دانشگاه مازندران

 آمار

تعداد نشریات32
تعداد شماره‌ها562
تعداد مقالات5,465
تعداد مشاهده مقاله8,311,045
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله6,150,598
Meghdadi, Zeinab, Shabanlou, Mohammad, Mofid, Massood. (1405). Finite Element Investigation of Stiffened Beam-Only Connected Steel Plate Shear Walls under Cyclic Loading. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, (), 131-145. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2026.31223.1077
Zeinab Meghdadi; Mohammad Shabanlou; Massood Mofid. "Finite Element Investigation of Stiffened Beam-Only Connected Steel Plate Shear Walls under Cyclic Loading". پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, , , 1405, 131-145. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2026.31223.1077
Meghdadi, Zeinab, Shabanlou, Mohammad, Mofid, Massood. (1405). 'Finite Element Investigation of Stiffened Beam-Only Connected Steel Plate Shear Walls under Cyclic Loading', پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, (), pp. 131-145. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2026.31223.1077
Meghdadi, Zeinab, Shabanlou, Mohammad, Mofid, Massood. Finite Element Investigation of Stiffened Beam-Only Connected Steel Plate Shear Walls under Cyclic Loading. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 1405; (): 131-145. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2026.31223.1077

Finite Element Investigation of Stiffened Beam-Only Connected Steel Plate Shear Walls under Cyclic Loading

Civil Engineering and Applied Solutions
مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 16 خرداد 1405
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/ceas.2026.31223.1077
نویسندگان
Zeinab Meghdadi* ؛ Mohammad Shabanlou؛ Massood Mofid
Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
تاریخ دریافت: 18 بهمن 1404،  تاریخ بازنگری: 09 اردیبهشت 1405،  تاریخ پذیرش: 16 خرداد 1405 
چکیده
This study investigates a novel type of steel plate shear wall (SPSW) system in which the infill plate is detached from the boundary columns and reinforced using side, horizontal, or cross stiffeners. Although conventional SPSW systems offer several advantages, their main drawback is the requirement for large column sections due to the significant tension field forces developed in the infill plate after buckling. According to the capacity design concept, boundary columns must resist these forces to prevent the formation of plastic hinges along the column height. In recent years, the concept of separating the steel plate from the boundary columns has been proposed to mitigate these demands. In this study, the behavior of stiffened beam only connected steel plate shear walls (BO SPSWs) is investigated using finite element analysis. The effects of stiffener arrangement, stiffener cross section, stiffener dimensions, and web plate thickness are examined. The numerical results demonstrate stable cyclic responses with no sudden strength degradation, indicating the ductile and reliable behavior of the proposed system. For configurations with side, horizontal, and cross stiffeners, tension fields develop within the steel plate, forming between the stiffeners and boundary beams and within the resulting subpanels. Among the investigated stiffener sections, T shaped stiffeners provide superior structural performance. Furthermore, increasing the stiffener dimensions and the web plate thickness leads to higher ultimate strength and improved energy dissipation capacity.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Steel plate shear wall؛ Stiffener؛ Nonlinear analysis؛ Finite element method؛ Cyclic behavior؛ Dissipated energy
مراجع
  1. Sarcheshmehpour, M., Shabanlou, M., Meghdadi, Z., Estekanchi, H. E., Mofid, M. Seismic evaluation of steel plate shear wall systems considering soil-structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2021; 145: 106738. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106738.
  2. Shabanlou, M., Moghaddam, H., Daryan, A. The Effect of Geometry on Structural Behavior of Buildings with Steel Plate Shear Wall System Subjected to Blast Loading. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2021; 21: 650–665. doi:10.1007/s13296-021-00463-4.
  3. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Steel Design Guide 20: Steel Plate Shear Walls. Farmington Hills (MI): AISC; 2006.
  4. Sarcheshmehpour, M., Estekanchi, H. E. Life cycle cost optimization of earthquake-resistant steel framed tube tall buildings. Structures, 2021; 30: 585–601. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2021.01.038.
