پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 30 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 467 |
| تعداد مقالات | 4,519 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,144,833 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,334,658 |
تأثیر کیفیت‌های محیط مصنوع بر سرزندگی و انسجام اجتماعی (نمونه موردی: محلات شهر سنندج) | ||
| مطالعات ساختار و کارکرد شهری | ||
| دوره 10، شماره 34، فروردین 1402، صفحه 155-178 اصل مقاله (726.04 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقالات مستقل پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/usfs.2023.23988.2285 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| فرزین چاره جو* | ||
| استادیار گروه شهرسازی، واحد سنندج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سنندج،ایران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 30 تیر 1401، تاریخ بازنگری: 15 مهر 1401، تاریخ پذیرش: 06 اسفند 1401 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف اصلی این پژوهش بررسی ارتباط بین کیفیت‌های محیط مصنوع، سرزندگی و انسجام اجتماعی است. انسجام اجتماعی دربرگیرنده پویایی بین فردی و احساس ارتباط بین افراد است. الگوی ساخت کالبدی و مولفه‌های کیفیت محیط مصنوع نیز از راه‌های دستیابی و ارتقای انسجام و همبستگی اجتماعی در سطح محلات است و تعاملات اجتماعی موجود در محلات مؤثر‌ترین عامل در جهت افزیش انسجام اجتماعی است. این در حالی است که اهمیت این موضوع و نقش آن در توسعه و همچنین تأثیرگذاری کالبدی محلات شهری سهم به سزایی در شکل‌گیری روابط اجتماعی دارند و تبیین نقش آن به‌عنوان یکی از عوامل مؤثر در ارتقای توسعه است. روش مورد‌استفاده در این پژوهش، توصیفی تحلیلی و از نوع کاربردی است. داده‌های این پژوهش به دو روش مطالعات کتابخانه ای و پرسش‌نامه تهیه شده‌اند. جامعه آماری این پژوهش 383 نفر از ساکنین 28 محله مختلف شهر سنندج است. برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها، آزمایش مدل مفهومی‌تحقیق و رسیدن به هدف پژوهش از مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری و AMOS استفاده شده است. نتایج کلی نشان داده‌اند که فاصله از مرکز شهر، سرزندگی شهری ارتباط مستقیمی با کیفیت‌های محیط مصنوع نظیر تراکم، دسترسی به خدمات و تسهیلات، دسترسی به فضاهای سبز دارد. در نهایت راهبرد‌ها و سیاست‌های اجرایی در جهت ارتقای کیفیت ساختار کالبدی و افزایش انسجام اجتماعی در سطح محلات ارائه شده است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| محیط مصنوع؛ انسجام اجتماعی؛ سرزندگی شهری؛ معادلات ساختاری؛ محلات شهر سنندج | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The impact of built environment qualities on vitality and social cohesion (Case study: Sanandaj city neighborhoods) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Farzin Charehjoo | ||
| Department of Urban Planning and Design, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Social cohesion includes interpersonal dynamics and a sense of connection between people. Increasing social cohesion can bring various physical and mental health benefits. The main purposes of this research are to investigate and analyze the components of environmental quality with vitality and social cohesion, and also to determine the relationship between these variables at the level of the neighborhoods of Sanandaj city, which have different textures and typologies in terms of the qualities of the structural environment. The data of this research were prepared through two methods of library studies and questionnaire. The statistical population of this research is 300 residents of 28 different neighborhoods of Sanandaj city. Structural equation modeling and AMOS were used to analyze and test the conceptual model of research, and determine the relationships between variables. Two components of urban vitality and social cohesion were considered as hidden variables and the artificial environment was used as an obvious variable. The general results have shown that at the level of neighborhoods in Sanandaj city, urban vitality has a positive relationship with artificial environment variables, such as distance from the city center, neighborhood density, access to local facilities, access to public transportation, and green space. However, access to local facilities and green spaces, play the biggest role in the vitality of the neighborhoods of this city. In terms of the social cohesion of Sanandaj’s neighborhoods, some variables of the artificial environment, such as the distance from the city center, and the density of the neighborhood, have negatively related to the cohesion of the neighborhoods of the city. Finally, policies and executive strategies were presented to improve the quality of the environment in order to increase vitality and social cohesion. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Built environment, Social cohesion, Urban vitality, Structural equation modeling, Sanandaj city neighborhoods | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abella, Llopis; Fruttero, Anna; Taş, Emcet; & Taj, Umar. (2020). Urban Design, Public Spaces, and Social Cohesion : Evidence from a Virtual Reality Experiment. Social Sustainability and Inclusion Global Practice, (9407), 1-34.
