تعداد نشریات | 29 |
تعداد شمارهها | 431 |
تعداد مقالات | 4,216 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 6,797,036 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,044,047 |
اثر آنی کفی حمایت کننده قوس طولی داخلی پا بر روی کینماتیک سه عدی اندام تحتانی در کودکان با کف پای صاف منعطف | ||
پژوهشنامه فیزیولوژی ورزشی کاربردی | ||
مقاله 3، دوره 14، شماره 28، بهمن 1397، صفحه 41-56 اصل مقاله (397.11 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/jaep.2018.12580.1648 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
امیرعلی جعفرنژادگرو* 1؛ سید مجید علوی مهر2؛ مهدی مجلسی3؛ فرزاد نوبخت4 | ||
1استادیار بیومکانیک ورزشی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران | ||
2دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد بیومکانیک ورزشی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران. | ||
3استادیار بیومکانیک ورزشی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد همدان، همدان، ایران. | ||
4ااستادیار گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران. | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 04 مرداد 1396، تاریخ بازنگری: 30 مرداد 1396، تاریخ پذیرش: 20 شهریور 1396 | ||
چکیده | ||
سابقه و هدف: ارتزهای پا اغلب برای اصلاح تغییرات الگوی راه رفتن مورد استفاده قرار میگیرند. هدف این مطالعه بررسی این موضوع که چگونه ارتز پا قادر به تعدیل مقادیر کینماتیک سهبعدی مفاصل مچ پا، زانو و ران در طی فاز استقرار راه رفتن در کودکان دارای کف پای منعطف میباشد. مواد و روشها: دادههای کینماتیکی سهبعدی از 15 کودک پسر (میانگین سنی: 5/1±3/10 سال) با کف پای صاف متعطف جمعآوری گردید. جهت ثبت دادههای کینماتیکی از یک سیستم تحلیل حرکتی Vicon استفاده شد. مداخله پژوهش حاضر استفاده از کفی حمایتکننده قوس طولی داخلی پا بود. جهت تحلیل آماری از آزمون آنالیز واریانس با اندازههای تکراری استفاده شد (05/0=α). یافتهها: نتایح تحلیل دادهها نشان داد که کفی کفش میتواند سبب کاهش اوج چرخش خارجی زانو (01/0>P) و ران (05/0>P) و اوج زاویه آبداکشن زانو (01/0>P) گردد. در مفصل مچ پا، استفاده از کفی اوج دادههای کینماتیکی را در هر سه بعد در سمت غیربرتر تغییر نداد (05/0 نتیجهگیری: ارتز مورد استفاده در پژوهش حاضر اثرات سیستماتیک مثبتی را بر روی دادههای کینماتیکی طی فاز استقرار راه رفتن نشان داد. بنابراین میتوان استفاده از این کفی را در کوردکان پسر دارای کف پای صاف توصیه نمود. بعلاوه، یافتههای پژوهش حاضر میتواند به عنوان راهنمای مناسبی برای تحقیقات آینده در این زمینه مورد استفاده قرار گیرد | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
اندام تحتانی؛ زاویه مفصل؛ ارتز پا | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Immediate effect of Arch support foot orthoses on three dimensional lower limb kinematics in children with flexible flat feet | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
AmirAli Jafarnezhadgero1؛ Seyed Majid Alavi Mehr2؛ Mahdi Majlesi3؛ Farzad Nobakht4 | ||
1. | ||
2Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Educational Science and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran. | ||
32. Department of Sport Biomechanics, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan Branch, Hamedan, Iran | ||
4Department of Sport Biomechanics, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan Branch, Hamedan, Iran. | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Background & Purpose: Foot orthoses are often used to correct altered gait patterns. The purpose of this study was to investigate how foot orthoses can modify the magnitude of three dimensional ankle, knee, and hip joints kinematics during stance phase of walking in children with flexible flat feet. Methodology: Three dimensional kinematic data were collected from 15 male children (age: 10.3 ± 1.5 years) suffering from flexible flat feet. In order to obtain the kinematics data, a Vicon motion capture system was used. Arch support foot orthoses were used as an intervention. ANOVA repeated measure test was used for statistical analysis (α =0.05). Results: The results of data analysis showed that shoe insole can decrease the peak knee (P0.05). Conclusion: The foot orthoses used in this study were observed to have positive systematic effects on kinematic data during stance phase of walking. Therefore, using of this orthoses was recommended for male children with flexible flat feet. Moreover, the findings of this study may be used as a guidance for future researches in this field | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Lower limb, Joint angle, Foot orthoses | ||
مراجع | ||
##Farmani F, Sadeghi M, Saeedi H, Kamali M, Farahmand B. The effect of foot orthoses on energy consumption in runners with flat feet. Journal of Knowledge & Health. 2010;5(1):36-40.##Ozonoff MB. Pediatric Orthopedic Radiology. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 1992;12(4):548.##Williams Iii DS, McClay IS, Hamill J. Arch structure and injury patterns in runners. Clinical biomechanics. 2001;16(4):341-7.## Kothari A, Dixon P, Stebbins J, Zavatsky A, Theologis T. The relationship between quality of life and foot function in children with flexible flatfeet. Gait & posture. 2015;41(3):786-90.##Kothari A, Dixon P, Stebbins J, Zavatsky A, Theologis T. Are flexible flat feet associated with proximal joint problems in children? Gait & posture. 2016;45:204-10.##Riskowski JL, Dufour AB, Hagedorn TJ, Hillstrom HJ, Casey VA, Hannan MT. Associations of Foot Posture and Function to Lower Extremity Pain: Results From a Population‐Based Foot Study. Arthritis care & research. 2013;65(11):1804-12.##Farahpour N, Jafarnezhad A, Damavandi M, Bakhtiari A, Allard P. Gait ground reaction force characteristics of low back pain patients with pronated foot and able-bodied individuals with and without foot pronation. Journal of biomechanics. 2016;49(9):1705-10.##Murley GS, Menz HB, Landorf KB. Foot posture influences the electromyographic activity of selected lower limb muscles during gait. Journal of foot and ankle research. 2009;2(1):35.##Twomey D, McIntosh A, Simon J, Lowe K, Wolf S. Kinematic differences between normal and low arched feet in children using the Heidelberg foot measurement method. Gait & posture. 2010;32(1):1-5.##Hunt AE, Smith RM. Mechanics and control of the flat versus normal foot during the stance phase of walking. Clinical biomechanics. 2004;19(4):391-7.##Houck JR, Tome JM, Nawoczenski DA. Subtalar neutral position as an offset for a kinematic model of the foot during walking. Gait & posture. 2008;28(1):29-37.## Cobb SC, Tis LL, Johnson JT, Geil MD, McCarty FA. The effect of low-mobile foot posture on multi-segment medial foot model gait kinematics. Gait & posture. 2009;30(3):334-9.##Buldt AK, Murley GS, Butterworth P, Levinger P, Menz HB, Landorf KB. The relationship between foot posture and lower limb kinematics during walking: A systematic review. Gait & posture. 2013;38(3):363-72.##Tweed JL, Campbell JA, Avil SJ. Biomechanical risk factors in the development of medial tibial stress syndrome in distance runners. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association. 2008;98(6):436-44.##Simon J, Doederlein L, McIntosh A, Metaxiotis D, Bock H, Wolf S. The Heidelberg foot measurement method: development, description and assessment. Gait & posture. 2006;23(4):411-24.##Hunt AE, Smith RM, Torode M. Extrinsic muscle activity, foot motion and ankle joint moments during the stance phase of walking. Foot & ankle international. 2001;22(1):31-41.##Ness ME, Long J, Marks R, Harris G. Foot and ankle kinematics in patients with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Gait & posture. 2008;27(2):331-9.##MacWilliams BA, Cowley M, Nicholson DE. Foot kinematics and kinetics during adolescent gait. Gait & posture. 2003;17(3):214-24.##Stebbins J, Harrington M, Thompson N, Zavatsky A, Theologis T. Repeatability of a model for measuring multi-segment foot kinematics in children. Gait & posture. 2006;23(4):401-10.##Lin C-J, Lai K-A, Kuan T-S, Chou Y-L. Correlating factors and clinical significance of flexible flatfoot in preschool children. Journal of pediatric orthopaedics. 2001;21(3):378-82.##Schutte L, Narayanan U, Stout J, Selber P, Gage J, Schwartz M. An index for quantifying deviations from normal gait. Gait & posture. 2000;11(1):25-31.##Yates B, White S. The incidence and risk factors in the development of medial tibial stress syndrome among naval recruits. The American journal of sports medicine. 2004;32(3):772-80.##Buldt AK, Levinger P, Murley GS, Menz HB, Nester CJ, Landorf KB. Foot posture is associated with kinematics of the foot during gait: A comparison of normal, planus and cavus feet. Gait & posture. 2015;42(1):42-8.##Shibuya N, Kitterman RT, LaFontaine J, Jupiter DC. Demographic, physical, and radiographic factors associated with functional flatfoot deformity. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2014;53(2):168-72.##Williams III DS, McClay IS, Hamill J, Buchanan TS. Lower extremity kinematic and kinetic differences in runners with high and low arches. Journal of applied biomechanics. 2001;17(2):153-63.##Michelson JD, Durant D, McFarland E. The injury risk associated with pes planus in athletes. Foot & ankle international. 2002;23(7):629-33.##Root ML, Orien WP, Weed JH. Normal and abnormal function of the foot: Clinical Biomechanics; 1977.##Vanderwilde R, Staheli L, Chew D, Malagon V. Measurements on radiographs of the foot in normal infants and children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70(3):407-15.##Kaufman KR, Brodine SK, Shaffer RA, Johnson CW, Cullison TR. The effect of foot structure and range of motion on musculoskeletal overuse injuries. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1999;27(5):585-93.##Messier SP, Pittala KA. Etiologic factors associated with selected running injuries. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1988;20(5):501-5.##Milgrom C, Radeva-Petrova DR, Finestone A, Nyska M, Mendelson S, Benjuya N, et al. The effect of muscle fatigue on in vivo tibial strains. Journal of biomechanics. 2007;40(4):845-50.##Kim J-a, Lim O-b, Yi C-h. Difference in static and dynamic stability between flexible flatfeet and neutral feet. Gait & posture. 2015;41(2):546-50.##Coughlin MJ, Mann RA. Surgery of the foot and ankle: Mosby Inc; 1999.##Wapner KL, Chao W. Nonoperative treatment of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 1999;365:39-45.##Kido M, Ikoma K, Hara Y, Imai K, Maki M, Ikeda T, et al. Effect of therapeutic insoles on the medial longitudinal arch in patients with flatfoot deformity: A three-dimensional loading computed tomography study. Clinical Biomechanics. 2014;29(10):1095-8.##Tang SF-T, Chen C-H, Wu C-K, Hong W-H, Chen K-J, Chen C-K. The effects of total contact insole with forefoot medial posting on rearfoot movement and foot pressure distributions in patients with flexible flatfoot. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery. 2015;129:S8-S11.##Lin JL, Balbas J, Richardson EG. Results of non-surgical treatment of stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction: a 7-to 10-year followup. Foot & ankle international. 2008;29(8):781-6.##Chen Y-C, Lou S-Z, Huang C-Y, Su F-C. Effects of foot orthoses on gait patterns of flat feet patients. Clinical biomechanics. 2010;25(3):265-70.##Kulcu DG, Yavuzer G, Sarmer S, Ergin S. Immediate effects of silicone insoles on gait pattern in patients with flexible flatfoot. Foot & ankle international. 2007;28(10):1053-6.##Alvarez RG, Marini A, Schmitt C, Saltzman CL. Stage I and II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction treated by a structured nonoperative management protocol: an orthosis and exercise program. Foot & ankle international. 2006;27(1):2-8.##Eslami M, Begon M, Hinse S, Sadeghi H, Popov P, Allard P. Effect of foot orthoses on magnitude and timing of rearfoot and tibial motions, ground reaction force and knee moment during running. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2009;12(6):679-84.##Cheung RT, Chung RC, Ng GY. Efficacies of different external controls for excessive foot pronation: a meta-analysis. British journal of sports medicine. 2011;45(9):743-51.##Powell DW, Long B, Milner CE, Zhang S. Frontal plane multi-segment foot kinematics in high-and low-arched females during dynamic loading tasks. Human movement science. 2011;30(1):105-14.##Ferber R, Benson B. Changes in multi-segment foot biomechanics with a heat-mouldable semi-custom foot orthotic device. Journal of foot and ankle research. 2011;4(1):18.##Zifchock RA, Davis I. A comparison of semi-custom and custom foot orthotic devices in high-and low-arched individuals during walking. Clinical biomechanics. 2008;23(10):1287-93.##MacLean C, Davis IM, Hamill J. Influence of a custom foot orthotic intervention on lower extremity dynamics in healthy runners. Clinical biomechanics. 2006;21(6):623-30.##Ritchie C, Paterson K, Bryant AL, Bartold S, Clark RA. The effects of enhanced plantar sensory feedback and foot orthoses on midfoot kinematics and lower leg neuromuscular activation. Gait & posture. 2011;33(4):576-81.##Murley GS, Landorf KB, Menz HB, Bird AR. Effect of foot posture, foot orthoses and footwear on lower limb muscle activity during walking and running: a systematic review. Gait & posture. 2009;29(2):172-87.##Novick A, Kelley DL. Case study: position and movement changes of the foot with orthotic intervention during the loading response of gait. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 1990;11(7):301-12.##Mündermann A, Nigg BM, Humble RN, Stefanyshyn DJ. Foot orthotics affect lower extremity kinematics and kinetics during running. Clinical Biomechanics. 2003;18(3):254-62.##Levinger P, Menz HB, Morrow AD, Feller JA, Bartlett JR, Bergman NR. Foot kinematics in people with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatology. 2012;51(12):2191-8.##Souza TR, Pinto RZ, Trede RG, Kirkwood RN, Fonseca ST. Temporal couplings between rearfoot–shank complex and hip joint during walking. Clinical biomechanics. 2010;25(7):745-8.##Jafarnezhadgero AA, Shad MM, Majlesi M. Effect of foot orthoses on the medial longitudinal arch in children with flexible flatfoot deformity: A three-dimensional moment analysis. Gait & Posture. 2017;55:75-80.##Jafarnezhadgero A, Shad MM, Ferber R. The effect of foot orthoses on joint moment asymmetry in male children with flexible flat feet. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2017.##Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior research methods. 2007;39(2):175-91.##Lange B, Chipchase L, Evans A. The effect of low-Dye taping on plantar pressures, during gait, in subjects with navicular drop exceeding 10 mm. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2004;34(4):201-9.##Jafarnezhadgero AA, Majlesi M, Azadian E. Gait ground reaction force characteristics in deaf and hearing children. Gait & Posture. 2017;53:236-40.##Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan H, Wootten M. Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. Journal of orthopaedic research. 1990;8(3):383-92.##Wolf S, Simon J, Patikas D, Schuster W, Armbrust P, Döderlein L. Foot motion in children shoes—A comparison of barefoot walking with shod walking in conventional and flexible shoes. Gait & posture. 2008;27(1):51-9.##Lythgo N, Wilson C, Galea M. Basic gait and symmetry measures for primary school-aged children and young adults whilst walking barefoot and with shoes. Gait & posture. 2009;30(4):502-6.##Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological bulletin. 1992;112(1):155.##Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavior science. Lawrance Eribaum Association. 1988.##Harato K, Sakurai A, Kudo Y, Nagura T, Masumoto K, Otani T, et al. Three-dimensional knee kinematics in patients with a discoid lateral meniscus during gait. The Knee. 2016;23(4):622-6.##Pothrat C, Authier G, Viehweger E, Berton E, Rao G. One-and multi-segment foot models lead to opposite results on ankle joint kinematics during gait: Implications for clinical assessment. Clinical Biomechanics. 2015;30(5):493-9.##Robertson G, Caldwell G, Hamill J, Kamen G, Whittlesey S. Research methods in biomechanics, 2E: Human Kinetics; 2013.##Song J. The Kinematic comparative study about effects of foot orthotics. Korean J Sport Sci. 2008;19:11-21.##Nester C, Van Der Linden M, Bowker P. Effect of foot orthoses on the kinematics and kinetics of normal walking gait. Gait & posture. 2003;17(2):180-7.##Branthwaite HR, Payton CJ, Chockalingam N. The effect of simple insoles on three-dimensional foot motion during normal walking. Clinical Biomechanics. 2004;19(9):972-7.##Telfer S, Abbott M, Steultjens M, Rafferty D, Woodburn J. Dose–response effects of customised foot orthoses on lower limb muscle activity and plantar pressures in pronated foot type. Gait & posture. 2013;38(3):443-9.##Perry S, Lafortune M. Influences of inversion/eversion of the foot upon impact loading during locomotion. Clinical Biomechanics. 1995;10(5):253-7.##Dedieu P, Drigeard C, Gjini L, Dal Maso F, Zanone P-G. Effects of foot orthoses on the temporal pattern of muscular activity during walking. Clinical Biomechanics. 2013;28(7):820-4.##Bellchamber T, van den Bogert AJ. Contributions of proximal and distal moments to axial tibial rotation during walking and running. Journal of biomechanics. 2000;33(11):1397-403.##Kakihana W, Akai M, Nakazawa K, Takashima T, Naito K, Torii S. Effects of laterally wedged insoles on knee and subtalar joint moments. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2005;86(7):1465-71.##Nigg BM, Stergiou P, Cole G, Stefanyshyn D, Mündermann A, Humble N. Effect of shoe inserts on kinematics, center of pressure, and leg joint moments during running. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2003;35(2):314-9.## Razeghi M, Ebrahimi S, Yazdani F. The comparison of patellofemoral joint forces between flat footed and normal subjects during stance phase of gait. Gait & Posture. 2012;36:S38.##Huang Y-P, Kim K, Song C-Y, Chen Y-H, Peng H-T. How Arch Support Insoles Help Persons with Flatfoot on Uphill and Downhill Walking. Journal of Healthcare Engineering. 2017;2017.##Lack S, Barton C, Malliaras P, Twycross-Lewis R, Woledge R, Morrissey D. The effect of anti-pronation foot orthoses on hip and knee kinematics and muscle activity during a functional step-up task in healthy individuals: A laboratory study. Clinical Biomechanics. 2014;29(2):177-82.##Kosonen J, Kulmala J-P, Müller E, Avela J. Effects of medially posted insoles on foot and lower limb mechanics across walking and running in overpronating men. Journal of Biomechanics. 2017;54:58-63.## | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,527 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 705 |