرمایه گذاری خارجی دارد؛ با این وجود کنوانسیون ایکسید تعریفی از واژه سرمایهگذاری در ماده 25 خود ارائه نداده که این خلأ سبب تشتت آراء در میان حقوقدانان و محاکم داوری سرمایهگذاری بین المللی در خصوص مفهوم سرمایهگذاری و عناصر تشکیل دهنده آن شده است. یکی از مباحث بحث برانگیز در این خصوص، قابلیت یا عدم قابلیت تلقی موارد مرتبط با حقوق مالکیت فکری، به عنوان یک قرارداد متضمن سرمایهگذاری تحت کنوانسیون ایکسید است. از این جهت در پاسخ به این سوال کلیدی که آیا دعاوی مرتبط با مالکیت فکری و به طور خاص سرمایهگذاریهای انجام شده به واسطه وجود علائم تجاری را میتوان متضمن عناصر یک قرارداد سرمایهگذاری تلقی نمود، نویسندگان با روش کتابخانهایی و با ابزار فیش برداری به تحلیل نگرشهای مرتبط با تفسیر ماده 25 کنوانسیون ایکسید و همچنین رویه داوری سرمایهگذاری بینالمللی در دو پرونده مشهور فیلیپ موریس بر علیه اروگوئه و بریجستون علیه پاناما پرداختهاند. مطالب ارائه شده در این پژوهش که با روش کتابخانهایی و با ابزار فیش برداری انجام شده نشان میدهد در فرض استفاده مثبت از علائم تجاری به سبب درآمد زایی آن برای کشور میزبان سرمایه و با توجه به گستره مفهوم سرمایهگذاری در کنوانسیون ایکسید، میتوانیم قائل به تحقق مفهوم قراردادهای سرمایهگذاری برای موارد مرتبط با حقوق مالکیت فکری شویم. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| حقوق مالکیت فکری؛ کنوانسیون ایکسید؛ معیار عینی؛ معیار شخصی؛ حقوق ایران؛ داوری | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| A Reflection on the Determination of the Concept of Investment in Intellectual Property Disputes under the ICSID Arbitration Convention with a Glance at Iranian Law | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohammad Javad Abdollahi1؛ Ehsan MoshkelGosha2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Law and Economics, Khomeini Shahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khomeini Shahr, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The ICSID Convention does not provide a definition of the term "investment" in its Article 25, which has led to a divergence of opinions among legal scholars and international investment arbitration tribunals regarding the concept of investment and its constituent elements. One of the most contentious issues in this regard is whether disputes related to intellectual property rights (IPRs) can be considered as involving an "investment" under the ICSID Convention. To address this key question—**whether intellectual property-related claims, particularly those involving trademarks, can be classified as investments under the ICSID framework**—the authors have analyzed the interpretation of Article 25 of the ICSID Convention and the approaches taken by international investment arbitration tribunals in two landmark cases: Philip Morris v. Uruguay and Bridgestone v. Panama. This research, which employs a library-based method and a questionnaire-based survey, demonstrates that, under certain conditions, intellectual property rights—especially trademarks—can indeed be considered investments under the ICSID Convention. Specifically, if trademarks are actively used in a manner that generates income for the host state and contributes to its economic development, they may satisfy the criteria for an "investment" as interpreted by ICSID tribunals. Thus, the study concludes that intellectual property-related matters, particularly those involving trademarks, can be regarded as falling within the scope of investment contracts under the ICSID Convention. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Intellectual property rights, ICSID, objective criterion, personal criterion, Iranian Law, arbitration | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdollahi, Mohammad Javad, Karimi, Mohammad. (2025). An analysis on the criterion "Assistance to the economic development of the host state" for realizing the concept of investment contracts under the ICSID Arbitration Convention, Encyclopedia of Economic Law Journal,Volume 31, Issue 26, pp.146-161. [In Persian] Ansari Mahyari, Alireza, Raisi, Leila (2018), International Standards of Foreign Investment Protection, Encyclopedia of Economics Law journal, Volume 25, Issue 14 - Serial Number 14,pp. 47-88. [In Persian] Baghban, Rahim, Ghanbari Jahromi, Mohammad Jafar, Bagheri, Mahmoud (2017), Protective Aspects of Iranian Law on Foreign Direct Investment and a Comparative Study with International Standards, International Legal Research, Article 1, Volume 10, Number 36, pp. 1-24. [In Persian] Behbahani, Mohammad Rahim, Ensafi Azar, Behnam, Farrokhi, Zohreh (2019), Studying the position and role of the law encouraging and supporting Iran's foreign investment in foreign exchange transfers within the framework of international investment law, Iranian Quarterly Journal of Political Sociology, Year 3, Issue (4), pp. 2750-2731. [In Persian] Betancourt, Teresita (2014). When May Foreign Investors Lose the Protection of Investment Treaties Due to Misconduct?, PluriCourts Research Paper No. 14-11, University of Oslo Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2014-12, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2433578 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2433578, pp. 1- 80. Brightfield, M. (2023). Competing Interests and Obligations: Indirect Expropriation and Intellectual Property Rights LLM Thesis in International and European Law Track: International Trade and Investment Law Supervisor: Nikos Lavranos, University of Amsterdam. Ramić, Armela, Brodlija, Fahira. (2025). International Investment Law and Dispute Resolution in the Western Balkans Regional Prospects for a European Future, Netherlands, Brill. Capaldo, G.Z. (2019). The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2018, Oxford University Press, USA, Incorporated. Carlevaris, Andrea; Crivellaro, Antonio; Beatrice Deli, Maria; Benedettelli Massimo, (2024). Arbitration as Balanced Administration of Justice Essays In Honour of Piero Bernardini, Netherlands, Brill. Cole, T. (2013). The Structure of Investment Arbitration. New York, Taylor & Francis. Demİr, Berk. (2015). The Notion of ‘Investment’ in International Investment Law, Turkish Commercial Law Review 41, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2579247, pp. 41-50 Ebrahimi, Seyed Nasrollah, Soltanzadeh, Sajad. (2014). The Concept of Investment in Arbitration Precedent of the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), Volume 31, Issue 50, pp. 77-108. [In Persian] Falahati, S.; Jafarzadeh, M. (2013). Lessons from the Philip Morris v. Uruguay Case on the Necessity of Changing the Approach of Iran's Investment Treaties to Expropriation of Intellectual Property Owners. Public Law Research, Vol. 25, pp. 88-95. [In Persian] Geiger, C. (2019). Intellectual Property and Investment Law: An Introduction, Center for International Intellectual Property Studies Research Paper No. 2019-10. Given, J. (2019). Malaysia Historical Salvors Revisited. 42 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. Vol. 345, pp. 108. Grabowski, A. (2014). The Definition of Investment under the ICSID Convention: A Defense of Salini. Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 15. Günarslan, B.F. (2024). Protection of IP Rights as an Investment, Ankara Üni. Hukuk Fak. Dergisi, Vol. 73, pp. 1255-1292. Halpern, S.; Brett, M. (2018). The Great Battle of Intellectual Property versus State Sovereignty: Is Philip Morris v Uruguay a Good Referee. Krajewski, Markus, Tamara Hoffmann, Rhea. (2019). Research Handbook on Foreign Direct Investment, USA, Edward Elgar Publishing. Kulick, A.; Álvarez-Zarate, J.M. Turnbull, Konrad; Żenkiewicz, Maciej; Merkouris, P. (2024). Custom and Its Interpretation in International Investment Law: Vol. 2, UK, Cambridge University Press. Lim, C.L.; Ho, J.; Paparinskis, M. (2021). International Investment Law and Arbitration Commentary. Awards and Other Materials, UK, Cambridge University Press. Mahmoudi, A. (2012). The Nature of Intellectual Property Rights and Their Place in Property Law. Bi-Quarterly Scientific-Research Journal of Civil Law Knowledge, Vol. 2. [In Persian] McGuire, M.; Klopschinski, S. (2024). Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Rights and Arbitration, USA, Edward Elgar Publishing. Metzger, A.; Ruse-Khan, H.G. (2022). Intellectual Property Ordering Beyond Borders, USA, Cambridge University Press. Mirkarimi, P.; Mirabbasi, S.B.; Moradi, M. (2022). Studying the role and status of intellectual property rights in the system of public international law. Iranian Political Sociology Monthly, Vol. 5, pp. 3368-3384. [In Persian] Moerland, A.; Kamperman Sanders, A. (2021). Intellectual Property as a Complex Adaptive System the Role of IP in the Innovation Society, USA, Edward Elgar Publishing. Naeni, Hadi, Jafari Seresht, Davoud, Issazadeh, Saeed (2013), The Effect of Bilateral Investment Treaties on Attracting Foreign Investment in Iran: An Attraction Model Approach, Scientific Journal (Quarterly) of Economic Research and Policies, No. 107, Year 31, 213-238. [In Persian] Nakajima, K. (2022). The International Law of Sovereign Debt Dispute Settlement, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press. Nath Upreti, P. (2018). IP Licence as an Investment: Insights from Bridgestone v. Panama. Stockholm Intellectual Property Law Review, Vol. 1, pp.16-27. Nath Upreti, P. (2022). Intellectual Property Objectives in International Investment Agreements, USA, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. Newcombe, A.; Cordonier Segger, M.; Gehring, Markus, W. (2011). Sustainable Development in World Investment Law, UK, Kluwer Law International. Ngobeni, Lawrence. (2021). Do the SALINI Criteria Apply to the Definition of An Investment Provided in Annex 1 of the 2006 and 2016 SADC Protocol on Finance and Investment?An Assessment, http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2020/v23i0a5132, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3919575, pp. 1-34. Oke, E.K. (2020). Defining Intellectual Property As An Investment, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3689005. Oke, E.K. (2021). The Interface between Intellectual Property and Investment Law An Intertextual Analysis, USA, Edward Elgar Publishing Peters, B.; Lohse, E.J. (2023). Sustainability Through Participation? Perspectives from National, European and International Law, Netherlands, Brill. Popa Tache, C. (2020). Introduction to International Investment Law, Bucharest, Adjuris - International Academic Publishers. Reinisch, A.; Schill, S. (2023). Investment Protection Standards and the Rule of Law, UK, Oxford University Press. Sinclair, A.; Reinisch, A.; Schreuer, C.; Malintoppi, L.; Schill, S. (2022). Schreuer's Commentary on the ICSID Convention A Commentary on the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States, Cambridge University Press. Stepanov, I. (2020). Economic development dimension of intellectual property as investment in international investment law. Journal Of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 23, pp. 736-758. Tams, J.; Christian, H.; Rainer, W.; Schill, S. (2017). International Investment Law and the Global Financial Architecture, USA, Edward Elgar Publishing. Taslim, S. (2019). Implications of Investor-State Arbitration of IPR as an Investment From a Developing Countries Perspective. Toebes, B.; Luca Burci, G. (2018). Research Handbook on Global Health Law, USA, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. Upreti, P.N. (2018). Philip Morris v Uruguay: A Breathing Space for Domestic IP Regulation. European Intellectual Property Review, Vol. 40. Viñuales, J.; Waibel, M. (2021). ICSID Reports: Volume 19, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press. Waibel, Michael. (2021). Subject Matter Jurisdiction: The Notion of Investment, 19 ICSID Rep (Cambridge, University Press) (eds. Jorge Vinuales and Michael Waibel), 25-84, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3763725 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3763725, pp. 1-57. Wang, G. (2014). International Investment Law A Chinese Perspective, New York, Taylor & Francis. Yu, P.K. (2017). The Investment-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. American University Law Review, Vol. 66. Zahedi, M.; Mohammadi, H. (2012). Functions of Mediation in Resolving Intellectual Property Disputes. Quarterly Journal of Private Law Studies, Vol. 52, pp. 537-517. [In Persian] Zahedi, M.; Mohammadi, A. (2015). The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Supporting the Tourism Industry, Quarterly Journal of Private Law Research, Vol. 4, pp. 118-87. [In Persian] Zamani, Sayyed Ghasem, Darounparvar, Amir ( 2015 ). Dynamism of a Investment a Concept in Light of ICSID Determining Jurisdiction Methodologies, JUDICIAL LAW VIEWS, Volume 20, Issue 69, Serial Number 69, PP. 97-124. [In Persian] Ziaee, Seyed Yaser, Javadi, Saeedeh (2019). Protection of Intellectual Property in International Foreign Investment Law, Journal of Legal Studies, Volume 11, Issue 2, Serial Number 32, pp. 127-155. [In Persian]
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 316 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 38 |
||