| تعداد نشریات | 32 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 601 |
| تعداد مقالات | 5,851 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 8,832,025 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 6,470,497 |
مطالعه تطبیقی نظام حقوقی پسماند و پساب در ایران و آلمان با تأکید بر اصول حکمرانی خوب | ||
| پژوهشنامه حقوق تطبیقی | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 10، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 22، شهریور 1405، صفحه 31-55 اصل مقاله (916.05 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/lps.2026.30519.1823 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| امیرنظام براتی* | ||
| استادیار گروه حقوق، دانشکده کمیسر دریایی، دانشگاه علوم دریایی امام خمینی(ره)، نوشهر، ایران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 27 آبان 1404، تاریخ بازنگری: 30 اردیبهشت 1405، تاریخ پذیرش: 27 خرداد 1405 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| مدیریت پسماند و پساب یکی از چالشهای اساسی زیستمحیطی و حکمرانی پایدار در جوامع معاصر است که مستقیماً با سلامت عمومی، توسعه پایدار و حفاظت منابع طبیعی ارتباط دارد. این پژوهش با رویکرد تطبیقی، قوانین و مقررات مرتبط با پسماند و پساب در ایران و آلمان را با تأکید بر اصول حکمرانی خوب شامل شفافیت، پاسخگویی، مشارکت عمومی، کارایی، حاکمیت قانون، عدالت و پایداری مورد بررسی قرار میدهد. روش تحقیق از نوع توصیفی–تحلیلی و مبتنی بر مطالعه اسنادی، بررسی قوانین داخلی، دستورالعملهای اتحادیه اروپا و گزارشهای بینالمللی مرتبط است. یافتهها نشان میدهد که آلمان با بهرهگیری از سیاستهای اقتصاد چرخشی، ایجاد نظام یکپارچه پایش و دادههای محیطزیستی، تقسیم وظایف نهادی شفاف، ضمانتاجراهای مؤثر و مشارکت گسترده شهروندان و سازمانهای مردمنهاد، توانسته عملکردی پایدار، کارآمد و اثرگذار در مدیریت پسماند و پساب ایجاد کند. در مقابل، ایران با وجود تصویب قوانین متعدد مانند قانون مدیریت پسماند و قانون حفاظت و بهسازی محیط زیست، در مرحله اجرا با چالشهای جدی از جمله تداخل وظایف نهادی، نبود سامانه جامع پایش، کمبود منابع مالی و تجهیزات شهرداریها، ضعف ضمانتاجراها و مشارکت محدود شهروندان مواجه است. تحلیل تطبیقی نشان میدهد که اصلاح ساختار قانونی و نهادی، تقویت نظارت و ضمانتاجرا، افزایش مشارکت اجتماعی، و بهرهگیری از فناوریهای نوین، به همراه الهامگیری از تجربه آلمان و استانداردهای اتحادیه اروپا، میتواند چارچوبی کارآمد و پایدار برای مدیریت پسماند و پساب در ایران فراهم سازد. این پژوهش بر اهمیت بازنگری قوانین و ایجاد سیاستهای مبتنی بر شواهد و داده تأکید دارد و نشان میدهد که حکمرانی خوب زیربنای تحقق مدیریت پایدار محیط زیست است. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| نظام حقوقی مدیریت پسماند و پساب؛ حکمرانی خوب؛ آلمان؛ ایران؛ مدیریت محیطزیست | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Comparative Study of the Solid Waste and Wastewater Legal Framework in Iran and Germany with an Emphasis on Good Governance Principles | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| AmirNezam Barati | ||
| Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Maritime Commissioner, Imam Khomeini University of Marine Sciences, Nowshahr, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Waste and wastewater management represents a fundamental environmental and governance challenge in contemporary societies, directly linked to public health, sustainable development, and natural resource protection. This study adopts a comparative approach to examine the legal frameworks related to waste and wastewater management in Iran and Germany, emphasizing good governance principles, including transparency, accountability, public participation, efficiency, rule of law, equity, and sustainability. The research employs a descriptive-analytical method based on document analysis, reviewing domestic laws, European Union directives, and relevant international reports. Findings indicate that Germany, through circular economy policies, integrated environmental monitoring systems, clear institutional task allocation, effective enforcement mechanisms, and active citizen and non-governmental organization participation, has established a sustainable, efficient, and effective waste and wastewater management system. In contrast, although Iran has enacted several laws, such as the Waste Management Act and the Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act, its implementation faces significant challenges, including overlapping institutional responsibilities, lack of a comprehensive monitoring system, insufficient financial and technical resources at the municipal levels, weak enforcement, and limited public engagement. Comparative analysis suggests that reforming the legal and institutional structure, strengthening oversight and enforcement, enhancing social participation, and leveraging modern technologies—guided by Germany's experience and EU standards—can provide an effective and sustainable framework for Iran. This study emphasizes the importance of law revision, evidence-based policymaking, and the adoption of data-driven strategies. The results indicate that good governance forms the foundational basis for achieving sustainable environmental management and ensuring long-term protection of ecosystems. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Legal system of waste management, Wastewater, Good governance, Germany, Iran | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahmadi, M. (2025). Legal system of waste management in Iran. Tehran: Jangal Publications. Ahmadi, S., & Rahimi, A. (2021). Comparative analysis of the role of environmental governance in coastal countries. Environmental Law Quarterly, 7(2), 115–142. Ashrafi, M. (2020). International environmental law and its challenges in Iran. Tehran: SAMT. Baqeri, H. (2019). Role of supervisory bodies in preventing pollution of Iran’s coastal environments. Public Policy Journal, 12(1), 124–148. Barati, A. N. (2019). Good Governance and Combating Economic Corruption: "A Study of Anti-Corruption Laws in the National and International System". Tehran: Majd University Press. BMUV. (2021). Federal Water Act and Wastewater Ordinance (AbwV). Berlin. Boyle, A., & Anderson, M. (2020). Human rights and the environment: Governance frameworks. Oxford University Press. Boyle, A., & Chinkin, C. (2021). The formation of making international law. Oxford University Press. Bodansky, D. (2010). The art and craft of international environmental law. Harvard University Press. Churchill, R., & Lowe, V. (2018). The law of the sea (4th ed.). Manchester University Press. Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran (1979). Craig, R. K. (2019). Comparative ocean governance: The future of the seas. Ecology Law Quarterly, 46(2), 233–270. Department of Environment. (2022). Report on the status of municipal waste in Iran. Tehran: Human Environment Division. Dryzek, J. (2013). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses. Oxford University Press. Emami, M., & Shakeri, H. (2015). Good governance and the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Comparative Law Research Journal, 1(2), 25–57. Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act. (1974). Official Gazette, No. 8715. European Commission. (2019). Circular economy package: Implementation progress. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/ European Commission. (2020). European Green Deal and waste management strategy. Brussels. European Commission. (2021a). Environmental justice and sustainable development in the EU. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the EU. European Commission. (2021b). Zero Pollution Action Plan for air, water and soil. Brussels. European Environment Agency. (2022a). Municipal waste management in Germany and EU trends (Report No. 15/2022). Copenhagen. European Environment Agency. (2022b). Waste management and circular economy in Europe 2022 (Report No. 3/2022). Copenhagen. European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2008). Directive 2008/98/EC on waste and repealing certain directives. Official Journal of the European Union, L312, 3–30. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32008L0098 Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action. (2023). Circular economy and resource efficiency in Germany. Berlin. https://www.bmwk.de/Redaktion/EN/Publikationen/circular-economy-report.html German Environment Agency. (2022). Environmental education and waste separation programs in Germany. Berlin. German Federal Ministry for the Environment. (2021). Circular Economy Act (KrWG). Berlin. Hansen, A., & Wurzel, R. (2020). Environmental governance in Germany. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 22(2), 210–224. Hosseini, F. (2023). Management of environmental crises and evaluation of national policies. Tehran: Strategic Research Institute. Izadi, K. (2022). Effectiveness of national policies in the management of marine pollution. Public Law Research Journal, 25(3), 55–78. Jafari, H. (2021). Comparative analysis of Article 50 of the Iranian Constitution and sustainability principles in German law. Comparative Law Journal, 7(2), 59–74. Kim, S. (2020). Marine environmental governance and integrated coastal management. Ocean Development & International Law, 51(3), 204–227. Khosravi, P. (2021). Marine pollution and state responsibility under international conventions. Strategic Maritime Studies Journal, 9(2), 79–106. Klein, N. (2012). Maritime security and the law of the sea. Oxford University Press. Majlis Research Center. (2023). Assessment of wastewater treatment status in Iran. Tehran. Mirzaei, A. (2021). Governance challenges in waste and wastewater management in Iran: A legal perspective. Environmental Law Review, 15(3), 104–112. Mirzaei, S. (2021). Institutional challenges in urban waste management in Iran. Sustainable Development Journal, 5(1), 95–112. Ministry of Energy. (2019). Revisions to the regulation on water pollution prevention. Tehran. Müller, J. (2020). Waste governance in the European Union: Lessons for emerging economies. Environmental Policy Journal, 15(3), 71–88. OECD. (2015). Principles of good environmental governance. Paris: OECD Publishing. OECD. (2020). Environmental taxation and waste governance. Paris: OECD Publishing. OECD. (2021). Extended Producer Responsibility policies and efficiency. Paris: OECD Publishing. Pierre, J., & Peters, G. (2000). Governance, politics and the state. St. Martin’s Press. Pour-Hashemi, S. A. (2022). International environmental law. Tehran: Dadgostar Publishing. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667. Rothwell, D., & Stephens, T. (2016). The international law of the sea (2nd ed.). Hart Publishing. Sachs, J. (2015). The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press. Sadeqi, M. (2019). Institutional review of the industrial waste management system in Iran. Environmental Policy Quarterly, 3(2), 75–92. Sands, P., Peel, J., Mackenzie, R., & Fabra, A. (2018). Principles of international environmental law (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press. Scholz, R., & Bartels, K. (2021). Circular economy and governance structures in Germany. Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 28(2), 55–68. Schröder, M. (2019). Environmental law and administrative courts in Germany. Springer. Scott, K. (2020). Governing the oceans. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 35(1), 1–24. Sattari, M. (2022). National planning for protection of Iran’s marine environment. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. Transparency Portal. (2022). Open data on waste management in Germany. Berlin. Tavakoli, R., & Naderi, J. (2018). Analysis of Iran's maritime governance structure in the framework of international law. Constitutional Law Research Journal, 6(4), 9–34. UNDP. (2020). Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020. New York: United Nations. UNECE. (1998). Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation and Access to Justice. Geneva. UNEP. (2019). Global Environment Outlook 6. Nairobi: UNEP. UNEP. (2021). Global Environmental Outlook: Asia and the Pacific. Nairobi: UNEP. Waste Management Act. (2004). Official Gazette, No. 17471. WHO. (2021). Wastewater management and public health. Geneva: WHO. World Bank. (1992). Governance and development. Washington, DC: World Bank. World Bank. (2020). Good governance and environmental management: Lessons from OECD countries. Washington, DC: World Bank. Zare, Sh. (2020). Analysis of Iran’s marine policies in light of sustainable development requirements. Law and Policy Quarterly, 5*(3), 45–69.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 199 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 10 |
||