دانشگاه مازندران

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات28
تعداد شماره‌ها426
تعداد مقالات4,162
تعداد مشاهده مقاله6,738,769
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله4,988,330
بشارتی مقدم, مریم, ملائی, مینا, رمضانی نژاد, رحیم. (1402). تأثیر خرده نظام‌های محیطی بر ساختار وزارت ورزش و جوانان جمهوری اسلامی ایران. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 19(38), 28-1. doi: 10.22080/jsmb.2024.19551.3411
مریم بشارتی مقدم; مینا ملائی; رحیم رمضانی نژاد. "تأثیر خرده نظام‌های محیطی بر ساختار وزارت ورزش و جوانان جمهوری اسلامی ایران". پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 19, 38, 1402, 28-1. doi: 10.22080/jsmb.2024.19551.3411
بشارتی مقدم, مریم, ملائی, مینا, رمضانی نژاد, رحیم. (1402). 'تأثیر خرده نظام‌های محیطی بر ساختار وزارت ورزش و جوانان جمهوری اسلامی ایران', پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 19(38), pp. 28-1. doi: 10.22080/jsmb.2024.19551.3411
بشارتی مقدم, مریم, ملائی, مینا, رمضانی نژاد, رحیم. تأثیر خرده نظام‌های محیطی بر ساختار وزارت ورزش و جوانان جمهوری اسلامی ایران. پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی, 1402; 19(38): 28-1. doi: 10.22080/jsmb.2024.19551.3411

تأثیر خرده نظام‌های محیطی بر ساختار وزارت ورزش و جوانان جمهوری اسلامی ایران

پژوهشنامه مدیریت ورزشی و رفتار حرکتی
دوره 19، شماره 38، بهمن 1402، صفحه 28-1    اصل مقاله (770.5 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/jsmb.2024.19551.3411
نویسندگان
مریم بشارتی مقدم1؛ مینا ملائی* 2؛ رحیم رمضانی نژاد3
1کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت راهبردی در سازمان های ورزشی دانشگاه گیلان
2استادیار گروه مدیریت ورزشی دانشگاه گیلان
3هیئت علمی دانشگاه گیلان
تاریخ دریافت: 18 شهریور 1399،  تاریخ بازنگری: 15 اردیبهشت 1400،  تاریخ پذیرش: 23 تیر 1400 
چکیده
هدف: همه سازمان‌ها در تعامل با محیط، به زندگی خود ادامه می‌دهند و بقاء سازمان نیز در گرو شناخت کارکرد این محیط‌هاست. بنابراین، هدف مطالعه حاضر تعیین چگونگی تأثیر کارکردهای خرده نظام‌های محیط بیرونی سازمان (اقتصادی،سیاسی،اجتماعی و فرهنگی)، بر ساختار وزارت ورزش و جوانان است. روش‌شناسی: روش انجام این پژوهش توصیفی-تحلیلی بود و جامعه آماری آن را همه مدیران ارشد و تصمیم‌گیرندگان اصلی وزارت ورزش و جوانان (53 نفر) تشکیل می دادند که همه به عنوان نمونه‌ تمام ‌شمار درتحقیق شرکت کردند. از یک پرسشنامة استاندارد و یک پرسشنامه محقق ساخته برای جمع‌آوری داده ها استفاده‌‌‌شد. روایی پرسشنامه به تأیید ده نفر از متخصصان مدیریت ورزشی، مدیریت و جامعه‌شناسی رسید. داده‌ها بااستفاده از نرم‌افزار اس‌پی‌اس‌اس نسخه‌20 و مدلسازی معادلات ساختاریPLS نسخه دوم آنالیز شدند. یافته‌ها: یافته‌ها نشان‌داد از دیدگاه مدیران وزارت ورزش و جوانان خرده نظام فرهنگی (66/0 = ، B، 58/2= t) و اقتصادی (32/0 = B، 97/1= t) مهم‌ترین خرده‌نظام‌های محیطی تأثیرگذار بر ساختار سازمانی است که اثر مستقیم و معنی‌داری نیز داشتند. نتیجه‌گیری: در نتیجه با قوت بخشیدن کارکرد مربوط به خرده‌نظام فرهنگی، با استفاده از بسترسازی برای همکاری کارکنان همانند اعضای یک تیم در کنار مدیران و شفاف‌سازی اهداف و اطلاعات و رسالت‌ها، می‌توان فواید ساختار ادهوکراسی (انعطاف و تطبیق محیطی خوب وتخصص‌های مناسب) را با حذف نقاط ضعف آن (مرز غیر شفاف و جریان‌های سیاسی مضر)، بیشتر نمود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
ساختار سازمانی؛ خرده نظام‌های محیطی؛ بقا و رشد؛ سازمان های ورزشی دولتی
عنوان مقاله [English]
Effect of the environmental subsystems on the structure of Islamic Republic of Iran's Ministry of Sport and Youth
نویسندگان [English]
Maryam Besharati moghadam1؛ Mina Mallaei2؛ Rahim Ramezaninejad3
1Master of Strategic Management in Sports Organizations of Guilan University
2Assistant Professor, Department of Sports Management, University of Guilan
3Professor of Sports Management, University of Guilan
چکیده [English]
Purpose: Organizations interact with the external environment as an open system; This issue is especially evident in the dynamic and changing environment of sports organizations. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of the functions of four sub-systems of the external environment (economic, political, social and cultural environment) on the structure of the Ministry of Sports and Youth.
