پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 32 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 567 |
| تعداد مقالات | 5,501 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 8,339,845 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 6,172,171 |
تأثیر متغیرهای شهرسازی شهروندگرا بر هویت فضاهای عمومی؛ نمونۀ موردی: بافت تاریخی منطقۀ 12 تهران | ||
| مطالعات ساختار و کارکرد شهری | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 13، شماره 2، خرداد 1405، صفحه 129-148 اصل مقاله (598.96 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله استخراج از رساله و پایان نامه | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/usfs.2026.29385.2526 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| امیرحسین تکمیل1؛ بهناز امین زاده* 2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری، گروه شهرسازی، پردیس بینالمللی کیش، دانشگاه تهران، کیش، ایران | ||
| 2استاد، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکدگان هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 11 خرداد 1404، تاریخ بازنگری: 13 مهر 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 30 دی 1404 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هویت فضاهای عمومی، بهعنوان یکی از مؤلفههای کلیدی در ارتقاء کیفیت زندگی شهری و تقویت حس تعلق، نقشی اساسی در شکلدهی به معانی فضایی و تجربۀ زیستۀ شهروندان ایفا میکند. هدف این پژوهش، بررسی تأثیر شاخصهای شهرسازی شهروندگرا بر هویت فضاهای عمومی در بافت تاریخی منطقۀ ۱۲ تهران است. روش تحقیق مبتنی بر مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری SEM) ) بوده و جامعۀ آماری شامل 384 نفر از شهروندان و 30 نفر از متخصصان و مسؤولان حوزۀ شهری است. یافتهها نشان میدهد شاخصهای «حکومتی-محلی» شهرسازی شهروندگرا (شامل پاسخگویی و شفافیت، رهبری مشارکتی و خودگردانی محلی) و شاخصهای «شهروندی» (نظیر مشارکت فعال، ارتقاء آگاهی شهروندی و دسترسی به اطلاعات) تأثیر معناداری بر ابعاد سهگانۀ هویت فضاهای عمومی (کالبدی-فضایی، اجتماعی-فرهنگی و ادراکی) در منطقۀ مورد مطالعه دارند. نتایج همچنین نشان میدهد شاخصهای شهروندی، از دیدگاه هر دو گروه پاسخدهنده، کمترین تأثیر را بر بعد کالبدی-فضایی هویت داشتهاند. این مسأله بیانگر آن است که درک و تجربۀ شهروندان از فضاهای عمومی، بیش از هر چیز متأثر از مؤلفههای اجتماعی، فرهنگی و ادراکی است. از سوی دیگر، شهروندان بیشترین تأکید را بر بعد ادراکی هویت (شامل مؤلفههایی مانند خاطرهانگیزی، ارزش ذهنی و حس تعلق) داشتهاند، درحالیکه از منظر مسؤولان، بعد اجتماعی-فرهنگی (شامل امنیت، تعاملات اجتماعی، و رویدادهای فرهنگی-هنری) اهمیت بیشتری داشته است. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| شهرسازی شهروندگرا؛ هویت فضاهای عمومی؛ معادلات ساختاری؛ منطقه 12 تهران | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Impact of Citizen-oriented Urban Planning Variables on the Identity of Public Spaces (Case Study: Historical Fabric of District 12, Tehran) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Amirhossein Takmil1؛ behnaz Aminzadeh2 | ||
| 1PhD Candidate in Urban Planning, Kish International Campus, University of Tehran, Kish, Iran. | ||
| 2Professor, Faculty of Urban Planning, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The identity of public spaces, as a key component in enhancing urban quality of life and fostering a sense of belonging, plays a fundamental role in shaping spatial meanings and the lived experiences of citizens. Despite its importance, the identity of many public spaces in contemporary cities has weakened. One effective approach to revitalizing this identity is through the application of citizen-centered urban planning principles. This study aims to examine the impact of citizen-centered urban planning indicators on the identity of public spaces in the historical fabric of District 12 of Tehran. The research methodology is based on Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), with a statistical population consisting of 384 citizens and 30 urban experts and officials. Findings indicate that the “governance-local” indicators of citizen-centered urban planning (including accountability and transparency, participatory leadership, and local autonomy), as well as “citizenship” indicators (such as active participation, promotion of civic awareness, and access to information), have a significant impact on the three dimensions of public space identity: physical-spatial, socio-cultural, and perceptual. The results further show that, from the perspective of both respondent groups, citizenship indicators had the least influence on the physical-spatial dimension. This suggests that citizens’ perception and experience of public spaces are primarily influenced by social, cultural, and perceptual components. Moreover, citizens placed the greatest emphasis on the perceptual dimension of identity (including elements such as memorability, mental value, and sense of belonging), whereas officials considered the socio-cultural dimension (including security, social interaction, and cultural-artistic events) to be of higher importance. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Citizen-centered urban planning, Public space identity, Structural equation modeling, District 12 Tehran | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aeroshana, P. D. A. (2011). Human scale as a linking factor between urban form and function: an analytical study with special reference to streets of Pettah central business area (Doctoral dissertation). http://dl.lib.mrt.ac.lk/handle/123/334
Arefi, M. (1999). Non‐place and placelessness as narratives of loss: Rethinking the notion of place. Journal of urban design, 4(2), 179-193.
Azuma, E. M. (2017). Public spaces as part of discourse in cultural events Case study: Europalia. Brasil 2011. Crossways Journal, 1(2).
Buser, M. (2014). Democratic accountability and metropolitan governance: The case of South Hampshire, UK. Urban studies, 51(11), 2336-2353. doi.org/10.1177/0042098013484531
Bussu, S., & Bartels, K. P. (2014). Facilitative Leadership and the Challenge of Renewing Local Democracy in Italy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(6), 2256-2273.https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-427.12070
Calenda. (2018, March 2). Public space democracy. Study days, International Study Group on Spatial Dimensions of Public Memory, EHESS-Nomis Foundation, Room Lombard – 96 Boulevard Raspail, Paris, France. https://doi.org/10.58079/zrh
Cheng, K. F. (2011). Social Interactions in Computer-mediated Public Spaces (Doctoral dissertation, UC Berkeley). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6zz6d6dd
Cheshmehzangi, A. (2012). Identity and public realm. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 307-317. doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.036
Dewantara, J. A. (2023). From place attachment to sense of belonging: Promoting good citizenship through civic education. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 20(1), i–iv.
Erfani, G. (2020). Sense of place as an investigative method for the evaluation of participatory urban redevelopment: A case study in Tehran. Urban Research & Practice, 13(2), 132–150.
Eyvazlu, D. and Razavian, M. (2018). Metropolises Urban Management Assessment Based on Urban Good Governance Indexes; Case Study: Tehran Metropolis. Geography and Development, 16(52), 175-192. (In persian). doi: 10.22111/gdij.2018.4003
Fazeli, M., & Kalantari, M. (2012). Democratic values of generations: A case study in the city of Sari. Iranian Journal of Sociology, 13(1-2), 84–108. (In Persian). https://sid.ir/paper/476566/fa
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2004, October). The role of direct democracy and federalism in local power (IEW Working Paper No. 209). Institute for Empirical Research in Economics.
Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. MIT Press.
Habibpour Gatabi, K. (2022). The Needs and Priorities of Citizenship Education among Citizens (An Empricial Study in the City of Karaj). Journal of Iranian Social Development Studies, Vol. 14, No. 4. (In Persian).
Heidary, R. Aboozar, V. and Doolatyaran, K. (2022). Assessment and evaluation of the project of cultural-social regeneration of public spaces with the approach of improving environmental quality and neighbourhood identity The case study: historical walkways of Kashan city. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 10(3), 143-170. (In Persian).
10.22059/jurbangeo.2022.339760.1667
Hussain, K. A. M., & Ujang, N. (2018). Identification of landmarks in the historic district of banda hilir, melaka, malaysia. Asian Journal of Quality of Life, 3(9), 99.10.21834/ajqol.v3i9.81
Kamacı, E. (2014). A novel discussion on urban planning practice: citizen participation. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 2(1), 1-19.
Karimzadeh, D., Davoudpour, Z. and Khatibi, S. M. (2019). The Review of Urban Development Plans from the Perspective of Democratic Theories. The Journal of Community Development (Rural-Urban), 11(2), 525-544. (In Persian).
Karimzadeh, D., & Davoudpour, Z. (2018). Democratic approaches in urban planning and the emergence of agnostic theory. Urban Structure and Function Studies, 5(16), 111–128. (In Persian).
Khomejani, S., Sarvar, R., Amirazodi, T., & Arbabi Sabzvari, A. (2022). Measuring and evaluating the indicators of good urban governance in Tehran metropolis. Journal of Fundamental and Contemporary Views (JFCV), 3(3), 3. (In Persian).
Kobiernacka, A. (2015). Urban movements as an expression of contemporary democracy. Polish political science yearbook, 44(1), 204-219.DOI:
10.15804/ppsy2015015
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Low, S. M., & Smith, N. (Eds.). (2006). The politics of public space. Routledge.
Love, H., & Kok, C. (2021). Unpacking the “hybrid” model of stewarding public spaces. Brookings Institution.
Maćkowska, K. (2018). The rule of decentralization equals to local self-government? General remarks on local democracy in the U.S. an introduction to new explorations. Review of European and Comparative Law, 33(2), 21–34.
Manzo, L. C., & Perkins, D. D. (2006). Finding common ground: The importance of place attachment to community participation and planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 20(4), 335–350.
Meshkini, A., Pourmousavi, S. M., & Moazen, S. (2013). Evaluation of the neighborhood management model based on good urban governance indicators: A case study of Evin neighborhood, Tehran. Motaleate Shahri, 2(6), 31–42. (In Persian). https://sid.ir/paper/496232/fa
Mesquita-Mendes, N. (2025). Designing for super diversity: Transcultural identity, participation and place. MAJ - Malaysia Architectural Journal, 7(3), 231–266. https://majournal.my/index.php/maj/article/view/318
Moulay, A., Ujang, N., & Said, I. (2017). Legibility of neighborhood parks as a predictor for enhanced social interaction towards social sustainability. Cities, 61, 58–64.
Moghadas, Azam, Saei, A., & Ghaffari, M. (2014). Civil Society and Democratic Consolidation: A Theoretical Introduction. Journal of Political Studies, 6(23), 31-56. (In Persian).
Mohammadzadeh, A., Pourezzat, A., Rezayan Ghayehbashi, A. and Pirannejad, A. (2020). Imaginary of Citizen Participation with the Aim of Improving Urban Governance (Case Study: Tehran). Urban Planning Knowledge, 4(4), 117-135. (In Persian).
10.22124/upk.2020.16986.1507
Mulyana, D. (2024). National character, local wisdom, and citizenship education: Building national identity through education. Journal Arbitrase: Economy, Management and Accounting, 2(02), 87–93. https://paspama.org/index.php/Arbitrase/article/view/118
Varghese, P. (2019). A study into how the relationship between public and private spaces in the built environment influence the social and cultural aspects of the community (Bachelor’s thesis, TU Delft, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment). TU Delft Repository. https://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:366b004e-e9c1-49b1-acbe-6c77c91f71de
Palihawadana, U. I. (2005). Urban social space design in Sri Lanka: An analytical study of sense of belongingness in commercial oriented urban public spaces in Sri Lanka [Master’s thesis, University of Moratuwa]. Institutional Repository University of Moratuwa.
Qian, J. (2014). Public Space in non‐Western Contexts: Practices of Publicness and the Socio‐spatial Entanglement. Geography Compass, 8(11), 834-847. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12183
Rijal, S. (2023). The Importance of Community Involvement in Public Management Planning and Decision-Making Processes. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN), 1(2), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.61100/adman.v1i2.27
Rocco, R., & Van Ballegooijen, J. (2019). The political meaning of informal urbanization. In The Routledge handbook on informal urbanization (pp. 1-10). Routledge.
Sennett, R. (1999). On place: The spaces of democracy. Harvard Design Magazine, 8, 1–9.
Sobhani, N. Beyranvandzadeh, M. sh, M. and m, D. (2019). Effective prioritization of urban spaces in urban identity using multi-criteria models (Case Study: Borujerd City). Geography (Regional Planning), 9(35), 495-507.
Sumadi, P. (2004). Governance in a democratic transition: The case of the Urban Poverty Project in Cirebon (Master’s thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Svensdotter, A. O. N., & Guaralda, M. (2018). Dangerous safety or safely dangerous: Perception of safety and self-awareness in public space. The Journal of Public Space, 3(1), 75-92.10.5204/jps.v3i1.319
Vaitkevičiūtė, V. (2019). Legibility of urban spaces in kaunas new town: Research, strategy, suggestions. Architecture and urban planning, 15(1), 13-21. 10.2478/aup-2019-0002
Vahidnia, M.H. Citizen participation through volunteered geographic information as equipment for a smart city to monitor urban decay. Environ Monit Assess 195, 181 (2023).
Yang, J., Yang, L., & Ma, H. (2022). Community Participation Strategy for Sustainable Urban Regeneration in Xiamen, China. Land, 11(5), 600.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Harvard University Press.
Ziari K, Nikpay V, Hosseini A. (2013). Measurement the Level of Citizen Participation in Urban Management Based on Urban Good Governance: A Case Study for Yasouj. JHRE. 32(141), 69-86. (In Persian). URL:
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 146 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 38 |
||