تعداد نشریات | 31 |
تعداد شمارهها | 505 |
تعداد مقالات | 4,896 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 7,547,900 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 5,625,633 |
تحولات نظام حقوقی ایالاتمتحده امریکا و ایران در زمینه سقط جنین | ||
پژوهشنامه حقوق تطبیقی | ||
مقاله 7، دوره 9، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 18، تیر 1404 | ||
نوع مقاله: علمی پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22080/lps.2025.28174.1691 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
شقایق میلانلویی* 1؛ شیما عرب اسدی2 | ||
1کارشناس ارشد حقوق بشر، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران | ||
2استادیار گروه حقوق عمومی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 17 آذر 1403، تاریخ بازنگری: 12 دی 1403، تاریخ پذیرش: 21 دی 1403 | ||
چکیده | ||
این پژوهش با ارائه یک شمای کلی از مسیر تاریخی مسئلهی سقطجنین در ایالاتمتحده و ایران، بر آن است که تحلیل جامعی از تحولات نظام حقوقی ایران و ایالاتمتحده در زمینه سقطجنین ارائه کند. هدف اصلی این پژوهش، شناسایی شباهتهای موجود میان رویکردهای حقوقی این دو کشور و بررسی تاثیر این رویکردها بر حقوق باروری است. روش مطالعه در این پژوهش به صورت کتابخانهای و با استفاده از کتابها و مقالات معتبر است. در ایالاتمتحده، نگاه حقوقی به مسئله سقطجنین تحت تاثیر ارزشهای مختلف اجتماعی، فرهنگی، مذهبی و سیاسی در طول زمان متغیر بوده است. در سال 1973، دادگاه عالی در یک رای تاریخی سقطجنین را مورد حمایت قانون اساسی قرار داد. اما این تصمیم در سال 2022 لغو شد و تنظیم سقطجنین به ایالتها به صورت جداگانه تفویض شد. این تحولات باعث شده است که دسترسی به خدمات سقطجنین در بسیاری از ایالتها محدود شود و زنان مجبور شوند برای دریافت این خدمات به ایالتهای دیگر سفر کنند. به علاوه، این تغییرات قانونی واکنشهای گستردهای را به دنبال داشت. بسیاری از حامیان حقوق زنان، این تصمیم را نقض حقوق زنان و تهدیدی برای سلامت باروری آنها میدانند. از سوی دیگر، گروههای نزدیک به جریان محافظهکار از این تصمیم استقبال کردند و آن را گامی مهم در جهت حفاظت از زندگی جنینها دانستند. در ایران نیز قوانین تنظیمکننده سقطجنین، بسته به سیاستهای جمعیتی دستخوش تغییرات قابل توجهی شده است. در ایالاتمتحده، تنش میان حقوق فردی و ارزشهای محافظهکارانه منجر به تحول رویکرد حقوقی این کشور به سمت ممنوعیت سقطجنین شده است. درحالیکه در ایران، سیاستهای افزایش جمعیت نقش تعیینکنندهای در تنظیم قوانین سقط-جنین ایفاء کردهاند. این شباهتها نشاندهنده تاثیر عمیق ارزشهای مذهبی و سیاستهای جمعیتشناختی بر قوانین مرتبط با سقطجنین در دو کشور داشته است | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
سقطجنین؛ حقوق باروری؛ مطالعه تطبیقی؛ سقطجنین درمانی؛ قانون حمایت از خانواده و جوانی جمعیت | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Legal Developments in the United States and Iran Regarding Abortion | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Shaghayegh Milanlouei1؛ Shima arabasadi2 | ||
1Master's degree in Human Rights, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran | ||
2Assistant Professor, Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
This research aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the legal developments regarding abortion in Iran and the United States by presenting an overview of the historical path to the legalization of abortion in both countries. The main objective of this research is to identify the similarities between the legal approaches of these two countries and to examine the impacts of these approaches on reproductive rights. The study method in this research is library-based, utilizing books and reputable articles. In the United States, the legal perspective on abortion has varied over time, influenced by different social, cultural, religious, and political values. In 1973, the Supreme Court, in a historic ruling, supported abortion under the Constitution. However, this decision was overturned in 2022, delegating the regulation of abortion to individual states. These developments have led to restricted access to abortion services in many states, forcing women to travel to other states to receive these services. Additionally, these legal changes have sparked widespread reactions. Many women's rights advocates view this decision as a violation of women's rights and a threat to their reproductive health. On the other hand, conservative groups welcomed this decision, considering it an important step towards protecting the lives of fetuses. In Iran, the laws regulating abortion have undergone significant changes depending on population policies. In the United States, the tension between individual rights and conservative values has led to a shift in the legal approach toward banning abortion. In contrast, in Iran, population growth policies have played a decisive role in regulating abortion laws. These similarities highlight the profound impact of religious values and demographic policies on abortion-related laws in both countries. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
abortion, reproductive rights, comparative study, Therapeutic Abortion, Family Protection and Youth Population Law | ||
مراجع | ||
Afshar Ghouchani, Zohreh (2014). "A Review and Critique of the Single Article Law on Therapeutic Abortion Approved in 2005." *Family Jurisprudence and Law Quarterly*, Vol. 19, No. 60, pp. 123-144. [In Persian] Beisel, Nicola, and Tamara Kay. (2004). Abortion, Race, and Gender in Nineteenth-Century America. American Sociological Review, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 498–518., https://doi.org/ 10.1177/000312240406900402. Caron, Simone M. (2008). Who Chooses?: American Reproductive History since 1830. Gainesville: University Press of Florida Civil Code of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 1928 [In Persian] Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 1979. [In Persian] Cook, Rebecca J. and Dickens, Bernard. (2003). Human Rights Dynamics of Abortion Law Reform. Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 25, pp. 1-59, U Toronto, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 03-04, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=407400 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, 597 U.S. ___ (2022). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/597/19-1392/ Engelman, P. C. (2011). A History of the Birth Control Movement in America. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger Fallah Nejad, Fatemeh, Agha Majidi, Tarifeh, and Aziz Zadeh, Fatemeh (2017). "Abortion from the Perspective of Shiite Jurisprudence and Iranian Criminal Law Compared to Japanese Criminal Law." *Women's Studies Quarterly*, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 109-136. [In Persian] Family Protection and Youth Population Law, 2021. [In Persian] Fattahi, Nasrin, Mousavi Moghaddam, Seyed Mohammad, and Khademi, Maryam (2013). "An Analysis of Islamic Jurisprudence Views on Abortion, Considering the Health of the Mother and Fetus." *Islamic Jurisprudence and Law Research Quarterly*, Vol. 10, No. 34, pp. 109-128. [In Persian] Fazel Lankarani, Mohammad (2004). Jami' al-Masa'il. Qom: Amir Qalam Publications, Vol. 2. [In persian] Greenhouse, Linda, and Reva B. Siegel. (2011). Before (and After) Roe v. Wade: New Questions About Backlash. The Yale Law Journal, vol. 120, no. 8, https://www.jstor.org/stable/ 41149586. Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/381/479/ Guttmacher Institute. (2024). Advancing Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in the United States and Around the World. Guttmacher Institute. https://www.guttmacher.org/2024-impact-report Hajo, C. M. (2010). Birth Control on Main Street. Organizing Clinics in the United States, 1916–1939. Champaign: University of Illinois Press. Harris, A. (2018). The Schism of 68: Catholics, Contraception and Humanae Vitae in Europe, 1945-1975. (Genders and Sexualities in History). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70811-9 Hassani, Saeed (2024). "Examining the Signs of Soul Infusion in the Fetus." Journal of Jurisprudential and Legal Studies on Women and Family, Vol. 7, No. 13, pp. 90-114 [In Persian] Helisai, Asma, Es-haqi, Mohammad, Hosseini, Seyed Mohammad (2022). "Exploring the Jurisprudential, Religious, and Medical Dimensions of Therapeutic Abortion." *Women's Strategic Studies*, Vol. 25, No. 98, pp. 61-82. [In Persian] Hemmatian, Shahrbanoo, Aghaei Bejestani, Maryam, and Taheri, Mohsen (2018). "Examples of Reproductive Rights and Their Status in International Human Rights Documents." *Bioethics Journal*, Special Issue on Citizenship Rights, pp. 407-425. [In Persian] Homayounzadeh, Elaheh, and Azin, Seyed Mohammad (2023). "A Critique of the Public Distribution of Contraceptives Considering the Family Protection and Youth Population Law." *Ethics and Medical History*, Vol. 16, No. 13, pp. 1-11. [In Persian] https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/505/833/ Islamic Penal Code, 2013. [In Persian] Javid, Mohammadjavad and Mohajeri, Maryam (2018). Foundations of Government Intervention in the Family Institution in Iran's Legal System. Quarterly Journal of Women and Family Cultural Council, Vol. 21, No. 82, pp. 7-34. [In Persian] Johnson, Ryan. (2017). A Movement for Change: Horatio Robinson Storer and Physicians’ Crusade Against Abortion. James Madison Undergraduate Research Journal vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 13-23., https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? article=1023&context=jmurj. Kaczor, C. (2023). The ethics of abortion: Women’s rights, human life, and the question of justice (Third edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003305217 Kaveny, M. C. (2023). Abortion and the Law in the United States: From Roe to Dobbs and Beyond. Theological Studies, 84(1), 134-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405639231153868 Khamenei, Seyyed Ali (1999). Ajwibat al-Istifta'at. Al-Dar al-Islamiyyah. Beirut, First Edition [In Persian] Leggett, Marlene (2001). *Women in Their Time: A History of Feminism in the West*. Translated by Niloufar Mahdian (2022). 10th Edition. Tehran: Ney Publishing. [In Persian] Lopez, Raquel. (2012). Perspectives on Abortion: Pro-Choice, Pro-Life, and What Lies in between. European Journal of Social Sciences, vol.27, no.4, pp. 511-517., http://www.europeanjournalofsocialsciences.com Mackert, Kristin. (1990). To Bear or Not to Bear: Abortion in Victorian America. Digital Georgetown, https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/1051350. Makarem Shirazi, Naser (2002). New Istifta'at. Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib School Publications, Qom, First Edition [In Persian] Mississippi Gestational Age Act, Miss. Code Ann. § 41-41-191 (2018). https://law.justia.com/codes/mississippi/title-41/chapter-41/gestational-age-act/section-41-41-191/
Moein, Mohammad (2002). Moein Dictionary. Tehran: Adna: Ketab-e Rah-e No [In Persian]
Nourizadeh, Roghieh (2009). "The Status of Induced Abortion in Iran: Reproductive Rights and the Challenges of Safe Induced Abortion in Iran." *Medical Law Quarterly*, Vol. 3, No. 11, pp. 101-130. [In Persian] Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act, 18 Pa. C.S.A. § 3201 (1982). Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/410/113/ Rose, M. (2008). Abortion: a documentary and reference guide. Westport, Conn., Greenwood Press. Rostami, Sahar, Abdi, Fatemeh, Ahmadi, Mahboubeh, and Vadadhir, Abouali (2013). "A Comparative Study of Abortion Laws in Different Countries." *Medical History Quarterly*, Vol. 5, No. 17, pp. 79-111. [In Persian] Roustaei, Mehrangiz and Maghdesi, Mohammad Bagher (2022). "Evaluation of Population Policies in the Context of Criminalization Principles; Emphasizing the Family Protection and Youth Population Law." *Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Research*, Vol. 10, No. 20, pp. 117-150. [In Persian] Sanger, Margaret (1990). A Woman's Right to Her Body. Translated by Tavaana Institute (2014). [In Persian] Sauer, R. (1974). Attitudes to Abortion in America, 1800-1973. Population Studies, vol. 28, no. 1, p. 53., https://doi.org/10.2307/2173793. Silber, Tomas J. (1980). Abortion: A Jewish View. Journal of Religion and Health, vol.19, no.3, pp. 231-239 Sistani, Ali (2014). Istifta'at. Mashhad: Entezar-e Mehr. [In Persian] Strasser, Mark (2020). Unduly Burdening Abortion Jurisprudence. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 367-411., https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj/vol29/iss2/4 Strebin, Annick Marie. (2023). The Politics of Abortion in France and the United States: A Case Study on the Laws, Legislation, Activism, and Advocacy that Determined Abortion Laws Today (Senior Thesis, Fordham University) Tabrizi, Mirza Javad (2006). Sirat al-Najat. Qom: Dar al-Siddiqah al-Shahidah, Vol. 9. [In Persian] Therapeutic Abortion Law, 2005. [In Persian] Williams, D. K. (2016). Defenders of the unborn: the pro-life movement before Roe v. Wade. New York, NY, Oxford University Press. Wolk, L., Snead, O.C. (2021). Fearfully and Wonderfully Made: The Catholic Church’s Position on Abortion. In: Bagheri, A. (eds) Abortion. (pp.51-62). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63023-2_5 Ziegler, Mary. (2017). Liberty and the Politics of Balance: The Undue Burden Test after Casey/Hellerstedt. FSU College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 831, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2930058 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2930058 Ziegler, M. (2020). Abortion and the Law in America. In Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. Wade to the Present (pp. i–ii). half-title-page, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 33 |