دانشگاه مازندران

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات28
تعداد شماره‌ها426
تعداد مقالات4,163
تعداد مشاهده مقاله6,738,889
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله4,988,429
شریفیان, اسماعیل, ملکی پور حرجندی, احسان. (1401). چالش های پیش روی برنامه ها و راهکارهای عملیاتی سند تحول بنیادین آموزش و پرورش در بخش تربیت بدنی و ورزش مدارس. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 18(35), 80-61. doi: 10.22080/jsmb.2019.12007.2593
اسماعیل شریفیان; احسان ملکی پور حرجندی. "چالش های پیش روی برنامه ها و راهکارهای عملیاتی سند تحول بنیادین آموزش و پرورش در بخش تربیت بدنی و ورزش مدارس". پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 18, 35, 1401, 80-61. doi: 10.22080/jsmb.2019.12007.2593
شریفیان, اسماعیل, ملکی پور حرجندی, احسان. (1401). 'چالش های پیش روی برنامه ها و راهکارهای عملیاتی سند تحول بنیادین آموزش و پرورش در بخش تربیت بدنی و ورزش مدارس', پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 18(35), pp. 80-61. doi: 10.22080/jsmb.2019.12007.2593
شریفیان, اسماعیل, ملکی پور حرجندی, احسان. چالش های پیش روی برنامه ها و راهکارهای عملیاتی سند تحول بنیادین آموزش و پرورش در بخش تربیت بدنی و ورزش مدارس. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 1401; 18(35): 80-61. doi: 10.22080/jsmb.2019.12007.2593

چالش های پیش روی برنامه ها و راهکارهای عملیاتی سند تحول بنیادین آموزش و پرورش در بخش تربیت بدنی و ورزش مدارس

پژوهشنامه مدیریت ورزشی و رفتار حرکتی
مقاله 4، دوره 18، شماره 35، شهریور 1401، صفحه 80-61    اصل مقاله (375.74 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/jsmb.2019.12007.2593
نویسندگان
اسماعیل شریفیان* 1؛ احسان ملکی پور حرجندی2
1دانشگاه شهید باهنر کرمان
2دبیراموزش وپرورش
تاریخ دریافت: 25 اسفند 1395،  تاریخ بازنگری: 19 اسفند 1396،  تاریخ پذیرش: 12 دی 1397 
چکیده
مقدمه و هدف: در مسیر اجرای برنامه های عملیاتی هر سند راهبردی موانعی وجود دارد. هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی چالش های پیش روی برنامه ها و راهکارهای عملیاتی سند تحول بنیادین آموزش و پرورش در بخش تربیت بدنی و ورزش مدارس بود.
روش شناسی : روش تحقیق از نوع پیمایشی و جامعه آماری شامل 1400نفر از کارکنان حوزه تربیت بدنی آموزش وپرورش استان کرمان بودند. از جامعه یاد شده 302 نفر با روش نمونه گیری خوشه ای چند مرحله ای و براساس جدول مورگان انتخاب شدند. ابزار تجقیق برگرفته از پرسشنامه رعیت (1392)بود که روایی آن مورد بررسی وتایید قرار گرفت همچنین پایایی آن با روش آلفای کرونباخ87/0محاسبه گردید. برای تجزیه وتحلیل داده ها از آزمون های آماری تی تک نمونه ای،آنالیز واریانس مکرر و آزمون تعقیبی بونفرونی با نرم افزار «اس.پی.اس.اس» استفاده شد.
یافته ها : یافته های تحقیق نشان داد که از بین 5 عامل تخصص معلمان، انگیزه معلمان، تجهیزات وامکانات ورزشی، منابع مالی و برنامه های اجرایی، منابع مالی مهم ترین چالش های پیش روی برنامه ها و راهکارهای عملیاتی شناسایی شده بودند.
بحث ونتیجه گیری :با توجه به یافته های پژوهش، سند تحول بنیادین در مسیر اجرای برنامه ها و راهکارهای عملیاتی نبازمند پیش بینی های لازم جهت تعدیل یا مرتفع ساختن این چالش ها دارد .
کلیدواژه‌ها
تربیت بدنی؛ ورزش؛ مدارس؛ برنامه های عملیاتی؛ معلمان
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Challenges Facing the Programs and Operational Guidelines of Fundamental Reform Document of Education in Schools’ Physical Education and Sport
نویسندگان [English]
Esmaeil sha1؛ ehsan malekipour horjandi2
1Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman
2education
چکیده [English]
 
Background & Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the challenges facing the programs and operational guidelines of fundamental reform document of Education in schools’ physical education and  sport.
Methodology: This research was a survey study and its statistical population included 1,400 teachers, administrative experts, and other professionals in the field of physical education of Kerman province in the academic year of 2014-2015. The sampling method was multistage cluster with a proportional distribution. The sample size was considered based on the Kerjsy-Morgan table, with 302 subjects of men and women as samples. To collect the data, a questionnaire with two sections of demographic and main questions, consisting of 35 items based on 5 factors was used. This questionnaire was based on Raeit’s (1392) questionnaire, whose structures were retained in the present study. The face and content validities of the used questionnaire was estimated and confirmed by experts of sport management and education (n = 10). Its reliability was also calculated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient (0.87). For analyzing the collected data,  One Sample T-test, ANOVA, and Bonferroni test were used by spss20 software.
Results: The results showed that of the five factors of teachers' specialization, teachers’ motivation, equipment and sports facilities, financial resources, and executive programs, the financial resources factor was identified as the most important challenge facing the plans and operational guidelines of fundamental reform document of Education in schools’ physical education and sport.
Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, the fundamental reform document in the implementation of programs and operational guidelines requires the necessary modifications to adjust the five factors of the teachers’ specialization, teachers' motivation, equipment and facilities, financial resources, and executive programs.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Physical Education, Sport, Schools, Operational programs, Teachers
مراجع

Razavi.M.H & Rohani.Z &  Ghanbari.A.(2014).” Analysis of factors affecting the promotion of physical education in schools”. Journal of Sport Management and motor behavior,10,19, pp: 69-80 (Persian)

  1. Skovdal ,M &Campbell,C. (2015). “Beyond education: What role can schools play in the support and protection of children in extreme settings?” International Journal of Educational Development, 41, pp: 175-183

3.Almeida Sales,A. (2015). “Prospects for the Future of Education.Training Teachers to Think Beyond”.Social and Behavioral Sciences,174, pp: 739–744.

4. AhmadiHedayat.A. (2013).”Review Document of Fundamental Ttransformation of Education Based on Votes of Education Jean Piaget”.(Unpublished master's thesis).Payam Noor University , Hamedan.(Persian).

5 Mozaffari,A & MoeinFard,M & Poursoltani,H & MoshrafJavadi,B & Esmaeili,M. (2009). “Describe the implementation status of physical education and sport in the country in terms of first-grade teachers and administrators”. Journal Movement,7,2,14,pp: 119-139. (Persian)

  1. Drake,K & Longacre,M & MacKenzie,T & Titus,L&Beach,M & Rundle,A & Dalton,M. (2014).” High school sports programs differentially impact participation by sex”.Journal of Sport and Health Science,31,pp: 125-132.

7.Aurnhammer,W & Kanowith,I & Fleischman,S & Garafola,G & Laffin,M & Richards,J. (2013).” Aims and Objectives of Physical Education Activities”.Research Quarterly. American Physical Education Association,8,1,pp: 103-122.

  1. Powell.E & Woodfield.L & Nevill.A . (2015). “Increasing physical activity levels in primary school physical education: The SHARP Principles Model” .Preventive Medicine Reports 3,pp: 7–13.

9.Chen.H & Dai.J & Gao.Y. (2017). “ Measurement invariance and latent mean differences of the Chinese version physical activity self-efficacy scale across gender and education levels “.”.Journal of Sport and Health Science X X (2017) PP:1-9.