Al-Thani, Soud K; Amato, Alexandre; Koç, Muammer; & Al-Ghamdi, Sami G. (2019). Urban Sustainability and Livability: An Analysis of Doha’s Urban-form and Possible Mitigation Strategies. Sustainability, 11(786), 1-25.
Brunt, Liam; & García-Peñalosa, Cecilia. (2021). Urbanisation and the onset of modern economic growth. Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
Cramm, J. M., van Dijk, H. M., & Nieboer, A. P. (2012). The importance of neighborhood social cohesion and social capital for the well being of older adults in the community.
The Gerontologist, 53(1), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gns052 %J The Gerontologist.
Cobbinah, Patrick Brandful; Erdiaw-Kwasie, Michael Odei; & Amoateng, Paul. (2015). Rethinking sustainable development within the framework of poverty and urbanisation in developing countries. Environmental Development, (13), 18-32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2014.11.001
Fang, Chuanglin; He, Sanwei; & Wang, Lei. (2021). Spatial Characterization of Urban Vitality and the Association With Various Street Network Metrics From the Multi-Scalar Perspective. Frontiers in Public Health, 9.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.677910
Fone, D., Dunstan, F., Lloyd, K., Williams, G., Watkins, J., & Palmer, S. (2007). Does social cohesion modify the association between area income deprivation and mental
health? A multilevel analysis. International Journal of Epidemiology, 36(2), 338–345.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dym004 %J International Journal of Epidemiology.
Hagen, Bjoern; Nassar, Cara; & Pijawka, David. (2017). The Social Dimension of Sustainable Neighborhood Design: Comparing Two Neighborhoods in Freiburg, Germany. Urban Planning, 2(4), 64-80. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v2i4.1035
He, Sylvia Y; Lee, Jeongwoo; Zhou, Tao; & Wu, Dan. (2017). Shrinking cities and resource-based economy: The economic restructuring in China’s mining cities. Cities, (60), 75-83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.07.009
Jennings, Viniece; & Bamkole, Omoshalewa. (2019). The Relationship between Social Cohesion and Urban Green Space: An Avenue for Health Promotion. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(452), 1-14.
Kim, Suji. (2020). Urban Vitality, Urban Form, and Land Use: Their Relations within a Geographical Boundary for Walkers. Sustainability, 12(10633), 1-14.
Macdonald, Elizabeth. (2020). Urban design for sustainable and livable communities: the case of Vancouver. Transportation, Land Use, and Environmental Planning, 1(1), 83-104.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815167-9.00005-0
McCraty, Rollin. (2017). New Frontiers in Heart Rate Variability and Social Coherence Research: Techniques, Technologies, and Implications for Improving Group Dynamics and Outcomes. Frontiers in Public Health, 5(267), 1-13.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00267
Mikaeli Hachesu, Golnaz, & Azar, Ali. (2016). Comparative investigation and evaluation of urban vitality in special neighborhoods and traditional neighborhoods with a sustainable development approach in geography: a case study of Tabriz metropolis. Quarterly Journal of Geography (Regional Planning), 7(4), 269-284.
Molaeihashjin, Mahsa; karimi azeri, amirreza; karimi, baqer; & Mahdinezhad, jamaladdin. (2021). Vitality analysis in residential complex spaces (Impact Concept, Components, and Indices). Urban Planning Knowledge, 5(1), 113-129. https://doi.org/10.22124/upk.2021.17094.1517
Mouratidis, Kostas; & Poortinga, Wouter. (2020). Built environment, urban vitality and social cohesion: Do vibrant neighborhoods foster strong communities? Landscape and Urban Planning, (204), 1-9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103951
Mousavi S Y. The Phenomena of Social Solidarity Decline in Metropolitans. MJSP 2002; 6 (4) :113-133
Shoshev, M; Stoykov, A; & Ilieva, M. (2017). Medico - Biological Grounds of the Social Coherence in the Social Worker - Client Interaction. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 4, 351-353. https://doi.org/doi:10.15547/tjs.2017.04.015
Stanislav, Andrew; & Chin, Jae Teuk. (2019). : Evaluating Livability and Perceived Values of Sustainable Neighborhood Design: New Urbanism and Original Urban Suburbs. Sustainable Cities and Society, 47(101517), 1-38.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101517
WHO. (2021). World Cities Report 2020 - the value of sustainable urbanization (pp. 1-418). UN habiat.
Zhang, Anqi; Wu, Jiayu; Lin, Jian; Chu, Jianqun; & Xia, Chang. (2021). How can the urban landscape affect urban vitality at the street block level? A case study of 15 metropolises in China. Urban Analytics and City Science, 48(5), 1245–1262. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2399808320924425
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 319 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 319 |
||