پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 32 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 591 |
| تعداد مقالات | 5,779 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 8,660,788 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 6,342,639 |
تابآوری در برابر سوانح طبیعی: ارزیابی کاربست رویکرد طبیعتمحور (NBS) در زیرساختهای شهری (مطالعه موردی: مناطق منتخب تهران) | ||
| مطالعات ساختار و کارکرد شهری | ||
| دوره 13، شماره 3، شهریور 1405، صفحه 83-107 اصل مقاله (988.28 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی- پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/usfs.2026.28846.2539 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| ویدا ایوبی1؛ سمیه آهنی* 2؛ امیرحسین عظیم پور3 | ||
| 1کارشناسیارشد، گروه برنامهریزی منطقهای، دانشکدۀ شهرسازی، دانشکدگان هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2استادیار، گروه برنامهریزی منطقهای، دانشکدۀ شهرسازی، دانشکدگان هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3دانشجوی دکتری، گروه شهرسازی، دانشکدۀ شهرسازی، دانشکدگان هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 19 مرداد 1404، تاریخ بازنگری: 10 آبان 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 18 خرداد 1405 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| با توجه به چالشهای فزایندهای مانند تغییرات اقلیمی، سیلابها و آلودگی هوا در تهران، این پژوهش به ارزیابی نقش راهکارهای مبتنی بر طبیعتNBS) ) در ارتقاء تابآوری شهری میپردازد. هدف اصلی، پاسخ به این پرسش کلیدی است که چالشهای نهادی، فنی، مالی و اجتماعی در مسیر کاربست NBS در زیرساختهای شهری تهران کداماند و چه چهارچوبی برای غلبه بر آنها میتوان ارائه داد. این مطالعه با روش پژوهش کمی و با ماهیت توصیفی - اکتشافی، از مطالعات کتابخانهای و میدانی (پرسشنامۀ خبرگانمحور) برای گردآوری دادهها بهره برده است. سپس با استفاده از فرآیند تحلیل شبکهایANP) ) بهعنوان یک روش تصمیمگیری چندمعیاره، اولویتهای اجرای NBS در چهار منطقۀ منتخب تهران (مناطق ۱، ۵، ۱۲ و ۲۲) ارزیابی شد. یافتهها نشان میدهد که در میان مؤلفههای تابآوری، «تابآوری زیستمحیطی» (با امتیاز ۰.۲۳۸) و در میان راهکارها، «توسعۀ فضاهای سبز نفوذپذیر» (با امتیاز ۰.۲۲۳) بالاترین اولویت را دارند. این پژوهش در پاسخ به سؤال اصلی خود، مشخص کرد که مهمترین چالشها به ترتیب «کمبود منابع مالی» (چالش مالی)، «ضعف هماهنگی بینبخشی» (چالش نهادی) و «مشارکت ضعیف ذینفعان» (چالش اجتماعی) هستند. همچنین نتایج حاکی از آن است که منطقۀ یک (شمیرانات) به دلیل آسیبپذیری بالا و توانایی اکولوژیک، با امتیاز نرمالشدۀ ۰.۴۸۹ بالاترین اولویت را برای اجرای NBS دارد. درنهایت، این مطالعه با تحلیل شکاف میان یافتههای فنی و واقعیتهای اجرایی، یک «چارچوب تابآوری تطبیقی» بهعنوان نقشۀ راه پیشنهاد میدهد. این چارچوب که بر سه اصل یادگیری پویا، حکمرانی چندلایه و پایش هوشمند استوار است، راهکاری برای غلبه بر چالشهای شناساییشده و کاهش شکاف میان نظریه و عمل ارائه میدهد. این پژوهش با ارائۀ شواهد علمی و اولویتبندی مشخص، بر ضرورت تغییر پارادایم از مداخلات پراکنده به سمت برنامهریزی نظاممند و تطبیقپذیر برای دستیابی به تهران تابآور تأکید میکند. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| تغییرات اقلیمی؛ زیرساختهای شهری؛ فرایند تحلیل شبکهای (ANP)؛ مخاطرات محیطی؛ تهران | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Resilience to natural disasters: An Assessment of the Application of Nature-based Solutions (NBS) in Urban Infrastructure (A Case Study of Selected Districts in Tehran) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| vida auobi1؛ Somayeh Ahani2؛ Amir Hosein Azimpour3 | ||
| 1M.A in Regional Planning, Department of Regional Planning, Faculty of Urban Planning, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of Regional Planning, Faculty of Urban Planning, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3PhD student in Urban Planning, Department of Regional Planning, Faculty of Urban Planning, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| This research evaluates the role of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) in enhancing urban resilience. The primary objective is to address the key question of what institutional, technical, financial, and social challenges exist in implementing NBS in Tehran's urban infrastructure and what framework can be proposed to overcome them. This study employed a quantitative research method with a descriptive-exploratory approach, utilizing library-based and field studies for data collection. Subsequently, the ANP, as a multi-criteria decision-making method, was used to assess the priorities for implementing NBS in four selected districts of Tehran. The findings indicated that among resilience components, "environmental resilience" and among solutions, "development of permeable green spaces" have the highest priorities. In response to the main research question, the study identified the most significant challenges as "lack of financial resources", "weak inter-sectoral coordination", and "lack of stakeholder participation", respectively. Additionally, the results revealed that District 1, due to its high vulnerability and ecological capacity, holds the highest priority for NBS implementation with a normalized score of 0.489. Ultimately, the study proposes an "Adaptive Resilience Framework" as an operational roadmap. By providing scientific evidence and clear prioritization, this research underscores the necessity of shifting from fragmented interventions to systematic and adaptive planning to achieve a resilient Tehran. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Climate change, environmental hazards, urban infrastructure, Analytic Network Process (ANP), Tehran | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
bedini, A., Aram, F., Khalili, A., & Mirzaei, E. (2022). Recognition and evaluating the indicators of urban resilient by using the network analysis process. Urban Science, 6(2), 31.
Apostu, S. A., Vasile, V., Vasile, R., & Rosak-Szyrocka, J. (2022). Do smart cities represent the key to urban resilience? Rethinking urban resilience. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 15410.
Beceiro, P., Brito, R. S., & Galvão, A. (2022). Nature-based solutions for water management: Insights to assess the contribution to urban resilience. Blue-Green Systems, 4(2), 108–134. https://doi.org/10.2166/bgs.2022.009
Boros, J., & Mahmoud, I. (2021). Urban design and the role of placemaking in mainstreaming nature-based solutions: Learning from the Biblioteca degli Alberi case study in Milan. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 3, 635610.
Bottero, M., Datola, G., & De Angelis, E. (2020). A system dynamics model and analytic network process: An integrated approach to investigate urban resilience. Land, 9(8), 242. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9080242
Brokking, P., Mörtberg, U., & Balfors, B. (2021). Municipal practices for integrated planning of nature-based solutions in urban development in the Stockholm region. Sustainability, 13(18), 10389.
Chan, F. K. S., Griffiths, J. A., & Higgitt, D. (2018). Nature-based solutions for urban climate adaptation and disaster risk reduction. In T. Kabisch, H. Korn, J. Stadler, & A. Bonn (Eds.), Nature-based solutions to climate change adaptation in urban areas (pp. 123–142). Springer.
Clemente, M. F., D’Ambrosio, V., Di Martino, F., & Miraglia, V. (2023). Quantify the contribution of nature-based solutions in reducing the impacts of hydro-meteorological hazards in the urban environment: A case study in Naples, Italy. Land, 12(3), 569.
Croese, S., Green, C., & Morgan, G. (2020). Localizing the Sustainable Development Goals through the lens of urban resilience: Lessons and learnings from 100 Resilient Cities and Cape Town. Sustainability, 12(2), 550.
Cui, M., Ferreira, F., Fung, T. K., & Matos, J. S. (2021). Tale of two cities: How nature-based solutions help create adaptive and resilient urban water management practices in Singapore and Lisbon. Sustainability, 13(18), 10427.
Datola, G., Bottero, M., De Angelis, E., & De Gregorio, M. (2021). Enhancing urban resilience capacities: An Analytic Network Process-based application. Environmental and Climate Technologies, 25(1), 1270–1283. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0096
Debele, S. E., Kumar, P., Sahani, J., Marti-Cardona, B., Mickovski, S. B., Leo, L. S., Porcù, F., Bertini, F., Montesi, D., Vojinovic, Z., & Di Sabatino, S. (2019). Nature-based solutions for hydro-meteorological hazards: Revised concepts, classification schemes and databases. Environmental Research, 179(B), 108799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108799
Dehghani, A., Alidadi, M., & Soltani, A. (2023). Density and urban resilience: Cross-section analysis in an Iranian metropolis context. Urban Science, 7(1), 23.
Dremel, M., Goličnik Marušić, B., & Zelnik, I. (2023). Defining natural habitat types as nature-based solutions in urban planning. Sustainability, 15(18), 13708.
Farhadi, E., Pourahmad, A., Ziari, K., Faraji Sabokbar, H., & Tondelli, S. (2022). Indicators affecting the urban resilience with a scenario approach in Tehran metropolis. Sustainability, 14(19), 12756.
Ferretti, V., & Montibeller, G. (2023). An integrated framework for multi-criteria decision analysis in urban planning: Combining ANP with GIS and stakeholder engagement. European Journal of Operational Research, 305(2), 494–509.
Hale, S. E., Folde, M. S., Melby, U. H., Sjødahl, E. U., Smebye, A. B., & Oen, A. M. P. (2022). From landfills to landscapes—Nature‐based solutions for water management taking into account legacy contamination. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 18(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4467
He, Y., Jorgensen, A., Sun, Q., Corcoran, A., & Alfaro-Simmonds, M. J. (2022). Negotiating complexity: Challenges to implementing community-led nature-based solutions in England pre- and post-COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 14906. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214906
Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4(1), 1–23.
IPCC. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926
Jamali, A., Robati, M., Nikoomaram, H., Farsad, F., & Aghamohammadi, H. (2023). Urban resilience and climate change: Developing a multidimensional index to adapt against climate change in the Iranian capital city of Tehran. Urban Science, 7(1), 7.
Kabisch, N., Frantzeskaki, N., & Pauleit, S. (2017). Urban green infrastructure for climate change adaptation and mitigation. Urban Ecosystems, 20(4), 857–873.
Le Gouvello, R., Cohen-Shacham, E., Herr, D., Spadone, A., Simard, F., & Brugere, C. (2023). The IUCN Global Standard for Nature-based Solutions™ as a tool for enhancing the sustainable development of marine aquaculture. Frontiers in Marine Science, 10, 1146637.
Levinthal, R., & Weller, R. (2023). Mega-eco projects: A global assessment of large-scale ecological restoration initiatives. Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 5, 341–361.
Lowe, M., Bell, S., Briggs, J., McMillan, E., Morley, M., Grenfell, M., & Jordan, N. (2024). A research-based, practice-relevant urban resilience framework for local government. Local Environment, 29(7), 886–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2024.2318571
McCloy, M. W. D., Andringa, R. K., Maness, T. J., Smith, J. A., & Grace, J. K. (2024). Promoting urban ecological resilience through the lens of avian biodiversity. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 12, 1302002.
Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
Michalik-Śnieżek, M., Adamczyk-Mucha, K., Sowisz, R., & Bieske-Matejak, A. (2024). Green roofs: Nature-based solution or forced substitute for biologically active areas? A case study of Lublin City, Poland. Sustainability, 16(8), 3131.
Morita, K., & Matsumoto, K. (2021). Governance challenges for implementing nature-based solutions in the Asian region. Politics and Governance, 9(4), 102–113.
Parizi, S. M., Taleai, M., & Sharifi, A. (2022). A GIS-based multi-criteria analysis framework to evaluate urban physical resilience against earthquakes. Sustainability, 14(9), 5034.
Putri, A. A., Sari, D. P., & Santoso, B. (2024). Application of the Analytic Network Process (ANP) in multi-criteria decision-making: A review of recent trends. Journal of Decision Systems, 33(2), 123–140.
Quichimbo-Miguitama, F., Matamoros, D., Jiménez, L., & Quichimbo-Miguitama, P. (2022). Influence of low-impact development in flood control: A case study of the Febres Cordero stormwater system of Guayaquil (Ecuador). Sustainability, 14(12), 7109.
Remme, D., & Haarstad, H. (2022). From instrumentalization to commoning: A critical review of participation in urban nature-based solutions. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 4, 917607. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2022.917607
Sabunchi, P., Khosravani Niko, M., Masnavi, M. R., & Motadin, H. (2025). Strategies for reducing drought and water stress in Tehran with emphasis on nature-based solutions (fuzzy cognitive map-based decision making). Manzar, 17(70), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.22034/manzar.2024.473280.2307 [in Persian]
Shah, M. A. R., Renaud, F. G., Wild, A., Anderson, C. C., Loupis, M., Panga, D., Stefanopoulou, M., Polderman, A., Pouta, E., Votsis, A., Thomson, C., Munro, K., Basu, B., Pilla, F., Pulvirenti, B., Toth, E., Domeneghetti, A., & Di Sabatino, S. (2020). A conceptual framework for vulnerability and risk assessment in the context of nature-based solutions to hydro-meteorological risks. EGU General Assembly.
Shi, C., & Lu, J. (2024). Unlocking economic resilience: A new methodological approach and empirical examination under digital transformation. Land, 13(5), 621.
Si, W., & Niu, L. (2024). Enhancing Human Reliability Prediction in Smart Tower Crane Interfaces: A Refined Approach Using Simplified Plant Analysis Risk–Human Reliability Assessment and the Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory–Analytic Network Process. Buildings, 14(4), 1083.
Tehran Disaster Mitigation and Management Organization. (2018, October). Tehran Municipality statistical yearbook 1397 [Statistical yearbook]. Tehran Municipality. [in Persian]
UNDRR. (2024). Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction 2024. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction.
van Rees, C. B., Chambers, M. L., Catalano, A. J., Buhr, D. X., Mansur, A. V., Hall, D. M., Nelson, A., Suedel, B., Hawley, R. J., Bledsoe, B., & Nibbelink, N. (2024). An interdisciplinary overview of levee setback benefits: Supporting spatial planning and implementation of riverine nature-based solutions. WIREs Water, 11(6), e1750. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1750
Venuti, F., Heinilä, A., & Davids, P. R. (2025). Regulations ‘under the weather’: Legal factors of stability and change for the implementation of natural stormwater management in Finland. Environmental Policy and Governance, 35(4), 431–449.
Widjajanti, K., & Sugiyanto, E. K. (2024). Competitiveness improvement strategies of MSME Blora Batik: Analytic network process approach. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 9(1), Article e03381. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2024.v9i1.3381
Xiang, H., Heng, X., Zhai, B., & Yang, L. (2024). Digital and culture: Towards more resilient urban community governance. Land, 13(6), 758. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13060758
Xiao, Z., Ge, H., Lacasse, M. A., Wang, L., & Zmeureanu, R. (2023). Nature-based solutions for carbon neutral climate resilient buildings and communities: A review of technical evidence, design guidelines, and policies. Buildings, 13(6), 1389. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061389
Xu, W., Cong, J., Proverbs, D., & Zhang, L. (2021). An Evaluation of Urban Resilience to Flooding. Water, 13(15), 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13152022
Zeng, X., Yu, Y., Yang, S., Lv, Y., & Sarker, M. N. I. (2022). Urban resilience for urban sustainability: Concepts, dimensions, and perspectives. Sustainability, 14(5), 2481.
Zhao, J., Davies, C., Veal, C., Xu, C., Zhang, X., & Yu, F. (2024). Review on the application of nature-based solutions in urban forest planning and sustainable management. Forests, 15(4), 727.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 118 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 14 |
||