آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 28 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 426 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,164 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 6,739,515 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 4,988,932 |
مطالعه تطبیقی صلاحیت هیأت‌مدیره بورس در رسیدگی به اختلافات بازار سرمایه در حقوق ایران، آمریکا و انگلستان | ||
| پژوهشنامه حقوق تطبیقی | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 7، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 12، مهر 1402، صفحه 47-65 اصل مقاله (985.39 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/lps.2022.24414.1410 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| نیما علیجان نژاد1؛ حمید ابهری* 2؛ سام محمدی3 | ||
| 1دکتری حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران | ||
| 2استاد گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران | ||
| 3استاد گروه حقوق خصوصی دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| تبصره1 ماده 43 قانون بازار اوراق بهادار، هیأت‌مدیره بورس را در کنار هیأت داوری، صالح به رسیدگی دعاوی خسارت در فرایند عرضه اولیه اوراق بهادار دانسته است؛ هیأت مدیره بورس، علاوه بر شأن و وظایف هیأت مدیره شرکت های سهامی عام، صلاحیت و تکالیف دیگری نیز از باب ناشر بودن و تشکل خودانتظام دارد. مقرره فوق الذکر از حیث نوع، قلمرو و حدود صلاحیت رسیدگی در هیأت مدیره بورس نیاز به بررسی دقیق داشته و با بررسی آن، کشف می شود درخصوص آیین و تشکیلات رسیدگی و همچنین صدور رأی و اجرای آن مبهم است. علاوه بر این، هیأت مدیره بورس فاقد هرگونه شأن حقوقی قضایی بوده و رسیدگی به دعوی در آن با ایراد اساسی مواجه و به علت صلاحیت دو مرجع با تشکیلات متفاوت، امکان تعارض آرای صادره در امری واحد بسیار بالاست؛ حال آنکه در حقوق کشورهای دیگر ازجمله آمریکا و انگلیس گرچه نهادهای دیگر به غیر از دادگاه نسبت به رسیدگی امور تخلفاتی، ایجاد سازش و داوری میان زیان دیده و عامل زیان در فرایند عرضه اولیه صالح هستند؛ لکن رسیدگی قضایی به موضوع برعهده دستگاه قضایی آنهاست. بررسی دقیق مقررات راجع به موضوع بحث و تطبیق آن با سایر کشورها ضرورت تفسیر مضیق، اصلاح و تکمیل آن را در شرایط فعلی که بازار سرمایه نیازمند حمایت است روشن می سازد؛ لذا این مقاله بر آنست تا با بررسی دقیق منابع و نوشتارهای موجود داخلی و خارجی، ضمن بررسی ابعاد مختلف صلاحیت هیأت مدیره بورس، بر ضرورت اصلاح مقررات مربوط تأکید نماید؛ خصوصاً اینکه در حال حاضر مقدمات اصلاح قانون نیز آغاز شده است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| صلاحیت؛ هیأت مدیره بورس؛ دعوای مسئولیت‌مدنی؛ داوری؛ سازش | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Comparative Study of the Jurisdiction of the Stock Exchange’s Board of Directors in Dealing with Capital Market Disputes in the Laws of Iran, America, and England | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Nima Alijannejad1؛ Hamid Abhari2؛ Sam Mohammadi3 | ||
| 1Ph.D. in Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran , Babolsar, Iran | ||
| 2Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran. | ||
| 3Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Note 1, Article 43 of the Securities Market Law, the board of directors of the stock exchange, along with the arbitration board, is competent to deal with damage claims in the process of the initial offering of securities; The board of directors of the stock exchange, in addition to the dignity and duties of the board of directors of public joint-stock companies, has other competences and duties regarding being a publisher and self-regulating organization. The above-mentioned regulation needs to be carefully examined in terms of the type, scope and limits of jurisdiction of the board of directors of the stock exchangeAnd by examining it, it is discovered that it is unclear about the procedure and organization of the hearing, as well as the issuance of the opinion and its implementation. In addition, the board of directors lacks any legal-judicial dignity, and the handling of lawsuits in it is faced with a fundamental problem, and due to the jurisdiction of two authorities with different organizations, the possibility of conflicting opinions issued in a single matter is very high. However, in the laws of other countries, including the United States and the United Kingdom, although other institutions other than the court are responsible for dealing with violations, creating compromises, arbitration between the injured party and the causer of the damage, and similar cases in the process of the initial offer, the judicial investigation of the issue is the responsibility of the judicial system. A detailed examination of the regulations on the topic of discussion and its adaptation to other countries makes clear the necessity of its narrow interpretation, modification and completion in the current situation where the capital market needs support; Therefore, this article aims to emphasize the necessity of amending the relevant regulations by carefully examining the existing internal and external sources and writings, while examining the various aspects of the board of directors' competence; Especially since the preparations for amending the law have already started. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Jurisdiction, Board of Directors of the Stock Exchange, Civil Liability Litigation, Arbitration, Conciliation | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
-Ansari, A. and Isaie T. M.and Hosseini S. M., (2013) Analysis of the legal structure of self-regulatory institutions in the Iranian capital market with a comparative study in the American legal system, Financial Research, 15( 2), 149-160. [In Persian] -Asghari, A. F. and Isaie T. M., (2015). The legal nature of the relationship between managers of joint-stock companies and the company, Journal of the Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Isfahan University, (18)2, 35-52. [In Persian] -Badini, H. and Siah-Bidi-Kermanshahi S., (2021). Analysis of the Concept and Examples of Conflict of Interests in Private Law, Legal Journal of Justice, 85( 116), 209-231. [In Persian] -Bagheri, M. and Ehzari, A. (2018). The nature of the over-the-counter market and its distinction from the stock exchange in the Iranian and American legal systems. Perspectives on Judicial Law, 24(86), 65-85. [In Persian] - Black, Bernard and Cheffins, Brian. and Klausner, Michael. (2003) Outside Director Liability, Stanford Journal of Law, Business and Finance, University of Texas School of Law, 9(26). -Blair, M., and Walker G.,(2006). Financial Services Law, London: Oxford University Press. -Bush, T., Fearnley, S., & Sunder, S. (2007). Auditor Liability Reforms in the UK and the US: A Comparative Review. New Haven: Yale School of Management, 1-11, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1011235. -Carson, J. (2011). Self-regulation in securities markets. Policy Research working Paper, 5542, 1-73. -Derek, French, Blackstone’s Statutes on Company Law, Oxford University Press, 11th ed, 2007-2008. - Douglas, William, Bates, George, (1993) The Federal Securities Act of 1933. Yale Law Journal. The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc. 43 (2). -Ebrahimi, M. (2011). Civil liability arising from violation of information disclosure regulations in stock transactions. Stock Exchange Quarterly, 4(15),161-189. [In Persian] - E’esaii Tafreshi, M. and Shahbazi’nia M. and Norani Moghadam S. Y., (2010). Issuer's civil liability in the initial public offering of shares of a public joint stock company, Journal of Comparative Law Research, 14 (4), 93-114. -Field, Marilyn J., Lo. B,. (2009). Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice, National Academies Press, . 118(2). -Fleuriet, M. (2008). Investment Banking Explained, New York – USA: McGraw Hill Professional -Fridman, G.H.L,(1990) "The Law of Agency" 6 Th Ed, London, Butterworths. -Ghamami, M, and Mohseni H., (2018) principles of transnational civil procedure, Tehran:Mizan. [In Persian] -Hajiha, Z. and Ebrahimi, M. (2015). Improvement in the auditor's opinion and its effects on changes in the price and volume of stock transactions. Financial Accounting and Audit Research Quarterly, 8(30), 61-82. [In Persian] -Hirst, S,. and Kastiel, K. (2019). Corporate Governance by Index Exclusion. Boston University Law Review, 19. -Lan, R. Macneil,. (1992) America Arbitration Law, New York Oxford University Press. - Mirzaei Monfared, Gh. A., (2011), Laws of Securities Market, Tehran: Mizan. [In Persian] -Mobin, H,. (1385). The arbitration board of the stock exchange. Govah, 8 & 9, 45-50 [In Persian] -Mehrabipour, L., (2010). A look at the activity of the jury (interview with Gholam-Ali Mirzaei-Monfard). Bors Magazine, No. 84. [In Persian] -Pasban, M. and Nik-Nejad, J., (2019) the legal position of managers in joint-stock companies, International Law Research, 4(14), 9-40. [In Persian] -Qajar, M. and etc,. (2014). Money and capital market, Tehran:Houshman Tadbir. [In Persian] -Reynolds, F.M.B,(1996). Bowstead and Reynolds Agency , 6ed, London: Sweet & Maxwell. -Soltani, Mohammad and etc.,(2014) Capital Market Law Requirements. Tehra:Bourse. [In Persian] -Soltani, Mohammad,(2017) Capital market Law. Tehran:Samt,. [In Persian] -Swadkohi, S,. (2008). Securities Market Commission. Tehran:Adak. [In Persian] -Volz, Dustin. Yahoo hack may become test case for SEC data breach disclosure rules". Reuters. Retrieved 13 December 2021. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 423 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 338 |
||