  1. The Perspective of the Islamic Republic of Iran on the horizon of 1404, (2004), (Persian)
  2. Hajibabayi,H. (2012). “A Study on the characteristics of “THE SCHOOL WHICH I LIKE” according to the document on fundamental development in education”.  Journal of educational innovation, 11,42, PP: 4-5. (Persian)
  3. Ryat,J. (2013).”Document the fundamental transformation of education and the challenges facing it, from the perspective of elementary school principals Qazvin Province”. (Unpublished master's thesis). Islamic Azad University,Takestan. (Persian)
  4. Hoseini,G & Hamidi,M & Tojari,F. (2014). “Operational plans of students’ sport for Islamic Azad University branches”. Applied Research of Sport Managemen, 2 ,4, PP: 37-54. (Persian)
  5. NavidAdham,M. (2012).” Management requirements for a Fundamental Development In Education”.Journal culture strategy,17,18, PP: 295-323. (Persian)
  6. RamzaniNejad,R & HematiNejad,M & Zabihi,E. (2007). “Compare management problems in school physical education classes deprived of the opportunity to sport”. Journal of The Faculty of Physical Education & Sport Sciences (HARAKAT),44, PP: 127-140. (Persian)
  7. Zandi,B & Farahani,A. (2007). “A Comparative Study of Physical Education Curriculum In Iran,Usa and Canada”. Journal Movement,12,PP: 97-110. (Persian)
  8. Goudarzi,A. (2013).”Document On Fundamental Development In Educaion, Philosophy And Physical Education Position”. Journal of development and education in physical education,13,4,PP: 32-34. (Persian)
  9. PeyravaniNia,P. & PeyravaniNia,P. (2013).” Evaluating Contents of Document of Fundamental Reforms in Education, Focusing on Organizational Learning”.Journal E-Learning University(MEDIA),4,3,PP: 2-3. (Persian)
  10. Rahbari,M & Belbasi,M & Ghorbi,M. (2015). “National IdentityDocument of Fundamental Development Education In The Islamic Republic of Iran”. Journal National studies,16,1,PP: 45-66. (Persian)
  11. Maleki,E & Sharifian,E. (2015,February). “The role of physical education schools in realize the value proposition document on fundamental development in Education of Iran”.Paper presented at 8the International Congress on Physical Education and Sport Sciences (Iran), ShahidBehshti University (pp.1-2). Tehran ,Ministry of Sciences, Research and Technology Sport Sciences Research Institute.
  12. Document on the fundamental transformation of education, (2012), (Persian).
  13. Ashtiani,H. (2005). “Describe and prioritize the factors of physical education teachers motivation Nishapur according to Herzberg's theory”. (Unpublished master's thesis).ShahidBeheshtiUniversity ,College of Physical Education. (Persian)
  14. Maliki Gandomani,Gh. (2002).” Management problems of physical education classes from the perspective of teachers”.(Unpublished master's thesis).Tehran University, College of Physical Education. (Persian)
  15. FallahzadehAbargouei,M. (2002). “Job motivations educators government boys schools in Yazd province”. (Unpublished master's thesis).Teacher Training University of Tehran, College of Education. (Persian)
  16. CAN,S. (2015). “ Factors motivating teachers working at elementary and secondary schools". Social and Behavioral Sciences,174,pp: 3087 – 3093.
  17. DaghighehRezaei,S. (1992).”Check the status of physical education in schools for boys Khorasan Province”. (Unpublished master's thesis).Teacher Training University of Tehran, College of Physical Education. (Persian)
  18. Ron,H. (2009).” Physical education programs in schools to spread the culture of sport in society”. Journal of development and education in physical education,32, pp: 19-23. (Persian)
  19. Monazzami,M & Allam,Sh & ShetabBushehri,N.(2011).” Factors affecting the development of physical education and sport for women Islamic Republic of Iran”. Journal of Sport Management,10,pp: 151-168. (Persian)
  20. SheikhZadeh,M. (2005).” Review the financial provisions from the perspective of parents and experts in education”. Journal Educational Research,2,4,pp: 3-4. (Persian)
  21. Razavi,M & ShabaniBahar,Gh & Sajadi,A. (2011). “Analysis of factors affecting the quality of physical education teachers in middle schools from the perspective of sports”.Journal of Sport Management and motor behavior,7,14,pp: 103-112. (Persian)
  22. Dehghani,M. (2000).” Middle school physical education from the perspective of school principals, physical education teachers and students of the city Mybod”.(Unpublished master's thesis).Esfahan University, College of Physical Education. (Persian)
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 460
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 533


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب