| تعداد نشریات | 32 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 559 |
| تعداد مقالات | 5,438 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 8,259,977 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 6,135,354 |
بررسی رابطه نوآوری دانشگاهی و یادگیری مادامالعمر در راستای توسعه آموزش عالی: تبیین نقش واسطهای مهارتهای یاددهی-یادگیری اعضای هیئت علمی | ||
| مطالعات برنامه ریزی آموزشی | ||
| مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 10 خرداد 1405 اصل مقاله (1004.33 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/eps.2026.31301.2402 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مهدی محمدی* ؛ فرزانه دیمه کار حقیقی | ||
| گروه مدیریت و برنامه ریزی آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 25 بهمن 1404، تاریخ بازنگری: 07 اردیبهشت 1405، تاریخ پذیرش: 10 خرداد 1405 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف: در نظامهای آموزش عالی، نوآوری از فعالیتی حاشیهای به مأموریتی نهادی و محرک تعاملات اجتماعی بدل گشته و یادگیری مادامالعمر نیز به سازهای غایتمند برای بالندگی حرفهای تغییر ماهیت داده است. بر این اساس، پژوهش حاضر با هدف تحلیل رابطه بین نوآوری دانشگاهی و یادگیری مادامالعمر، با تبیین نقش واسطهای مهارتهای یاددهی-یادگیری اعضای هیأت علمی در مسیر توسعه آموزش عالی انجام شد. روششناسی: پژوهش حاضر، کاربردی و توصیفی-همبستگی (مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری) است. جامعه آماری شامل دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشگاه شیراز (۱۴۰۴-۱۴۰۳) بود که ۲۱۰ نفر از آنان به روش خوشهای مرحلهای انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش، سه پرسشنامه استاندارد نوآوری دانشگاهی، مهارتهای یادگیری و یادگیری مادامالعمر بود. تحلیل دادهها با نرمافزارهای SPSS-23 و LISREL-8.54 در دو سطح توصیفی و استنباطی صورت گرفت. یافتهها: یافته ها نشان داد «نوآوری آموزشی»، «مهارت مشارکت» و «جمعآوری اطلاعات» مؤلفههای غالب متغیرهای پژوهش هستند. مدل ساختاری ضمن تأیید اثر مستقیم نوآوری دانشگاهی بر یادگیری مستمر، بر نقش واسطهای راهبردی شایستگیهای پداگوژیک اساتید در پیوند میان نوآوری سازمانی و یادگیری دانشجویان صحه گذارد. نتیجهگیری و پیشنهادها: نتایج مؤید آن است که تحقق اهداف یادگیری مادامالعمر در گرو عبور نوآوریهای ساختاری از مجرای شایستگیهای پداگوژیک اساتید است. در این راستا، پیشنهاد میگردد دانشگاه شیراز با اتخاذ مدل رهبری توزیعیافته و تبدیل دورههای توسعه حرفهای به اجتماعات پژوهشی، بستر را برای ارتقای پداگوژی کاوشمحور و پیوند پایاننامههای تحصیلات تکمیلی با نیازهای نوآورانه بازار کار فراهم آورد. نوآوری و اصالت: نوآوری این پژوهش در تبیین فرآیند ترجمه پداگوژیک است؛ بدین معنا که نشان میدهد چگونه شایستگیهای حرفهای اساتید، دروندادهای سختافزاری و ساختاری نوآوری را به خروجیهای خودتنظیمگر در یادگیری مادامالعمر تبدیل میکند. این مطالعه با عبور از مدلهای خطی، بر ماهیت غیرمستقیم و واسطهای نوآوری در بستر آموزش عالی تأکید میورزد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| نوآوری؛ نوآوری دانشگاهی؛ یادگیری مادام العمر؛ مهارت اعضای هیئت علمی؛ برنامه ریزی آموزشی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Investigating the Relationship Between University Innovation and Lifelong Learning in Higher Education Development: Explaining the Mediating Role of Faculty Teaching-Learning Skills | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| mehdi mohammadi؛ farzane deimehkarhaghighi | ||
| Department of Educational Administration and Planing, Faculty of Education and psychology, shiraz University, shiraz, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Aim: In higher education systems, innovation has evolved from a peripheral activity into an institutional mission and a driver of social interactions, while lifelong learning has been redefined as a purposeful construct for professional flourishing. Accordingly, this study aimed to analyze the relationship between academic innovation and lifelong learning, specifically examining the mediating role of faculty members' teaching-learning skills in the development of higher education. Methodology: This study is applied in purpose and descriptive-correlational (Structural Equation Modeling) in nature. The statistical population comprised all postgraduate students at Shiraz University (academic year 2024-2025), from which 210 participants were selected via multi-stage cluster sampling. Data were collected using three standardized questionnaires: Academic Innovation (Keshavarz, 2013), Learning Skills (Darabi, 2013), and Lifelong Learning (Koochaki, 2012). Data analysis was performed at both descriptive and inferential levels using SPSS-23 and LISREL-8.54. Results: The findings indicated that "educational innovation," "participatory skills," and "information gathering" are the dominant components of the research variables. The structural model, while confirming the direct positive effect of academic innovation on continuous learning, validated the strategic mediating role of faculty members' pedagogical competencies in linking organizational innovation to students' lifelong learning. Conclusions and suggestions: The results confirm that achieving lifelong learning goals depends on the transition of structural innovations through the channel of faculty pedagogical competencies. In this regard, it is suggested that Shiraz University adopt a distributed leadership model and transform professional development courses into "research communities" to facilitate inquiry-based pedagogy and align postgraduate theses with the innovative needs of the labor market. Innovation and originality: The novelty of this research lies in elucidating the process of "pedagogical translation"; demonstrating how faculty professional competencies transform hardware and structural inputs of innovation into self-regulated lifelong learning outcomes. By moving beyond linear models, this study emphasizes the indirect and mediated nature of innovation within the higher education ecosystem | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| nnovation, Academic Innovation, Lifelong Learning, Faculty Skills, educational planning | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abbasi mosleh, Z. , taqavi, H. , & roshani ali benasee, H. (2026). Predicting innovative behaviors in students based on participation in exploratory communities and academic identity: Modeling. Journal of Educational Planning Studies, 14(28), 217-234. https://doi: 10.22080/eps.2025.30284.2378 Aghaei, S., Shokrpour, N., & Bazrafkan, L. (2022). The relationship between reflectivity and self-regulated learning in MA medical education students of Shiraz University in 2018 and 2019. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 32(5), 1065–1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01615-9 Ali, M. G. (2025). Introducing and evaluating key performance indicators and generating awareness of competence among inter-departments for quality performance and quality assurance in large academic and research multidisciplinary institutions. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 10(1), 287-360. Amado-Mateus, M., Guzmán Rincón, A., Juarez, F., & Ramos, I. (2024). Validity of the multidimensional reputation perception scale in private universities. Frontiers in Education, 9, 637-739. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1365210 Anonymous. (2024). A sector in crisis? Insights from how English higher education apprenticeships are weathering the storm. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 14(1). Baog, I. W., Ongcoy, M. T. P., Roferos, J. L., Talo, M. R. L., & Sardido, J. R. A. (2024). School innovation climate and educational technology integration of elementary teachers: A mediation role of engagement to professional development. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 12(3). Bellhäuser, H., Dignath, C., & Theobald, M. (2023). Daily automated feedback enhances self-regulated learning: a longitudinal randomized field experiment. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1125873. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1125873 Biggs, J., Tang, C., & Kennedy, G. (2022). Teaching for quality learning at university 5e. McGraw-hill education (UK). bin As-Siddiqi, H., & El-Bukhary, A. (2025). Comparative studies on educational governance: Balancing centralization and decentralization in global contexts. Innovative Journal of Educational Research and Insights, 2(3), 123-134. Borozan, M., & Bushnaq, T. (2025). Professional competences for the innovation of education in the 21st century from the perspective of pedagogical action research. Annals of the University of Craiova, Psychology-Pedagogy Series, 24(47), 46-59. Bransford, J. , Brown, A. , & Cocking, R. (eds) (2000). How People Learn. Washington, D. C. : National Academy Press. Caliskan, A., & Zhu, C. (2021). Organizational culture barriers and facilitators for instructional innovations at the Faculty of Education. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 92, 137-166. Carr, O. G., & Cravens, X. (2023). Teaching without boundaries: Interviews exploring the adaptation of collaborative inquiry to the American context. Gates Open Research, 7, 70. CHARM-EU. (2025). CHARM-EU Annual Conference 2025 Utrecht University Poster Proceedings. Utrecht University. Darabi, M. (2013). Design and validation of a faculty teaching proficiency scale based on the 7E learning cycle (Master's thesis). University of Shiraz, Shiraz, Iran. [In Persian] Davis-Singaravelu, S. (2022). The potential to build collective capacity for organisational learning in the context of teachers’ use of digital technology for school improvement. Education Sciences, 12(1), 33. Dennis, J. L., & Somerville, M. P. (2022). Supporting thinking about thinking: Examining the metacognition theory-practice gap in higher education. Higher Education, 84, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00904-x Diaz-Ducca, J. A., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2023). Affordances of the CoI model and Freire’s pedagogy for critical thinking in EFL teacher training. In 29th ICDE World Conference: Conference Proceedings (pp. 274–288). Effendi-Hasibuan, M. H., Harizon, Ngatijo, & Mukminin, A. (2019). The Inquiry-based Teaching Instruction (IbTI) in Indonesian secondary education: What makes science teachers successful enact the curriculum? Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10263a Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Expanding the 5E Model. The Science Teacher, 70(6), 56-59. Enachescu, V. A. (2025). Microlearning and lifelong learning: effects on skill acquisition and ‘learning-to-learn’ competencies in higher education. Proceedings of the Bucharest University of Economic Studies. Eschenbacher, S., & Fleming, T. (2020). Transformative dimensions of lifelong learning: Mezirow, Rorty and COVID-19. International Review of Education, 66(5-6), 657–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-020-09859-6 Estaiteyeh, M., DeCoito, I., & Takkouch, M. (2024). STEM teacher candidates’ preparation for online teaching: Promoting technological and pedagogical knowledge. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 50(4), 1–20. Eviyanti, L., Farisi, A. N., Uyuni, Y. R., & Bachtiar, M. (2024). Problems and innovations of educational institutions. Formosa Journal of Science and Technology, 3(6), 1271-1282. Fontell, H. (2024). Metrics for evaluating societal impact of university innovation ecosystems: A case study of Aalto University [Master’s thesis, Aalto University]. Aaltodoc. Garner-O'Neale, L., & Bridgeman-Maxwell, Z. (2023). From crisis to classroom transformation: Unleashing the power of the flipped classroom model in a post-COVID era. In 3rd BTC Book of Abstracts & Programme (p. 11). Ghodrati, A. , kian, M. , & Mahdavinasab, Y. (2025). Identifying digital professional competencies of teachers in the field of artificial intelligence application in education. Journal of Educational Planning Studies, 13(26), 74-95. https://doi: 10.22080/eps.2025.28512.2309 Gopo, C. F., Canillas, P. C., Nuyad, A. L., Zamora, J. E., Godin, C. T., Tagaro, S. M., & Junsay, M. D. (2026). Strategy formulation in education: A systematic literature review. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 29(2), 044-054. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2026.29.2.0284 Güven, Z. Z. (2020). Lifelong learning skills in higher education: A case study based on the students’ views. Turquoise International Journal of Educational Research and Social Studies, 2(2), 20-30. Guzonova, V., Jakúbek, P., Rudenko, O., Shestakovska, T., & Ovramets, V. (2022). An analytical look at the management of public universities in the Slovak Republic and Ukraine. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 12(1), XXV, 27-33. Halasz, G. (2021). Measuring innovation in education with a special focus on the impact of organisational characteristics. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 11(2), 189–209. Han, J., Liu, G., Liu, X., Yang, Y., Quan, W., & Chen, Y. (2024). Continue using or gathering dust? A mixed method research on the factors influencing the continuous use intention for an AI-powered adaptive learning system for rural middle school students. Heliyon, 10(12), e33251. Hu, Y. H., Asistido, R. L., & Villanueva, M. J. (2021). Influencing variables and implications in the teacher-student relationships. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1317-1327. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1317 İspir, R., & Çakmak, M. (2025). A content analysis study on research articles in the field of lifelong learning. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 13(4), 191–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1793116 Jakob, M., Büchel, K., Steffen, D., & Brunetti, A. (2023). Participatory teaching improves learning outcomes: Evidence from a field experiment in Tanzania (Discussion Paper No. 23-10). University of Bern, Department of Economics. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/278646 Jin, Y., Yan, L., Echeverria, V., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100348. Joyce, B., & Calhoun, E. (2024). Models of teaching. Routledge. Keshavarz, S. (2013). The relationship between university innovation and educational quality: A case study of Shiraz University (Master's thesis). University of Shiraz, Shiraz, Iran. [In Persian] Kleiner-Schaefer, T., & Schaefer, K. J. (2022). Barriers to university–industry collaboration in an emerging market: Firm-level evidence from Turkey. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(3), 872–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09919-z Koucheki, M. (2012). Investigating the tendency toward lifelong learning among postgraduate students and its relationship with academic self-efficacy (Master's thesis). University of Shiraz, Shiraz, Iran. [In Persian] Kozirog, K., Lucaci, S.-M., & Berghmans, S. (2022). Universities as key drivers of sustainable innovation ecosystems: Results of the EUA survey on universities and innovation. European University Association. Lamaro, G., Ndyomugenyi, E. K., & Openjuru, G. L. (2025). From administration to transformation: The new role of managers in higher education. African Educational Research Journal, 13(4), 461-471. Lewis, A. (2023). Enhancing classroom learning experience: A comprehensive study on the integration and influence of technology in 21st century education. In 3rd BTC Book of Abstracts & Programme (p. 76). Li, Z., Li, Q., & Liu, W. (2023). How distributed leadership affects social and emotional competence in adolescents: The chain mediating role of student-centered instructional practices and teacher self-efficacy. Preprints.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202312.1663.v1 Mathias, T., Fertig, M. B., Zancanaro, M., Thibes, R. F., & Hahn, I. S. (2024). Defining innovation: A comprehensive analysis of types, levels, and strategic interactions. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 29(9), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2909022836 Meylani, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence in the education of teachers: A qualitative synthesis of the cutting-edge research literature. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 12(24), 600–637. Munguiko, C., Masereka, E. M., & Sang, C. (2025). Applying learning theories to clinical teaching in contemporary settings: A conceptual analysis. South Asian Research Journal of Medical Sciences, 7(2), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.36346/sarjms.2025.v07i02.001 Ng, B. (2023). Conceptualizing lifelong learning for K-12 education. Journal of Research Initiatives, 7(2), Article 9. https://digitalcommons.uncfsu.edu/jri/vol7/iss2/9 Ni, L. B., Liang, L., & Haibao, C. (2025). Learning management systems and pedagogical innovation: Evidence from academic staff in China. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, 10(6), 1209–1214. https://doi.org/10.51584/IJRIAS.2025.10060090 Olsson, A. K., & Bernhard, I. (2023). Transforming doctoral education: Exploring industrial PhD collaboration in Sweden. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 24(4), 523–536. Owusu-Agyeman, Y. (2019). An analysis of theoretical perspectives that define adult learners for effective and inclusive adult education policies. International Review of Education, 65(6), 929-953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09811-3 Papi, C., Desjardins, G., & Tjen, M. (2023). Bimodal learning: A way to adapt to students’ autonomy? In 29th ICDE World Conference: Conference Proceedings (pp. 489–503). Perez Carpio, J. E., López-Gonzales, J. L., Tocto-Cano, E., & Turpo-Chaparro, J. E. (2024). Implementing the SDGs in higher education: A systematic review. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 13(5). Perez-Ruiz, J. C., Munares, M. L. Q., Armas-Cima, F., & Bejarano-Álvarez, P. M. (2025). Institutional factors and teaching performance at a university in southern Lima, 2025. Management (Montevideo), 3, 203. Phelps, J. L. (2025). Investigating the relationship between discovery learning and students’ engagement and knowledge acquisition in Montessori and traditional schools [Doctoral dissertation, Bethel University]. Spark Repository. https://spark.bethel.edu/etd/1170 Pinkerton, T., Oakes, W., & Kurz, A. (2023). Using the principles of Universal Design for Learning to support students in higher education. In 3rd BTC Book of Abstracts & Programme (p. 64). Rosales-Márquez, C., Carbonell-García, C. E., Miranda-Vargas, V., Diaz-Zavala, R., & Laura-De La Cruz, K. M. (2025). Self-confidence as a predictor of digital skills: a fundamental pillar for the digitalization of higher education. Frontiers in Education, 9, 496-569. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1515033 Sala, A., Punie, Y., Garkov, V., & Cabrera Giraldez, M. (2020). LifeComp: The European framework for personal, social and learning to learn key competence. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/302967 Salimi, G., Mohammadi, M., Jahromi, R. N., Maaref, P., Safari, M., & Mirghafari, F. (2022). Meta-synthesis approach to continuity of learning in higher education by online education especially for Corona crisis. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 28(3), 199–221. https://doi.org/10.52547/irphe.28.3.199 Samatoina, D., & Farrant, C. (2025). From learners to co-creators: Redefining teaching and assessment strategy in entrepreneurship education. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(46). Sarango-Lapo, C. P., Mena, J., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2021). Evidence-based educational innovation model linked to digital information competence in the framework of Education 4.0. Sustainability, 13(18), 10034. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810034 Scuotto, V., Magni, D., Garcia-Perez, A., & Pironti, M. (2026). The impact of innovation failure: Entrepreneurship adversity or opportunity? Technovation, 129, 102944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102944 Sembiring, M. G., & Budiman, R. (2023). Better understanding of educational experience related to the soft-skills development in open-distance learning settings. In 29th ICDE World Conference: Conference Proceedings (pp. 316–331). Serohina, T., Pliushch, R., Pobirchenko, N., Shulga, N., Akimova, L., & Akimov, O. (2022). Pedagogical innovations in public administration and legal aspects: The EU experience. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 12(1), XXV, 7-13. Sheth, A., & Sinfield, J. V. (2020). Systematic problem-specification in innovation science using language. International Journal of Innovation Science, 13(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-03-2020-0019 Stănescu, D. F., Frunzaru, V., & Stefanita, O. (2024). Self-regulated learning, self-efficacy and life-long learning: the mediating role of future orientation. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-03-2024-0585 Stănescu, D. F., Frunzaru, V., & Stefanita, O. (2024). Self-regulated learning, self-efficacy and life-long learning: The mediating role of future orientation. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-03-2024-0585 Surrey Business School. (2024). Incubating vibrant futures: 2024-2030. University of Surrey. Tafrihah, Utanto, Y., & Pristiwati, R. (2024). Optimizing digital literacy integration in early childhood education: A case study of Tarbiyatul Athfal Bulumanis Kidul Kindergarten. Golden Age: Jurnal Ilmiah Tumbuh Kembang Anak Usia Dini, 9(4), 757-770. https://doi.org/10.14421/jga.2024.94-14 Tang, J., Huang, P., & Yan, S. (2025). Digital transformation in higher education: logical framework, practical dilemmas, and implementation approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1565591. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1565591 Theobald, M. (2021). Self-regulated learning training programs enhance university students’ academic performance, self-regulated learning strategies, and motivation: A meta-analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 66, 101976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101976 Thwe, W. P., & Kálmán, A. (2023a). Lifelong learning in the educational setting: A systematic literature review. Lifelong Learning in the Educational Setting, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00738-w Thwe, W. P., & Kálmán, A. (2023b). The regression models for lifelong learning competencies for teacher trainers. Heliyon, 9(2), e13749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13749 Ting, F. S. T., Shroff, R. H., Lam, W. H., Garcia, R. C. C., Chan, C. L., Tsang, W. K., & Ezeamuzie, N. O. (2022). A meta-analysis of studies on the effects of active learning on Asian students’ performance in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) subjects. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00661-6 Università di Macerata. (2023). 2023–2025 Strategic Plan. EUM Edizioni Università di Macerata. University of Limerick. (2026). 3rd University Learning, Teaching and Assessment Conference: Reimagining Student Engagement – Innovate, Include, Inspire. Kemmy Business School. Voropai, O., & Antoniouk, O. (2025). Innovation ecosystem models: Defining the role of the university in the Industry 5.0 perspective. Humanities and Social Sciences 2025 Research Journal, 32(1), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2025.hss.11 Wen, K., & Liu, Q. (2024). Examining the relationship between teaching ability and smart education adoption in K-12 schools: A moderated mediation analysis. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(4), 381-396. Wu, J., & Gu, Y. (2022). Innovation capabilities in the convergence trend of higher education from the perspective of quality management. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 979059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.979059 Wu, J., & Gu, Y. (2022). Innovation capabilities in the convergence trend of higher education from the perspective of quality management. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 979059. Yang, Y., & Chang, Y. C. (2023). A study on the relationship between teacher competency and job performance under human resource management in higher education. Educational Research and Reviews, 18(8), 203-217. Ye, J. H., Cui, Y., Nong, W., Lee, Y. S., Yang, X., Wang, L., & Ye, J. N. (2024). The development of an analysis of quantitative measurements competence disparity scale for graduate students. Environment and Social Psychology, 9(6), 2576. https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i6.2576 Yıldırım, H., Kır, Ş., & Bozkurt, A. (2025). Towards a future of qualifications: A systematic review of micro-credentials. Online Learning, 29(4), 535-559. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v29i4.4969. Yudianto, I., Mulyani, S., Fahmi, M., & Winarningsih, S. (2021). The influence of good university governance and intellectual capital on university performance in Indonesia. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(1), 570-636. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0006 Zine, M., Harrou, F., Terbeche, M., & Sun, Y. (2025). Evaluating e-learning readiness using explainable machine learning and key organizational change factors in higher education. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13335-9 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1 |
||