پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 32 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 540 |
| تعداد مقالات | 5,282 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 8,018,287 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,961,119 |
تأثیر نهادها و جهانیشدن بر عملکرد محیطزیست کشورهای منتخب درحالتوسعه | ||
| پژوهشنامه اقتصاد کلان Macroeconomics Research Letter | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 20، شماره 45، اردیبهشت 1404، صفحه 29-51 اصل مقاله (826.72 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: علمی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/mrl.2024.27310.2092 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| پیمان جهانفر1؛ ابوالفضل شاه آبادی* 2؛ سیما اسکندری سبزی3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری، گروه اقتصاد، واحد میانه، دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی، میانه، ایران. | ||
| 2استاد گروه اقتصاد دانشکده علوم اجتماعی و اقتصادی، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3استادیار، گروه اقتصاد، واحد میانه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، میانه، ایران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 01 تیر 1403، تاریخ بازنگری: 22 شهریور 1403، تاریخ پذیرش: 30 شهریور 1403 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| تأثیر نهاد و جهانیشدن بر عملکرد محیطزیست کشورهای منتخب درحالتوسعه چکیده محیطزیست محل زندگی و اصلیترین تأمینکننده نیازهای انسان است که هر روز بر اهمیت آن افزوده میشود. هدف مطالعه حاضر بررسی تأثیر نهاد حکمرانی و جهانیشدن بر عملکرد محیطزیست کشورهای منتخب درحالتوسعه با استفاده از الگوی رگرسیون PSTR طی دوره زمانی 2022-2008 است. بر اساس نتایج تخمین شاخص نهاد حکمرانی خوب و جهانیشدن بر عملکرد محیطزیست کشورهای منتخب درحالتوسعه نامتقارن است؛ زیرا در رژیم پایین (رکود) تنها شاخص اثربخشی و کیفیت قوانین و جهانیشدن اثر مثبت و معناداری بر عملکرد محیطزیست دارد. درحالیکه در هر دو رژیم حدی بالا (رونق) و پایین (رکود)، شاخص حاکمیت قانون و کنترل فساد تأثیر مثبت و معنادار بر عملکرد محیطزیست دارد. همچنین مقادیر متفاوت رانت منابع طبیعی بهعنوان آستانه در رژیم بالا (رونق) و پایین(رکود) بر نوع اثرگذاری متغیرهای توضیحی بر عملکرد محیطزیست متفاوت است. کلید واژه ها: حکمرانی خوب ، تولید ناخالص داخلی ، شاخص توسعه انسانی ، رانت منابع طبیعی . طبقه بندی موضوعی : K32، P48، O44 | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| حکمرانی خوب؛ تولید ناخالص داخلی؛ شاخص توسعه انسانی؛ رانت منابع طبیعی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Effect of Institutions and Globalization on the Environmental Performance of Selected Developing Countries | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Peyman Jahanfar1؛ Abolfazl Shahabadi2؛ Sima Eskandari sabzi3 | ||
| 1PhD Student, Department of Economics, Miyaneh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Miyaneh, Iran | ||
| 2Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Miyaneh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Miyaneh, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The Effect of Institutions and Globalization on the Environmental Performance of Selected Developing Countries Abstract The environment is the place of life and the main provider of human needs, which is increasing in importance every day. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the impact of the governance institution and globalization on the environmental performance of selected developing countries using the PSTR regression model during the period of 2008-2022. The results of the estimations showed that there is a asymmetrically relationship between the variables of good governance and globalization with the environmental performance of the selected countries is developing; Because in the low regime (recession), only the effectiveness and Law quality index and globalization have a positive and significant effect on the environmental performance. While in both high (boom) and low (recession) regimes, the rule of law and corruption control index has a positive and significant effect on environmental performance. Also, the different values of the natural resource rent as a threshold in the high (boom) and low (recession) regimes are different on the type of effect of the explanatory variables on the environmental performance. Keywords: Good Governance, Gross Domestic Product, Human Development Index, Rent of Natural Resources. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Good Governance, Gross Domestic Product, Human Development Index, Rent of Natural Resources | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Azam, M., Abbassi, W., Tayachi, T., & Azam, I. (2022). Impact of socioeconomic factors on environmental quality: A panel quintile regression method. Not Peer -Reviwed. http://doi:10.20944/preprints202204. 0164.v1.
