پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 32 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 554 |
| تعداد مقالات | 5,380 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 8,160,817 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 6,064,041 |
رویه های زیان آور علیه زنان در نظام بین المللی حقوق بشر: ساختار و مخاطرات | ||
| پژوهشنامه حقوق تطبیقی | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 9، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 20، دی 1404، صفحه 97-116 اصل مقاله (387.54 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/lps.2026.30712.1830 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| عطیه زیدابادی نژاد1؛ احسان شهسواری* 2 | ||
| 1کارشناس ارشد حقوق بشر، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران | ||
| 2استادیار گروه حقوق بین الملل، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 15 فروردین 1404، تاریخ بازنگری: 15 تیر 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 17 آبان 1404 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| نقض حقوق بشر فارغ از شدت و ضعف می تواند به اعتبار پراکندگی و یا رویه محور بودنِ نقض ها قابل تفکیک و ارزیابی باشد. در حالت اخیر مفاهیمی چون نقض سیستمیک، نقض سیستماتیک و نقض رویه ای حقوق بشر قابل ردیابی در نظام بین المللی حقوق بشر است. موضوع رویه های زیان آور مورد توجه برخی معاهدات و اسناد بین المللی حقوق بشر به ویژه در حوزه حقوق زنان و کودکان بوده است. نظر به فقر نظری در این حوزه، جستار حاضر در صدد توصیف مفهوم رویه های زیان آور و تحلیل ساختار و مخاطرات این پدیده است و این پرسش را پاسخ می دهد که در نظام بین المللی حقوق بشر چه کنش هایی را میتوان به عنوان رویه های زیان آور شناخت؟ تعامل رویه های زیان آور و مفهوم رفتار غیر انسانی و خوارکننده در رویه قضایی و آموزه های حقوقدانان اهمیت و مخاطرات چنین رویه هایی را بیش از پیش بازنمایی می کند و خود از انگیزه های تدوین این نوشتار است. به نظر می رسد رویه های زیان آور در نظام حقوق بشر به عنوان هر الگوی مستمر و یکنواخت از رویکردها و رفتارهای غیرانسانی شناخته می شود که اثر غایی آن نقض یا انکار حقوق بنیادین ذی نفعان است. بازتولید در گذر زمان، استمرار، یکنواختی و آشکار بودن، سبب شده است که این الگوهای زیان آورِ رویکردی و رفتاری به عنوان رویه شناخته شوند؛ امری که ممیزِ رویه های زیان آور از نقض های موردی و پراکنده حقوق بشر است. در گذر زمان، خاستگاه فرهنگی، اجتماعی، سنتی و یا مناسکی به یاری این رویه ها آمده اند و بقای چنین الگوهای آسیب زایی از کنش ها را تضمین کرده اند. پژوهش حاضر منصرف از بررسی حجاب اجباری در برخی نظام های حقوقی است. به باور دیوان بین المللی کیفری در قضیه "الحسن"، اجبار به حجاب و تعریف ضمانت اجرای کیفری از جمله حبس و شلاق برای نقض قوانین حجاب به شرط حصول سایر شرایط، می تواند در قالب "تعقیب و آزار افراد یک گروه بر پایه های جنسیتی" و ذیل ماده 7 اساسنامه دیوان به عنوان جنایت علیه بشریت تلقی شود. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| رفتارهای غیر انسانی؛ رویه زیان آور؛ تبعیض جنسیتی؛ حقوق زنان؛ آسیب جسمی و روحی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Harmful Practices Against Women in International Human Rights Law: Structure and Consequences | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Atiyeh Zeidabadinejad1؛ Ehsan Shahsavari2 | ||
| 1Master of Human Rights, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of International Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Human rights violations, regardless of their severity, can be categorized and analyzed based on whether they occur as isolated incidents or as part of established and consistent practices. In the latter context, concepts such as systemic, systematic, and practice-based violations of human rights are examined within international human rights law—an issue explicitly addressed under the notion of harmful practices in certain international human rights treaties and instruments. Due to a lack of theoretical foundations, this article aims to conceptualize harmful practices and analyze their structural features and inherent risks. It further seeks to address which types of acts or conduct may qualify as harmful practices within international human rights law. The interaction between harmful practices and the notion of inhuman and degrading treatment, as reflected in judicial precedent and legal doctrine, underscores the gravity and dangers of such practices and serves as a principal motivation for this research. It is argued that harmful practices in human rights law may be understood as any persistent, uniform, and obvious pattern of inhuman conduct whose ultimate effect is the violation or denial of the fundamental rights of rights-holders. Characteristics such as repetition over time, continuity, uniformity, and pervasiveness distinguish harmful practices from isolated and sporadic human rights violations. Over time, cultural, social, traditional, and ritual foundations have reinforced these practices, thereby ensuring the persistence of such harmful patterns of conduct. This research does not aim to examine models of compulsory veiling within certain legal systems. The jurisprudence of the International Criminal Court in the Al Hassan case corroborates this position. The Court considered that the enforcement of mandatory veiling, coupled with the imposition of criminal penalties—such as imprisonment and corporal punishment—for non-compliance, provided that the contextual and material elements are met, may fall within the definition of “persecution against an identifiable group on gender grounds” pursuant to Article 7 of the Rome Statute, thereby constituting a crime against humanity. The jurisprudence of the International Criminal Court in the Al Hassan case supports this position. The Court held that the enforcement of mandatory veiling, combined with the imposition of criminal penalties—such as imprisonment and corporal punishment—for non-compliance, provided that the contextual and material elements are satisfied, may constitute “persecution against an identifiable group on gender grounds” under Article 7 of the Rome Statute, thereby qualifying as a crime against humanity. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Inhuman Behaviors, Harmful Practices, Gender-based Discrimination, Women's Rights, Physical and Mental Harm | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Amnesty International. (2025). Amnesty International report 2024/25: The state of the world's human rights. Amnesty International. Amor, A. (2009). Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development (Report of the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief). United Nations Human Rights Council. (Note: Specific document details inferred from context; full report A/HRC/10/8). Boyle, A., & Chinkin, C. (2007). The making of international law. Oxford University Press. Byrnes, A., & Freeman, M. (2012). The impact of the CEDAW Convention: Paths to equality. In The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: A commentary (pp. 1–42). Oxford University Press. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. (2025). Global struggle over gender norms. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (2016). General comment No. 22 on the right to sexual and reproductive health (article 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights) (UN Doc. E/C.12/GC/22). United Nations. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, & Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2014). Joint general recommendation No. 31 of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women/General comment No. 18 of the Committee on the Rights of the Child on harmful practices (UN Doc. CEDAW/C/GC/31-CRC/C/GC/18). United Nations. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women. (1992). General recommendation No. 19: Violence against women (11th session). United Nations. Cook, R. J., & Cusack, S. (2010). Gender stereotyping: Transnational legal perspectives. University of Pennsylvania Press. Coomaraswamy, R. (2002). Cultural practices in the family that are violent towards women (Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences, UN Doc. E/CN.4/2002/83). United Nations Commission on Human Rights. Crawford, J. (2019). Brownlie's principles of public international law (9th ed.). Oxford University Press. Erdman, J. N. (2011). Access to information on safe abortion: A harm reduction and human rights approach. Harvard Journal of Law & Gender, 34(1), 413–461. Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 915–981). McGraw-Hill. Freedman, R. (2016). Third generation human rights: The case of harmful traditional practices. In The Routledge handbook of international human rights law (pp. 345–362). Routledge. Gill, A. (2014). Female genital mutilation: A form of gender-based violence. Routledge. Gilleri, G. (2019). Intersex rights and medical practices: A critical examination. International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare, 12(3), 189–201. Harcourt, W. (2009). Body politics in development: Critical debates in gender and development. Zed Books. Human Rights Watch. (2025). No money, no care: Obstetric violence in Sierra Leone. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/report/2025/11/02/no-money-no-care/obstetric-violence-in-sierra-leone International Law Commission. (2018). Draft conclusions on identification of customary international law, with commentaries (UN Doc. A/73/10). United Nations. Lewis, H. (1995). Between Irua and "female genital mutilation": Feminist human rights discourse and the cultural divide. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 8, 1–56. Longman, C., & Bradley, T. (2015). Interrogating harmful cultural practices: Gender, culture and coercion. Ashgate Publishing. Meron, T. (1989). Human rights and humanitarian norms as customary law. Clarendon Press. Mohanty, C. T. (2003). "Under Western eyes" revisited: Feminist solidarity through anticapitalist struggles. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(2), 499–535. https://doi.org/10.1086/342914 Nabaneh, S., & Muula, A. S. (2019). Female genital mutilation/cutting in Africa: A complex legal and ethical landscape. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 145(2), 270–276. Narayan, U. (1997). Dislocating cultures: Identities, traditions, and third-world feminism. Routledge Nussbaum, M. C. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 33–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570022000077926 Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2025). Annual report on harmful practices. OHCHR. Reiter, R. R. (Ed.). (1975). Toward an anthropology of women. Monthly Review Press. Roberts, T., et al. (2013). Cultural influences on self-esteem and mental health. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(3), 456–478. Stobart, E. (2006). Child abuse linked to accusations of "possession" and "witchcraft" (Research Report RR750). Department for Education and Skills UNFPA. (2025). State of world population 2025. United Nations Population Fund. https://www.unfpa.org/swop-2025 UNICEF. (2025). Child marriage: Latest trends and future prospects. United Nations Children's Fund. https://data.unicef.org/resources/child-marriage-latest-trends/ United Nations General Assembly. (1979). Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (UN Doc. A/RES/34/180). United Nations. United Nations Human Rights Council. (2025). Resolution on the elimination of female genital mutilation (Specific session/document). UNHRC. United Nations. (1995). Harmful traditional practices affecting the health of women and children (Fact Sheet No. 23). Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Walker, J. (2012). Maternal mortality in rural areas: The role of traditional birth attendants. Journal of Global Health, 2(1), 45–52. Watts, C., & Zimmerman, C. (2002). Violence against women: Global scope and magnitude. The Lancet, 359(9313), 1232–1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08221-1 Yakin Ertürk. (2011). Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences (UN Doc. A/HRC/17/26). United Nations Human Rights Council.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 338 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 24 |
||