آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 28 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 426 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,164 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 6,739,508 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 4,988,920 |
چالش‌های تعارض قوانین ناشی از جهانی شدن اوراق بهادار در نظام حقوقی ایران، انگلیس و اسناد بین المللی | ||
| پژوهشنامه حقوق تطبیقی | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 5، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 8، مهر 1400، صفحه 29-45 اصل مقاله (371.81 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/lps.2021.22603.1284 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| جابر اسماعیل زاده1؛ نجاد علی الماسی* 2؛ ربیعا اسکینی3؛ علی اکبر ایزدی فرد4 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری گروه حقوق خصوصی، واحد زنجان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، زنجان، ایران. | ||
| 2استاد گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 3استاد گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه مفید، قم، ایران. | ||
| 4استاد گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، دانشکده الهیات و معارف اسلامی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 18 آبان 1400، تاریخ بازنگری: 12 آذر 1400، تاریخ پذیرش: 28 آذر 1400 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در چند دهه جهانی شدن تمامی حوزه های زندگی بشر را تحت تاثیر قرارداده است.یکی از مورادی که جهانی شدن باعث ایجاد چالش هایی گردیده است، اوراق بهادار است. از سویی دیگر با توجه به تمایل کشورها به مداخله در امور اقتصادی علی الخصوص بورس اوراق بهادار،باعث گردیده است که ماهیت دوگانه عمومی- خصوصی پیدا نماید. همین امر در کنار جهانی شدن باعث ایجاد ابهاماتی در زمینه تعارض قوانین مرتبط با این اسناد گردیده است. پرسش اساسی ای که مطرح می گردد اینست که جهانی شدن و آزاد سازی اوراق بهادار چه تاثیری بر سیاست های تقنینی و قضایی کشور ها بر جای گذاشته است؟ آزاد سازی و بین المللی شدن بازار های اوراق بهادار، علاوه بر اینکه موجب پیچیدگی بیشتر در برخی از جنبه های این بازار ها شده است، این بازار ها را نیازمند طرح سیاست ها و استراتژی های تقنینی مناسب با این تغییرات کرده است. متاسفانه در حقوق ایران مقرره صریحی در زمینه تعارض قوانین در زمینه اوراق بهادار وجود ندارد و به نظر می رسد، قانونگذار جنبه ملی اوراق بهادار را در قانون بازار اوراق بهادار تقویت نموده است. در حقوق انگلیس، مقررات رم یک و کنوانسیون حقوق بین الملل خصوصی لاهه حتی بعد از خروج این کشور از اتحادیه اروپا جهت تعیین قانون حاکم بر اوراق بهادار اعمال می شود. در اسناد بین المللی نیز اصل حاکمیت اراده جهت تعیین قانون حاکم بر اوراق بهادار در صورتی که مناقاتی با نظم عمومی و قواعد آمره نداشته باشد مورد پذیرش قرار گرفته است. در این مقاله، ابتدا به بررسی و تعیین ماهیت حقوقی اوراق بهادار می پردازیم، سپس، رژیم های مختلف حقوقی ای که ممکن است در یک قرارداد بین المللی بر اوراق بهادار حاکم باشند را بررسی می کنیم و در فصول نهایی، با استفاده از اسناد بین المللی، رویه قضایی و تجارب سایر کشورها،راهکارهای تعیین قانون حاکم بر معاملات اوراق بهادار را روشن خواهیم ساخت. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| اوراق بهادار؛ تعارض قوانین؛ قاعده؛ حل تعارض؛ بورس | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Challenges of conflict of laws due to the globalization of securities in the legal system of Iran, United Kingdom and international documents | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Jaber Esmaeilzadeh1؛ nejad ali almasi2؛ rabia eskini3؛ ali akbar izadi fard4 | ||
| 1PhD Student, Department of Private Law, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran. | ||
| 2Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law, Mofid University, Qom, Iran. | ||
| 4Professor, Department of Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Over the decades, globalization has affected all areas of human life. One of the challenges that globalization has created is securities. On the other hand, due to the willingness of countries to intervene in economic affairs, especially the stock exchange, it has caused a dual nature of public-private. This, along with globalization, has created ambiguities in the conflict of laws related to these documents. The main question that arises is what effect has the globalization and liberalization of securities had on the legislative and judicial policies of countries? The liberalization and internationalization of securities markets, in addition to further complicating some aspects of these markets, has necessitated the development of appropriate legislative policies and strategies with these changes. Unfortunately, there is no explicit provision in Iranian law for conflict of laws in the field of securities, and it seems that the legislature has strengthened the national aspect of securities in the securities market law. After the country leaves the European Union, it is applied to determine the law governing securities. In international documents, the principle of the rule of will to determine the law governing securities is accepted if it does not conflict with public order and rules. In this article, we first examine and determine the legal nature of securities, then, we examine the various legal regimes that may prevail in an international securities agreement, and in the final chapters, using the documents. International, jurisprudence and experiences of other countries, we will clarify the strategies for determining the law governing securities transactions. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Securities, conflict of laws, conflict resolution rule, stock exchange, public law, private | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Almasi, Nejad Ali.(2007). Private International Law. Fifth Edition .Tehran. Mizan Publishing. (In Persian) Bagheri. Mahmood. & Nakajima . Chizu.( 2002). The private international law of securities transactions: a socio- economic analysis . The company lawyer. 23(1) . (In Persian) Bagheri . Mahmoud . (2006). The Impact of Economic Law and Utilitarianism on Private Law on Private International Law . Mofid Legal Letter. No. 58.41-60 . (In Persian) Bagheri .Mahmoud & Ghanbari. Hamid.(2010). Legal Problems Due to the Internationalization of Capital Markets and the Status of National Laws. Public Law Research. No. 29. 25-64. (In Persian) Bagheri. Mahmoud & Shushi Nasab. Nafiseh.(2013). Direct and Indirect Ownership of Securities. Comparative Law Studies. 4( 2). 81-96. (In Persian) Bagheri. Mahmoud & Talebzadeh Torqabeh. Fahimeh.(2016). Ability to Apply Conflict Resolution Rules on International Securities Claims (Analysis of Exchange and Distribution Justice). Comparative Law Research. 2(4). 1-23. (In Persian) Borland’s Trustee v. Steel Brothers & Co., Limited [1901] 1 Ch 279 (ChD), at 288. Brand. Roland A .(2011). The Rome I Regulation Rules on Party Autonomy for Choice of Law: A U.S. Perspective. University of Pittsburgh School of Law3900 Forbes Avenue. Pennsylvania 15260-6900. Legal Studies Research PaperSeries Working Paper No. 2011-29. Clayton Act Article 7. Davis . Martin .(2004). shares and other securities in the conflict of laws by Maisie Ooi ( Oxford ,UK: Oxford University Press, 2003) . Melburne Journal of International Law. Edalatjou .Azam & Hassanzadeh Benam. Yaser.(2017). The Impact of Theoretical Foundations on Government Intervention in Economic Fields. National Conference on Creative Economics. Islamic Azad University. West Tehran Branch . Eskini. Rabia.(2009). Commercial Law. Commercial Companies. Tehran. Samt. (In Persian) Fadavi. Soleiman.( 2006). Conflict of Laws in Iranian Law with Emphasis on Personal Status.Tehran. New Thought Project. (In Persian) Haentjens. Matthias. (2005). The Law Applicable to Indirectly Held Securities: the Plumbing of International Securities Transactions . Hazelhoff Research Paper Series.No.1. 1-100. Hague Conference on Private International Law. Hartely. Trevor . (2011). Choice of Law Regarding the Voluntary Assignment of Contractual Obligations Under The Rome I Regulation., Cambridge 9-Micheler Eva.(2009). Legal Nature of Secucurities Inspirations from Comparative Law . 1-26. : 10.2139/ssrn.1481427 Issaei Tafreshi. Mohammad. (2007). Analytical Discussions of Corporate Law. Volume 2. First Edition, Tehran. Tarbiat Modares University Scientific Works Publishing Office. (In Persian) Issaei Tafreshi. Mohammad.(1999). Analytical Discussions of Corporate Law. Volume I. Tehran.Tarbiat Modares University. (In Persian) Izanloo. Mohsen & Jabarizadeh. Roozbeh.(2019). Mutual Behavior as a Condition for the Execution of Foreign Judgments: A Study in Private International Law of Iran and the United States. Quarterly Journal of Legal Research. 22 ( 88). 108-85. (In Persian) Layton . Alexander.(2020). On Brexit and private international law _ what now_ on 11 December 2020, EAPIL hosted its first (Virtual) seminar. http://eapil.org/eapil-activities/eapil-virtual-seminar-series. Micheler. Eva.(2002) . The Legal Nature of Securities, Inspirations from Comparative Law. Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1481427. Mohammadi. Gholam Hassan.(2014). A Comparative Study of Liberalism and Neoliberalism. Marxism and Neo-Marxism in the World Economy. Strategy Quarterly. 23(72). (In Persian) Ooi. Maisie.(2003). Shares and other securities in the conflict of laws .Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2003. Paech. Philip(2014).Intermediated Securities and conflict of laws. London school of Economics Law Department – Conference on investing in securities . Harris Manchester College. University of Oxford. Qelich.Wahab.(2010). Criteria of Distributive Justice (Comparative Comparison of the Views of John Rawls and Shahid Motahhari). Two Scientific Quarterly of Islamic Economic Studies.3(1). (In Persian) Rasekhi. Saeed et al.(2016).The Relationship between Economic Efficiency and Environmental Efficiency: New Evidence for Developing and Developed Countries. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research and Policy. 24(78) .31-56. (In Persian) Rodriguez. Ana M. Lopez.( 2003). The Revision of the Rome Convention of 1980 on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations-A Crucial Role within the European Contract Law Project?. Nordic Journal of International Law. 72 . 341-367. Rogers, S. James. (2006). Conflict of Laws for Transactions in Securities Held Through Intermediaries, Cornell International Law Journal .39. Boston College Law School. 285-327. Saljuqi. Mahmoud.(2008). Private International Law. Volume 2. Fifth Edition. Tehran. Mizan. (In Persian) Schemmer v. Property limited (1975) ch 273. Seghri. Mohammad.(2011). Commercial Law of Companies. First Edition. Publishing Company, Tehran, 2011. (In Persian) Sheykh al-Islami. Mohsen.(2005). Private International Law. Tehran.Ganj-e-Danesh Library. First Edition. (In Persian) Shushi Nasab. Nafiseh.( 2013). Legal and Economic Analysis of Securities Based on Their Application in Islamic Financial System. Ph.D. Thesis. Private Law. Faculty of Law and Political Science. University of Tehran. (In Persian) Soltani. Mohammad & Akhavan Hazaveh. Hamedeh.(2012).The Nature and Legal Rules of Stock Certification. Quarterly Journal of the Stock Exchange. No. 17. 141-161. (In Persian) Tafreshi. Mohammad Issa & Sokooti Nasimi. Reza.(2004). Sale of shares of joint stock companies. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. Shiraz University. 21. 35-58. (In Persian) Taylor.Martyn.(2006).International Competition Law : A new dimension for the WTO? NewYork .Cambridge university press. Cambtidge.1-520. Ungerer.Johannes.(2019).Consequences of Brexit for European Private International Law.European Papers www.europeanpapers.eu ISSN 2499-8249. 4(1) .395-407. Vygovskyy. Oleksandr.(2019) . Conflict of laws issues related to securities transactions . Media. Culture, and Public relations . Zagreb.Vol.10, Iss.1. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 584 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 383 |
||