  5. Elgaaly, M., Caccese, V., Du, C. Postbuckling Behavior of Steel‐Plate Shear Walls under Cyclic Loads. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1993; 119: 588–605. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:2(588).
  6. Ghosh, S., Adam, F., Das, A. Design of steel plate shear walls considering inelastic drift demand. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2009; 65: 1431–1437. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.02.008.
  7. Li, C.-H., Tsai, K.-C., Lin, C.-H., Chen, P.-C. Cyclic tests of four two-story narrow steel plate shear walls. Part 2: Experimental results and design implications. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2009; 39: 801–826. doi:10.1002/eqe.964.
  8. Li, C. H., Tsai, K. C., Chang, J. T., Lin, C. H. Cyclic Test of a Coupled Steel Plate Shear Wall Substructure. Procedia Engineering, 2011; 14: 582–589. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.073.
  9. Roberts, T. M., Sabouri-Ghomi, S. Hysteretic characteristics of unstiffened perforated steel plate shear panels. Thin-Walled Structures, 1992; 14: 139–151. doi:10.1016/0263-8231(92)90047-Z.
  10. Purba, R., Bruneau, M. Seismic Performance of Steel Plate Shear Walls Considering Two Different Design Philosophies of Infill Plates. I: Deterioration Model Development. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2015; 141: 04014160. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001098.
  11. Chan, R., Albermani, F., Kitipornchai, S. Stiffness and Strength Of Perforated Steel Plate Shear Wall. Procedia Engineering, 2011; 14: 675–679. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.086.
  12. Valizadeh, H., Sheidaii, M., Showkati, H. Experimental investigation on cyclic behavior of perforated steel plate shear walls. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2012; 70: 308–316. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.09.016.
  13. Bahrebar, M., Lim, J. B. P., Clifton, G. C., Zirakian, T., Shahmohammadi, A., Hajsadeghi, M. Perforated steel plate shear walls with curved corrugated webs under cyclic loading. Structures, 2020; 24: 600–609. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2020.01.047.
  14. Ahmad Khan, N. A., Srivastava, G. Models for strength and stiffness of steel plate shear walls with openings. Structures, 2020; 27: 2096–2113. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2020.07.037.
  15. Vian, D., Lin, Y.-C., Bruneau, M., Tsai, K.-C. Cyclic performance of low yield strength steel panel shear walls. In: Proceedings of The Sixteenth KKCNN Symposium on Civil Engineering; 2003; Kolon Hotel, Gyeongju, Korea. p. 379–384.
  16. Chen, S.-J., Jhang, C. Cyclic behavior of low yield point steel shear walls. Thin-Walled Structures, 2006; 44: 730–738. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2006.08.002.
  17. Astaneh-Asl, A. Seismic Behavior and Design of Composite Steel Plate Shear Walls. San Francisco (CA): Structural Steel Educational Council; 2002.
  18. Zhao, Q., Astaneh-Asl, A. Cyclic Behavior of Traditional and Innovative Composite Shear Walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2004; 130: 271–284. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:2(271).
  19. Arabzadeh, A., Soltani, M., Ayazi, A. Experimental investigation of composite shear walls under shear loadings. Thin-walled Structures - THIN WALL STRUCT, 2011; 49: 842–854. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2011.02.009.
  20. Emami, F., Mofid, M. On the hysteretic behavior of trapezoidally corrugated steel shear walls. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2014; 23: 94–104. doi:10.1002/tal.1025.
  21. Emami, F., Mofid, M., Vafai, H. Experimental study on cyclic behavior of trapezoidally corrugated steel shear walls. Engineering Structures, 2013; 48: 750–762. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.11.028.
  22. Farzampour, A., Laman, J. A., Mofid, M. Behavior prediction of corrugated steel plate shear walls with openings. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2015; 114: 258–268. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.07.018.
  23. Hosseinzadeh, L., Emami, F., Mofid, M. Experimental investigation on the behavior of corrugated steel shear wall subjected to the different angle of trapezoidal plate. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 2017; 26: e1390. doi:10.1002/tal.1390.
  24. Alinia, M. M. A study into optimization of stiffeners in plates subjected to shear loading. Thin-Walled Structures, 2005; 43: 845–860. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2004.10.008.
  25. Alinia, M. M., Dastfan, M. Cyclic behaviour, deformability and rigidity of stiffened steel shear panels. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2007; 63: 554–563. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.06.005.
  26. Alinia, M. M., Sarraf Shirazi, R. On the design of stiffeners in steel plate shear walls. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2009; 65: 2069–2077. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.06.009.
  27. Sabouri-Ghomi, S., Sajjadi, S. R. A. Experimental and theoretical studies of steel shear walls with and without stiffeners. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2012; 75: 152–159. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.03.018.
  28. Guo, H.-C., Hao, J.-P., Liu, Y.-H. Behavior of stiffened and unstiffened steel plate shear walls considering joint properties. Thin-Walled Structures, 2015; 97: 53–62. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2015.09.005.
  29. Guo, H., Li, Y., Liang, G., Liu, Y. Experimental study of cross stiffened steel plate shear wall with semi-rigid connected frame. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017; 135: 69–82. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.04.009.
  30. Ma, Z.-y., Hao, J.-p., Yu, H.-s. Shaking-table test of a novel buckling-restrained multi-stiffened low-yield-point steel plate shear wall. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2018; 145: 128–136. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.02.009.
  31. Xue, M., Lu, L.-W. Influence of steel shear wall panels with surrounding frame members. Proc. SSRC annual technical session. 1994:339-354.
  32. Choi, I.-R., Park, H.-G. Steel Plate Shear Walls with Various Infill Plate Designs. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2009; 135: 785–796. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:7(785).
  33. Guo, L., Rong, Q., Ma, X., Zhang, S. Behavior of steel plate shear wall connected to frame beams only. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2011; 11: 467–479. doi:10.1007/s13296-011-4006-7.
  34. Clayton, P., Berman, J., Lowes, L. Seismic performance of self-centering steel plate shear walls with beam-only-connected web plates. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2015; 106: 198–208. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.12.017.
  35. Ozcelik, Y., Clayton, P. M. Seismic design and performance of SPSWs with beam-connected web plates. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2018; 142: 55–67. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.12.004.
  36. Clayton, P. M., Berman, J. W., Lowes, L. N. Subassembly testing and modeling of self-centering steel plate shear walls. Engineering Structures, 2013; 56: 1848–1857. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.06.030.
  37. Rong, Q., Guo, L., Ma, X., Zhang, S. Analysis of composite steel plate shear walls connected with frame beams only. Proceedings of the ICE - Structures and Buildings, 2013; 166: 507–518. doi:10.1680/stbu.11.00089.
  38. Ozcelik, Y., Clayton, P. M. Strip model for steel plate shear walls with beam-connected web plates. Engineering Structures, 2017; 136: 369–379. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.051.
  39. Shekastehband, B., Azaraxsh, A. A., Showkati, H., Pavir, A. Behavior of semi-supported steel shear walls: Experimental and numerical simulations. Engineering Structures, 2017; 135: 161–176. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.004.
  40. Shekastehband, B., Azaraxsh, A., Showkati, H. Experimental and numerical study on seismic behavior of LYS and HYS steel plate shear walls connected to frame beams only. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 2017; 17: 154–168. doi:10.1016/j.acme.2016.09.006.
  41. Ozcelik, Y., Clayton, P. M. Behavior of columns of steel plate shear walls with beam-connected web plates. Engineering Structures, 2018; 172: 820–832. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.087.
  42. Mu, Z., Yang, Y. Experimental and numerical study on seismic behavior of obliquely stiffened steel plate shear walls with openings. Thin-Walled Structures, 2020; 146: 106457. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2019.106457.
  43. Shekastehband, B., Azaraxsh, A. A., Showkati, H. Experimental seismic study on shear walls with fully-connected and beam-only-connected web plates. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2018; 141: 204–215. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.11.013.
  44. Özçelik, A. Y., Clayton, P. Tension field inclination angle in steel plate shear walls with beam- connected web plates. In: 2nd International Conference on Natural Hazards & Infrastructure; 2019; Athens (GR).
  45. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). ANSI/AISC 360-16: Specification for structural steel buildings. Farmington Hills (MI): AISC; 2016.
  46. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. Washington, DC (US): AASHTO; 2005.
  47. Moghimi, H., Driver Robert, G. Beam Design Force Demands in Steel Plate Shear Walls with Simple Boundary Frame Connections. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2014; 140: 04014046. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000993.
  48. Habashi, H. R., Alinia, M. M. Characteristics of the wall–frame interaction in steel plate shear walls. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2010; 66: 150–158. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.09.004.
  49. Khoei, A. R., Gharehbaghi, S. A., Azami, A. R., Tabarraie, A. R. SUT-DAM: An integrated software environment for multi-disciplinary geotechnical engineering. Advances in Engineering Software, 2006; 37: 728–753. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2006.03.001.
  50. Shabanlou, M., Meghdadi, Z., Ghaffar, S. Experimental and Analytical Study of the Residual Performance of Reinforced Concrete Deep Beams with Circular Web Openings. Results in Engineering, 2025; 25: 104229. doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104229.
  51. Shabanlou, M., Mofid, M., Tavakoli, A. Experimental and Numerical Study on the Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Deep Beams with Normal-Strength and High-Strength Concrete After Being Exposed to Fire. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2024; 49: 13457–13476. doi:10.1007/s13369-023-08676-x.
  52. Webster, D., Berman, J., Lowes, L. Experimental Investigation of SPSW Web Plate Stress Field Development and Vertical Boundary Element Demand. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2014; 140: 04014011. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000989.
  53. Clayton, P., Tsai, C.-Y., Berman, J., Lowes, L. Comparison of web plate numerical models for self-centering steel plate shear walls. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2015; 44: 2093–2110. doi:10.1002/eqe.2578.
  54. Meghdadi, Z., Khaloo, A. Experimental, theoretical and numerical study on flexural behavior of hybrid steel‐GFRP reinforced concrete slabs. Structural Concrete, 2024; 26: 739–758. doi:10.1002/suco.202301085.
  55. Meghdadi, Z., Khaloo, A., Ashour, A. Residual structural performance of fire-exposed concrete slabs reinforced with hybrid GFRP-steel bars: Experimental and numerical studies. Structures, 2025; 80: 109757. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2025.109757.
  56. Wang, M., Yang, W., Shi, Y., Xu, J. Seismic behaviors of steel plate shear wall structures with construction details and materials. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2015; 107: 194–210. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.01.007.
  57. Clark, P. W. F., Karl H.; Krawinkler, Helmut; Shaw, Robert E Protocol for fabrication, inspection, testing and documentation of beam-column connection tests and other experimental specimens. Berkeley (CA): The Earthquake Engineering Online Archive NISEE e-Library; 1997. Report No.: SAC/BD-97/02.
  58. Shabanlou, M., Mofid, M., Eslami, M., Kodur, V., Meghdadi, Z., Tavakoli, A. Experimental, analytical and numerical investigation on the effects of different shear reinforcement on residual post-fire behavior of reinforced concrete deep beams. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2025; 1–18. doi:10.1080/15732479.2025.2456466.
  59. Shabanlou, M., Mofid, M., Tavakoli, A. Post-fire performance of GFRP reinforced concrete deep beams: experimental and numerical study. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2024; 1–19. doi:10.1080/15732479.2024.2382131.
  60. Basler, K. Strength of plate girders in shear. Journal of the Structural Division, 1961; 87: 151–180. doi:10.1061/JSDEAG.0000697.
  61. Thorburn, L. J., Montgomery, C. J., Kulak, G. L. Analysis of steel plate shear walls. Alberta (CA): Department of Civil Engineering the University of Alberta; 1983. Report No.: SER107.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 15


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب