پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 479 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,665 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,303,728 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,466,103 |
Evaluation of Genetic Diversity of Twenty-eight Sweet Cherry Genotypes by Morphological Traits and SCoT Markers in the Northwest of Iran | ||
| Journal of Genetic Resources | ||
| دوره 8، شماره 2، 2022، صفحه 138-146 اصل مقاله (563.43 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/jgr.2022.22815.1293 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Yousef Atapour1؛ Alireza Ghanbari2؛ Asghar Estaji* 2؛ Rohallah Haghjooyan3 | ||
| 1Department of Horticultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran. | ||
| 2Department of Horticultural sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran. | ||
| 3Horticultural Sciences Research Institute, Karaj, Iran | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 19 مرداد 1400، تاریخ بازنگری: 10 اسفند 1400، تاریخ پذیرش: 27 آبان 1400 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) is mainly grown in temperate climate countries. Because of the economic importance of sweet cherry and its high genetic diversity in Arasbaran (a region in northwestern Iran), the selection of superior genotypes as resistant rootstocks has great importance for breeding programs. In this study, the genetic diversity of 28 genotypes of sweet cherry was by 11 qualitative and nine quantitative traits and SCoT markers, in the Ahar Afil area (a region of Arasbaran). In the first experiment, quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the fruits, leaves, trees as well as flowers were evaluated. Results of simple correlation coefficients showed a positive and significant correlation among some of the measured morphological traits. Cluster analyses of the morphological traits classified the genotypes into two main groups. In the second experiment, SCoT markers, by application of 12 primers, were used for genetic diversity analysis of the sweet cherry genotypes. The results, 89.9% of polymorphism was detected by 12 primers and the number of polymorphic bands per primer was between 2 to 9 bands, with an average of 5.3. The number of observed (Na) and effective (Ne) alleles, Marker index (MI), resolving power (RP), and an index for primer was an average of 11, 8.27, 3.78, and 5.07, respectively. A high variation was observed in the grouping of genotypes through cluster analysis. Cluster analysis based on Dice similarity coefficient matrix and structure analysis classified the populations into eight main groups. Our results showed a high level of genetic diversity in 28 sweet cherry genotypes. This study will be helpful for the conservation and management of sweet cherry genetic resources for further breeding programs. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Cluster analysis؛ Molecular Markers؛ Morphology؛ Prunus avium؛ Structure analysis | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abedian M, Talebi M, Golmohammdi HR, Sayed-Tabatabaei BE, 2012. Genetic diversity and population structure of mahaleb cherry (Prunus mahaleb L.) and sweet cherry (Prunu savium L.) using SRAP markers. Biochem Syst Ecol 40: 112-117. Colagar AH, Yusefi M, Zarei M. Yosefzadeh H. 2013. Assessment of genetic diversity of Tilia rubra DC. by RAPD analysis in the hyrcanaian forests, North of Iran. Pol J Ecol 62(2): 341-348. Collard BC, Mackill DJ. 2009. Start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphism: a simple, novel DNA marker technique for generating gene-targeted markers in plants. Plant Mol Biol Rep 27(1): 86-93. Di Vaio C, Villano C, Marallo N. 2015. Molecular analysis of native cultivars of sweet cherry in southern Italy. Hortic Sci 42(3): 114-118. Doyle JJ. Doyle JL. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19: 11-15. Drake SR, Elfving DC. 2017. Indicators of maturity and storage quality of Lapins’ sweet cherry. Hort Technol 12(4): 687-690. El Baji M, Hanine H, En-Nahli S, Socias I Company R, Kodad O. 2021. Morphological and pomological characteristics of sweet cherry (Prunus Avium L.) grown in-situ under South Mediterranean climate in Morocco. Int J Fruit Sci 12(1): 52-65. Etminan A, Pour-Aboughadareh A, Mohammadi R, Ahmadi-Rad A, Noori A, Mahdavian Z, Moradi Z. 2016. Applicability of start codon targeted (SCoT) and inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers for genetic diversity analysis in durum wheat genotypes. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 30(6): 1075-1081. FAO. 2020. The statistical division (FAOSTAT) of the food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Feng S, Zhu Y, Yu C, Jiao K, Jiang M, Lu J, Wang H. 2018. Development of species-specific SCAR markers, based on a SCoT analysis, to Authenticate Physalis (Solanaceae) species. Front Genet 9: 192. Ganji Moghaddam E, Ahmadi Moghaddam H, Piri S. 2013. Genetic variation of selected Siah Mashhad sweet cherry genotypes grown under Mashhad environmental conditions in Iran. Crop Breed J 3(1): 45-51. Ghanbari A, Estaji A. 2018. ISSR analysis for determination of genetic diversity in 29 olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars. Iran j genet plant breed 7(1): 31-40. Goncalves B, Moutinho-Pereira J, Santos A, Silva AP, Bacelar E, Correia C, Rosa E. 2006. Scion rootstock interaction affects the physiology and fruit quality of sweet cherry. Tree Physiol 26(1): 93-104. Guo DL, Zhang JY, Liu CH. 2012. Genetic diversity in some grape varieties revealed by SCoT analyses. Mol Biol Rep 39(5): 5307-5313. Jamali M, Ghanbari A, Estaji A, Torabi Giglou M, Saidi M. 2020. Genetic diversity of dog rose (Rosa canina L.) using ISSR markers. Iran J Genet Plant Breed 8(2): 1-8. Kazantzis KA, Chatzicharisis JA. 2011. Monograph on cherry tree cultivation. NAGREF, Institute of Deciduous Trees, Naoussa, Greece. Lisek A, Korbin M, Rozpara E. 2006. Using simply generated RAPD markers to distinguish between sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars. J Fruit Ornam Plant Res 14(1): 25-32. Mahjbi A, Baraket GH, Oueslati A, Salhi-hannachi A. 2015. Start codon targeted (SCoT) markers provide new insights into the genetic diversity analysis and characterization of Tunisian Citrus species. Biochem Syst Ecol 61: 390-398. Malekzadeh K, Mahmoodnia M, Farzad Amirebrahimi F. 2018. Analysis of genetic diversity among male and female pistachio genotypes using start codon targeted (SCoT) markers. J Plant Mol Breed 6(2): 10-18. Mozafari J, Jamali H, kavand AR, Sadeghian SY, Bouzari N. 2011. DNA fingerprinting of commercial cherry cultivars in Iran. Ministry of Jihad-Agriculture, Agricultural Research and Education Organization, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute. Final report of project, p 110. Naderiboldaji M, KhadiviKhub A, Tabatabaeefar A, Ghasemi Varnamkhasti M, Zamani Z. 2008. Some physical properties of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) fruit. Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 3(4): 513-520. Perez-sanchez R, Gomez-sanchez MA, Morales-corts MR. 2010. Description and quality evaluation of sweet cherries cultured in Spain. J Food Qual 33: 490-506. Perrier X, Flori A, Bonnot F. 2003. Methods for data analysis. in Genetic diversity of cultivated tropical plants (eds: Hamon P, Seguin M, Perrier X, Glazmann JC), Enfield, Montpellier, Science Publishers Inc and Cirad. Rakonjac V, Mratinic E, Jovkovic R, Fotiric Aksic M. 2014. Analysis of morphological variability in wild cherry (Prunus avium L.) genetic resources from c entral Serbia. J Agr Sci Tech 16: 151-162 Rodrigues LC, Morales MR, Fernandes AJB, Ortiz JM. 2008. Morphological characterization of sweet and sour cherry cultivars in a germplasm bank at Portugal. Genet. Resour Crop Evol 55(4): 593-601. Romero G, Adeva C, Battad Z. 2009. Genetic fingerprinting: advancing the frontiers of crop biology research. Philipp Sci Lett 2: 8-13. Stanys V, Frercks B, Siksnianiene B, Stepulatiene I, Gelvonauskiene D, Staniene G, Bobinas C. 2012. Identification of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars using AFLP and SSR markers. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 99(4): 437-444. Struss D, Ahmad R, Southwick SM. 2003. Analysis of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars using SSR and AFLP markers. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 128(6): 904-909. Struss D, Boritzki M, Glozer K, Southwick SM. 2001. Detection of genetic diversity among populations of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) by AFLPs. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 76(3): 362-367. Xanthopoulou A, Ganopoulos I, Kalivas A, Nianiou-Obeidat I, Ralli P, Moysiadis T, Madesis P. 2015. Comparative analysis of genetic diversity in Greek genebank collection of summer squash (Cucurbita pepo) landraces using start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphism and ISSR markers. Aust J Crop Sci 9(1): 14-21. Yeh FC, Boyle R, Yang RC, Ye Z, Mao JX, Yeh D. 1999. POPGENE version 1.32. Computer program and documentation distributed by the author. Available in: http://www.ualberta.ca/∼fyeh/popgene.html Zhang J, Xie W, Wang Y, Zhao X. 2015. Potential of start codon targeted (SCoT) markers to estimate genetic diversity and relationships among Chinese Elymus sibiricus accessions. Molecules 20(4): 5987-6001. Zhi-Hui G, Kai-Xin F, Xin-Quan Z. 2014. Molecular insights into the genetic diversity of Hemarthria compressa germplasm collections native to south-west China. Molecules 19(12): 21541-21559. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 430 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 537 |
||