Boyce, J. K. (2003). Inequality and environmental protection. Working Paper Series No. 52, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Chakraborty, D. & Mukherjee, S. (2010). The relationship between trade, investment and environment: Some empirical findings. Foreign Trade Review, 9(2), 3-37. http://DOI:10.1177/0015732515100201
Chishti, M. Z., Ahmed, Z., Murshed, M., Namkambe, H. H., & Ulucak, R. (2021). The asymmetric associations between foreign direct investment inflows, terrorism, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: a tale of two shocks. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 28(48), 69253-69271. http://doi:10.1007/s11356- 021-15188-4.
Cheng-Feng, W., Tsangyao, C., Tsung-Pao, W., Kai-Jun, L. & Shian-Chang, H. (2022). Impact of globalization on the environment in major CO2-emitting countries: Evidence using bootstrap ARDL with a Fourier function. Brief Research Report Article Front. Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.907403.
Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2004). Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(1), 7-71. DOI: 10.1257/002205104773558047
Costantini, V., & Monni, S. (2008). Environment, human development and economic growth. Ecological Economics, 64, 867-880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.011
Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecological Economics, 49(4), 43-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.011
Dietz, T., Rosa, E. A., & York, R. (2009). Environmentally efficient well-being: Rethinking sustainability as the relationship between human well-being and environmental impacts. Human Ecology Review,16(1), 114-123.
Djankov, S. R., La Porta, F., Lopez, D., & Shleider, A. (2002). The Regulation of entry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1),1 -37.
Esty, D., & Porter, M. (2005). National environmental performance: An empirical analysis of policy results and determinants. Environment and Development Economics,10(4), 391-434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X05002275
Ibrahim, M. H., & Law, S. H. (2015). Institutional quality and CO2 emission–trade relations: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. South African Journal of Economics, 84(12), 323-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/saje.12095
Emerson, J. W., Hsu, A., Levy, M. A., De Sherbinin, A., Mara, V., Esty, D. C., & Freymeyer, R. H. & Johnson, B. E. (2010). A cross-cultural iinvestigation of factors influencing eenvironmental actions. Sociological Spectrum, 30(2), 184-195. DOI:10.1080/02732170903496075
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 3914. DOI 10.3386/w3914
Maccari, N. (2014). Sustainable human development: Human development index and the environment. International Journal of Sustainable Human Development, 2(1), 29-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2426073
Mashud, A. H. M., Roy, D., Daryanto, Y., & Ali, M. H. (2020). A sustainable inventory model with imperfect products, deterioration, and controllable emissions. Math, 8, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8112049
Meo, M. S., Chowdhury, M. A. F., Shaikh, G. M., Ali, M., & Masood Sheikh, S. (2021). Asymmetric impact of oil prices, exchange rate, and inflation on tourism demand in Pakistan: New evidence from nonlinear ARDL. Asia Pacific Journal. Tourism. Research, 23(4), 408-422. doi:10.1080/10941665.2018. 1445652
Shahbaz, M., Khan, S., Ali, A. & Bhattacharya, M. (2017). The impact of globalization on CO2 emissions in China. The Singap Economic Review, 62(4), 929-957. doi:10.1142/s0217590817400331.
Shahbaz, M., Solarin, S. A. & Ozturk, I. (2016). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis and the role of globalization in selected African countries. Ecological Indicators, 67, 623-636. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.024
Sarkodie, S. A., & Adams, S. (2018). Renewable energy, nuclear energy, and environmental pollution: accounting for political institutional quality in South Africa. The Science of The Total Environment, 1, 1590-1601. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018. 06.320
Usman, M., Jahanger, A., & Ahmad, P. (2024). Investigating the effects of natural resources and institutional quality on CO2 emissions. during globalization mode in developing countries. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04638-2.
Wang, F., & Li, J. (2016). Urban innovation, regional externalities of foreign direct investment and industrial agglomeration: Evidence from Chinese cities. Research Policy ,45(4), 830–843.
Wu, Q., & Madni, G. (2021). Environmental protection in selected one belt one road economies through institutional quality: Prospering transportation and industrialization. Plos One, 16(1), e0240851. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0240851.
World Development Indicators (WDI) (2024) World Development Indicators. Available at: www.data.worldbank.org/indicators | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 286 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 291 |
||