آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 29 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 431 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,216 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 6,797,039 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,044,054 |
طراحی و اعتباریابی آزمون چابکی جدید ویژه بسکتبال | ||
| پژوهشنامه فیزیولوژی ورزشی کاربردی | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 15، شماره 30، دی 1398، صفحه 49-62 اصل مقاله (878.27 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/jaep.2019.14166.1751 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| رستم علی زاده* 1؛ مرضیه کلامی فرد2؛ لیدا مرادی3؛ مهدی امیدی4 | ||
| 1استادیار فیزیولوژی ورزشی، گروه علوم ورزشی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه ایلام، ایلام، | ||
| 2کارشناس ارشد فیزیولوژی ورزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران شمال، تهران. | ||
| 3استادیار گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران شمال، تهران. | ||
| 4استادیار گروه ریاضی، دانشکده علوم پایه، دانشگاه ایلام، ایلام. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 29 اردیبهشت 1397، تاریخ بازنگری: 25 آذر 1397، تاریخ پذیرش: 21 بهمن 1397 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| زمینه و هدف: یک آزمون کامل در ورزشی خاص باید بر اساس نیازهای حرکتی و فیزیولوژیکی خاص درگیر در آن ورزش طراحی شده است.هدف از این تحقیق بررسی اعتبار و پایایی آزمون طراحی شده جدید چابکی در بسکتبال بود. روش شناسی: آزمودنی‌های تحقیق را تعداد 65 نفر از بازیکنان غیرنخبه و 105 نفر از بازیکنان نخبه بسکتبال تشکیل می دادند. آزمون طراحی شده شامل حرکات مختلف با توپ و بدون توپ در دامنه طولی زمین بسکتبال بود که بازیکنان در دو وضعیت باز و بسته انجام می دادند. آزمون ملاک چابکی در این تحقیق، آزمون Tبود. یافته ها: نتایج تحقیق نشان داد بین اجرای آزمون طراحی شده به صورت بسته و باز با آزمون T بدون در نظر گرفتن سطح مهارتی ارتباط معنی داری وجود دارد (05/0>P ،80/0<r)، که این همبستگی در گروه نخبه بیشتر از گروه غیر نخبه بود (80/0<r). همچنین همبستگی درون گروهی (پایایی) دو مرتبه اجرای آزمون چابکی طراحی شده به صورت بسته و باز بدون در نظر گرفتن سطح مهارتی بالا و معنی دار بود (05/0>P ،90/0<r). علاوه بر این آزمون طراحی شده به صورت باز و بسته دارای توانایی بیشتری نسبت به آزمون T در ارزیابی چابکی بود (05/0>P). نتیجه گیری: می توان چنین استباط کرد که آزمون طراحی شده چابکی ویژه بسکتبال، آزمون معتبر و پایایی در حالت باز و هم بسته برای ارزیابی چابکی بازیکنان بسکتبال است. این آزمون توانایی بیشتری در تمایز سطح مهارت زنان بسکتبالیست دارد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| آزمون طراحی شده چابکی؛ بازیکنان زن؛ بسکتبال؛ پایایی؛ روایی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Designing and Validating a New Agility Test for Basketball | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Rostam Alizadeh1؛ Marzieh Kalamifard2؛ Lida Moradi3؛ Mehdi Omidi4 | ||
| 1Department of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Sport Science, North Tehran Branch,Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Sport Science, North Tehran Branch,Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 4Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Background &Purpose: A perfect test in a particular sport is designed based on the specific motor and physiological needs involved in that sport. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of a newly-designed agility test for basketball. Methodology:The participants of the study involved 65 female basketball players from non-elite players and 105 from elite players. The designed test included various movements with and without the ball in the longitudinal range of the basketball court performed in both open and closed models. The standardized test for evaluating agility was the T test. Results:The results showed that, regardless of skill levels, there was a significant relationship between the participants’ performance on the designed test in both open and closed models and the T test (r > 0.8, p < .05); this correlation was higher among elite players (r > 0.9). Regardless of skill levels, the intraclass correlation (reliability) between the two performances of the newly-designed agility test in both open and closed models was high and significant (r > 0.9, p < .05). In addition, the designed test in both open and closed models could better evaluate agility when compared with the T test (p < .05). Conclusion:It could be concluded that the agility test designed for basketball was a valid and reliable alternative to the T test in both open and close models and could better differentiate skill levels among female basketball players. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| designed agility test, female players, basketball, reliability, validity | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
##Corbin, C. B., Welk, G. J., Richardson, C., Vowell, C., Lambdin, D., & Wikgren, S. Youth physical fitness: ten key concepts. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, (2014). 85(2), 24-31.##Bompa, T. O., & Haff, G. G. Periodization: Theory and methodology of training: Human Kinetics Publishers. (2009).##Vanhees, L., Lefevre, J., Philippaerts, R., Martens, M., Huygens, W., Troosters, T., & Beunen, G. How to assess physical activity? How to assess physical fitness? European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation, (2005). 12(2), 102-114.##Bapiran, M., Rajabi, H., & Yousefi, M. y. Designing of the specific anaerobic power test for basketball. exercise physiology, (1394). 27, 13 [Persian].##Castro-Piñero, J., Artero, E. G., España-Romero, V., Ortega, F. B., Sjöström, M., Suni, J., & Ruiz, J. R. Criterion-related validity of field-based fitness tests in youth: a systematic review. British journal of sports medicine. (2009).##Sheppard, J. M., & Young, W. B. Agility literature review: Classifications, training and testing. Journal of sports sciences, (2006). 24(9), 919-932.##Cabrera, J. M., Smith, D. P., & Byrd, R. J. Cardiovascular adaptations on Puerto Rican basketball players during a 14-week season. The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness, (1977). 17(2), 173-180.##Hoffman, J. R., Tenenbaum, G., Maresh, C. M., & Kraemer, W. JRelationship Between Athletic Performance Tests and Playing Time in Elite College Basketball Players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, . (1996). 10(2), 67-71.##Bosco, J. S., & Gustafson, W. F. Measurement and evaluation in physical education, fitness, and sports: Prentice Hall. (1983).##Miller, D. Measurement by the physical educator why and how: McGraw-Hill Higher Education. (2013).##Baechle, T., & Earle, R. Essentials of strength training and conditioning. Human Kinetics Champaign. Bandy, WD and Irion, JM .The eŠect of time on static stretch on the‰ flexibility of the hamstring muscles. Phys. Ther, . (2008). 74, 845-852.##Prentice, W. E. Fitness and wellness for life: WCB/McGraw-Hill. (1999).##Delextrat, A., Grosgeorge, B., & Bieuzen, F. Determinants of performance in a new test of planned agility for young elite basketball players. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, (2015). 10(2), 160-165.##Delextrat, A., & Cohen, D. Strength, power, speed, and agility of women basketball players according to playing position. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, (2009). 23(7), 1974-1981.##Alemdaroğlu, U. The relationship between muscle strength, anaerobic performance, agility, sprint ability and vertical jump performance in professional basketball players. Journal of human kinetics, (2012). 31, 149-158.##Chaouachi, A., Brughelli, M., Chamari, K., Levin, G. T., Abdelkrim, N. B., Laurencelle, L., & Castagna, C. Lower limb maximal dynamic strength and agility determinants in elite basketball players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, (2009). 23(5), 1570-1577.##Jakovljević, S., Karalejić, M., Pajić, Z., Gardašević, B., & Mandić, R. The influence of anthropometric characteristics on the agility abilities of 14 year-old elite male basketball players. Facta universitatis-series: Physical Education and Sport, (2011). 9(2), 141-149.##Jakovljevic, S. T., Karalejic, M. S., Pajic, Z. B., Macura, M. M., & Erculj, F. F. Speed and agility of 12-and 14-year-old elite male basketball players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, (2012). 26(9), 2453-2459.##Paul G, M., David B, P., & Clare L, M. The physical and physiological demands of basketball training and competition. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, (2010). 5(1), 75-86.##Brown, A. E. The reliability and validity of the lane agility test for collegiate basketball players. University of wisconsin-la crosse. (2012).##Mujika, I., Santisteban, J., Impellizzeri, F. M., & Castagna, C. Fitness determinants of success in men's and women's football. Journal of sports sciences, (2009). 27(2), 107-114.##Young, W., & Farrow, D. A Review of Agility: Practical Applications for Strength and Conditioning. Strength & Conditioning Journal, (2006). 28(5), 24-29.##Serpell, B. G., Ford, M., & Young, W. B. The development of a new test of agility for rugby league. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, (2010). 24(12), 3270-3277.##Farrow, D., Young, W., & Bruce, L. The development of a test of reactive agility for netball: a new methodology. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, (2005). 8(1), 52-60.##Hewett TE, Ford KR, Myer GD, Wanstrath K, Scheper M. Gender differences in hip adduction motion and torque during a single‐leg agility maneuver. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2006;24(3):416-21.## | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,381 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 759 |
||