| تعداد نشریات | 32 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 602 |
| تعداد مقالات | 5,867 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 8,848,028 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 6,493,570 |
The Role of Prompt Engineering in Enhancing Critical Thinking Disposition and Engagement in Face-to-Face Group Discussions | ||
| Interdisciplinary Studies in English Language Teaching | ||
| مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 13 مهر 1405 اصل مقاله (365.93 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/iselt.2026.32546.1219 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Tala Bagheri Malek Abadi1؛ Goodarz Shakibaei* 2 | ||
| 1M.A Student, English Department, Ahv.C. Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of English Language Teaching, Ahv.C. Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 05 مرداد 1405، تاریخ بازنگری: 05 مهر 1405، تاریخ پذیرش: 06 مهر 1405 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Prompt engineering is increasingly used to structure learner responses, yet its pedagogical value in face-to-face English as a foreign language (EFL) discussion remains underexplored. This study examined whether systematically designed instructor prompts could improve Iranian EFL learners’ engagement and critical thinking disposition (CTD) during classroom group discussions. Fifty intermediate-level female learners were randomly assigned to a prompt-supported discussion group or a conventional discussion group and completed pretest and posttest measures before and after an 8-week intervention. Paired-samples t-tests indicated significant within-group improvement, whereas independent-samples t-tests showed significantly higher posttest engagement and CTD in the prompt-supported group. The findings are consistent with such prompts helping to organize participation and create conditions conducive to analytical and reflective engagement. By extending prompt engineering beyond predominantly human-AI interaction, the findings suggest that structured prompt design may serve as a pedagogically grounded resource for face-to-face EFL discussions that are both cognitively substantive and participatory. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Critical thinking Disposition؛ EFL Learners؛ Face-To-Face Group Discussions؛ Prompt Engineering؛ Student Engagement | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aizikovitsh-Udi, E., & Cheng, D. (2015). Developing critical thinking skills from dispositions to abilities: Mathematics education from early childhood to high school. Creative Education, 6(4), 455–462. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.64045
Aydın Yıldız, T. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on language learners’ motivation. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, 5(2), 582–597. https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1314355
Bakhtiari Moghadam, Z., Narafshan, M. H., & Tajadini, M. (2023). The effect of implementing a critical thinking intervention program on English language learners’ critical thinking, reading comprehension, and classroom climate. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00188-3
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Bozorgian, H., & Rahimi, H. (2025). Peer e-feedback and ChatGPT-4o in EFL writing: A cognitive-interpersonal comparison based on EFL students. Journal of Language and Education, 11(4), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2025.27195
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.
Deguchi, A., Tsuji, H., & Kitazawa, T. (2026). Designing epistemic partnerships with generative AI: A four-stage model of student engagement in scientific argumentation. Research in Science Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-026-10370-5
DeWaelsche, S. A. (2015). Critical thinking, questioning and student engagement in Korean university English courses. Linguistics and Education, 32, 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2015.10.003
Ding, N., Hu, S., Zhao, W., Chen, Y., Liu, Z., Zheng, H.-T., & Sun, M. (2022). OpenPrompt: An open-source framework for prompt-learning. In V. Basile, Z. Kozareva, & S. Stajner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations (pp. 105–113). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.acl-demo.10
Ebadi, S., Zandi, M., & Fakher Ajabshir, Z. (2024). The effect of language learning engagement on L2 motivation over Instagram. Acta Psychologica, 250, Article 104512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104512
Eerdemutu, L., Dewaele, J.-M., & Wang, J. (2024). Developing a short language classroom engagement scale (LCES) and linking it with needs satisfaction and achievement. System, 120, Article 103189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103189
Erawan, P. (2010). Developing life skills scale for high school students through mixed methods research. European Journal of Scientific Research, 47(2), 169–186.
Farsinejad, M., & Haddad Narafshan, M. (2024). The effect of watching sustainability-focused animations on English language learners’ critical thinking and reading comprehension. Interdisciplinary Studies in English Language Teaching, 2(2), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.22080/iselt.2024.5137
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Florea, N. M., & Hurjui, E. (2015). Critical thinking in elementary school children. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 565–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.161
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Gastineau, J. (2024). Exploring the impact of generative AI prompt engineering in higher education: A study in undergraduate and graduate business analytics courses [Doctoral dissertation, University of Arkansas]. ScholarWorks@UARK. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/5551
Geranpayeh, A. (2003). A quick review of the English Quick Placement Test. Research Notes, 12, 8–10.
Gever, V. C., Tunca, E. A., Boluwatife, A. A., Nwogbo, V. C., Chinweobo-Onuoha, B. N., Ugwuoke, J. C., & Talabi, F. O. (2021). Visual media and learning: Effect of interactive television instruction as an intervention strategy for improving the critical thinking skills and disposition of out-of-school nomadic children in Nigeria. Learning and Motivation, 76, Article 101767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2021.101767
Grabb, D. (2023). The impact of prompt engineering in large language model performance: A psychiatric example. Journal of Medical Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 20. https://doi.org/10.21037/jmai-23-71
Hayes, K. D., & Devitt, A. A. (2008). Classroom discussions with student-led feedback: A useful activity to enhance development of critical thinking skills. Journal of Food Science Education, 7(4), 65–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4329.2008.00054.x
Hoorijani, S., & Heidari Tabrizi, H. (2024). Improving EFL learners’ argumentative writing through critical thinking disposition: Focus on gender-related differences. Interdisciplinary Studies in English Language Teaching, 2(1), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.22080/iselt.2023.25923.1056
Hwang, M., Lee, K.-H., & Lee, H.-K. (2025). A word to the wise: Crafting impactful prompts for ChatGPT. System, 133, Article 103756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103756
Jacobsen, L. J., & Weber, K. E. (2025). The promises and pitfalls of large language models as feedback providers: A study of prompt engineering and the quality of AI-driven feedback. AI, 6(2), Article 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai6020035
Jones, A., Hook, M., Podduturi, P., McKeen, H., Beitzell, E., & Liss, M. (2022). Mindfulness as a mediator in the relationship between social media engagement and depression in young adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 185, Article 111284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111284
Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2018). Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197
Khalili, T., Ketabi, S., Pnevmatikos, D., & Mahabadi, D. N. A. (2024). Critical thinking and L2 learning in the Persian context: A meta-analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 54, Article 101640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101640
Knoth, N., Tolzin, A., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2024). AI literacy and its implications for prompt engineering strategies. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100225
Lee, D., & Palmer, E. (2025). Prompt engineering in higher education: A systematic review to help inform curricula. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00503-7
Liang, W., & Wu, Y. (2024). Exploring the use of ChatGPT to foster EFL learners’ critical thinking skills from a post-humanist perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 54, Article 101645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101645
Liu, P., Yuan, W., Fu, J., Jiang, Z., Hayashi, H., & Neubig, G. (2023). Pre-train, prompt, and predict: A systematic survey of prompting methods in natural language processing. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(9), Article 195, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3560815
Liu, V., & Chilton, L. B. (2022). Design guidelines for prompt engineering text-to-image generative models. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Article 384, pp. 1–23). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501825
Luo, N., Wang, Y., Zhang, Z. (V.), Zhou, Y., & Zhao, R. (2026). Impact of prompt sophistication on ChatGPT’s output for automated written corrective feedback. ReCALL, 38(2), 240–254. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834402510044X
Mzwri, K., & Turcsányi-Szabó, M. (2025). The impact of prompt engineering and a generative AI-driven tool on autonomous learning: A case study. Education Sciences, 15(2), Article 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020199
Nasseh, A., Zareian, G., Ghaniabadi, S., & Amirian, S. M. R. (2026). An inquiry method for critical thinking instruction in the Iranian EFL context. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 61, Article 102160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2026.102160
Ni, X., Shao, X., Geng, Y., Qu, R., Niu, G., & Wang, Y. (2020). Development of the social media engagement scale for adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 701. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00701
Oxford University Press, & University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate. (2001). Quick Placement Test. Oxford University Press.
Pescatore, C. (2007). Current events as empowering literacy: For English and social studies teachers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(4), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.51.4.4
Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. Viking Press.
Polat, O., & Aydin, E. (2020). The effect of mind mapping on young children’s critical thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, Article 100743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100743
Rahimi, H., Pishghadam, R., Shayesteh, S., & Al Abdwani, T. (2026). The interplay of teacher energy, students’ active and passive motivation, and their willingness to attend classes. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 54, 212–239. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2026.54.09
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Sang, Y., & Hiver, P. (2021). Engagement and companion constructs in language learning: Conceptualizing learners’ involvement in the L2 classroom. In P. Hiver, A. H. Al-Hoorie, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Engagement in the language classroom (pp. 17–38). Multilingual Matters.
Schmidt-Fajlik, R. (2023). ChatGPT as a grammar checker for Japanese English language learners: A comparison with Grammarly and ProWritingAid. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 14(1), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.231417
Shang, J., Huang, Y., Xu, M., Huang, Y., Shen, X., Wang, G., Wang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2025). Competition between human learners and ChatGPT: Enhancing university EFL students’ reading comprehension and critical thinking through competitive questioning. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2577356
Sosu, E. M. (2013). The development and psychometric validation of a Critical Thinking Disposition Scale. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.09.002
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
Tavassoli, K., Bahrami, M., & Ghamoushi, M. (2024). The effect of the six thinking hats technique on Iranian EFL learners’ writing skill and their attitudes toward it. Interdisciplinary Studies in English Language Teaching, 2(2), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.22080/iselt.2025.27524.1073
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
Woo, D. J., Wang, D., Yung, T., & Guo, K. (2026). Effects of a prompt engineering intervention on undergraduate students’ AI self-efficacy, AI knowledge and prompt engineering ability: A mixed methods study. British Educational Research Journal, 52(2), 1442–1469. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.70087
Wu, T.-T., Hapsari, I. P., & Huang, Y.-M. (2026). Intelligent chatbot-supported collaborative learning: Impact on student engagement and English speaking skills. ReCALL, 38(2), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344025100451
Zou’bi, R. A. (2021). The impact of media and information literacy on acquiring the critical thinking skill by the educational faculty’s students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, Article 100782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100782 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 20 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 12 |
||