 Methodology: The research method was descriptive-analytical and its statistical population consisted of all senior managers and main decision makers of the Ministry of Sports and Youth (47 people) who participated in the research as samples. A standard questionnaire and a researcher-made questionnaire were used to collect data. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by ten experts in sports management, management and sociology. The data were analyzed using SPS version 20 and PLS version 2 softwares.
Findings: The findings showed that from the point of view of the managers of the Ministry of Sports and Youth, the cultural environment subsystem (B = 0.66, t = 2.58) and the economic environment (B = 0.32, t = 1.97 ) are the most important environmental subsystems influencing the structure of the Ministry of Sports and Youth, which had direct and significant effects. Conclusion: By using the functions of the cultural sub-system, the adhocracy structure, which is a professional structure, can be strengthened to interact more with the external environment so that the Ministry of Sports and Youth can increase its dynamics.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Organizational Structure, Environmental Subsystems, Survival and Development, Governmental Sport Organizations
مراجع
  1. Rocher, G. (1972). Talcott Parsons et la sociologie américaine. Presses universitaires de France.
  2. Craib, I. (2015). Modern social theory. Routledge.
  3. French, W. L., & Bell, C. H. (2001). Organization development: behavioral science interventions for organization improvement (No. HD38 F69).
  4. Deloitte, Introducing the UK Human Capital Trends 2016 report. Global Human Capital Trends. The new organisation: Different by design. Country report: United Kingdom.
  5. Williams, T. (2002). Cooperation by Design: Structure and Cooperation in Inter-Organizational Networks. Journal of Business Research, 5867, 1-9.
  6. Teixeira, R., Koufteros, X., & Peng, X. D. (2012). Organizational structure, integration, and manufacturing performance: A conceptual model and propositions. Journal of Operations and Supply Chain Management, 5(1): 70-81.
  7. Slack, T., & Parent, M. M. (2006). Understanding sport organizations: The application of organization theory. Human Kinetics.
  8. Gilbertson, D. W. (2000). Transformational Leadership In Australasian Sports Organisations. New Zeal Innov Compet Proj Victoria Univ Wellingt, 65-81.
  9. Li, M., MacIntosh, E. W., & Bravo, G. A. (2019). International sport management. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  10. Kriemadis, A. (1997). Strategic planning in higher education athletic departments. The International Journal of Educational Management, 11(6): 238-247.
  11. Gómez, S., Opazo, M., & Martí, C. (2008). Structural characteristics of sport organizations: main trends in the academic discussion.
  12. Ba, L. (2004). Knowledge management and organizational culture: A social action perspective (Doctoral dissertation, The George Washington University).
  13. Chelladurai, P. (2014). Managing organizations for sport and physical activity: A systems perspective. Taylor & Francis.
  14. Sajjadi, N. S. (2016). Design of the Pattern of Sports Structure of the Country, (Doctoral dissertation, University of Mazandaran). (Persian).
  15. Girginov, V. (2001). Strategic relations and sport policy making: The case of Aerobic Union and School Sports Federation Bulgaria. Journal of sport Management, 15(3): 173-194.
  16. Houlihan, B., & White, A. (2002). The politics of sports development: Development of sport or development through sport?. Psychology Press.
  17. Hoye, R., Smith, A. C., Nicholson, M., & Stewart, B. (2015). Sport management: principles and applications. Routledge.
  18. Green, M., & Houlihan, B. (2005). Elite sport development. Policy learning and political priorities. Routledge, London and New York.
  19. Omidi, Y., Kazemi, R. M., & Azmode, S. (2016). Identification and analysis of environmental barriers to organizational entrepreneurship in the Ministry of Sports and Youth. Sports Management. 8(5): 753-775. (Persian).
  20. Majidiparast, M., Elahi, A., Khanlari, A., & Akbariyazdi, H. (2016). Identification of environmental components affecting customer relationship management in professional football clubs in Iran. New approaches in sports management. 4(13): 73-87. (Persian).
  21. Hasanitavabe, A., Kazemi, M., & Maharati, Y. (2013). The Impact of Environmental Uncertainty on Organizational Innovation: Explaining the Role of Organizational Structure as an Interfering Variable. Human resource management research. 3(4): 67-91. (Persian).
  22. Small, A., Russell, S. V., & Paavola, J. (2019). Corporate Environmental Sustainability and Ecosystem Services: A 21st Century Solution?. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2019, No. 1, p. 12858). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
  23. Vilnai-Yavetz, I., Rafaeli, A., & Yaacov, C. S. (2005). Instrumentality, aesthetics, and symbolism of office design. Environment and Behavior, 37(4): 533-551.
  24. Lee, S. Y., & Brand, J. L. (2005). Effects of control over office workspace on perceptions of the work environment and work outcomes. Journal of environmental psychology, 25(3): 323-333.
  25. McCoy, J. M., & Evans, G. W. (2002). The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3-4): 409-426.
  26. Ramezaninejad, R., Ahmadi, F., Asheghi B., & Eskandaripour, M. (1399). "Advanced management in sports organizations". Iran,Tabriz, Tannin Danesh publication.
  27. Robbins, S. P. (1983). Organization theory: The structure and design of organizations. Prentice-Hall.
  28. Kiani, Majid; Shabani Bahar, Ghulam Reza; Erfani, Nasrullah. (1396). Development of Organizational Health Model Based on Organizational Virtue of the Ministry of Sports and Youth of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Organizational Behavior Management Studies in Sports, Volume 4, Number 3, pp. 95-107. (Persian).
  29. Sabunchi, Reza; Hadavi, Farideh; Mozaffari, Seyed Amir Ahmad. (1388). Explaining the organizational structure of the Organization of Physical Education, Motor Sciences and Scientific-Research Sports (Ministry of Science) / ISC, No. 13, pp. 137-144. (Persian).
  30. Daft, R. L. (1998). Organization theory.
  31. Robbins, S. P., & DeCenzo, D. A. (1998). Fundamentals of management. Englewood Cliffs, NY.
  32. Mintzberg, H. (1984). Power and organization life cycles. Academy of Management review, 9(2): 207-224.
  33. Uhl-Bien, M., & Arena, M. (2018). Leadership for organizational adaptability: A theoretical synthesis and integrative framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1): 89-104.
  34. Wilden, R., Gudergan, S. P., Nielsen, B. B., & Lings, I. (2013). Dynamic capabilities and performance: strategy, structure and environment. Long Range Planning, 46(1-2): 72-96.
  35. Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. (2009). Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(3): 413-452.
  36. Ruikar, K., Anumba, C. J., & Carrillo, P. M. (2006). VERDICT—An e-readiness assessment application for construction companies. Automation in construction, 15(1): 98-110.
  37. Moon, H., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphrey, S. E., Ilgen, D. R., West, B., Ellis, A. P., & Porter, C. O. (2004). Asymmetric adaptability: Dynamic team structures as one-way streets. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5): 681-695.
  38. Koozehchian, H., Ehsani, M., Seifi Saldehi, M., Soleimani, S., & Rezaei, Sh. (2009). The Relationship between Entrepreneurial Structure and Organizational Effectiveness in the Physical Education Organization of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Sports Management. 2 (6): 5-31. (Persian).
  39. Zheng, W., Yang, B., & McLean, G. N. (2010). Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management. Journal of Business research, 63(7): 763-771.
  40. Leenders, R. T. A., Van Engelen, J. M., & Kratzer, J. (2003). Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective. Journal of Engineering and technology management, 20(1-2): 69-92.
  41. Chang, M. H., & Harrington, J. E. (2000). Centralization vs. decentralization in a multi-unit organization: A computational model of a retail chain as a multi-agent adaptive system. Management Science, 46(11): 1427-1440.
  42. Turkzadeh, J, Abdsharifi, F. Predicting readiness for organizational change based on the perception of bank employees of the organizational structure type with the role of mediating organizational cohesion. Management Studies (Improvement and Transformation).1394; 24 (78);33-64. (Persian).
  43. Jansen, J. J., Tempelaar, M. P., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization science, 20(4): 797-811.
  44. Reagans R, McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative science quarterly. 2003 Jun;48(2): 240-67.
  45. Cummings TG, Worley CG. Organisation Development and Change (Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College, 6th edn).
  46. Nazari, R., Smaelie, M., Zarei, A. & Ashraf Ganjavi, F. (2016). Investigating the effect of organizational culture on organizational structure in the Ministry of Sports and Youth of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Organizational Behavior Management Studies in Sports. 3(4): 57-66.
  47. Safaria Abaksari, M. (2012). Investigating the Relationship between Organizational Culture and Organizational Structure in the General Department of Sports and Youth of Mazandaran Province, Unpublished master thesis, Mazandaran University, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences.
  48. Wei, L. Q., Liu, J., & Herndon, N. C. (2011). SHRM and product innovation: Testing the moderating effects of organizational culture and structure in Chinese firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(01): 19-33.
  49. Indeje, W. G., & Zheng, Q. (2010). Organizational culture and information systems implementation: A structuration theory perspective. Working Papers on Information Systems ISSN, 1535-6078.
  50. Koufteros, X. A., Nahm, A. Y., Cheng, T. E., & Lai, K. H. (2007). An empirical assessment of a nomological network of organizational design constructs: From culture to structure to pull production to performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 106(2): 468-492.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 143
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 61


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب