دانشگاه مازندران

 آمار

تعداد نشریات32
تعداد شماره‌ها592
تعداد مقالات5,809
تعداد مشاهده مقاله8,766,653
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله6,418,886
Shayanfar, Javad, Barros, Joaquim A. O.. (1406). Size-Dependent Constitutive Model for Normal- and High-Strength Unconfined Concrete. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, (), -. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2026.32290.1117
Javad Shayanfar; Joaquim A. O. Barros. "Size-Dependent Constitutive Model for Normal- and High-Strength Unconfined Concrete". پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, , , 1406, -. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2026.32290.1117
Shayanfar, Javad, Barros, Joaquim A. O.. (1406). 'Size-Dependent Constitutive Model for Normal- and High-Strength Unconfined Concrete', پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, (), pp. -. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2026.32290.1117
Shayanfar, Javad, Barros, Joaquim A. O.. Size-Dependent Constitutive Model for Normal- and High-Strength Unconfined Concrete. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 1406; (): -. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2026.32290.1117

Size-Dependent Constitutive Model for Normal- and High-Strength Unconfined Concrete

Civil Engineering and Applied Solutions
مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 10 تیر 1406
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/ceas.2026.32290.1117
نویسندگان
Javad Shayanfar* ؛ Joaquim A. O. Barros
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minho, Azurém, Guimarães, Portugal
تاریخ دریافت: 11 تیر 1405،  تاریخ بازنگری: 31 تیر 1405،  تاریخ پذیرش: 17 شهریور 1405 
چکیده
This study presents a unified stress–strain model for unconfined concrete under axial compression that accounts for key size-dependent effects and varying material strength levels. The proposed formulation is designed to overcome limitations in existing constitutive models, particularly their restricted applicability across different specimen geometries, strength classes, and their limited ability to consistently represent both pre-peak and post-peak behavior within a single coherent framework. The model adopts a two-stage representation of the compressive response, allowing independent yet physically consistent characterization of the nonlinear ascending branch and the strain-softening post-peak regime. The formulation explicitly incorporates the influence of concrete strength and specimen geometry, enabling the model to capture transitions from more ductile behavior in lower-strength concrete to increasingly brittle responses in higher-strength materials. The proposed approach is calibrated and validated using an extensive experimental database covering a wide range of concrete strengths, specimen dimensions, and aspect ratios compiled from multiple independent research programs. Comparisons with experimental stress–strain curves demonstrate that the model reliably reproduces both the peak response and the subsequent softening behavior across diverse testing conditions, including cases with pronounced geometric and material variability. The results confirm that the proposed formulation provides a simplified but robust representation of the compressive behavior of unconfined concrete, making it suitable for nonlinear structural analysis and performance-based engineering applications without the need for case-specific recalibration.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Unconfined concrete؛ Stress-strain model؛ Size effect؛ Post-peak strain softening؛ Multi-variable regression
مراجع
  1. Hognestad, E. A Study of Combined Bending and Axial Load in Reinforced Concrete Members. Urbana (IL): University of Illinois Engineering Experiment Station; 1951. Report No.: 399.
  2. Kent, D. C., Park, R. Flexural Members with Confined Concrete. Journal of the Structural Division, 1971; 97: 1969–1990.
  3. Popovics, S. A numerical approach to the complete stress-strain curve of concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 1973; 3: 583–599. doi:10.1016/0008-8846(73)90096-3.
  4. Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N., Park, R. Theoretical Stress‐Strain Model for Confined Concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1988; 114: 1804–1826. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
  5. Collins, M. P., Mitchell, D., Adebar, P., Vecchio, F. J. A General Shear Design Method. ACI Structural Journal, 1996; 93: 36–45.
  6. Légeron, F., Paultre, P. Uniaxial Confinement Model for Normal- and High-Strength Concrete Columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2003; 129: 241–252. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:2(241).
  7. Karthik Madhu, M., Mander John, B. Stress-Block Parameters for Unconfined and Confined Concrete Based on a Unified Stress-Strain Model. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2010; 137: 270–273. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000294.
  8. Lim, J. C., Ozbakkaloglu, T. Stress-strain model for normal- and light-weight concretes under uniaxial and triaxial compression. Construction and Building Materials, 2014; 71: 492–509. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.050.
  9. Yang, K.-H., Lee, Y., Mun, J.-H. A Stress-Strain Model for Unconfined Concrete in Compression considering the Size Effect. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2019; 2019: 2498916. doi:10.1155/2019/2498916.
  10. Shayanfar, J., Barros, J. A., Rezazadeh, M. Unified model for fully and partially FRP confined circular and square concrete columns subjected to axial compression. Engineering Structures, 2022; 251: 113355. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113355.
  11. Tariq, M., Khan, A., Ullah, A., Shayanfar, J., Niaz, M. Improved Shear Strength Prediction Model of Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete Beams by Adopting Gene Expression Programming. Materials, 2022; 15: 3758. doi:10.3390/ma15113758.
  12. Shayanfar, J., Barros, J. A. O., Pereira, J. P. C. A versatile model with a design framework for axially-loaded FRP-confined concrete with/without a stress reduction-recovery behavior. Construction and Building Materials, 2024; 448: 138097. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138097.
  13. Shayanfar, J., Barros Joaquim, A. O., Rezazadeh, M. Stress–Strain Model for FRP-Confined Circular Concrete Columns Developing Structural Softening Behavior. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2024; 28: 04023065. doi:10.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-4364.
  14. Shayanfar, J., Barros, J. A. O., Rezazadeh, M. Design-oriented stress-strain model for RC columns with dual FRP- steel confinement mechanism. Composite Structures, 2024; 330: 117821. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117821.
  15. Eid, R., Roy, N., Paultre, P. Normal- and High-Strength Concrete Circular Elements Wrapped with FRP Composites. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2009; 13: 113–124. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2009)13:2(113).
  16. Shayanfar, J., Barros, J. A. O., Rezazadeh, M., Kafshgarkolaei, H. J. Enhancing the performance of heat-damaged rectangular RC columns using prestressed FRP confinement. Construction and Building Materials, 2025; 501: 144346. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.144346.
  17. Shayanfar, J., Pereira, J. P. C., Barros, J. A. O. Passive confinement scenarios for strengthening fire-damaged concrete columns: Experimental and analytical research. Structures, 2025; 73: 108375. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108375.
  18. Shayanfar, J., Baharloo, S., Barros Joaquim, A. O., Mohammadi, A. Strength Model for FRP-Confined Concrete: Comprehensive Database and Reliability-Based Partial Factor Calibration. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2026; 30: 04026006. doi:10.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-5448.
  19. Shayanfar, S., Ghasemi Naghibdehi, M., Shayanfar, J. Data-Driven Prediction of FRP Confinement Efficiency in Concrete Columns: Incorporating Corner Radius and Aspect Ratio Effects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Applied Solutions, 2026; 2: 1–15. doi:10.22080/ceas.2026.30750.1059.
  20. Gholampour, A., Fallah Pour, A., Hassanli, R., Ozbakkaloglu, T. Behavior of Actively Confined Rubberized Concrete under Cyclic Axial Compression. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2019; 145: 04019131. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002434.
  21. Shayanfar, J., Barros Joaquim, A. O. Design-Oriented Model of Unified Character to Determine Softening–Hardening Stress–Strain Behavior of FRP-Confined Concrete Columns of General Cross Section. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2024; 28: 04024059. doi:10.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-4772.
  22. Shayanfar, S., Ghasemi Naghibdehi, M., Shayanfar, J. Data-Driven Predictive Formulation for FRP-Confined Circular Concrete Columns. Civil Engineering and Applied Solutions, 2027; 3: 25–36. doi:10.22080/ceas.2026.30751.1060.
  23. Watanabe, K., Niwa, J., Yokota, H., Iwanami, M. Experimental Study on Stress-Strain Curve of Concrete Considering Localized Failure in Compression. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 2004; 2: 395–407. doi:10.3151/jact.2.395.
  24. Shayanfar, J., Barros, J. A. O., Rezazadeh, M. Analysis-oriented model for partially FRP-and-steel-confined circular RC columns under compression. Engineering Structures, 2023; 276: 115330. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115330.
  25. Shayanfar, J., Barros, J. A. O., Rezazadeh, M. Analytical model to predict axial stress-strain behavior of heat-damaged unreinforced concrete columns wrapped by FRP jacket. Engineering Structures, 2023; 289: 116244. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116244.
  26. Paultre, P., Boucher-Trudeau, M., Eid, R., Roy, N. Behavior of Circular Reinforced-Concrete Columns Confined with Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymers under Cyclic Flexure and Constant Axial Load. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2016; 20: 04015065. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000624.
  27. Sadeghpour Haji, M., Shayanfar, J., Niknam, R. ANN-Based Modeling of Shear Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Columns under Constant Axial Loads. Civil Engineering and Applied Solutions, 2025; 2: 28–48. doi:10.22080/ceas.2025.30228.1050.
  28. Dahl, K. K. B. Uniaxial Stress-Strain Curves for Normal and High Strength Concrete. Kongens Lyngby (DK): Technical University of Denmark; 1992. Report No.: R282.
  29. Jansen Daniel, C., Shah Surendra, P. Effect of Length on Compressive Strain Softening of Concrete. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1997; 123: 25–35. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:1(25).
  30. Lim Jian, C., Ozbakkaloglu, T. Investigation of the Influence of the Application Path of Confining Pressure: Tests on Actively Confined and FRP-Confined Concretes. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2015; 141: 04014203. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001177.
  31. Ahmad, S. H., Shah, J. P. Behavior of hoop confined concrete under high strain rates. Journal of the American Concrete Institute, 1985; 82: 634–647.
  32. Osorio, E., Bairán, J. M., Marí, A. R. Lateral behavior of concrete under uniaxial compressive cyclic loading. Materials and Structures, 2013; 46: 709–724. doi:10.1617/s11527-012-9928-9.
  33. Vecchio, F. J., Collins, M. P. The Modified Compression-Field Theory for Reinforced Concrete Elements Subjected to Shear. ACI Journal Proceedings, 1986; 83: 219–231. doi:10.14359/10416.
  34. Nakamura, H., Higai, T. Compressive Fracture Energy and Fracture Zone Length of Concrete. In: P. B. Shing, T. Tanabe, editors. Modeling of Inelastic Behavior of RC Structures Under Seismic Loads. Reston: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2001. p. 471–487.
  35. Wischers, G. Application and effects of compressive loads on concrete. Betonverlag GmbH, Düsseldorf, 1979; 31–56.
  36. Taerwe, L. Influence of Steel Fibers on Strain-Softening of High-Strength Concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 1992; 89: 54–60.
  37. Desnerck, P., De Schutter, G., Taerwe, L. Stress-strain behaviour of self-compacting concretes containing limestone fillers. Structural Concrete, 2012; 13: 95–101. doi:10.1002/suco.201100056.
  38. Hany Najwa, F., Hantouche Elie, G., Harajli Mohamed, H. Axial Stress-Strain Model of CFRP-Confined Concrete under Monotonic and Cyclic Loading. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2015; 19: 04015004. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000557.
  39. Shayanfar, J., Akbarzadeh Bengar, H. Numerical model to simulate shear behaviour of RC joints and columns. Computers and Concrete, 2016; 18: 877–901. doi:10.12989/cac.2016.18.4.877
  40. Shayanfar, J., Akbarzadeh Bengar, H. Nonlinear analysis of RC frames considering shear behaviour of members under varying axial load. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2017; 15: 2055–2078. doi:10.1007/s10518-016-0060-z.
  41. Shayanfar, J., Akbarzadeh Bengar, H. A practical model for simulating nonlinear behaviour of FRP strengthened RC beam-column joints. Steel and Composite Structures, 2018; 27: 49–74. doi:10.12989/SCS.2018.27.1.049.
  42. Shayanfar, J., Akbarzadeh Bengar, H., Parvin, A. Analytical prediction of seismic behavior of RC joints and columns under varying axial load. Engineering Structures, 2018; 174: 792–813. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.103.
  43. Shayanfar, J., Hemmati, A., Akbarzadeh Bengar, H. A simplified numerical model to simulate RC beam–column joints collapse. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2019; 17: 803–844. doi:10.1007/s10518-018-0472-z.
  44. Shayanfar, J., Akbarzadeh Bengar, H., Niroomandi, A. A proposed model for predicting nonlinear behavior of RC joints under seismic loads. Materials & Design, 2016; 95: 563–579. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.098.
  45. Dashtaki, H., Shayanfar, J., Jamshidi, M. Performance-Based Seismic Assessment of RC Frames Strengthened with Steel Angle and Strap Systems. Civil Engineering and Applied Solutions, 2027; 3: 49–68. doi:10.22080/ceas.2026.31395.1082.
  46. Nematzadeh, M., Mousavimehr, M., Shayanfar, J., Omidalizadeh, M. Eccentric compressive behavior of steel fiber-reinforced RC columns strengthened with CFRP wraps: Experimental investigation and analytical modeling. Engineering Structures, 2021; 226: 111389. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111389.
  47. Shayanfar, J., Barros, J. A. O., Rezazadeh, M. Generalized Analysis-oriented model of FRP confined concrete circular columns. Composite Structures, 2021; 270: 114026. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114026.
  48. Tariq, M., Khan, A., Shayanfar, J., Hanif, M. U., Ullah, A. A regression model for predicting the shear strength of RC knee joint subjected to opening and closing moment. Journal of Building Engineering, 2021; 41: 102727. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102727.
  49. Khant, K., Shayanfar, J., Win, S., Nguyen, H., Rezazadeh, M. Machine learning algorithms for axial strength prediction of fully FRP-confined circular concrete columns. Materials and Emerging Technologies for Sustainability, 2026; 02: 2650003. doi:10.1142/S3060932126500032.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 39


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب