دانشگاه مازندران

 آمار

تعداد نشریات32
تعداد شماره‌ها568
تعداد مقالات5,511
تعداد مشاهده مقاله8,344,901
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله6,175,216
Shobeyri, Gholamreza. (1405). Comparison of Numerical Performance of a Modified MPS Method with a Least Squares Method Based on a Mixed Formulation for Elasticity Problems. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, (), 27-38. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2026.31619.1095
Gholamreza Shobeyri. "Comparison of Numerical Performance of a Modified MPS Method with a Least Squares Method Based on a Mixed Formulation for Elasticity Problems". پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, , , 1405, 27-38. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2026.31619.1095
Shobeyri, Gholamreza. (1405). 'Comparison of Numerical Performance of a Modified MPS Method with a Least Squares Method Based on a Mixed Formulation for Elasticity Problems', پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, (), pp. 27-38. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2026.31619.1095
Shobeyri, Gholamreza. Comparison of Numerical Performance of a Modified MPS Method with a Least Squares Method Based on a Mixed Formulation for Elasticity Problems. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 1405; (): 27-38. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2026.31619.1095

Comparison of Numerical Performance of a Modified MPS Method with a Least Squares Method Based on a Mixed Formulation for Elasticity Problems

Civil Engineering and Applied Solutions
مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 26 خرداد 1405
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/ceas.2026.31619.1095
نویسنده
Gholamreza Shobeyri*
Faculty of Civil, Water & Environmental Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
تاریخ دریافت: 08 اردیبهشت 1405،  تاریخ بازنگری: 09 خرداد 1405،  تاریخ پذیرش: 26 خرداد 1405 
چکیده
High-precision stress analysis of structures under external loading represents a challenge in civil engineering. Although meshless numerical methods show great potential for solving such problems, their early versions often failed to provide acceptable accuracy. A conventional approach to addressing this is the use of a mixed formulation, which transforms second-order governing differential equations into a system of first-order equations. In this approach, both displacements and structural stresses are treated as unknowns. In contrast, in the original second-order formulation, only displacements are unknowns, and stresses are typically derived indirectly from displacement fields, often resulting in low accuracy. This research compares the numerical performance of an improved MPS gradient model [1] (a well-known meshless method) for stress calculation via second-order equations with a mixed formulation [2] coupled with a least-squares method. The comparison is conducted on two benchmark elasticity problems. The numerical findings reveal that the improved MPS method provides superior stress accuracy. These results suggest that solving the original second-order differential equations, followed by high-precision stress computation, offers a more effective alternative to the mixed formulation approach.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Meshless methods؛ Improved MPS gradient model؛ Mixed formulation؛ Least squares method؛ Elasticity problems
مراجع
  1. Shobeyri, G. Improved MPS Gradient Models for Elasticity Problems. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 2023; 47: 1831–1843. doi:10.1007/s40996-022-01013-6.
  2. Amani, J., Afshar, M. H., Naisipour, M. Mixed discrete least squares meshless method for planar elasticity problems using regular and irregular nodal distributions. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 2012; 36: 894–902. doi:10.1016/j.enganabound.2011.09.012.
  3. Jebalbarezi Sarbijan, M., Shirini, B., Rooholamini, H. Investigation of Crack Growth Behavior in Heterogeneous Asphalt Concrete Using FEM Modeling Based on Random Aggregate Generation and Distribution Algorithms. Civil Engineering and Applied Solutions, 2026; 2: 46–57. doi:10.22080/ceas.2025.29529.1020.
  4. Sadeghi, V., Bagheri, M., Abasi Hamidi, J. Earthquake-Induced Deformation of Road Embankments: A Finite Difference Method. Civil Engineering and Applied Solutions, 2026; 2: 28–41. doi:10.22080/ceas.2026.30800.1066.
  5. Ghaseminejad, V., Moosavi, S. M., Zargar Herijani, T. Parametric Study of Settlement in Shallow Foundations of Adjacent Buildings on Sandy Soil: A Finite Element Parametric Study. Civil Engineering and Applied Solutions, 2026; 2: 73–84. doi:10.22080/ceas.2026.30450.1053.
  6. Ansari, B., Moazzami, A. Soil Freezing Model in the Presence of Underground Inclusion Using Hybrid Boundary-Finite Element Method. Numerical Methods in Civil Engineering, 2026; 10: 25–41. doi:10.61882/NMCE.2511.1107.
  7. Shafiee, A. H., Oulapour, M., Shlaka Drifesh, Z. Uplift Capacity of Granular Pile Anchors in Clay Using Finite Element Limit Analysis. Numerical Methods in Civil Engineering, 2025; 9: 1–8. doi:10.61186/NMCE.2409.1074.
  8. Asadi, R., Zamani Aliabadi, Z. Comparison of numerical methods for the solution of Richards' equation in layered porous media. Numerical Methods in Civil Engineering, 2025; 9: 1–10. doi:10.61186/NMCE.2302.1007.
  9. daliri, m., Ghohani Arab, H., miri, m., Khatibi, S. h. Prediction of Shear Strength in SCS Panels with One-End Welded BP Shear Connector Using Numerical Modeling and Gene Expression Programming (GEP). AUT Journal of Civil Engineering, 2025; 9: 185–204. doi:10.22060/ajce.2025.23945.5907.
  10. Kiani Fordoei, M. A., khodaparast, M., Ghadamgahi, A. Numerical investigation of behavior of energy piles in saturated fine-grained soil. AUT Journal of Civil Engineering, 2024; 8: 145–160. doi:10.22060/ajce.2025.23636.5891.
  11. Koshizuka, S., Oka, Y. Moving-Particle Semi-Implicit Method for Fragmentation of Incompressible Fluid. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 1996; 123: 421–434. doi:10.13182/NSE96-A24205.
  12. Ataie-Ashtiani, B., Farhadi, L. A stable moving-particle semi-implicit method for free surface flows. Fluid Dynamics Research, 2006; 38: 241. doi:10.1016/j.fluiddyn.2005.12.002.
  13. Geng, C., Wang, W.-h., Heng, M.-y., Zhao, Y., Yang, H., Huang, Y. A new free surface identification method for 3D MPS method. Scientific Reports, 2026; 16: 13829. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-44218-9.
  14. Zhang, S., Morita, K., Fukuda, K., Shirakawa, N. An improved MPS method for numerical simulations of convective heat transfer problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2006; 51: 31–47. doi:10.1002/fld.1106.
  15. Khayyer, A., Gotoh, H. Enhancement of performance and stability of MPS mesh-free particle method for multiphase flows characterized by high density ratios. Journal of Computational Physics, 2013; 242: 211–233. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2013.02.002.
  16. Sun, Z., Djidjeli, K., Xing, J. T., cheng, F. Modified MPS method for the 2D fluid structure interaction problem with free surface. Computers & Fluids, 2015; 122: 47–65. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.08.017.
  17. Li, G., Liu, M., Duan, G., Chong, D., Yan, J. Numerical investigation of erosion and heat transfer characteristics of molten jet impinging onto solid plate with MPS–LES method. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016; 99: 44–52. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.03.090.
  18. Wang, L., Jiang, Q., Zhang, C. Improvement of moving particle semi-implicit method for simulation of progressive water waves. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2017; 85: 69–89. doi:10.1002/fld.4373.
  19. Wang, L., Jiang, Q., Nie, S., Zhang, J., Iddy, I. Improvement on MPS Method for Simulation of Dynamic Pressure in Dam Break Flows. Journal of Coastal Research, 2018; 85: 971–975. doi:10.2112/SI85-195.1.
  20. Zha, R., Peng, H., Qiu, W. An improved higher-order moving particle semi-implicit method for simulations of two-dimensional hydroelastic slamming. Physics of Fluids, 2021; 33: 037104. doi:10.1063/5.0033491.
  21. Yamada, D., Imatani, T., Shibata, K., Maniwa, K., Obara, S., Negishi, H. Application of improved multiresolution technique for the MPS method to fluid lubrication. Computational Particle Mechanics, 2022; 9: 421–441. doi:10.1007/s40571-021-00420-2.
  22. Zhang, G., Zhao, W., Wan, D. Moving Particle Semi-implicit method coupled with Finite Element Method for hydroelastic responses of floating structures in waves. European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids, 2022; 95: 63–82. doi:10.1016/j.euromechflu.2022.04.005.
  23. Kim, K. S. Numerical Modeling of Solid Particle Dynamics Using the Moving Particle Semi-Implicit (MPS) Method in Seabed Penetration Scenarios. Journal of Coastal Research, 2024; 116: 548–552. doi:10.2112/JCR-SI116-111.1.
  24. Mumeen, A., Rufai, O., Jin, Y.-C. MPS simulation of dense granular flows using a gradient-expansion nonlocal μ(I) rheology. Particuology, 2026; 114: 186–206. doi:10.1016/j.partic.2026.04.013.
  25. Khayyer, A., Gotoh, H. A higher order Laplacian model for enhancement and stabilization of pressure calculation by the MPS method. Applied Ocean Research, 2010; 32: 124–131. doi:10.1016/j.apor.2010.01.001.
  26. Tamai, T., Koshizuka, S. Least squares moving particle semi-implicit method. Computational Particle Mechanics, 2014; 1: 277–305. doi:10.1007/s40571-014-0027-2.
  27. Shobeyri, G., Madadi, H. An improvement in MPS method using Voronoi diagram and a new kernel function. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2018; 40: 172. doi:10.1007/s40430-018-1121-9.
  28. Duan, G., Yamaji, A., Koshizuka, S., Chen, B. The truncation and stabilization error in multiphase moving particle semi-implicit method based on corrective matrix: Which is dominant? Computers & Fluids, 2019; 190: 254–273. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2019.06.023.
  29. Li, D., Zhang, H., Qin, G. A Modified MPS Method with a Split-Pressure Poisson Equation and a Virtual Particle for Simulating Free Surface Flows. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2023; 11: 215. doi:10.3390/jmse11010215.
  30. Shobeyri, G. Improved MPS models for simulating free surface flows. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2024; 218: 79–97. doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2023.11.015.
  31. Shobeyri, G. Novel SPH and MPS Laplacian Models Improved by MLS Method for Solving Poisson equations. Numerical Methods in Civil Engineering, 2024; 9: 29–39. doi:10.61186/NMCE.2406.1061.
  32. Oñate, E., Perazzo, F., Miquel, J. A finite point method for elasticity problems. Computers & Structures, 2001; 79: 2151–2163. doi:10.1016/S0045-7949(01)00067-0.
  33. Atluri, S. N., Liu, H. T., Han, Z. D. Meshless Local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) Mixed Collocation Method For Elasticity Problems. Computer Modeling in Engineering \& Sciences, 2006; 14: 141–152. doi:10.3970/cmes.2006.014.141.
  34. Afshar, M. H., Amani, J., Naisipour, M. A node enrichment adaptive refinement in Discrete Least Squares Meshless method for solution of elasticity problems. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 2012; 36: 385–393. doi:10.1016/j.enganabound.2011.08.012.
  35. Nikravesh Kazeroni, S., Afshar, M. H., Faraji, S. RPIM and RPIM-MLS based MDLSM method for the solution of elasticity problems. Scientia Iranica, 2016; 23: 2458–2468. doi:10.24200/sci.2016.2305.
  36. Shobeyri, G. Mixed Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Method for Planar Elasticity Problems. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 2023; 47: 491–504. doi:10.1007/s40996-022-00883-0.
  37. Faraji, S., Afshar, M. H., Amani, J. Mixed discrete least square meshless method for solution of quadratic partial differential equations. Scientia Iranica, 2014; 21: 492–504.
  38. Eini, N., Afshar, M. H., Faraji Gargari, S., Shobeyri, G., Afshar, A. A fully Lagrangian mixed discrete least squares meshfree method for simulating the free surface flow problems. Engineering with Computers, 2022; 38: 331–351. doi:10.1007/s00366-020-01157-x.
  39. Timoshenko, S., Goodier, J. N. Theory of Elasticity. 3rd ed. New York (NY): McGraw Hill; 1987.
  40. Koh, C. G., Gao, M., Luo, C. A new particle method for simulation of incompressible free surface flow problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2012; 89: 1582–1604. doi:10.1002/nme.3303.
  41. Shobeyri, G., Najafabadi, S. H. G., Abed, M. A Comparative Study on Two Mixed Least Squares Meshless Models with Improved SPH, MPS and CPM Methods to Solve Elasticity Problems. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Mechanical Engineering, 2024; 48: 1565–1580. doi:10.1007/s40997-023-00742-x.
  42. Shobeyri, G., Ghoreishi Najafabadi, S. H., Abed, M. Computational efficiency of mixed least squares meshless models over SPH method for elliptic PDEs. AUT Journal of Civil Engineering, 2024; 8: 17–32. doi:10.22060/ajce.2024.22777.5847.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 11


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب