دانشگاه مازندران

 آمار

تعداد نشریات32
تعداد شماره‌ها604
تعداد مقالات5,899
تعداد مشاهده مقاله8,918,300
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله6,533,940
Majidi, Younes, Ghodratian-Kashan, Seyyed Mohyeddin, Ghassemieh, Mehdi. (1406). Cyclic Behavior of a Steel Braced Frame Equipped with TADAS and Shape Memory Alloy Dampers. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, (), -. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2026.33170.1154
Younes Majidi; Seyyed Mohyeddin Ghodratian-Kashan; Mehdi Ghassemieh. "Cyclic Behavior of a Steel Braced Frame Equipped with TADAS and Shape Memory Alloy Dampers". پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, , , 1406, -. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2026.33170.1154
Majidi, Younes, Ghodratian-Kashan, Seyyed Mohyeddin, Ghassemieh, Mehdi. (1406). 'Cyclic Behavior of a Steel Braced Frame Equipped with TADAS and Shape Memory Alloy Dampers', پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, (), pp. -. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2026.33170.1154
Majidi, Younes, Ghodratian-Kashan, Seyyed Mohyeddin, Ghassemieh, Mehdi. Cyclic Behavior of a Steel Braced Frame Equipped with TADAS and Shape Memory Alloy Dampers. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 1406; (): -. doi: 10.22080/ceas.2026.33170.1154

Cyclic Behavior of a Steel Braced Frame Equipped with TADAS and Shape Memory Alloy Dampers

Civil Engineering and Applied Solutions
مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 09 مهر 1406
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/ceas.2026.33170.1154
نویسندگان
Younes Majidi1؛ Seyyed Mohyeddin Ghodratian-Kashan2؛ Mehdi Ghassemieh* 1
1Faculty of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran
2Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
تاریخ دریافت: 11 مهر 1405،  تاریخ بازنگری: 04 آبان 1405،  تاریخ پذیرش: 06 آبان 1405 
چکیده
Improving the seismic performance of structures has long been regarded as one of the key challenges in civil engineering. This study investigates the effect of shape memory alloys (SMAs) on the cyclic behavior of braced frames equipped with TADAS dampers. Finite element simulations and numerical analyses were conducted in Abaqus on numerous structural systems, including one reference model without SMA components and models incorporating SMAs with varying lengths and stiffness values. The effects of parameters such as SMA length, cross-sectional area, and stiffness on the structural response were examined. The results indicate that incorporating SMAs into the damper system significantly enhances energy dissipation capacity, reduces residual displacements, and increases the ultimate strength of the structure. Furthermore, improved ductility was observed in several models. The integration of SMAs with steel dampers compensates for the inherent limitations of conventional dampers and offers an innovative approach for simultaneously enhancing damping performance and re-centering capability.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Shape memory alloy (SMA)؛ TADAS damper؛ Re-centering؛ Energy dissipation؛ Ductility
مراجع
  1. Spencer, B. F., Nagarajaiah, S. State of the Art of Structural Control. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2003; 129: 845–856. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:7(845).
  2. Soong, T. T., Spencer, B. F. Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice. Engineering Structures, 2002; 24: 243–259. doi:10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00092-X.
  3. Saaed, T. E., Nikolakopoulos, G., Jonasson, J.-E., Hedlund, H. A state-of-the-art review of structural control systems. Journal of Vibration and Control, 2015; 21: 919–937. doi:10.1177/1077546313478294.
  4. Bergman, D. M., Goel, S. C. Evaluation of cyclic testing of steel-plate devices for added damping and stiffness. Ann Arbor (MI): Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Michigan; 1987. Report No.: UMCE 87–10.
  5. Tsai, K.-C., Chen, H.-W., Hong, C.-P., Su, Y.-F. 9. Design of Steel Triangular Plate Energy Absorbers for Seismic-Resistant Construction. Earthquake Spectra, 1993; 9: 505–528. doi:10.1193/1.1585727.
  6. Saeedi, F., Shabakhty, N., Mousavi, S. R. Seismic assessment of steel frames with triangular-plate added damping and stiffness devices. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2016; 125: 15–25. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.06.011.
  7. Behnamfar, F., Almohammad-albakkar, M. Development of Steel Yielding Seismic Dampers Used to Improve Seismic Performance of Structures: A Comprehensive Review. International Journal of Engineering, 2023; 36: 746–775. doi:10.5829/ije.2023.36.04a.13.
  8. Ghassemieh, M., Rezapour, M. Application of shape memory alloys in structural engineering. ed. Tehran (IR): Tehran Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR); 2016.
  9. Ocel, J., DesRoches, R., Leon Roberto, T., Hess, W. G., Krumme, R., Hayes Jack, R., Sweeney, S. Steel Beam-Column Connections Using Shape Memory Alloys. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2004; 130: 732–740. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:5(732).
  10. Asgarian, B., Moradi, S. Seismic response of steel braced frames with shape memory alloy braces. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2011; 67: 65–74. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.06.006.
  11. DesRoches, R., McCormick, J., Delemont, M. Cyclic Properties of Superelastic Shape Memory Alloy Wires and Bars. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2004; 130: 38–46. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:1(38).
  12. McCormick, J., DesRoches, R., Fugazza, D., Auricchio, F. Seismic Assessment of Concentrically Braced Steel Frames with Shape Memory Alloy Braces. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2007; 133: 862–870. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:6(862).
  13. Motahari, S. A., Ghassemieh, M., Abolmaali, S. A. Implementation of shape memory alloy dampers for passive control of structures subjected to seismic excitations. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2007; 63: 1570–1579. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2007.02.001.
  14. Ghassemieh, M., Mostafazadeh, M., Sadeh, M. S. Seismic control of concrete shear wall using shape memory alloys. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2012; 23: 535–543. doi:10.1177/1045389X12436731.
  15. Ghassemieh, M., Bahaari, M. R., Ghodratian, S. M., Nojoumi, S. A. Improvement of Concrete Shear Wall Structures by Smart Materials. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 2012; 2: 87–95. doi:10.4236/ojce.2012.23014.
  16. Ghassemieh, M., Kari, A. Application of Shape Memory Alloys in Seismic Control of Steel Structures. Advances in Materials Science and Applications, 2013; 2: 66–72. doi:10.5963/AMSA0202005.
  17. Nojoumi, S. A., Bahaari, M. R., Ghodratian, S. M., Ghassemieh, M. Seismic Enhancement of Coupled Shear Walls Using Shape Memory Alloys. International Journal of Civil Engineering Science, 2013; 2: 93–101. doi:10.5963/JCES0202006.
  18. Kari, A., Ghassemieh, M., Badarloo, B. Development and design of a new self-centering energy-dissipative brace for steel structures. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2019; 30: 924–938. doi:10.1177/1045389X19828502.
  19. Zuo, H., Bi, K., Hao, H., Li, C. Numerical study of using shape memory alloy-based tuned mass dampers to control seismic responses of wind turbine tower. Engineering Structures, 2022; 250: 113452. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113452.
  20. Zhuang, P., Zhao, W., Zhang, G., Yang, T. Y. Shaking table tests on seismic behaviors of a single-layer spherical lattice shell with shape memory alloy-controlled friction pendulum bearings. Journal of Building Engineering, 2024; 82: 108150. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108150.
  21. Zhou, L., Ye, A., Alam, M. S. Seismic resilience-based assessment and design of concrete bridge piers reinforced with shape memory alloy bars. Engineering Structures, 2025; 345: 121420. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121420.
  22. Xian, Z., Tan, P., Zheng, W., Yang, K., Xiang, Y., Zheng, Y. Seismic performance of inter-story isolated structure with shape memory alloy variable curvature friction pendulum bearings. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2026; 200: 109737. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109737.
  23. Wang, B., Yu, T., Chen, P. High-performance shape memory alloy U-shaped devices under tension–compression loading for seismic resilient design. Thin-Walled Structures, 2026; 221: 114482. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2026.114482.
  24. Wang, Y., Liu, Z., Lu, Y., Yang, X., Luo, Y. Shaking table tests on the seismic responses of beam string structure with shape memory alloy-friction dampers under multi-support excitation. Engineering Structures, 2026; 359: 122758. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.122758.
  25. Fu, B., Li, H., Sun, M., Liu, X., Chen, J. Seismic retrofitting of steel frames using a novel shape memory alloy-air spring hybrid damper. Structures, 2026; 90: 112544. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2026.112544.
  26. Wang, B., Zhu, S. Cyclic tension–compression behavior of superelastic shape memory alloy bars with buckling-restrained devices. Construction and Building Materials, 2018; 186: 103–113. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.047.
  27. Mohammadi, R. K., Nasri, A., Ghaffary, A. TADAS dampers in very large deformations. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2017; 17: 515–524. doi:10.1007/s13296-017-6011-y.
  28. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). ASCE/SEI 41-23: Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. Reston (VA): ACSE; 2023. doi:10.1061/9780784416112.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب