دانشگاه مازندران

 آمار

تعداد نشریات32
تعداد شماره‌ها591
تعداد مقالات5,805
تعداد مشاهده مقاله8,758,233
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله6,414,042
Rezaei, Sadegh, Hasanzadeh, Ali, Moradi, Majid. (1406). Development and Application of a Simplified Multi-Criteria Framework for Soil Liquefaction Assessment: A Case Study. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, (), -. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2026.32800.1133
Sadegh Rezaei; Ali Hasanzadeh; Majid Moradi. "Development and Application of a Simplified Multi-Criteria Framework for Soil Liquefaction Assessment: A Case Study". پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, , , 1406, -. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2026.32800.1133
Rezaei, Sadegh, Hasanzadeh, Ali, Moradi, Majid. (1406). 'Development and Application of a Simplified Multi-Criteria Framework for Soil Liquefaction Assessment: A Case Study', پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, (), pp. -. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2026.32800.1133
Rezaei, Sadegh, Hasanzadeh, Ali, Moradi, Majid. Development and Application of a Simplified Multi-Criteria Framework for Soil Liquefaction Assessment: A Case Study. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 1406; (): -. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2026.32800.1133

Development and Application of a Simplified Multi-Criteria Framework for Soil Liquefaction Assessment: A Case Study

Civil Engineering and Applied Solutions
مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 10 تیر 1406
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/ceas.2026.32800.1133
نویسندگان
Sadegh Rezaei* 1؛ Ali Hasanzadeh2؛ Majid Moradi1
1Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Chemical, Industrial & Civil Engineering, University of Science and Technology of Mazandaran, Behshahr, Iran
2Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, Iran
تاریخ دریافت: 30 مرداد 1405،  تاریخ بازنگری: 07 شهریور 1405،  تاریخ پذیرش: 24 شهریور 1405 
چکیده
The liquefaction phenomenon has been one of the most important causes of damage to structures and vital lifelines during past earthquakes. The accurate assessment of liquefaction has always faced multiple challenges. Common methods based on field data such as Standard Penetration Test (SPT), Cone Penetration Test (CPT), and Shear wave velocity (Vs) often provide different results, and relying on only one method can lead to errors in identifying liquefied layers, post-liquefaction settlement values, and the likelihood of surface manifestation. In this study, the evaluation of the safety factor was examined by four common methods. Moreover, three methods were employed to estimate the post-liquefaction settlement, and two methods were used to assess surface manifestation. The results indicate significant differences among the methods in determining the safety factor, the surface manifestation, and the settlement amount. Since none of the methods alone can fully capture the complexity of soil behavior, a four-step framework including multi-criteria assessment of liquefaction potential, settlement, and surface manifestation was introduced, and then the integration of results was presented. This approach, by reducing uncertainty and simultaneously considering three main components of liquefaction (occurrence potential, settlement, and surface manifestation), provides a potentially useful and more comprehensive engineering-oriented framework for assessing liquefaction-related hazards and can serve as a suitable basis for engineering studies and structural design in liquefaction-prone areas.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Liquefaction؛ Surface manifestation؛ Post-liquefaction settlement؛ Multi-criteria framework؛ Liquefaction potential index
مراجع
  1. Hasanzadeh, A., Rezaei, S., Shooshpasha, I., Ebrahimian Ghajary, Y. Analysis of Soil Liquefaction Potential through Three Field Tests-Based Methods: A Case Study of Babol City. International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 2021; 13: 284–297. doi:10.30880/ijie.2021.13.04.027.
  2. Rezaei, S., Hasanzadeh, A. The site effect investigation using nonlinear and Iranian seismic code methods in Babol city. Magazine of Civil Engineering, 2022; 110: 11008. doi:10.34910/MCE.110.8.
  3. Elzamel, A., Altahrany, A., Elmeligy, M. Utilization of Different Additives in Improving Sandy Soil against Liquefaction. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 2023; 17: 107–116. doi:10.14525/JJCE.v17i1.10.
  4. Anderson, D. J., Franke, K. W., Kayen, R. E., Dashti, S., Badanagki, M. The Over-Prediction of Seismically Induced Soil Liquefaction during the 2016 Kumamoto, Japan Earthquake Sequence. Geosciences, 2023; 13: 7. doi:10.3390/geosciences13010007.
  5. Towhata, I. Summary of geotechnical activities in response to the 2011 Tohoku earthquake; follow-up of my TC203 Ishihara Lecture in 2019. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2023; 164: 107640. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107640.
  6. Baki, M. A. L., Cubrinovski, M., Stringer, M. E., van Ballegooy, S., Ntritsos, N. Effects of partial saturation on the liquefaction resistance of sand and silty sand from Christchurch. Soils and Foundations, 2023; 63: 101400. doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2023.101400.
  7. Chen, D., Yuan, R., Wang, P., Tian, Y., Hu, G., An, J., Ma, S. Preliminary study on the development characteristics and formation mechanism of the Zhongchuan Town liquefaction landslide-mudflow-blockage disaster chain induced by the 2023 Jishishan Earthquake in Gansu Province. Landslides, 2024; 21: 2467–2480. doi:10.1007/s10346-024-02307-8.
  8. Kramer, S. L., Stewart, J. P. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2024. doi:10.1201/9781003512011.
  9. Kokusho, T., Sawada, T., Hazarika, H., Isobe, Y. Long-distance flow mechanism of gentle slopes under seepage due to liquefaction-induced water film during 2018 Sulawesi earthquake, Indonesia. Soils and Foundations, 2025; 65: 101611. doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2025.101611.
  10. Casagrande, A. The determination of the pre-consolidation load and its practical significance. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering; 1936 Jun 22–26; Cambridge, Massachusetts. p. 3–60.
  11. Terzaghi, K., Peck, R. B. Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice. 2nd ed. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1948.
  12. Ghani, S., Kumari, S. Insight into the Effect of Fine Content on Liquefaction Behavior of Soil. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2021; 39: 1–12. doi:10.1007/s10706-020-01491-3.
  13. Fatima, T., Sadique, M. R., Alam, A. A. A Review on Impacts and Mitigation of Liquefaction of Soil Around the Tunnels. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2023; 23: 1822–1840. doi:10.1007/s11668-023-01759-9.
  14. Molina-Gómez, F., Viana da Fonseca, A., Ferreira, C., Caicedo, B. Insights into the assessment and interpretation of earthquake-induced liquefaction in sands under different degrees of saturation. Earth-Science Reviews, 2024; 258: 104925. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104925.
  15. Afkhami Hoor, S., Esmaeili-Falak, M. Innovative Approaches for Mitigating Soil Liquefaction: A State-of-the-Art Review of Techniques and Bibliometric Analysis. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 2025; 55: 3460–3487. doi:10.1007/s40098-024-01120-3.
  16. Cruz, A., Karimzadeh, S., Chieffo, N., Sandoval, E., Lourenço, P. B. A Review of Probabilistic Approaches for Assessing the Liquefaction Hazard in Urban Areas. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2024; 31: 4673–4708. doi:10.1007/s11831-024-10124-4.
  17. Rezaei, S., Moradi, M., Hasanzadeh, A. Numerical investigation of the parameters influencing site effects. Journal of Civil Engineering Researchers, 2025; 7: 10–20. doi:10.61186/JCER.7.2.10.
  18. Arjomand, M. A., Bagheri, M., Mostafaei, Y., Mola-Abasi, H. Experimental Evaluation of Micropile Bearing Capacity and Soil Interaction in Liquefiable Sands Using 1g Shaking Table Tests. Civil Engineering and Applied Solutions, 2025; 1: 27–39. doi:10.22080/ceas.2025.29087.1004.
  19. Sadeghi, V., Bagheri, M., Abasi Hamidi, J. Earthquake-Induced Deformation of Road Embankments: A Finite Difference Method. Civil Engineering and Applied Solutions, 2026; 2: 28–41. doi:10.22080/ceas.2026.30800.1066.
  20. Seed, H. B., Idriss, I. M. Simplified Procedure for Evaluating Soil Liquefaction Potential. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 1971; 97: 1249–1273. doi:10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001662.
  21. Sianko, I., Ozdemir, Z., Hajirasouliha, I., Pilakoutas, K. A Probabilistic Liquefaction Hazard Analysis: Case Studies from the Marmara Region. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2025; 43: 103. doi:10.1007/s10706-024-03042-6.
  22. Guo, H., Rabczuk, T., Zhu, Y., Cui, H., Su, C., Zhuang, X. Soil liquefaction assessment by using hierarchical Gaussian Process model with integrated feature and instance based domain adaption for multiple data sources. AI in Civil Engineering, 2022; 1: 5. doi:10.1007/s43503-022-00004-w.
  23. Iwasaki, T., Tokida, K., Tatsuko, F., Yasuda, S. A practical method for assessing soil liquefaction potential based on case studies at various sites in Japan. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Microzonation for Safer Construction; 1978 Nov 26–Dec 01; San Francisco, California. p. 885–896.
  24. Andrus, R. D., Stokoe, I. I. K. H. Liquefaction Resistance of Soils from Shear-Wave Velocity. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2000; 126: 1015–1025. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:11(1015).
  25. Moss, R. E., Seed, R. B., Kayen, R. E., Stewart, J. P., Der Kiureghian, A., Cetin, K. O. CPT-Based Probabilistic and Deterministic Assessment of In Situ Seismic Soil Liquefaction Potential. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2006; 132: 1032–1051. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:8(1032).
  26. Boulanger, R. W., Idriss, I. M. Probabilistic Standard Penetration Test–Based Liquefaction–Triggering Procedure. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2012; 138: 1185–1195. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000700.
  27. Tokimatsu, K., Seed, H. B. Evaluation of Settlements in Sands Due to Earthquake Shaking. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1987; 113: 861–878. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1987)113:8(861).
  28. Ishihara, K., Yoshimine, M. Evaluation of Settlements in Sand Deposits Following Liquefaction During Earthquakes. Soils and Foundations, 1992; 32: 173–188. doi:10.3208/sandf1972.32.173.
  29. Wu, J. Liquefaction triggering and post-liquefaction deformations of Monterey 0/30 sand under uni-directional cyclic simple shear loading [PhD Thesis]. Berkeley (CA): University of California, Berkeley; 2002.
  30. Iwasaki, T., Arakawa, T., Tokida, K.-I. Simplified procedures for assessing soil liquefaction during earthquakes. In: Conference on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering; 1982 Jul 13–15; Southampton, United Kingdom. p. 925–939.
  31. Ishihara, K. Stability of natural deposits during earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering; 1985 Aug 12–16; San Francisco, California. p. 321–376.
  32. European Committee for Standardization. EN 1997-1: Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design - Part 1: General rules. Brussels (BE): CEN; 2024.
  33. British Standards Institution. BS 8004:2015+A1: Code of practice for foundations. London (UK): BSI; 2020.
  34. Japanese Geotechnical Society. JGS 4001-2004: Principles for Foundation Designs Grounded on a Performance-Based Design Concept. Tokyo (JP): JGS; 2004.
  35. Office of the National Building Regulations of Iran. National Building Regulations of Iran, Topic 7: Geotechnical and Foundation Engineering. 4th ed. Tehran (IR): Ministry of Roads and Urban Development; 2021 (In Persian).
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب