دانشگاه مازندران

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات28
تعداد شماره‌ها426
تعداد مقالات4,132
تعداد مشاهده مقاله6,705,725
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله4,961,885
ویسی, هادی. (1394). بررسی تأثیر ایدئولوژی سیاسی بر صنعت گردشگری (مطالعه موردی: ایران). پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 4(14), 45-66.
هادی ویسی. "بررسی تأثیر ایدئولوژی سیاسی بر صنعت گردشگری (مطالعه موردی: ایران)". پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 4, 14, 1394, 45-66.
ویسی, هادی. (1394). 'بررسی تأثیر ایدئولوژی سیاسی بر صنعت گردشگری (مطالعه موردی: ایران)', پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 4(14), pp. 45-66.
ویسی, هادی. بررسی تأثیر ایدئولوژی سیاسی بر صنعت گردشگری (مطالعه موردی: ایران). پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 1394; 4(14): 45-66.

بررسی تأثیر ایدئولوژی سیاسی بر صنعت گردشگری (مطالعه موردی: ایران)

برنامه ریزی و توسعه گردشگری
مقاله 3، دوره 4، شماره 14، آذر 1394، صفحه 45-66    اصل مقاله (576.3 K)
نوع مقاله: علمی-پژوهشی
نویسنده
هادی ویسی*
استادیار جغرافیای سیاسی، دانشگاه پیام‌نور
تاریخ دریافت: 25 خرداد 1393،  تاریخ بازنگری: 16 شهریور 1394،  تاریخ پذیرش: 16 آذر 1394 
چکیده
فضای سیاسی و اقتصادی و حتی مسائل اجتماعی و فرهنگی هر کشور تا حد زیادی متأثر از ایدئولوژی سیاسی حاکم بر آن کشور است. گردشگری به عنوان پدیده ای اجتماعی ـ اقتصادی متأثر از عوامل گوناگونی است که در این میان، ایدئولوژی سیاسی تأثیر بسزایی دارد. رکود یا رونق این صنعت در هر کشور تا حدود زیادی به ایدئولوژی سیاسی بستگی دارد. مسئله تحقیق این است که ایدئولوژی سیاسی ایران چه تأثیری بر صنعت گردشگری در ایران داشته است و چرا ایران به عنوان کشوری با جاذبه های متعدد طبیعی و      تاریخی ـ فرهنگی سهم قابل توجهی در جذب گردشگر بین­المللی ندارد. روش انجام تحقیق به صورت توصیفی ـ تحلیلی و تحلیل محتوا (برنامه های پنج ساله توسعه، سند چشم انداز ایران در افق 1404) بوده است. داده های مورد نیاز تحقیق از نهادهای مرتبط ملی (مرکز آمار ایران، مجلس شورای اسلامی و وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی) و نهادهای بین­المللی (سازمان گردشگری جهانی، شورای جهانی گردشگری و سفر، موسسه هنلی و همکاران) اخذ شده است و با رقبای منطقه­ای و قطبهای گردشگری پیرامون ایران (ترکیه، دبی و مصر) مقایسه شده است. نتایج تحقیق نشان می­دهد که ایدئولوژی سیاسی حاکم بر ایران، بازار جذب گردشگر را به گردشگری زیارتی و تا حدودی به گردشگری تاریخی محدود کرده است و مانع توسعه گردشگری ساحلی و اکوتوریسم به عنوان پیشروترین بخش گردشگری در جهان شده است. همچنین نگاه ایدئولوژیکی و امنیت محور حکومت ایران به صنعت گردشگری باعث شده است که این صنعت بیشتر جنبه داخلی و مصرف داخلی پیدا کند و ایران را از منافع ارزی و بین المللی این صنعت کمتر منتفع کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
ایدئولوژی سیاسی؛ گردشگری؛ گردشگری ساحلی؛ اکوتوریسم؛ ایران
عنوان مقاله [English]
A Study of the Effect of Political Ideology on Tourism Industry (Case Study: Iran)
نویسندگان [English]
Hadi Veicy
Assistant Professor of Political Geography, Payame Noor University
چکیده [English]
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Tourism has become a popular global leisure activity and is the world’s fastest growing industry. Today, tourism is a major source of income for many countries, and affects the economy of both the source and host countries, in some cases being of vital importance. International tourist arrivals surpassed the milestone of 1 billion tourists globally for the first time in 2012 and International tourism receipts grew to US$1.07 trillion in 2013. In this industry, Marine and coastal tourism has been the fastest growing in the world.
This large market is not equal among world countries. Development of tourism in the countries depends to different factors that the most important is political ideology. The political-economical atmosphere and even social and cultural aspects a country impress from state’s political ideology. The tourism as a social-economical phenomenon a lot of is affected from the political ideology. Stagnancy or strenuous this industry a lot of depends on to it.
Iran is one of the oldest world civilization and countries. Iran is vast country and the landscapes of Iran are diverse. Iran has diverse climates and more than 2700 kilometers beach. So, this country has a lot of touristic attractions. But, Iran does not have fit rank in attracting international tourist and receipts in region and world. The problem of research is that what has affected Iran’s political ideology on its tourism industry. Why Iran has not any notable contribution from the world market of tourism, although it has a lot of environments and historical-cultural attractions.
 
Methodology
Political ideology is independent variable and tourism industry is dependent variable. The data of research gathered from national institutes (the center of Iran statistic, parliament of Islamic council and the ministry of culture and Islamic guide) and international organizations (World Tourism Organization, World Travel and Tourism Council, Henley & Partners institute). Iran’s data compared with touristic centers of the periphery of Iran (Turkey, Dubai and Egypt) by comparative method. Other parts of research used from contain analysis method for analysis of the 5-annual Plans of Economical, Social and Cultural Development of Iran Islamic Republic, the Outlook Document of Iran Islamic Republic in 1404 and some others documents and laws.
 
Result and Discussion
Iran has a lot of touristic attractions such as cultural, historical, religious, coastal, maritime, natural attractions and climate diverse. Iran inscribed on the World Heritage List of UNESCO more of its periphery countries. Therefore, Iran is one of the countries full attractions in the world especially in Middle East. But there are various attractions in a country are not enough for development of tourism industry. The rival countries of Iran (Turkey and Egypt) could gain main percent of world market of tourism. Even small territory of Dubai that has not any cultural, historical and climatic attractions, by select fit polities could gain main percent of tourism market of Middle East. Iran was the first country in Middle East that made a decision and planning for attracting international tourism from 80 years ago. Iran attracted the highest percent of international tourists in Middle East in middle 1970s. But suddenly was decreased the international tourism receipts after Islamic revolution in 1979 and continued by Iraq – Iran war. In this time, regional powers of rival Iran such as Turkey and Egypt even Arab United Emirates (Dubai) grew very fast in tourism industry. So, Iran lost geopolitical supremacy in regional tourism.      
The survey of basic laws and documents of republic of Iran Islamic about tourism show that they do not point to maritime, coastal tourism and eco-tourism. In this documents point to maintain of historical buildings and development of welfare affairs of pilgrims. To seem Iran’s government just supports religious tourism and a little historical tourism industry. 
Conclusion
The countries and geographical spaces involve with the political ideology. This political factor determine tourism type and a lots of percent stagnation or strenuous in a country. The political ideology of Iran’s state has limited tourism market to pilgrim tourism and some deal to historical tourism. Also, Iran state’s security-pivot and ideological view to tourism cussed Iran’s tourism industry has been more domestic aspect. It has been development obstacle of costal tourism and eco-tourism as the most progression of tourism type in the world.
Keywords: Political Ideology, Tourism, Coastal Tourism, Eco-tourism, Iran.
References

Aguiló, E. (2008). Future Insights into Mass Tourism Destinations with Special Reference to Spain, Chapter 12, in: Tourism Management in the 21st Century, Editor: Peter R. Chang, New York: Nova Science Publishers, 323-336.
Akbari, A. and Gharakhloo, M. (2010). Ecotourism: A New Concept in Tourism Geography, Tehran: Entekhab. (In Persian)
Bridges, T. (1997). Travel Industry World Yearbook - The Big Picture 1996-97, 40, Travel Industry Publishing Inc. Spencertown, NY.
Ceballos-Lascuráin, H. (1996). Tourism, Ecotourism and Protected Areas, Switzerland: IUCN.
Dredge, D. and Jamal, T. (2015). Progress in tourism planning and policy: A post-structural perspective on knowledge production, Tourism Management, 51: 285-297.
Ghafari, H. and Molaei, M.A. (2001), The Tourism Industry in Iran: Challenges and Solutions, Political-Economical Information, 185-186: 218-225. (In Persian)
Gregory, D., Johnston, R., Pratt, G., Watts, M. and Whatmore, S. (2009). Dictionary of Human Geography, 5th edition. UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hafeznia, M. and Ramazan Darabi, I. (2004). A comparative study on spatial effects of tourism policies in pre and post Islamic Revolution in Iran: A case study: Babolsar, on the coast of the Caspian sea, Geographical Research, 18(4): 47-59. (In Persian)
Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of Hope, Edinburgh University Press.
Henderson, J. (2002). Tourism and politics in the Korean Peninsula, The Journal of Tourism Studies, 13(2): 16-27.
Henley and Partners, (2011). Visa Restrictions Index 2011, https://www.henleyglobal.com.
Heywood, A. (2012). Politics, Persian Translator: Abdorahman Aalam, Tehran: Nashr Nay. (In Persian).
Hezar Jaribi, J. and Mohammadi Najafi, M. (2011). Social Trust and Development of Tourism, Urban-Regional Studies and Research, 2(7): 53-70. (In Persian)
Honey, M. and Krantz, D. (2007). Global Trends in Coastal Tourism, Washington DC: CESD.
INRA EUROPE. (1998). Facts and Figures on the European on Holidays (1997-1998): Executive Summary.
Islamic Consultative Assembly (1989). The First Plan of Economical, Social and Cultural Development of Iran Islamic Republic (1989-1993). (In Persian)
Islamic Consultative Assembly (1993). The Second Plan of Economical, Social and Cultural Development of Iran Islamic Republic (1995-1999). (In Persian)
Islamic Consultative Assembly (2000). The Third Plan of Economical, Social and Cultural Development of Iran Islamic Republic (2000-2004). (In Persian)
Islamic Consultative Assembly (2002). Outlook Document of Iran Islamic Republic in 1404.
Islamic Consultative Assembly (2005). The fourth Plan of Economical, Social and Cultural Development of Iran Islamic Republic (2005-2009). (In Persian)
Islamic Consultative Assembly (2010). The fifth Plan of Economical, Social and Cultural Development of Iran Islamic Republic (2011-2015). (In Persian)
Jafari, J. (1990). Research and Scholarship: The Basis of Tourism Education. Journal of Tourism Studies, 1(1): 33–41.
Jones, E. (2010). Arab olitics and Tourism: Political Change and Tourism in the Great Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, In: Tourism and Political Change, Edited by R. Butler and W. Suntikul, Oxford: Goodfellow.
Kim, S.S., Timothy, D.J., and Han, H. (2007), Tourism and political ideologies: A case of tourism in North Korea, Tourism Management, 28:1031–1043.
Kreck, L.A. (1998). Tourism in former eastern European societies: Ideology in conflict with requisites, Journal of Travel Research, 36: 62-67.
Mehrabi, J., Khalili Shurini, S. and Khalafi, A. (2012). A study the barriers to Iran's tourism industry development, Journal of Development & Evolution Management, 4(9): 1-10. (In Persian)
Minestry of Culture and Islamic Guide (1998). The Center of Statistic and Planning of Culture and Art. (In Persian)
Mojtahed Zadeh, P. (2000). The Persian Gulf: Countries and Boundaries, Tehran: Atai. (In Persian)
Naseri, M. (1996). Description of effect Obstacles on Iran’s Tourism and Designing of Model to Attraction of Tourists, M.A. Thesis, Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University. (In Persian)
Painter, J. and Jeffrey, A. (2009). Political Geography: an Introduction to Space and Power, Sage Publication Inc.
Painter, J. (2008). Geographies of Space and Power, In: The Sage Handbook of Political Geography, Edited by: Kevin R. Cox et al, Sage Publication Ltd. 57-72.
Penny Wan, Y.K. (2013). A comparison of the governance of tourism planning in the two special administrative regions (SARs) of China - Hong Kong and Macao, Tourism Management, 36: 164-177.
Rakhshaninasab, H.R. and Zarabi, A. (2008). Development Challenges and of Ecotourism in Iran, Geographical Space, 28: 41-55. (In Persian)
Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry. (2009). Investment Support and Promotion Agency of Turkey: Turkish Tourism, December 2009.
Rezvani, A.A. (1995). Geography & Tourism Industry, Tehran: Payame Noor University. (In Persian)
Rozname Rasmi of Iran Islamic Republic (2003). Law of Establishing Institute of Caltural Heratige and Tourism, 17184. (In Persian)
Saghaei, M. (2007). Possibility of Eco-tourism in Iran, Conference of Geography: Tourism and Sustainable Development, Tehran: Shahre Rey’s Islamic Azade University. (In Persian)
Shakuie, H. (2006). New Trends in Philosophy of Geography: Environmental Philosophies and Geographical Schools, 2, Third Edition, Tehran: Gitashenasi. (In Persian)
TIES and CESD. (2005). Ecotourism Fact Sheet. 
Tosun, C. (2001). Challenges of sustainable tourism development in the developing world: The case of Turkey, Tourism Management, 22, 289-303.
UNESCO (2011). < http://www.unesco.org/new/en/>.
UNWTO (2013). Tourism Highlights, 2013 Edition, Madrid: World Tourism Organization.
UNWTO (2012). Tourism Highlights, 2012 Edition, Madrid: World Tourism Organization.
UNWTO (2011). Tourism Highlights, 2011 Edition, Madrid: World Tourism Organization.
UNWTO (2006). Tourism Market Trends, 2006 Edition, Madrid: World Tourism Organization.
UNWTO (2004). Tourism Market Trends: Middle-East, 2005 Edition, Madrid: World Tourism Organization.
Valizadeh, H. (2007). Challenges of Iran’s Tourism Industry (Case Study: Metropolis of Tabriz), M.A. Thesis, Tabriz University. (In Persian)
Ward, D. (2006). Complete Guide to Cruising and Cruise Ships, New York: Berlitz Guides.
WTTC, (2011). < http://www.wttc.org/>.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Political Ideology, Tourism, Coastal Tourism, Eco-tourism, Iran
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,817
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,579


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب