دانشگاه مازندران

 آمار

تعداد نشریات32
تعداد شماره‌ها597
تعداد مقالات5,837
تعداد مشاهده مقاله8,820,777
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله6,459,272
Maghsoudi, Mohammad, Toghroli Pour, Amirreza. (1406). Axial Performance of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Lap Splices and Flash-Butt Welded Splices under Concentric Compression. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 3(3), 102-118. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2026.31231.1130
Mohammad Maghsoudi; Amirreza Toghroli Pour. "Axial Performance of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Lap Splices and Flash-Butt Welded Splices under Concentric Compression". پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 3, 3, 1406, 102-118. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2026.31231.1130
Maghsoudi, Mohammad, Toghroli Pour, Amirreza. (1406). 'Axial Performance of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Lap Splices and Flash-Butt Welded Splices under Concentric Compression', پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 3(3), pp. 102-118. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2026.31231.1130
Maghsoudi, Mohammad, Toghroli Pour, Amirreza. Axial Performance of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Lap Splices and Flash-Butt Welded Splices under Concentric Compression. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 1406; 3(3): 102-118. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2026.31231.1130

Axial Performance of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Lap Splices and Flash-Butt Welded Splices under Concentric Compression

Civil Engineering and Applied Solutions
مقاله 7، دوره 3، شماره 3، مهر 2027، صفحه 102-118    اصل مقاله (4.45 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/ceas.2026.31231.1130
نویسندگان
Mohammad Maghsoudi* 1؛ Amirreza Toghroli Pour2
1Department of Civil Engineering, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran
2Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
تاریخ دریافت: 20 مرداد 1405،  تاریخ بازنگری: 20 شهریور 1405،  تاریخ پذیرش: 02 مهر 1405 
چکیده
This study presents an extensive experimental investigation into the axial behavior of reinforced‑concrete columns containing different splice types, transverse reinforcement configurations, and cross‑sectional geometries. A total of six groups of circular and square columns were tested under concentric compression to evaluate the structural performance of lap splices and flash‑butt (forging) splices in combination with various confinement systems, including individual ties, circular hoops, and spirals with different pitches. Mechanical and electrical strain gauges, displacement transducers, and load cells were employed to monitor stresses in longitudinal and transverse reinforcement as well as concrete strains at multiple heights, enabling a detailed assessment of stiffness degradation, crack initiation, ductility, and failure mechanisms. The results demonstrate that the measured peak axial loads ranged from 371.52 kN for the plain-concrete reference specimen to 958.48 kN for specimen FB. The pre-peak secant stiffness at 40% of peak load, K0.4, ranged from 23.73 to 129.25 kN/mm, whereas the normalized energy-absorption ratio ranged from 0.45 to 1.10. Specimen FB, which contained a bottom flash-butt-forged splice and individual hoops, achieved the highest peak load, stiffness, and energy-absorption ratio. However, no consistent overall superiority of either lap splices or forged splices was observed; the response depended on the interaction among splice type, splice location, confinement, concrete strength, and specimen-specific construction quality. Specimens without transverse reinforcement in the splice region generally exhibited earlier cracking, wider cracks, and less stable deformation. The maximum crack width, 3.0 mm, was recorded for specimen LSM. Reducing the spiral pitch from 95 mm to 50 mm generally improved cracking resistance and deformation stability, although the magnitude of improvement varied among specimens. The results demonstrate that adequate transverse confinement and reliable construction quality are essential for stable axial performance of columns containing either lap splices or flash-butt-forged splices.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Reinforced-concrete columns؛ Lap splice؛ Flash-butt-forged splice؛ Axial compression؛ Secant stiffness؛ Energy absorption
مراجع
  1. American Concrete Institute (ACI). ACI 318-19: Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary. Farmington Hills (MI): ACI; 2019. doi:10.14359/51716937.
  2. Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N., Park, R. Theoretical Stress‐Strain Model for Confined Concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1988; 114: 1804–1826. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
  3. Yabe, Y., Narihara, H., Nakagomi, T. A study on weldability of high strength reinforcing bars (part 2): Evaluation by heat-affected zone fracture. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), 2020; 85: 1245–1253. doi:10.3130/aijs.85.1245.
  4. Sheng, X., Lin, C., Zheng, W., Zhu, Z., Song, X. Study on fatigue life of high-strength steel rebars joined by flash butt welding based on experimental and machine learning approaches. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2024; 156: 107812. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107812.
  5. Paulson, C., Hanson, J. M. Fatigue Behavior of Welded and Mechanical Splices in Reinforcing Steel. Northbrook (IL): Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc.; 1991. Report No.: 01.
  6. Ichiyama, Y., Kodama, S. Flash-Butt Welding of High Strength Steels. Chiyoda City (JP): Nippon Steel; 2007. Report No.: 95.
  7. Yabe, Y., Kobayakawa, Y. Performance of Gas Pressure Welded Joints of High-Strength Reinforcing Steel Bars (SD 50). Concrete Journal, 1989; 27: 20–26. doi:10.3151/coj1975.27.12_20.
  8. Narihara, H., Yabe, Y., Nakazawa, H., Hayashi, S. Performance of Gas Pressure Welded Joints of Reinforcing Bars. Concrete Journal, 2004; 42: 12–18. doi:10.3151/coj1975.42.10_12.
  9. Nakazawa, H., Yabe, Y., Narihara, H., Hayashi, S. Bend Test for Gas Pressure Welded Joints of Reinforcing Bars. Concrete Journal, 2006; 44: 23–30. doi:10.3151/coj1975.44.12_23.
  10. Kostantakopoulos, G., Bousias, S. Experimental study of the effect of reinforcement stability on the capacity of reinforced concrete columns. In: 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering; 2004 August 1–6; Vancouver, Canada. p. 770.
  11. Fahimuddin, F., Rochman, T. Review on the mechanical properties, crack and fatigue of friction stir welds and flash butt welds on the structural steel construction. Urbanism. Arhitectură. Construcţii, 2025; 16: 199–224.
  12. Issa, C. A., Nasr, A. An experimental study of welded splices of reinforcing bars. Building and Environment, 2006; 41: 1394–1405. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.05.025.
  13. Saito, T., Yabe, Y., Fujimori, T. An ultrasonic testing method for gas pressure welded joints of reinforcing steel bars. Ultrasonics, 1985; 23: 119–127. doi:10.1016/0041-624X(85)90060-5.
  14. Kim, H.-G., Jeong, C.-Y., Kim, D.-H., Kim, K.-H. Confinement Effect of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Rectangular and Octagon-Shaped Spirals. Sustainability, 2020; 12: 7981. doi:10.3390/su12197981.
  15. Cai, J., Suzuki, K. An experimental study on reinforce concrete circular columns heavily confined by spiral reinforcement. In: Proceedings of Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering; 1996 Jun 24–29; Acapulco, Mexico. p. 1361.
  16. El-Attar, M. M., El-Karmoty, H. Z., El-Moneim, A. A. The behavior of ultra-high-strength reinforced concrete columns under axial and cyclic lateral loads. HBRC Journal, 2016; 12: 284–295. doi:10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.10.003.
  17. Han, S., Xiao, G., Tan, W., Zhou, A., Yu, J., Ou, J. Experimental study and analytical model of full-scale concrete columns with hybrid steel-FRP reinforcements under axial compression and cyclic lateral loading. Engineering Structures, 2025; 336: 120301. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120301.
  18. Tazarv, M., Saiidi, M. S. Design and construction of bridge columns incorporating mechanical bar splices in plastic hinge zones. Reno (NV): University of Nevada, Reno; 2015. Report No.: CCEER 15-07.
  19. Khairallah, F. Mechanical behavior of confined self-compacting reinforced concrete circular columns under concentric axial loading. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 2013; 4: 641–649. doi:10.1016/j.asej.2013.01.009.
  20. Mostofinejad, D., Moshiri, N. Compressive Strength of CFRP Composites Used for Strengthening of RC Columns: Comparative Evaluation of EBR and Grooving Methods. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2015; 19: 04014079. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000545.
  21. Sharbatdar, M. K., Mohammadi Jafari, O., Karimi, M. S. Experimental evaluation of splicing of longitudinal bars with forging welding in flexural reinforced concrete beams. Advances in Concrete Construction, 2018; 6: 509–525. doi:10.12989/acc.2018.6.5.509.
  22. Croppi, J. I., Ahrens, M. A., Palmeri, A., Piccinin, R., Mark, P. Experimental investigation on post-installed lap splices in ordinary and steel fiber-reinforced concrete. Materials and Structures, 2024; 57: 180. doi:10.1617/s11527-024-02450-7.
  23. Nader Tehrani, B., Narayan Prajapati, G., Farghaly Ahmed, S., Benmokrane, B. Effect of Confinement Level and Staggering on Seismic Performance of Lap-Spliced GFRP-Reinforced Concrete Columns. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2024; 28: 04024002. doi:10.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-4424.
  24. Pardalopoulos, S. I., Tastani, S. P., Melidis, L., Katakalos, K. Experimental evaluation of lap-splice capacity in sub-standard reinforced concrete columns. Engineering Structures, 2024; 304: 117614. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.117614.
  25. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). ASTM A615/A615M-22: Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Carbon-Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2022. doi:10.1520/A0615_A0615M-22.
  26. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). ASTM C127-24: Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2024. doi:10.1520/C0127-24.
  27. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). ASTM C128-22: Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) and Absorption of Fine Aggregate. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2022. doi:10.1520/C0128-22.
  28. FIB - Federation Internationale Du Beton. FIB Model Code for Concrete Structures. 1st ed. Berlin (DE): Ernst & Sohn; 2013.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 52
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 37


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب