بررسی انگیزه‌ها و موانع گرایش به ورزش همگانی در بین دانشجویان دانشگاه‌های دولتی، پیام نور، و آزاد اسلامی مشهد

نخعی نیازی, اعظم; خرمی خرم آبادی, غلامرضا; عباس نژاد, اسماعیل

doi:10.22080/jsmb.2020.9986.2342

در پی اعلام نتایج ارزیابی و رتبه‌بندی سال ۱400 نشریات علمی وزارت علوم انجام شد:

تعداد نشریات	28
تعداد شماره‌ها	426
تعداد مقالات	4,164
تعداد مشاهده مقاله	6,739,515
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله	4,988,932

	بررسی انگیزه‌ها و موانع گرایش به ورزش همگانی در بین دانشجویان دانشگاه‌های دولتی، پیام نور، و آزاد اسلامی مشهد
پژوهشنامه مدیریت ورزشی و رفتار حرکتی
مقاله 8، دوره 15، شماره 30، مهر 1398، صفحه 411-420 اصل مقاله (195.29 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/jsmb.2020.9986.2342
نویسندگان
اعظم نخعی نیازی¹؛ غلامرضا خرمی خرم آبادی^* ²؛ اسماعیل عباس نژاد³
¹عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه پیام نور
²اداره آموزش و پرورش ناحیه4 مشهد
³اداره آموزش و پرورش ناحیه3 مشهد مقدس
تاریخ دریافت: 08 اردیبهشت 1395، تاریخ بازنگری: 26 آبان 1396، تاریخ پذیرش: 11 تیر 1399
چکیده
هدف پژ‍وهش حاضر بررسی انگیزه‌ها و موانع گرایش به ورزش همگانی در بین دانشجویان می‌باشد. بدین منظور از بین ۵0 هزار دانشجوی کارشناسی دانشگاه‌های دولتی، پیام نور و آزاد اسلامی مشهد در سال تحصیلی 94-93 ، ۱۱۳۱ نفر بر اساس جدول مورگان به صورت نمونه‌گیری تصادفی- طبقه‌‌‌ای، انتخاب شدند. اطلاعات بوسیله پرسشنامه خود محقق ساخته که روایی آن را ۲۰ نفر از اساتید صاحب نظر مدیریت ورزشی تایید کردند و پایایی این پرسشنامه طبق ضریب آلفای کرونباخ، 84/0برای انگیزه شرکت و 68/0برای موانع شرکت در فعالیت‌های ورزشی به دست آمد. همچنین برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها از روش‌های آمار توصیفی مانند جداول فراوانی و نمودارهای ستونی و هم چنین میانگین انحراف معیار و واریانس و در آماراستنباطی از آزمون کولوموگروف اسمیرنوف جهت تعیین نرمال بودن متغیر‌های آزمون کروسکال‌والیس و کی دوی جداول توافق استفاده شده است. نتایج نشان داد که لذت بردن از ورزش و آرامش روحی و روانی انگیزه مشارکت افراد در فعالیت‌های ورزشی است و تعاملات اجتماعی و تاثیر بر سلامت جزء انگیزاننده‌ها نمی‌باشد. متغیرهای فقدان اطلاعات ورزشی ، مشکلات رفتاری و روزمره ازموانع شرکت افراد در فعالیت‌های ورزشی نیست ولی متغییر عدم دسترسی به اماکن ورزشی اصلی ترین مانع مشارکت در ورزش می باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
ورزش همگانی؛ دانشجویان دانشگاههای مشهد؛ انگیزه ها؛ موانع
عنوان مقاله [English]
Investigation on motivations and barriers for tendency to the “sports for all” among the students of State, Payame Noor and Islamic Azad Universities of Mashhad
نویسندگان [English]
. .¹؛
¹..


چکیده [English]
The purpose of current study is investigation of motivations and barriers related to the “sports for all” among the students. For this reason, among the 50,000 undergraduate students of the universities of State, Payame Noor and Islamic Azad (Mashhad branch) in the academic year of 93-94, 1131 students were selected based on the Morgan table using random-stratified sampling method. The information was made by a questionnaire which had been designed by the researcher himself and the validity of that was confirmed by 20 experts in sport management. The stability of the questionnaire based on Cronbach's α-coefficient was 0.84 in the case of motivations and 0.68 for barriers of participating in sport activities. Also, descriptive statistics such as frequency tables and columnar graphs were used to analyze the data Also, the mean of standard deviation and variance and in the inferential statistics of Kolmogorov Smirnov test To determine the normality of the variables, the Kruskal-Wallis test and the two consensus tables have been used. The results demonstrated that enjoy the exercise and mental relaxation, are of the motivations for participating in sport activities, while social interactions and the impact of sport on health are not motivating factors. The variables of the lack of sport information, behavioral and everyday problems are not the barriers for participating in sport activities, but the variable of lack of access to sport sites is of the main barriers in this case.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Sports for all, Students at Mashhad universities, motivations, obstacles

مراجع
1. Fazzel, J. (2010).Comparison of personality between men and women athletes and non-athletes. Development and motor learning journal, 8, 81-98. 2. Bahrani, M and Latifiyan, M. (2008).Relationship between personality big five and Dimensions academic motivation among secondary students of Shiraz. New Thoughts on Education, 5(4), 29-42. Maddi S. R, (1996). Personality theories: A comparative analysis, Brooks /Cole publishing Company USA. 4. Maslow Abraham H, (1987). Motivation and Personality, Revised By: FragerR, Fadiman J,MacReynold C, cox R,(3 ed.) New York, Addison WesleyLogman Inc. 5. Vermetten Y. J, Lodewijks H. G &Vermunt J. D, (2001). The role of personality traits and goal orientation in strategy use, Contemporary Educational psychology, Vol. 26, pp. 149-170. Komarraju, M &Karau S. J, (2005).The relationship between the big five personality traits and academic motivation, Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 39 (3). pp. 557-67.. Shahar G, E, Kalnitzki, Shulman Sh& Blatt S. j, (2005).personality, motivation, and construction of goals during the transition to adulthood, Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 40 (1), pp 53-61. Zweing D & Webster J, (2004). What are we measuring? An examination of the relationships between the big-five Personality traits, goal orientation, and performance intentions, Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 36 (7), pp.: 1693-1708 9. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P.T. (2004).A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-FactorInventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 587-596. 10. Van den A, Y., Nys, K., Rzewnicki, R., & Van Mele, V. (2001).Personality and the athlete. In R. N. Singer, H. A. Hausenblas, & C. M. Janelle (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (pp. 239-268). New York, NY: Wiley. 11. Ghaderi, D and Ghaderi, M. (2013).Survey the relationship between big five factor, happiness and sport achievement in Iranian athletes. Annals of Biological Research, 3 (1):308-312 12. Mirzaei, A. Nikbakhsh , R. Sharififar, F. (2013). The relationship between personality traits and sport performance. European Journal of Experimental Biology3 (3):439-442. Allen, M. S., Greenlees, I., & Jones, M. (2011).An investigation of the five-factor model of personality and coping behavior in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 29(8),841-850. Binboga, E., Guven, S., Catikkas, F., Bayazit, O., &Tok, S. (2012). Psychophysiological responses to competitive and the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Human Kinetics, 33, 187-194. Dobersek, U and Bartling, C. (2008).Connection between personality type and sports. American journal of psychological research, 4(1), 21-28. Ingledew & Markland (2008).The role of motives in exercise participation. Psychology and Health, 23, 807-828. Ingledew, D. K., Markland, D., & Sheppard, K. E. (2004). Personality and self-determination of exercise behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 36,1921-1932. Kaiseler, M., Polman, R. C. J., & Nicholls, A. R. (2012).Effects of the Big Five personality dimensions on appraisal coping, and coping effectiveness in sport. European Journal of Sport Sciences, 12(1), 62-72. Lewis & Sutton (2011).Understanding exercise behavior: Examining the interaction of exercise motivation and personality in predicting exercise frequency. Journal of Sport Behavior, 34(1), 82-97. McKelvie, S. Lemieux P. & Stout D. (2003). Extraversion and neuroticism in contact athletes, no contact athletes and nonathletic: a research note. Athletic Insight 5, np. Liu, W; Wei, B; Li, Y. (2011). Perceived competence, motivation, and physical activity participation among college students. The Preliminary Program for 2011 AAHPERD National Convention and Exposition. Jafari Siavashani, F; Ghadimi, B; Behaeen, B; Same, H (2010).Study of student motivation for doing physical activities (Health-Related factors against physical appearance related factors). World Applied Sciences Journal, Vol. 10, No 2: 322-326. Dacey, M; Baltzell, A; Zaichkowsky, L. (2008).Older adults’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation toward physical activity. Journal of Health Behavior, 32(6):570-582. Bastos, A S, & Gonzalez و R and Marquez, S. (2006).Motives for participation in physical activity by Brazilian adults. Journal of Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol102: 358-367. Stuntz, M; Weiss, R; Cherly p. (2010).Motivating children and adolescents to sustain a physically active lifestyle. Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, vol 4, No. 5:433-444. Netz, Y. Raviv, S. (2004). Age differences in motivational orientation toward physical activity: An application of social cognitive theory. Journal of Psychology Interdisciplinary and Applied. Vol138, No1: 35-78. Kilpatrick, M; Hebert, E; Bartholomew, J. (2005). College students’ motivation for physical activity: Differentiating men’s and women’s motives for sport participation and exercise. Journal of American College Health, vol 54, no 2: 87-94. Wicker, P & Breuer, C and Pawolowski, T. (2009). Promoting Sport for All to Age-specific Target Groups: the Impact of Sport Infrastructure. European Sport Management Quarterly, Vol 9, No 2: 103-118. Brinkman, Craig. (2013). The Big Five Personality Model and Motivation in Sport. A Thesis Submitted to the faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Kinesiology and Health. Lonsdale, C., Hodge, K., & Rose, E. (2008b). The behavioral regulation in sportquestionnaire (BRSQ): Instrument development and initial validity evidence. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30, 323-355. Fornell, C., &Larcker, D. F. (1981). “Evaluating structural equation models with ‎unobservable ‎variables and measurement error”. Journal of marketing research, 18(1); 39-‎‎‎
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 814 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 463

سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب

پیوندهای مفید

اخبار و اعلانات

آمار

بررسی انگیزه‌ها و موانع گرایش به ورزش همگانی در بین دانشجویان دانشگاه‌های دولتی، پیام نور، و آزاد اسلامی مشهد

1. Fazzel, J. (2010).Comparison of personality between men and women athletes and non-athletes. Development and motor learning journal, 8, 81-98.

2. Bahrani, M and Latifiyan, M. (2008).Relationship between personality big five and Dimensions academic motivation among secondary students of Shiraz. New Thoughts on Education, 5(4), 29-42.

4. Maslow Abraham H, (1987). Motivation and Personality, Revised By: FragerR, Fadiman J,MacReynold C, cox R,(3 ed.) New York, Addison WesleyLogman Inc.

5. Vermetten Y. J, Lodewijks H. G &Vermunt J. D, (2001). The role of personality traits and goal orientation in strategy use, Contemporary Educational psychology, Vol. 26, pp. 149-170.

9. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P.T. (2004).A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-FactorInventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 587-596.

10. Van den A, Y., Nys, K., Rzewnicki, R., & Van Mele, V. (2001).Personality and the athlete. In R. N. Singer, H. A. Hausenblas, & C. M. Janelle (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (pp. 239-268). New York, NY: Wiley.

11. Ghaderi, D and Ghaderi, M. (2013).Survey the relationship between big five factor, happiness and sport achievement in Iranian athletes. Annals of Biological Research, 3 (1):308-312

12. Mirzaei, A. Nikbakhsh , R. Sharififar, F. (2013). The relationship between personality traits and sport performance. European Journal of Experimental Biology3 (3):439-442.