دانشگاه مازندران

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات28
تعداد شماره‌ها426
تعداد مقالات4,164
تعداد مشاهده مقاله6,739,136
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله4,988,673
ابراهیم پور, حبیب, بابایی, یاور, سخندان, الناز. (1396). بررسی تاثیر سرمایه اجتماعی بر مشارکت در توسعه گردشگری پایدار با نقش میانجی اثرات گردشگری (مطالعه موردی: شهر سرعین). پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 6(22), 118-143. doi: 10.22080/jtpd.2017.1712
حبیب ابراهیم پور; یاور بابایی; الناز سخندان. "بررسی تاثیر سرمایه اجتماعی بر مشارکت در توسعه گردشگری پایدار با نقش میانجی اثرات گردشگری (مطالعه موردی: شهر سرعین)". پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 6, 22, 1396, 118-143. doi: 10.22080/jtpd.2017.1712
ابراهیم پور, حبیب, بابایی, یاور, سخندان, الناز. (1396). 'بررسی تاثیر سرمایه اجتماعی بر مشارکت در توسعه گردشگری پایدار با نقش میانجی اثرات گردشگری (مطالعه موردی: شهر سرعین)', پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 6(22), pp. 118-143. doi: 10.22080/jtpd.2017.1712
ابراهیم پور, حبیب, بابایی, یاور, سخندان, الناز. بررسی تاثیر سرمایه اجتماعی بر مشارکت در توسعه گردشگری پایدار با نقش میانجی اثرات گردشگری (مطالعه موردی: شهر سرعین). پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 1396; 6(22): 118-143. doi: 10.22080/jtpd.2017.1712

بررسی تاثیر سرمایه اجتماعی بر مشارکت در توسعه گردشگری پایدار با نقش میانجی اثرات گردشگری (مطالعه موردی: شهر سرعین)

برنامه ریزی و توسعه گردشگری
مقاله 6، دوره 6، شماره 22، آذر 1396، صفحه 118-143    اصل مقاله (764.4 K)
نوع مقاله: علمی-پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/jtpd.2017.1712
نویسندگان
حبیب ابراهیم پور1؛ یاور بابایی* 2؛ الناز سخندان3
1دانشیار گروه مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی
2دانشجوی دکترای گردشگری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
3کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت جهانگردی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
تاریخ دریافت: 27 آذر 1395،  تاریخ بازنگری: 12 خرداد 1396،  تاریخ پذیرش: 18 آذر 1396 
چکیده
این پژوهش به بررسی نقش سرمایه اجتماعی بر مشارکت در توسعه گردشگری پایدار با نقش میانجی اثرات اقتصادی و اجتماعی- فرهنگی درک­شده به وسیله جامعه میزبان در شهر سرعین انجام شده است. این پژوهش از نوع کاربردی و از نظر روش پژوهش از نوع توصیفی- پیمایشی مبتنی بر پرسشنامه می ­باشد. نمونه آماری به دست آمده با استفاده از فرمول کوکران تعداد 385 نفر از ساکنین شهر سرعین و روش نمونه­گیری از نوع تصادفی در دسترس می باشد. تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها و آزمون فرضیات با استفاده از تحلیل عاملی تاییدی و مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری و با بهره‌گیری از نرم‌افزارهای SPSS و SMARTPLS انجام شده است. نتایج تحقیق حاکی از وجود رابطه مثبت و معنادار سرمایه اجتماعی با سه متغیر اثرات اقتصادی گردشگری (0.382)، اثرات اجتماعی- فرهنگی گردشگری (0.517) و متغیر مشارکت در توسعه گردشگری پایدار (0.348) می‌باشد. همچنین رابطه اثرات اقتصادی درک­شده بر مشارکت در توسعه گردشگری پایدار با توجه به ضریب مسیر (0.189) و مقدار t به دست آمده (2.467)، مورد تایید قرار گرفت. اما رابطه اثرات اجتماعی- فرهنگی درک­شده بر مشارکت در توسعه گردشگری پایدار تایید نشد که این امر حاکی از آن است که توسعه گردشگری در حوزه اثرات اجتماعی- فرهنگی گردشگری، به گونه­ای نبوده که بتواند سرمایه اجتماعی جامعه محلی سرعین را با خود همراه کند. همچنین نتایج نشان داد که سرمایه اجتماعی به صورت غیرمستقیم و با نقش میانجی اثرات اقتصادی گردشگری بر مشارکت در توسعه گردشگری پایدار تاثیر مثبت و معناداری دارد. اما رابطه سرمایه اجتماعی با نقش میانجی اثرات اجتماعی- فرهنگی گردشگری بر مشارکت در توسعه گردشگری پایدار در شهر سرعین مورد تایید قرار نگرفت.
کلیدواژه‌ها
سرمایه اجتماعی؛ توسعه پایدار؛ جامعه میزبان؛ اثرات گردشگری؛ مشارکت
عنوان مقاله [English]
Examining the Role of Social Capital on the Participation of Host Communities in the Sustainable Tourism Development with the Mediator Role of Tourism Effects (Case Study: Sareyn)
نویسندگان [English]
Habib EbrahimPour1؛ Yavar Babaei2؛ Elnaz Sokhandan3
1Associate Professor of Management, Mohaqeq Ardabili University
2Ph.D in Tourism, Allameh Tabataba'i University
3BA in Tourism Management, Allameh Tabataba'i University
چکیده [English]
Extended Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the role of social capital on the participation in the sustainable tourism development with the perceived mediator role of economic and socio-cultural effects by the host community in Sareyn. This study is an applied study and its methodology is questionnaire-based descriptive- survey. The statistical population included all people living in the city of Sareyn, Using Cochran formula, a sample of 385 persons were selected And the randomized sampling were used.
Correlation data analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation methods performed by using partial least squares (PLS) through using SPSS& SMARTPLS software. The results showed a significant positive relationship between social capital and three variables of economic impact of tourism (0.382), socio-cultural effects of tourism (0.517) and involvement in the sustainable tourism development (0.348) was approved. Also, the relationship between perceived economic impact  on participation in the sustainable tourism development with path coefficient (0.189) and t value(2.467) was confirmed. But the relationship between perceived socio-cultural effects on involvement in the sustainable tourism development was not confirmed because gained  t- value was less than (1.96).Also the results showed that social capital indirectly and by the mediator role of economic impact of tourism has positive and significant impact on participation in the development of sustainable tourism. But the indirect relationship between social capital and mediating role of socio-cultural effects of tourism on participation in sustainable tourism development was not approved.
 
Introduction
Survival and continuity of the communities and Human groups depend on the actions and relationships of their members. The level and depth of relationships in a group, indicate on continuity, cohesion and solidarity between its members. Community members are one the social aspects which their participation plays an important role in encouraging the development of tourism in one area. In this line, social capital is one of the most important variables support community involvement in many activities. Social capital has the ability to improve cooperation between members of society and coordination in the development process of society-based tourism (Liu et al., 2014). In one hand, social capital by involvement in decision making, some ways for promoting sustainability, Basic values, guarantee equitable distribution of resources and increased recognition of the stakeholders will be effective. Social capital in the field of tourism by participation in decision-making on the one hand, some way for promoting stability, economic and social development balance, complete planning of tourism destinations, make sure you have a clear understanding of the location, quick and effective evaluation of complex opportunities, development of public values, guarantee equitable distribution of resources and increased recognition of the stakeholders will be effective.
Although several studies have examined the social capital in the tourism industry and As well as numerous studies investigated the effects of tourism and sustainable tourism development in tourism destinations, However, few studies dealing with the relationship between social capital, economic and socio-cultural effects of tourism and participation in the sustainable tourism development simultaneously. So, this study examines the role of social capital on participation in the sustainable tourism development from the perspective of the host community of Sareyn.
 
Materials and Methods
This study is an applied form by objective and is a descriptive- survey study by gathering information, and is a quantitative research by data identity. Tourism and sustainable development is the subject of this research that was conducted in the summer of 1395 in the city of Sareyn. The study population consisted all those who live in the Sareyn. Cochran formula was used to calculate sample size which 385 sample was calculated based on a available random sampling method. A questionnaire was used for data collection. Content reliability and validity of the questionnaire was tested and approved. To test the hypothesis and conceptual model, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling (SEM) techniques using partial least squares (PLS) by SMART PLS software has been used.
 
Discussion and Results
According to the results of the path coefficient and t-values, a significant positive relationship was approvedbetween social capital and three variables of economic impact of tourism, socio-cultural effects of tourism and participation in sustainable tourism development. associal capital explain 34 percent of participation variation in the sustainable tourism development and explain51 percent  ofsocio-cultural effects of tourism and 38 percent of the variation of economic effects of tourism.
Also, the impact of the perceived economic effects oninvolvement in the development of sustainable tourism, with path coefficient of0.189and the t- value of 2.467 was approved. But the impact of socio-cultural effects on participationin the development of sustainable tourism, because of t- value less than 1.96, was not confirmed.
 
Conclusions
Tourism industry well knownas a safe and clean industry for the economy of each country which make the highest economic,cultural and socialexchanges in society. In addition to the factors affecting the development of social capital, today it’s as one of the main components required for the growth and development of societies. so in this study, the effect of social capital on the participation of host communities in the sustainable tourism development and the mediator role of economic and socio-cultural effects of tourism in the Sareyn has been examined. In this regard, to achieve the research objectives, seven hypotheses were tested. All except two hypotheses in the fields of the socio-culturaleffectsof tourism were approved. The results showed that the relationship between the economic impact of tourism and social capital and participationin the sustainable tourism development were approved. Thus, it is appropriate for the economic area of tourism development in the Sareyn and had supported by the host community. This in turn causes increased local community involvement in sustainable tourism programs and activities. Main components of the sustainable tourismparadigm, is  building relationships and alliances to give more strength the capacity of local communities and transfer the local economy in a sustainable manner, which is beneficial for the environment is. It’s as in the field of socio-cultural effects of tourism in Sareyn, the intended development was accepted.
Also the results showed that the relationship between socio- cultural effects of tourism with participation in the sustainable tourism development and the indirect relationship between social capital with the mediator role of socio-culturaleffectsand the participation in tourism were not approved. This shows the development in the area of socio-cultural effects of tourism, was not as could incorporate the social capital of the local community of Sareyn. So it can be said that the development of tourism in Sareyn wasn’t in line with the needs and desires of the local community and it should be considered in futureplanning, because considering the local community and the their participation and cooperation in tourism development is vital.
 
Keywords: Social capital, Sustainable Development, Host Communities, Tourism Effects, Participation
 
References

Andereck, K.L., Valentine, K.M., Richard, C. K. and Vogt, C. A. (2005). Residents’ perceptions of community tourism impacts, Annals of Tourism Research, 32 (4):1056-1076.
Hung Lee, T. (2012). Influence Analysis of Community Resident Support for Sustainable Tourism Development, Tourism Management, 34(1): 37- 46.
Hwang, D. and Stewart W.P. (2016). Social Capital and Collective Action in Rural Tourism, Journal of Travel Research, 56(1):81- 93.
Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational Advantage, Academy of Management Review, 2(1): 242-267.
Park, D.B., Lee, K.W., Choi, H.S. and Yoon, Y. (2012), Factors influencing social capital in rural tourism communities in South Korea, Tourism Management, 33(6): 1511-1520.
Rachmawati, E. (2014). Host community’s social and cultural capital for ecotourism development in Indonesia, Vol. 12, 4th International Conference on Tourism Research (41CTR) DOI:10.1051/shsconf/20141201035.

 
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
social capital, sustainable development, Host Communities, Tourism Effects, Participation
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
مراجع
  1. اکبریان­رونیزی، سعیدرضا (1392). بررسی رابطه توسعه گردشگری و سرمایه اجتماعی در نواحی روستایی (مطالعه موردی: دهستان سولقان تهران)، مجله برنامه­ریزی و توسعه گردشگری، سال 2، شماره 6: 92- 75.
  2. ایمان، محمدتقی؛ مرادی، گلمراد (1388). بررسی رابطه بین رضایت اجتماعی و هویت ملی با تعهد اجتماعی جوانان (مورد مطالعه: شهر شیراز)، مجله جامعه­شناسی کاربردی، سال20، شماره 2: 174- 155.
  3. چلبی، مسعود (1375). جامعه­شناسی نظم: تحلیل و تشریح نظری نظم اجتماعی، (چاپ اول)، تهران، نشر نی.
  4. حبیبی، فاتح (1395). بررسی نقش سرمایه اجتماعی در تمایل به ورود گردشگر (مطالعه موردی: شهرستان مریوان)، فصلنامه مطالعات شهری، شماره 18: 50- 37.
  5. رومیانی، احمد؛ عنابستانی، علی اکبر؛ ولائی، محمد (1394). تحلیلی بر اثرات سرمایه اجتماعی بر روی توسعه پایدار روستایی دهستان رومشگان غربی- شهرستان کوهدشت، فصلنامه علمی- پژوهشی فضایی جغرافیایی، سال 15، شماره 52: 115- 97.
  6. شکوهی­دولت­آبادی، محمود؛ مسعود، محمود (1389). پیاده راه عاملی برای افزایش سرمایه اجتماعی، نشریه انجمن علمی معماری و شهرسازی ایران، دوره 1، شماره1: 66- 55.
  7. ضیایی، محمود؛ امین بیدختی، علی اکبر؛ قربانی، فاطمه (1392). ارزیابی ظرفیت جامعه محلی برای توسعه پایدار گردشگری، فصلنامه مطالعات گردشگری، سال 8، شماره 24: 88- 59.
  8. عینالی، جمشید؛ فراهانی، حسین؛ رومیانی، احمد (1392). ارزیابی نقش سرمایه اجتماعی در توسعه گردشگری روستایی با تأکید بر خانه­های دوم (مطالعه موردی: دهستان حصار ولیعصر شهرستان بوئین­زهرا)، مجله برنامه­ریزی و توسعه گردشگری، دوره 2، شماره 6: 74- 52.
  9. غزانی، عزت­الله؛ بیژنی، مسعود؛ چیذری، محمد (1395). نقش سرمایه اجتماعی در توسعه گردشگری طبیعی مردم­نهاد از دیدگاه روستاییان استان مازندران، مجله علوم ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی ایران، جلد 12، شماره 1: 69- 53.
  10. غفاری، غلام­رضا؛ معاون، زهرا (1392). سهم سرمایه­های اجتماعی و فرهنگی در میزان تمایل به گردشگری در دو سایت حافظیه و تخت جمشید شیراز، مجله جامعه­پژوهی فرهنگی، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، سال 4، شماره 1: 127- 113.
  11. میرفردی، اصغر؛ مختاری، مریم؛ حیدری، علی؛ دانش­پذیر، علی (1393). بررسی تاثیر سرمایه اجتماعی بر میزان گرایش به ورود گردشگر (مورد مطالعه: شهر یاسوج)، مجله برنامه­ریزی و توسعه گردشگری، سال 3، شماره 10: 125- 106.
  12. میرک­زاده، علی­اصغر؛ شیری، نعمت­الله؛ هدایتی­نیا، سعید (1392). تأثیر ابعاد سرمایه اجتماعی بر نیت کارآفرینانه دانشجویان کشاورزی، مجله تحقیقات اقتصادی و توسعه کشاورزی ایران، دوره 45، شماره2: 246- 235.
  13. Akis, S., Peristianis, N. and Warner, J. (1996). Residents’ attitudes to tourism development: the case of Cyprus, Tourism Management, Vol. 17, Issue. 7, PP: 481- 494.
  14. Andereck, K. L., Valentine, K. M., Richard, C. K. and Vogt, C. A. (2005). Residents’ perceptions of community tourism impacts, Annals of tourism Research, 32 (4):1056-1076.
  15. Beeton, S. (2006). Community development through tourism, In: Land link Press, Australia.
  16. Berger-Schmitt, R. (2000). Social cohesion as an Aspect of the Quality of societies: concept and Measurement, Center for Survey Research and Methodology (ZUMA).
  17. Blore, M. L. (2015). The role of social capital in community-based natural resource management: A case study from South Africa, MSc dissertation, University of Pretoria, http://hdl.handle.net/2263/48954.
  18. Brohman, J. (1996). New Directions in Tourism for Third World Development, Annals of Tourism Research, 23(1): 48-70.
  19. Cole, S. (2006). Information and Empowerment: The keys to Achieving Sustainable Tourism, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 14(6): 629- 644.
  20. Cushman, J. W. (1992). The Organizational Dynamics of Teacher Workplace Commitment: A study of urban elementary and middle schools, Educational Administration Quarterly, 28 (1): 5- 42.
  21. Drake, S. P. (1991). Local Participation in Ecotourism Projects, Washington DC: Island Press.
  22. Dyer, P., Gursoy, D., Sharma, B. and Carter, J. (2007). Structural modeling of resident perceptions of tourism and associated development on the Sunshine Coast, Tourism Management, 28(1): 409- 422.
  23. Esfandabadi, H. M., Farsi, J. Y., Mobaraki, M. H. and Esfandabadi A. R. M. (2016). The Effect of Social Capital on Opportunity Recognition in Entrepreneurs as Mediated by the Social Network: A Case of Managers in the Science and Technology Park of the University of Tehran. Arabian Journal of Business and Management, Review, 6:199, doi:10.4172/2223-5833.1000199.
  24. Garrod, B. (2003). Local Participation in the Planning and Management of Ecotourism: A Revised Model Approach, Journal of Ecotourism, 2(1): 33-53.
  25. Gilliland, D. I. and Bellow D. C. (2002). Two side to Attitudinal Commitment: The Effect of Calculative and loyalty Commitment on Enforcement Mechanism in Distribution Channels,  Journal of Academy Marketing, Science, 30(1): 24- 43.
  26. Harpham, T. and Grant, E. (2002). Measuring social capital within health surveys: Key issues, Health policy and planning, 17(1): 106-111.
  27. Hung Lee, T. (2012). Influence Analysis of Community Resident Support for Sustainable Tourism Development, Tourism Management, 34(1): 37- 46.
  28. Hwang, D. H., Stewart, P. W. and Ko, D. W. (2012). Community-based action to influence tourism development, Journal of Travel Research, 51(3): 328-341.
  29. Hwang, D. and Stewart W. P. (2016). Social Capital and Collective Action in Rural Tourism, Journal of Travel Research, 56(1):81- 93.
  30. Jones, S. (2005). Community-based ecotourism: The significance of social capital, Annals of Tourism Research, 32 (2): 303-324.
  31. Kay, A. (2006). Social capital: the social economy and community development, Community Development Journal, 41(2): 160-173.
  32. Kim, k., Uysal, M. and Sirgy, J. (2013). How does tourism in a community impact the quality of life of community residents, Tourism Management, Vol. 13, June 2013, PP:527-540.
  33. Kim, S., Park, E. and Phandanouvong T. (2014). Barriers to Local Residents’ Participation in Community-Based Tourism: Lessons from Houay Kaeng Village in Laos, SHS Web of Conferences12, 01045, DoI: 10.1051/shSconf/20141201045.
  34. Ko, D. W. and Stewart, W. P. (2002). A structural equation model of residents’ attitudes for tourism development, Tourism Management, 23(1): 521-530.
  35. Kumar, S. (2002). Methods for Community Participation: A Complete Guide for Practitioners, London: ITDG Publishing.
  36. Lai, P. H. and Nepal, S. K. (2006). Local perspectives of ecotourism development in Tawush: an nature reserve, Tourism Management, 27(1):1117-1129.
  37. Lane Bernard (1994). Sustainable rural Tourism, strategies: at Tool Far development and conservation, Journal of sustainable Tourism, 2(2):12-18.
  38. Leana, C. R. and Van Buren, H. J. (1999). Organizational social and employment practices, Academy of Management Review, 24(1): 538-555.
  39. Lepp, A. (2007). Residents’ attitudes towards tourism in Bigodi village, Uganda, Tourism Management, 28(1): 876-885.
  40. Liu, J., Qu, H., Huang, D., Chen, G., Yue, X., Zhao, X. and Liang, Z. (2014), The role of social capital in encouraging residents' pro-environmental behaviors in community-based ecotourism, Tourism Management, 41(1):190-201.
  41. Macbeth, J., Carson, D. and Northcote, J. (2004). Social capital, tourism and regional development: SPCC - as a basis for innovation and sustainability, Current Issues in Tourism, 7(6): 502-522.
  42. McCool, S. and Martin, S. (1994). Community attachment and attitudes toward tourism development, Journal of Travel Research, 32(3): 29-34.
  43. Mearns, K. (2010). The sustainability of community-based ecotourism in southern Africa, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Portsmouth, United Kingdom.
  44. Mthembu, B. M. J. (2011). Rural tourism as a mechanism for poverty alleviation in KwaZulu-Natal: the case of Bergville, ph. D. thesis, Department of recreation and tourism, University of Zululand.
  45. Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational Advantage, Academy of Management Review, 2(1): 242-267.
  46. Nordin, A. O. S., Lonik, K. A. T. and Jaafar, M. (2014). Empowering local communities through tourism entrepreneurship: The case of micro tourism entrepreneurs in Langkawi island, Vol. 12, 2014, 4th International Conference on Tourism Resaerch (41CTR).  DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20141201101.
  47. Paimin, N. F. V., Modilish, S., Mogindol, S. H., Johnny, C. and Thamburaj J. A. (2014). Community participation and barriers in rural tourism: A case study in Kiulu, Sabah, SHS Web of Conferences12, 01003, DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20141201003.
  48. Park, D. B., Lee, K. W., Choi, H. S. and Yoon, Y. (2012), Factors influencing social capital in rural tourism communities in South Korea, Tourism Management, 33(6): 1511-1520.
  49. Pawar, M. (2006). Social capital, Social Science Journal, 43(2): 211-226.
  50. Pongponrat, K. and Chantradoan, N. J. (2012). Mechanism of social capital In community tourism participatory planning in Samu island: Thailand (An International Multidisciplinary), Journal of Tourism, 7(1): 339-349.
  51. Rachmawati, E. (2014). Host community’s social and cultural capital for ecotourism development in indonesia, DOI:10.1051/shsconf/20141201035.
  52. Saarinen, J. (2006). Traditions of sustainability in tourism studies, Annals of Tourism Research, 33(1):1-4.
  53. Sheldon, P. J. and Abenoja, T. (2001). Resident attitudes in a mature destination: The case of Waikiki, Tourism Management, 22(4): 435-443.
  54. Simmons, D. G. (1994). Community participation in tourism development, Tourism Management, 15(2): 98-108.
  55. Singh, S., Timothy, D. J. and Dowling R. K. (2003), Tourism and Destination Communities, Oxon, UK & Cambridge, USA: CABI Publishing.
  56. Stone, w. (2001). Measuring social capital, Australian Institute of Family studies, Research, paper No. 24.
  57. Tosun, C. (2000). Limits to community participation in the tourism develop­ment process in developing countries, Tourism Management, 21(1): 613-633.
  58. Tosun, C. (2002). Host perceptions of impacts: A comparative tourism study, Annals of Tourism Research, 29(1): 231-253.
  59. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and World Tourism Organization (WTO), (2005). Making tourism more sustainable: a guide for policy makers, Madrid, Spain, World Tourism Organization.
  60. Uslaner, E. M. (1999). Trust but verify: social capital and moral behavior, social science Information, 38(1): 29-56.
  61. Vadapalli, D. K. (2012). Heterogeneity in associational memberships: A latent class approach to the empirics of social capital, Ph.D. Dissertation, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
  62. Van Beuningen,  J. and Schmeets, H. (2013). Social capital in 2009: an index for the Netherlands, Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 72(1):73-90.
  63. Zhao, S. and Zhu, Y. (2017). The influence of social capital on small micro manufacturing venture in China, Vol. 100, 2017, 13th Global Congress on Manufacturing and Management (GCMM 2016) DOI: 10.1051/ 710004013.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,174
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3,320


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب