دانشگاه مازندران

 آمار

تعداد نشریات31
تعداد شماره‌ها519
تعداد مقالات5,044
تعداد مشاهده مقاله7,675,531
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله5,714,284
Sepahvand, Sajad, Hejazi, Seyed Jafar, Jalal Kamali, Mohammad Hossain. (1404). Advancing Tunnel Safety Management: A Simple and Adaptable Method for Comprehensive Evaluation. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, (), -. doi: 10.22080/cste.2025.29635.1066
Sajad Sepahvand; Seyed Jafar Hejazi; Mohammad Hossain Jalal Kamali. "Advancing Tunnel Safety Management: A Simple and Adaptable Method for Comprehensive Evaluation". پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, , , 1404, -. doi: 10.22080/cste.2025.29635.1066
Sepahvand, Sajad, Hejazi, Seyed Jafar, Jalal Kamali, Mohammad Hossain. (1404). 'Advancing Tunnel Safety Management: A Simple and Adaptable Method for Comprehensive Evaluation', پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, (), pp. -. doi: 10.22080/cste.2025.29635.1066
Sepahvand, Sajad, Hejazi, Seyed Jafar, Jalal Kamali, Mohammad Hossain. Advancing Tunnel Safety Management: A Simple and Adaptable Method for Comprehensive Evaluation. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 1404; (): -. doi: 10.22080/cste.2025.29635.1066

Advancing Tunnel Safety Management: A Simple and Adaptable Method for Comprehensive Evaluation

Contributions of Science and Technology for Engineering
مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 22 مهر 1404
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/cste.2025.29635.1066
نویسندگان
Sajad Sepahvand1؛ Seyed Jafar Hejazi2؛ Mohammad Hossain Jalal Kamali* 3
1Karaj Urban and Suburban Railway Organization
2Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz
3Department of Engineering, University of Gonabad
تاریخ دریافت: 18 تیر 1404،  تاریخ بازنگری: 04 مهر 1404،  تاریخ پذیرش: 16 مهر 1404 
چکیده
Unique challenges are presented by tunnel safety, requiring a practical and adaptable evaluation method. To address this need, a comprehensive safety index was developed in this study. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used with a panel of 43 experts to assign evidence-based weights to seven key safety categories. The results show that ‘Traffic Management and Surveillance’ (24%), ‘Emergency and Rescue Management’ (21%), and ‘Tunnel and Road Geometry’ (19%) are the most critical factors. The model was then validated through a case study of the Shohada-ye-Gaza Tunnel in Tehran, which scored 5.85, corresponding to a “Mean” safety level. Specific weaknesses were successfully pinpointed by the evaluation, demonstrating its utility as a diagnostic tool. Furthermore, it was confirmed by a sensitivity analysis that a 30% improvement in the ‘Traffic management and traffic surveillance’ category would raise the tunnel’s classification to “Good.” A validated, straightforward framework is provided by this research, enabling authorities to not only benchmark tunnel safety but also to strategically allocate resources for targeted improvements
کلیدواژه‌ها
Tunnel؛ Safety؛ Safety Evaluation؛ Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 202


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب