پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 30 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 448 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,332 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 6,904,749 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,123,829 |
مطالعه، گونه‌شناسی و طبقه‌بندی سنگ‌مزارهای دوران ایلخانی تا قاجاریه در ایران | ||
| مطالعات باستان شناسی دوران اسلامی Journal of Islamic Archaeology studies | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 1، شماره 2، اسفند 1401، صفحه 119-137 اصل مقاله (942.41 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/jiar.2021.3221 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سعید ستارنژاد* 1؛ علی‌اکبر راه‌چمنی2؛ صمد پروین3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری باستان شناسی, دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران. | ||
| 2دانش اموخته کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه بوعلیسینا، همدان، ایران. | ||
| 3دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد باستان شناسی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 29 اسفند 1399، تاریخ پذیرش: 29 اسفند 1399 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| مسأله‌ی مرگ و جهان پس‌ازآن یکی از تفکرات اساسی آدمی از آغاز خلقت تا به امروز بوده است. این بینش در تمامی جوامع، دارای مجموعه‌ای از نمودها و جلوه‌های گوناگون است. یکی از اجزای جدایی‌ناپذیر این تفکر در بین تمامی جوامع از روزگاران کهن تا به امروز که همچون ابزاری اساسی برای نمودهای عینی و معنوی آن به‌کاررفته، مزار و سنگ‌مزارهاست. در زمینه‌ی ساخت مزار و نشانه‌های مرتبط با آن در جوامع گوناگون دیدگاه‌های متفاوتی وجود دارد. این پدیده در جهان‌بینی ایرانی – اسلامی جایگاه ویژه‌ای داشته و در فرم‌های مختلف و نقش‌مایه‌های تزیینی متنوعی ایجاد شده‌اند. این پژوهش ضمن مطالعه‌ی آرایه‌های به‌کاررفته در سنگ‌مزارهای 23 گورستان در مناطق مختلف کشور، به طبقه‌بندی سنگ‌مزارها از نظر شکل ظاهری، نحوه‌ی قرارگیری و تحلیل مفاهیم به‌کاررفته در نقش‌مایه‌های سنگ‌مزارها پرداخته و به‌دنبال پاسخ به پرسش‌های زیر است: 1. سنگ‌مزارهای دوران ایلخانی تا قاجاریه از نظر شکل ظاهری و نحوه‌ی ایستایی در چند دسته قابل طبقه‌بندی هستند؟ 2. مفاهیم به‌کاررفته در نقش‌مایه‌ها نشانگر چیست؟ این پژوهش، به روش توصیفی – تحلیلی به همراه مطالعات اسنادی و میدانی است. نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که سنگ‌مزارها از منظر شکل و نحوه‌ی قرارگیری در سه نوع عمودی، افقی و ترکیبی با گونه‌های مختلف قابل دسته‌بندی هستند؛ همچنین از لحاظ آرایه‌های تزیینی دارای انواع مختلفی با مفاهیم متنوعی است ازجمله: الف) انسانی، ب) گیاهی، ج) حیوانی، د) انتزاعی - هندسی، ه) اشیاء و ابزارآلات. به باور نگارندگان گستردگی حوزه‌ی پراکنش و وجود وحدت در نقش‌مایه‌ها، خطوط و مضامین کتیبه‌های سنگ‌مزارهای موردمطالعه بیانگر آن است که این سنگ‌مزارها صرفاً به مذهب، دوره و جغرافیایی خاص محدود نبوده‌اند، بلکه ماهیت ایرانی – اسلامی آنها را نشان می‌دهند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| فرهنگ ایرانی - اسلامی؛ سنگ‌مزار؛ گونه‌شناسی؛ نقش‌مایه | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Typology, Classification and Analysis Patterns of the Tombstones from Ilkhanid to Qajar Era in Iran | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Saeid Sattarnezhad1؛ Ali Akbar RahChamani2؛ Samad Parvin3 | ||
| 1Ph.D Candidate in Archaeology, University Of Mohaghegh Ardebili, Ardebili, Iran. | ||
| 2MA Alumnus in Archaeology, University Of Bualisina Hamedan, Hamedan,Iran. | ||
| 3MA Alumnus in Archaeology, University Of Mohaghegh Ardebili، Ardebil, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction The issue of death and the world after it has been one of the basic thoughts of humankind from the beginning of the creation until today. This view has a set of various aspects and manifestations in all societies. One of the inseparable components of this thought in all societies from ancient times until today are tombs and tombstones which have been used as basic tools for its objective and spiritual manifestations. Although there are various views on the construction of tombs and signs related to them in different societies, this phenomenon has a special position in the Iranian-Islamic worldview and has been created in different forms and various decorative motifs. This research, besides studying the arrays used on the tombstones of 23 cemeteries in different regions of the country, classifies the tombstones in terms of appearance and placement and analyzes the concepts used in the motifs of tombstones and seeks to answer the following questions: 1. How many categories can tombstones from the Ilkhanate to Qajar era be classified in terms of appearance and position? 2. What do the concepts used in the motifs indicate? This research uses a descriptive-analytical method with documentary and field studies. The results show that tombstones can be classified into three types in terms of shape and placement: vertical, horizontal and a combination of both. They also have different types in terms of decorative arrays with various concepts including: human, plant, animal, abstract-geometric, objects and tools. According to the authors, the extent of the distribution and the existence of unity in the motifs, lines and themes of the inscriptions of the studied tombstones, indicate that these tombstones were not limited to a particular religion, period, or geography and indicate their Iranian-Islamic nature. Materials and Methods This research was conducted by descriptive-analytical method and the information was gathered by library and field studies. In this research, at first the essential sources for the research were collected. Then based on the obtained information, the classification, typology and analysis of the arrays used on the tombstones from the Islamic period was conducted. Results Our results suggest that the tombstones were divided into three separate categories with different sub-branches in terms of location and statics. The intended types are :1) Horizontal tombstones that can be classified in the forms of a) box b) stepped–flat c) cradle d) statue. 2) Vertical tombstones in the form of raised stones in the form of a) uncut b) prismatic c) cylindrical. 3) Combined tombstones. It is important to mention that some of the identified fossils were not in a pathological condition and were mostly destroyed. Apart from their appearance and location, tombstones can be classified into the following types from the perspective of drawings and arrays used on the graves such as a) human b) animal c) plant d) abstract-geometric e) objects and tools. Each of the arrays which are used in different regions is different in terms of the way the motifs were created and their appearance and also there are noticeable differences in their details which seems to be more inspired by the worldview of the artists who designed the tombstone arrays. The formation of images on tombstones with inscriptions, ornaments, art, language and literature and aesthetic concerns is cognitive. According to the authors, the extent of the distribution and the existence of unity in the motifs, lines and themes of the inscriptions of the tombstones indicate that these tombstones were not limited to a particular religion, period, or geography, but rather it indicates their Iranian-Islamic nature. Conclusion The results obtained in this study showed that the process of tombstone formation in the Iranian plateau has generally begun in the middle of the Islamic centuries. After the patriarchal period, we see tombstones in various shapes and in various cemeteries in Iran, especially in the Northwest. These tombs have various motifs such as plant, human, geometric, inscription and etc. According to the etymology of some of these species, they date back to pre-Islamic Iranian cultures and some are related to Central Asia. In general, the tombstones studied in this study are influenced by the three cultures of Iran, Islam and Central Asia. The contribution of Northwestern Iran in the study of tombstones is more significant than other regions. Funding: There is no funding support Authors' Contribution: The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: Study conception and analysis and interpretation of results: Saeid Sattarnezhad. Data collection: Ali Rahchamani. Draft manuscript preparation: Samad Parvin. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript. Conflict of Interest: Authors declared no conflict of interest. References - Ağasıoğlu, F., (2013). DAŞBABA TÜRKÜN DAŞ YADDAŞI, Baki. - Ahmadzadeh, Farid; Hosseini, Seyed Hashem; Norsi, Hamed (2019). "A Study on the Recognition of Themes and Patterns of the Tombstone of the Goran Tribe in the West of Islamabad" Theoretical Foundations of Visual Arts, No. 5, pp. 79-92. - Aksoy, M., (2012). TÜRK SANATININ TEMEL ÖZELLİKLERİ BAĞLAMINDA FARS SANATI İLE BİR KARŞILAŞTIRMA. İdil Sanat ve Dil Dergisi, 1(5), pp.32-48. - Aksoy, M., (2017). Bitlis ve Ahlat'ta Koç-Koyun Başlı MezarTaşları, Kümbetler ve Damgalar. Turk yourdu, 35-38. - Aktemur, A.M., (2017). POSOF ÇEVRESİNDEKİ MEZARLIKLAR VE MEZAR TAŞLARI, 64, pp. 237-268. - ALYILMAZ, C. and ALYILMAZ, S., IĞDIR VE ÇEVRESİNDEKİ KOÇ HEYKELLİ MEZAR TAŞLARININ ÜZERLERİNDEKİ ARAP HARFLİ YAZITLAR. Türk Dünyası Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi, (43), pp.305-345. - ARSLAN, A.S., (2017). “TAŞLAR KONUŞUR”: TÜRK MEZAR TAŞLARININ BİÇİM DİLİ. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim (TEKE) Dergisi, 6(3), pp.1923-1937. - Azadbakht, Massoud (2011). "Study of ritual and symbolic motifs of the Islamic period from the arrival of the Ilkhanids to the rise of the Qajarids", Master Thesis in Archeology, Sistan and Baluchestan University (unpublished). - Baykara, T., (1993). Asya Türk Kültürünün Bir Unsuru Olarak Mezar Taşı. Vakıflar Haftası, s. 127-131. - Berkli, Y., (2007). Erzurum’da Yeni Bulunan Haç Motifli Koç Heykelinin Düşündürdükleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(34), pp.215-232. - Berkli, Y., (2012). Azerbaycan-Bakü’de Bulunan İnsan Heykel Biçimli Mezar Taşları ve Orta Asya-Azerbaycan-Anadolu İlişkisi. Türk Kültürü ve Hacı Bektaş Velî Araştırma Dergisi, (61). - Danieli, Tawhid (2017). "Study of the contents of inscriptions and decorations on the tombstones of the tomb of Sheikh Safi al-Din Ardabili", Master Thesis in Visual Communication, Tribune University, Secretary of Shahid Rajaei (unpublished). - Demirel, F., (2008). Besni mezar taşları (Doctoral dissertation, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü). - Effendioff, Rasim (2013). The stones speak, translated by Mohammad Ali Arshfar, Tabriz: Deniz. - Ertan, D.A.Ş. (2014), Bozdoğan Mezar Taşları. Sanat Tarihi Dergisi, 19(2), pp.109-127. - Frost, Maryam (2007). "Consistency of inscriptions and geometric patterns in the buildings of Isfahan in the Safavid era", two scientific quarterly journals of Islamic art studies, Volume 3, Number 5, pp. 44-25. - Furtun, S., (2014). Iğdır Karakoyunlu Tarihi Mezar Taşları,Turkish Studies, Volume 9/12, pp. 769-773. - Ghazanfari, Zohreh (2014). "Comparative study of visual motifs of tombstones of the last century and bronzes of Lorestan", Master Thesis in Art Research, Payame Noor University, Central Tehran (unpublished). - Horizon, Maryam (2009). "Study of tombstones in the Safavid period with emphasis on the capitals of this period", Master Thesis in Handicrafts, Al-Zahra University (unpublished). - Jackson, Abraham Valentine Williams (1991). Iran in the past and present, translated by Fereydoun Badrahai, Tehran: Kharazmi. - Kazemi, Noushin (2015). "Intertextual Study of Bakhtiari Tombstone Patterns" Master's Thesis in Art Research, Al-Zahra University (unpublished). - Khalatbari, Mohammad Reza (2005). Archaeological excavations in the ancient sites of Talesh, Tehran: Cultural Heritage. - Khazaei, Mohammad (2002). "The role of Imam Ali's lion", Book of the Month of Art, pp. 37-39. - Kleiss, W. (1986), Berich Uber zwei Erkundungsfahrten in Nordwest – Iran, Archaeologische Mitteilungen Aus Iran, 1-54. - Moghadam, Abbas (2020). Tal Chega Sofla Shrine, Tehran: Cultural Heritage and Tourism Research Institute. - Morier, J., (1818). A Second Journey Through Persia, Armenia, and Asia Minor, to Constantinople, Between the Year 1810 and 1816 (etc.). Longman. - Mortensen, I., (1996). Nomad Iconography on Tombstones from Luristan, Iran. Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis, 16, pp.219-228. - Mousavi Koohpar, Seyed Mehdi; Khanali, Hamid; Neyestani, Javad (2016). "Tombstones of the unity of different Islamic religions in Iran Typology of classification and study of arrays of cradle type tombstones", Quarterly Journal of Islamic History Research, Volume 5, Number 20, pp. 133-152. - Parvin, Samad (2017). "Archaeological study of Islamic tombstones in Meshkinshahr city, a case study of Onar cemetery", Master Thesis in Archeology, Mohaghegh Ardabili University (unpublished). - Pollack, Jacob Edwards (1983). Pollack Travelogue, translated by Kikaus Jahandari, Tehran: Kharazmi. - René German, Dalmani (2009). From Khorasan to Bakhtiari, Tehran: Peacock. - Rezalu, Reza; Airmloo, Yahya (2015). "Horse burial ritual among Scythian tribes: A case study of Khorramabad Meshginshahr cemetery", Historical Sociology, Volume 6, Number 3, pp. 144-113. - Richards, Frederick Charles (2001). Richards Travelogue, translated by Mahin Dokht Saba, Tehran: Cultural Science. - Saeedi Harsini, Mohammad Reza (1997). "Study of burial method in the Parthian period (247 BC to 224 AD)" Master Thesis in Archeology, Tarbiat Modares University (unpublished). - Saeedi Ramiani, Abdullah (2016). "Study and analysis of the tombstones of Khalid Nabi Cemetery", Proceedings of the Second Iranian Archaeological Conference, Birjand University. - Samadi, Mehrangiz (1996). The moon in Iran from the earliest days to the rise of Islam, Tehran: Cultural science. - Sharifinia, Akbar; Sarikhani, Majid; Dolatyari, Abbas; Ghaemi, Naeema (2017). "Recognition and study of themes and decorative motifs of the tombstone of Darhshahr city in Ilam province", Fine Arts - Visual Arts, Volume 21, Number 1, pp. 35-23. - Stronach, D., 1981. Standing Stones in the Atrek Region: The Ḥālat Nabī Cemetery. Iran, 19(1), pp.147-150. - Tanavoli, Parviz (1976). Fars Dairy Rugs, Tehran: University of Tehran. - Trompleman, Leo (1995). "Rite of Tombs and Burial", translated by Shalkam, Archeology and History, Volume 8, Number 15, pp. 37-29. - YILDIRIM, Y., (2016). KARAMAN MEZAR TAŞLARI TİPOLOJİSİ. Şehir Dergisi, Sayı: 18, PP. 97-129. - Zahed, Somayeh (2016). "Comparative study of carved designs on the tombstones of Sefid Chah Cemetery and Khalid Nabi Cemetery", Master Thesis in Painting, Al-Zahra University (unpublished). | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 856 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,389 |
||